|
rest assured that my newfound jobliness will not interrupt your regularly scheduled programming as my flight was delayed and thus I downloaded the Atari Jaguar programming manual did you know the master 68K could, in future licensed designs, be replaced by an 8086 or Transputer?
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 16:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 00:40 |
|
|
it also claims the Jaguar chipset supports VGA resolutions for use in workstation applications lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 16:24
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Transputer? die cisputer scum
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
akadajet posted:die cisputer scum boo hiss anyway vbcc A) supports the jaguar risc cpus and B) includes the C library and the jaglib hardware/graphics library neat 
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
akadajet posted:die cisputer scum goddam it now i want to change my name to "js cispiler" or something. i do really like my current name though
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
gently caress bouncy castle and their terrible documentation oh good this method throws operatorcreationexception. what does that mean? what kind of errors does it relate to? gently caress knows because they haven't bothered to write a single word of documentation for the method or the exception type starting to see why idiots roll their own crypto. it's probably easier than trying to figure out how to use the terrible undocumented "good" implementations properly
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 19:20
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:goddam it now i want to change my name to "js cispiler" or something. i do really like my current name though An autoformatter or obfuscater would qualify as a "cispiler", since it turns JS into JS.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 19:32
|
|
|
Zemyla posted:An autoformatter or obfuscater would qualify as a "cispiler", since it turns JS into JS. please dont cisplain
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
or there's always "homo genius"
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
bouncycastle status: got it working. turns out the solution was to use a different constructor to one class, which has nine constructors, none of which has a single word of documentation to say why you might choose it over any of the others. the only hint about the cause of this problem was a passing reference to constructors in the error string used for an undocumented exception thrown by a different undocumented class. figuring this out would have been quicker if bouncycastle wasn't the only java library i have ever encountered that strips all debug information. (they provide a separate debuggable version of one part of the code. for the bit i'm using, they helpfully suggest building it yourself if you need to be able to step through it or see where exceptions were raised, which i'm pretty sure is the library equivalent of "go gently caress yourself".)
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
anyone know any good lightweight java web frameworks? I'm mostly going to to be porting a legacy app who's primary purpose is providing services to other apps I don't need an orm but I do have some service objects that I might want to keep singletons/pools of I was thinking maybe like spring+jersey mixup; they have a spring project for bootstrapping web apps right? its been a while since I looked any of this stuff
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
i know this is the dumbest thing in the world, but i always get really excited when i get to do load testing because i get to spin up a couple thousand instances and i get to see ~big numbers~
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
bouncy castle is a goddamn ridiculous namelancemantis posted:good lightweight java is this one of those pick no more than 2 situations?
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
ynohtna posted:bouncy castle is a goddamn ridiculous name more like a pick 1
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
lancemantis posted:anyone know any good lightweight java web frameworks? I'm mostly going to to be porting a legacy app who's primary purpose is providing services to other apps dropwizard
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 23:21
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:please dont cisplain
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 00:10
|
|
|
is there something besides Hadoop good for querying & aggregating data that’s not Big per se but can have tens of thousands of mostly sparse “columns” per row
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:is there something besides Hadoop good for querying & aggregating data that’s not Big per se but can have tens of thousands of mostly sparse “columns” per row https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_column-oriented_DBMSes
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 00:31
|
|
|
hmm yes thank you I know I’m looking for a columnar solution but was hoping for something slightly more substantial or personally recommended than fish mech diary but her I am posting on programmer web board
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
columns are just rows turned on their sides if u think about it
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:hmm yes thank you I know I’m looking for a columnar solution but was hoping for something slightly more substantial or personally recommended than fish mech diary but her I am posting on programmer web board I've been a an Elasticsearch bender for the last year, it's started to grow on me and it's pretty cool
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 04:33
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:hmm yes thank you I know I’m looking for a columnar solution but was hoping for something slightly more substantial or personally recommended than fish mech diary but her I am posting on programmer web board you could always use cassandra 
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 16:50
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:hmm yes thank you I know I’m looking for a columnar solution but was hoping for something slightly more substantial or personally recommended than fish mech diary but her I am posting on programmer web board A lot of the times you don't need one, the performance is actually similar or worse than row based. KDB is the big one, MariaDB×TokuDB is a very good second choice.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
lmao someone set up a whole dockerfile with all the atari jaguar dev tools preinstalled this owns
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:lmao someone set up a whole dockerfile with all the atari jaguar dev tools preinstalled this owns yeah this poo poo is why containers are good. i dont give a poo poo about containers in production, containers in dev are great.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:problem is, this json.net schema library has a weird license. in addition to regular commercial licenses, it's available under the scary AGPL for open sores projects, but limited into utter uselessness - max 10 schema generations / hour. having to use even a completely trivial fork is probably sufficient to nudge a decent number of companies into paying for commercial licenses (most of which would probably otherwise be using it in ways that aren't actually allowed by the agpl, but they wouldn't realize it and the author wouldn't know, so...). one of the most important parts of making money off open source things is to give companies a reason to give you money. even if it's not a very good reason or something they could easily work around, at the minimum you need to give some sort of justification to the people who actively want to give you money.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
hey i'm presenting on all this mongo -> postgres stuff I've been doing. One of the questions I know I'll get is "why postgres instead of mysql." The answer to this is json support (since we're migrating from mongo this is really critical), but are there any articles I can read/link to on why postrgres is almost always better than mysql? I can't just say "everyone on yospos/the internet says so" but to be honest I don't know that much about databases.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 21:58
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:hey i'm presenting on all this mongo -> postgres stuff I've been doing. One of the questions I know I'll get is "why postgres instead of mysql." The answer to this is json support (since we're migrating from mongo this is really critical), but are there any articles I can read/link to on why postrgres is almost always better than mysql? I can't just say "everyone on yospos/the internet says so" but to be honest I don't know that much about databases. Well first, mysql has 2 big forks which makes it even harder to compare. I don't know how many shops are running stock mysql instead of the other forks, but they gained a lot of traction for a . Another reason that might not apply to you, but the license for the mysql jdbc driver can be a problem compared to postgres driver. Also mysql default settings can and will gently caress with your db, but frankly so does postgres and if you/your team aren't familiar with either than this is a wash. Postgres generally has a longer history of not loving things up so horribly like mysql has, it's seriously the php of databases.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 22:17
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:hmm yes thank you I know I’m looking for a columnar solution but was hoping for something slightly more substantial or personally recommended than fish mech diary but her I am posting on programmer web board if you're on aws redshift and athena are maybe worth looking at. on gce bigquery might work
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:hey i'm presenting on all this mongo -> postgres stuff I've been doing. One of the questions I know I'll get is "why postgres instead of mysql." The answer to this is json support (since we're migrating from mongo this is really critical), but are there any articles I can read/link to on why postrgres is almost always better than mysql? I can't just say "everyone on yospos/the internet says so" but to be honest I don't know that much about databases. postgres is what people use to test other databases for correctness, namely sqlite postgres has rich data types: jsonb, and a whole bunch of lovely indexes and postgres has transactions to the point of transactional schema changes previously: postgres had to be vacuumed manually autovaccum locked the poo poo out of the tables mysql had a lot more in the way of replication and other tooling this is less true now, specifically the first two: 9.3 onwards, and 10 especially are looking to be very nice for vacuuming (major locking improvements) but the tooling for multi-primary replication is still way ahead mysql is more like a very good b-tree with poor sql support and reasonable tooling iirc, mysql does in-place update of values, meanwhile postgress is more mvcc, it keeps the old values around until not needed so for very high volume writes of often ephemeral data, mysql is a pretty good choice but, postgres is just a much better default
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 22:41
|
|
|
tef posted:postgres is what people use to test other databases for correctness, namely sqlite thank you tef, exactly what i needed Janitor Prime posted:Well first, mysql has 2 big forks which makes it even harder to compare. I don't know how many shops are running stock mysql instead of the other forks, but they gained a lot of traction for a . Another reason that might not apply to you, but the license for the mysql jdbc driver can be a problem compared to postgres driver. Also mysql default settings can and will gently caress with your db, but frankly so does postgres and if you/your team aren't familiar with either than this is a wash. Postgres generally has a longer history of not loving things up so horribly like mysql has, it's seriously the php of databases. also thanks!
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 22:45
|
|
|
just remember to use utf8_mb4 aka 'no i really mean utf-8' and also to turn off swedish collation by default, you should be fine with mysql
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
tef posted:just remember to use utf8_mb4 aka 'no i really mean utf-8' and also to turn off swedish collation by default, you should be fine with mysql See what I mean about the stupid poo poo mysql does
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:hey i'm presenting on all this mongo -> postgres stuff I've been doing. One of the questions I know I'll get is "why postgres instead of mysql." The answer to this is json support (since we're migrating from mongo this is really critical), but are there any articles I can read/link to on why postrgres is almost always better than mysql? I can't just say "everyone on yospos/the internet says so" but to be honest I don't know that much about databases. i've had this hn thread in my bookmarks for almost a year, it's chock full of good stuff that helped me when I had to make the same choice. the two main articles: https://renesd.blogspot.it/2017/02/is-postgresql-good-enough.html http://www.brightball.com/articles/why-should-you-learn-postgresql
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 01:02
|
|
|
Janitor Prime posted:See what I mean about the stupid poo poo mysql does see also how you can't have two columns with type "timestamp default now" in a table: http://gusiev.com/2009/04/update-and-create-timestamps-with-mysql/ this is still a current problem by the way, at least in the version we use at work
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 01:25
|
|
|
tef posted:and postgres has transactions to the point of transactional schema changes holy loving pissball, this if you're dealing with any sort of data that has real and direct consequences on your business, the sort of thing where the thought of your db making GBS threads itself causes the higher up's balls to shrivel, then this is something you want you don't want to start some multi-step multi-hour schema change on your prod db and then find out on the last step that you've got a bad case of "error 42069: LOL gently caress YOU" and then be stuck in some integrity netherworld you're already asking your db to provide you with atomicity guarantees, so it's probably important to you, then why the hell would you not want the same thing for schema changes of all things if you've got the option?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
has mysql stopped silently truncating text that did not fit the input type?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
tef posted:swedish collation by default MononcQc posted:has mysql stopped silently truncating text that did not fit the input type? lmao
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 02:57
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:has mysql stopped silently truncating text that did not fit the input type? LMAO no
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 03:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 00:40 |
|
|
tef posted:swedish collation by default feature, not bug
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 03:29
|
|
