Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Man Musk
Jan 13, 2010

https://twitter.com/slate/status/904117872062066688

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005


News media has always been uniformly awful, you say?

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004


the oppressive, failing new york times

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005


"Let's all listen to what noted war criminal Henry Kissinger has to say! Maybe he'll give free candies that are not poisoned this time!"

A Big Fuckin Hornet
Nov 1, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
what happened to nuzzi i thought she was hypernormalizd p early on

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

Andrei Dorkovsky posted:

what happened to nuzzi i thought she was hypernormalizd p early on

she's still death crew af but she's a journalist with journalist opinions


anyway the nyt made a good op ed for once

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/opinion/civil-rights-protest-resistance.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur&_r=0

Donkwich
Feb 28, 2011


Grimey Drawer

good take but a little rich coming from slate

Name Change
Oct 9, 2005


http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/09/02/new-york-times-opinions-safe-space-shafer-215569

In which Jack Shafer makes the argument that the NY Times runs op-eds from disgraced neoconservatives, cryptofascists, and bloody-handed merchants of death because ultimately it increases readership and audience engagement, which to me is a pretty convincing argument.

quote:

As the Times op-ed page took shape, its editors assembled a list of prospective authors and subjects they could address. One list, preserved in the Harrison Salisbury Papers at Columbia University, proposes soliciting pieces from Communist Party USA head Gus Hall, John Bircher Society leader Robert Welch, oil man and right-winger H.L. Hunt, labor radical Harry Bridges and revolutionary Angela Davis. The page’s concept was to express ideas and opinions the reader couldn’t find on the editorial page or elsewhere in the newspaper. The range and ambition of the page were such that one of the early editors on the page, John Van Doorn, tried (and failed) to hire Tupac Shakur’s mother, Afeni Shakur, as an editor in 1971, as Socolow writes elsewhere.

In an invitation to novelist Walker Percy to write for the section, Times editor Herbert Mitgang made explicit the page’s appetite for the notorious. “The most successful pieces have been highly individualistic, opinionated, and pungent,” Mitgang wrote. “[Y]ou will not get arrested if the piece is also witty.”

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

(and can't post for 27 days!)

dont even fink about it posted:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/09/02/new-york-times-opinions-safe-space-shafer-215569

In which Jack Shafer makes the argument that the NY Times runs op-eds from disgraced neoconservatives, cryptofascists, and bloody-handed merchants of death because ultimately it increases readership and audience engagement, which to me is a pretty convincing argument.

I'm noticing one big difference between the editorial selection of the Times circa 1971 and NYT today.

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

nowadays it would take a massive journalistic investigation just to get the contact information for all the CPUSA splinter parties

Egg Moron
Jul 21, 2003

the dreams of the delighting void


These good opinions are so foreign to the organization that they had to bring in 4 ringers to scrape together 4 and a half paragraphs.

an actual dog
Nov 18, 2014

🎶the failing...🎶
🎶Failing...🎶
🎶FAILING...🎶
🎶🎶NEW YORK TIMES!!🎶🎶

an actual dog
Nov 18, 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFELNIpeTjY

fabergay egg
Mar 1, 2012

it's not a rhetorical question, for politely saying 'you are an idiot, you don't know what you are talking about'


Over Easy posted:

These good opinions are so foreign to the organization that they had to bring in 4 ringers to scrape together 4 and a half paragraphs.

I imagine the editors had to be physically restrained from deleting the whole thing

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
https://twitter.com/SeanMcElwee/status/905091969801752576

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Correction: we hurt our stockholders feelings

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


big time fail by the New York Times.

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth
a bigly fail

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

etalian posted:

It's a mystery how bombing a country's infrastructure and supporting a starvation blockade somehow led to loss of life...

we are all from Al Ghaydah

an actual dog
Nov 18, 2014

the new york times, which is failing

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
this one is long and dumb so I'm gonna just quote some parts of it

I present to you How Ta-Nehisi Coates Gives Whiteness Power

https://nytimes.com/2017/10/06/opinion/ta-nehisi-coates-whiteness-power.html

quote:

In the study of German history, there is the notion of sonderweg, literally the “special path,” down which the German people are fated to wander. In different eras, and depending on who employed it, the term could imply different things. It began as a positive myth during the imperial period that some German scholars told themselves about their political system and culture. During and after World War II it turned distinctly negative, a way for outsiders to make sense of the singularity of Germany’s crimes.

Yet whether viewed from within or without, left or right, the Germans could be seen through such a lens to possess some collective essence — a specialness — capable of explaining everything. In this way, one could speak of a trajectory “from Luther to Hitler” and interpret history not as some chaotic jumble but as a crisp, linear process.

There is something both terrifying and oddly soothing about such a formulation. For better or worse, it leaves many very important matters beyond the scope of choice or action. It imagines Germans as having been either glorious or terrible puppets, the powerful agents of forces nonetheless beyond their control.

A similar unifying theory has been taking hold in America. Its roots lie in the national triple sin of slavery, land theft and genocide. In this view, the conditions at the core of the country’s founding don’t just reverberate through the ages — they determine the present. No matter what we might hope, that original sin — white supremacy — explains everything, an all-American sonderweg.

quote:

For having the temerity to defend himself, Mr. Packer was accused on social media of “excusing racism” and “whitesplaining.” Such logic extends a disturbing trend in left-of-center public thinking: identity epistemology, or knowing-through-being, somewhere along the line became identity ethics, or morality-through-being. Accordingly, whiteness and wrongness have become interchangeable — the high ground is now accessible only by way of “allyship,” which is to say silence and total repentance. The upside to this new white burden, of course, is that whichever way they may choose, those deemed white remain this nation’s primary actors.

quote:

I have spent the past six months poring over the literature of European and American white nationalism, in the process interviewing noxious identitarians like the alt-right founder Richard Spencer. The most shocking aspect of Mr. Coates’s wording here is the extent to which it mirrors ideas of race — specifically the specialness of whiteness — that white supremacist thinkers cherish.

This, more than anything, is what is so unsettling about Mr. Coates’s recent writing and the tenor of the leftist “woke” discourse he epitomizes. Though it is not at all morally equivalent, it is nonetheless in sync with the toxic premises of white supremacism. Both sides eagerly reduce people to abstract color categories, all the while feeding off of and legitimizing each other, while those of us searching for gray areas and common ground get devoured twice. Both sides mystify racial identity, interpreting it as something fixed, determinative and almost supernatural. For Mr. Coates, whiteness is a “talisman,” an “amulet” of “eldritch energies” that explains all injustice; for the abysmal early-20th-century Italian fascist and racist icon Julius Evola, it was a “meta-biological force,” a collective mind-spirit that justifies all inequality. In either case, whites are preordained to walk that special path. It is a dangerous vision of life we should refuse no matter who is doing the conjuring.

This summer, I spent an hour on the phone with Richard Spencer. It was an exchange that left me feeling physically sickened. Toward the end of the interview, he said one thing that I still think about often. He referred to the all-encompassing sense of white power so many liberals now also attribute to whiteness as a profound opportunity. “This is the photographic negative of a white supremacist,” he told me gleefully. “This is why I’m actually very confident, because maybe those leftists will be the easiest ones to flip.”

However far-fetched that may sound, what identitarians like Mr. Spencer have grasped, and what ostensibly anti-racist thinkers like Mr. Coates have lost sight of, is the fact that so long as we fetishize race, we ensure that we will never be rid of the hierarchies it imposes. We will all be doomed to stalk our separate paths.

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Thomas Chatterton Williams...

....actually owns

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
it read to me like "white supremacy doesn't matter unless you think it matters, which gives it power, black people are actually doing just fine as long as they don't worry about racism", which seemed to me to be a profoundly dumb take

maybe I'm a huge dumbass or something, idk

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

(and can't post for 27 days!)

Main Paineframe posted:

it read to me like "white supremacy doesn't matter unless you think it matters, which gives it power, black people are actually doing just fine as long as they don't worry about racism", which seemed to me to be a profoundly dumb take

maybe I'm a huge dumbass or something, idk

It's easy to not worry about white supremacy unless you're directly affected when you're a member of the black professional or bourgeois class.

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth
it's also easy to not worry about white supremacy when you've got class solidarity.

A Major Fucker
Mar 10, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
i agree with ta nehisi coats that black people will alwas be a lower social class

Agnostalgia
Dec 22, 2009
in my head i always read his name as Tennessee Coats

Reprisal
Jul 20, 2001
tbf Coates has publicly stated that he cannot envision a racially integrated world and that black Americans best hope, as individuals, is to move elsewhere (as he did for a time)

Jewel Repetition
Dec 24, 2012

Ask me about Briar Rose and Chicken Chaser.

Reprisal posted:

tbf Coates has publicly stated that he cannot envision a racially integrated world and that black Americans best hope, as individuals, is to move elsewhere (as he did for a time)

So he's literally a black nationalist?

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

Jeb! Repetition posted:

So he's literally a black nationalist?

a black navalgazist

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Jeb! Repetition posted:

So he's literally a black nationalist?
If I understand him correctly, and Liberia is anything to go by, a black imperialist.

babypolis
Nov 4, 2009

Fallen Hamprince posted:

she's still death crew af but she's a journalist with journalist opinions


anyway the nyt made a good op ed for once

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/opinion/civil-rights-protest-resistance.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur&_r=0



reminder that olivia nuzzi wrote this wretched piece of poo poo article

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/08/mike-cernovich-pivots-from-pizzagate-to-not-so-fake-news.html

im pretty sure her irony poisoning act is just that, an act. shes bottom feeding scum who will try to ingratiate herself to anyone, be it twitter leftists or nazi shitheads like milo, cernovich, and coulter

babypolis
Nov 4, 2009

Main Paineframe posted:

it read to me like "white supremacy doesn't matter unless you think it matters, which gives it power, black people are actually doing just fine as long as they don't worry about racism", which seemed to me to be a profoundly dumb take

maybe I'm a huge dumbass or something, idk

you misunderstand his argument. hes not saying that racism doesnt exist, hes saying that the way liberals conceive of racism is harmful. that they turn whiteness into some kind of supernatural force that trasnceds human will to make white people uniquely evil and lovely people and that the only thing they can do is shut up and listen. and its true, the way racists and wokes talk about race is remarkably similar, that black people and white people are fundamentally different and they should avoid mixing. the only difference is their prescription. there was a good chapo episode on this not too long ago

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Olivia Nazzi folks

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

from 'journalists r the real nazis' to 'blacks r the real racists'. the CSPAM hits are coming back 2 back itt

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
My take:

Ta Nehisi Coates is good and Thomas Chatterton Williams has written viable, lucid critiques of his work in both the LRB and NYT

babypolis
Nov 4, 2009

Fallen Hamprince posted:

from 'journalists r the real nazis' to 'blacks r the real racists'. the CSPAM hits are coming back 2 back itt

the people doing that poo poo are overwhelmingly white

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

babypolis posted:

the people doing that poo poo are overwhelmingly white

the article is literally titled "How Ta-Nehisi Coates Gives Whiteness Power"

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
Child Shocked to Learn That Headlines Not Written by Authors, Are Sometimes Misleading or Incomplete

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

C. Everett Koop
Aug 18, 2008

babypolis posted:

whiteness into some kind of supernatural force that trasnceds human will to make white people uniquely evil and lovely people

but that's true :confused:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply