|
TontoCorazon posted:Somebody datamosh this so when the guy gets punched its get all crazy. Why the gently caress did I spend the last hour or so making this I was supposed to be working oh well 
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 03:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 17:28 |
|
|
Mezzanine posted:Why the gently caress did I spend the last hour or so making this I was supposed to be working oh well Nice, thank you
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 03:52
|
|
|
lol I just noticed the punchee and the kid warp into the middle for a split second like the punch made a fold in space/time or something, I think I like it better that way
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 03:54
|
|
|
Mezzanine posted:Why the gently caress did I spend the last hour or so making this I was supposed to be working oh well Wait  Enhance 224 to 176  Pull out, track right. Stop. Enhance 34 to 36.  Gimme a hard copy right there.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:07
|
|
|
Dear god...
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:20
|
|
|
ugh its Troika posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ0aqeS7xkM Canadians did it first https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8eTFSJAIvg
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:22
|
|
|
I found a version with sound: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX7wL0AbuZA
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:32
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:I found a version with sound: Why would you do this.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:39
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/michaelskolnik/status/900550446221275137
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 05:06
|
|
|
Memento posted:
Is it a loving loss edit?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 05:23
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Is it a loving loss edit? hoyl poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 05:37
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Is it a loving loss edit? For a second I thought I was in the meme thread. Over there literally any square image divided into four equal parts is somehow a loss edit.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
Foxhound posted:Wasn't sure what thread to post this in, but it had to be shared. this got lost in all the stupid loving boxing bullshit chat
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 05:45
|
|
|
Memento posted:Wait 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 08:28
|
|
|
Memento posted:Wait idgi
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 08:36
|
|
|
Slugnoid posted:idgi loss
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 08:41
|
|
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...k-a7887576.htmlquote:Prominent right wing YouTube users say the site is censoring them. More fallout from the Google memo. This time perennial shitlord, paul joseph watson. Edit: Choice quotes include quote:“Let’s great it straight I’m not flouncing, I’m not taking my ball and going home, I’m not going to start crying on camera. I’ll probably come back at some point, if I’m not banned.” From his video titled "I'm done with youtube" Mephiston has a new favorite as of 09:52 on Aug 24, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 09:50
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Is “image macro” just a fancy way of saying “image” now? The schadenfreude is on people who don't get why "to gift" has pretty much replaced "to give" in a bunch of contexts
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 10:51
|
|
|
@joeyDUMBass
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 10:53
|
|
|
Olympic Mathlete posted:@joeyDUMBass More like @joeyBADEYES
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 10:55
|
|
|
Mephiston posted:http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...k-a7887576.html I wish Youtube would respond to "YOU'RE CENSORING US!!!" with "Yeah. So?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/UjBy6H3.gifv
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 13:28
|
|
|
Mephiston posted:Trump-supporting accounts like Paul Joseph Watson and Diamond and Silk say the site is stopping them making money from their videos I just have to grin at how they think Google, the private-sector company that has signed no social contract promising to help Average Joe "make money" and to which those two idiots voluntarily signed up for (and evidently accepted the terms and conditions when they did so) is "stopping them making money (provided by Google) from their videos (hosted on and served by Google)". Gosh, if they're so butthurt at google why don't they just take their money-making content to another provider?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 13:38
|
|
|
loving (((net neutrality)))
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 13:52
|
|
|
funmanguy posted:They were pretty clear that it was done to avoid him and the network being the butt of a lot of jokes because it would make for a silly screenshot. Yeah, how's that working out for them?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 14:18
|
|
|
Sunswipe posted:I wish Youtube would respond to "YOU'RE CENSORING US!!!" with "Yeah. So?" And that's the key, too. They're not being removed, and then users aren't being banned. The videos are just being demonetized and deprioritized. These goobers are still allowed to upload videos an use the site all they want, so this might not be able to be spun as discrimination. Is there anything in the YouTube ToS that says they can demonetize for any reason?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 14:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 14:59
|
|
|
Phanatic posted:Yeah, how's that working out for them? They would have been able to do it quietly had it not been for noted sleazeball Clay Travis leaking it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
I believe they did do it to avoid the memes or w/e but that's still pretty silly imo, shame it's being co-opted as "SNOWFLAKES ARE CENSORING THIS POOR INNOCENT MAN"
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 15:25
|
|
|
That final backhand just barely missed him by about a foot.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX7wL0AbuZA Schadenfreude is cornering the Garfield market
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:01
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:I believe they did do it to avoid the memes or w/e but that's still pretty silly imo, shame it's being co-opted as "SNOWFLAKES ARE CENSORING THIS POOR INNOCENT MAN" What's astonishing is that these nudniks still haven't caught on that they're being manipulated. See also: https://twitter.com/playasia/status/669343456423100416 The "SJW nonsense" being Koei Tecmo saying "we made a game that's kinda lovely about women and we don't want the backlash from releasing it in the US right now, but you can still totally get the English-language Asian edition".
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:03
|
|
|
Phanatic posted:Yeah, how's that working out for them? Pretty well. Thanks for asking. EmmyOk posted:I believe they did do it to avoid the memes or w/e but that's still pretty silly imo, shame it's being co-opted as "SNOWFLAKES ARE CENSORING THIS POOR INNOCENT MAN" Part of the problem was the early accounts of it was one guy saying Robert Lee was fired for his name, and many more people repeating it. It quickly became something that people allowed themselves to be upset about, but haven't changed their view when more accurate information came out. funmanguy has a new favorite as of 16:10 on Aug 24, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:07
|
|
|
Legit question: doesn't he go by Bob Lee on the air anyway? If that's the case, then ESPN has manufactured a problem that didn't really exist in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
Zamboni_Rodeo posted:Legit question: doesn't he go by Bob Lee on the air anyway? If that's the case, then ESPN has manufactured a problem that didn't really exist in the first place. You're probably thinking of ESPN staple Bob Ley, who tweeted a joke about the whole thing. I think Robert Lee probably goes by Robert.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 17:28 |
|
|
Zamboni_Rodeo posted:Legit question: doesn't he go by Bob Lee on the air anyway? If that's the case, then ESPN has manufactured a problem that didn't really exist in the first place. That's a different guy, Bob Ley.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 16:40
|
|
