|
Not nork related but i laughed at this https://twitter.com/CobraBall3/status/904134341038661636 In nork related , i still dont see what they would gain with nuclear attack. Isnt it deterrence theyre seeking? Better get solid snake on the Job.
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 17:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 00:18 |
|
|
Oh my god I have to have one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
 Those dudes have the best morale patches: "RC-135: We Hate Each Other, But We Hate You More" "Russian Border Patrol" Waroduce posted:Realistically under this Administration where do you think you'd learn it first? Like offical we launched poo poo? Honestly, it's probably been Twitter since the internet plane spotter community got established there. I fully expect my first warning of nuclear war to be some foamer sitting off the end of the runway at Whiteman talking about how excited he is to see 19 B-2 bombers take off at once and complaining about the klaxon noise.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
That S Korea headline is some pretty serious poo poo, we've been trying hard for decades to keep the S Koreans from getting big booms. There are various reasons why this is the case, but probably none of them can be comprehended by a person who does not understand the concept of the nuclear triad. EDIT: Maybe we could find someone qualified to explain it to the current administration? Maybe, like, the director of the Air Force School of Advanced Nuclear Deterrence Studies? Oh wait he just got arrested for child sexual abuse The gross thing for me is that I've actually cited papers by this dude before Prop Wash fucked around with this message at 18:51 on Sep 4, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
If Nikki Hale's speech gets UN backing for military action it's pretty much game over.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
The name Nikki Haley somehow rings a bell of clinical stupidity and incompetence, but a cursory look at her wikipedia page leads me to believe I'm confusing her with another female elected official from the South?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
Betsy Devos?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
Duzzy Funlop posted:The name Nikki Haley somehow rings a bell of clinical stupidity and incompetence, but a cursory look at her wikipedia page leads me to believe I'm confusing her with another female elected official from the South? She was governor of South Carolina before Trump sent her to the UN
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
Pesticide20 posted:She was governor of South Carolina before Trump sent her to the UN And during her time as governor she was clinically stupid and incompetent. Seems nothing has changed since becoming ambassador to the UN.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
I wonder what would happen if Mattis wasn't in the administration.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 19:51
|
|
|
cowboy elvis posted:I wonder what would happen if Mattis wasn't in the administration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VG2aJyIFrA
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
Looks like ISIS is in its death throes https://twitter.com/ejmalrai/status/904778251394048000
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
https://splinternews.com/after-assa...gn=beingliberal So, Salt Lake Tribune got the body cam footage and audio from the officers arresting the nurse, in which they discuss whether the charges will stick (they won't) and how one of the officers, who doubles as a paramedic, will only bring transients to that particular hospital now to punish them. http://www.sltrib.com/news/2017/09/...k&ICID=ref_fark
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
That PD is going to be loving miserable for the next year+.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
Vengarr posted:That PD is going to be loving miserable for the next year+. Especially how its out now that the guy they were trying to draw blood from, was also a volunteer police officer, who was the victim of the accident by their perp. Yeah, they crossed another PD, something is going to stick.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
Even worse, a PD from another state thereby dragging the Idaho governor and AG into the shitrain.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
I dont get what the endgame was with that, because even if the victim had had something in his system, the evidence would be inadmissible because of no consent.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
orange juche posted:I dont get what the endgame was with that, because even if the victim had had something in his system, the evidence would be inadmissible because of no consent. slander in the news
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
orange juche posted:I dont get what the endgame was with that, because even if the victim had had something in his system, the evidence would be inadmissible because of no consent. Is any consent needed beyond the implied consent of having a UT driver's license?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:41
|
|
|
Godholio posted:Is any consent needed beyond the implied consent of having a UT driver's license? The dude was from Idaho
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:44
|
|
|
Terrible Robot posted:The dude was from Idaho 
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
Godholio posted:Is any consent needed beyond the implied consent of having a UT driver's license? Implied consent applies to breath only. You cannot do an implied consent blood draw.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
Hurricane Irma does not look pleasant and Florida is now inside the cone of uncertainty for this coming weekend. Irma is currently a Cat 4. https://twitter.com/POLITICO_Steve/status/904807616794288132 https://twitter.com/NHC_Atlantic/status/904805934509297665
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
Terrible Robot posted:The dude was from Idaho Good point. Probably not a UT license then, but it turns out operating a motor vehicle in the state is enough. Mr. Nice! posted:Implied consent applies to breath only. You cannot do an implied consent blood draw. Well... quote:A person operating a motor vehicle in this state is considered to have given the person's consent to a chemical test or tests of the person's breath, blood, urine, or oral fluids for the purpose of determining whether the person was operating or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while: Unless the draw itself is considered separate from the test?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Implied consent applies to breath only. You cannot do an implied consent blood draw. Yes you can... The recent supreme court case only said you can't compel a implied consent blood draw with a criminal penalty associated with the refusal. If it's a civil penalty or a non-criminal penalty (like a fine or dmv auto suspending your license), it's still fine to take blood. There were a lot of headlines about that case which made it sound like DUI blood draws were out without a search warrant, but it's not the case. And it really only affected states with criminal penalties for refusal.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
Godholio posted:Good point. Probably not a UT license then, but it turns out operating a motor vehicle in the state is enough. https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...e82e5&tid=a_inl quote:The Supreme Court on Thursday said that police must obtain a warrant before requiring a suspected drunk driver to submit to a blood alcohol test.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:05
|
|
|
But they can still yank your license for refusing a blood test, if I understand correctly. orange juche posted:I dont get what the endgame was with that, because even if the victim had had something in his system, the evidence would be inadmissible because of no consent. If they were doing the draw even though they knew it would be inadmissible for a prosecution, they were hoping to get it in through parallel construction, or they were going to use it to deflect liability if the injured driver tried to sue the department. My other guess was that they were used to getting the blood through pressure or just asking, and their supervisor expected them to come back with a completed draw, so when the nurse actually decided to follow the letter of the law, the cops decided to handcuff the messenger rather than disappoint their boss. I've been in that position where people were furious with me for refusing to honor handshake agreements or loose "interpretations" of regulation. Dead Reckoning fucked around with this message at 22:11 on Sep 4, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:09
|
|
|
If memory serves, a breath test is not admissible in court proceedings. In that case, wouldn't it be best to just refuse the blood test?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:28
|
|
|
There was no loose interpretation. They were citing an outdated law. The nurse was 100% correct about what happened. They had no legal right to the blood draw under any law.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:28
|
|
|
psydude posted:If memory serves, a breath test is not admissible in court proceedings. In that case, wouldn't it be best to just refuse the blood test? Never voluntarily give evidence to police.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Never volunt(eer)
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
Also Rick Scott just declared state of emergency in prep for Irma. If you haven't kept track, it's trending to hit florida hard as gently caress in the next week. It potentially is going to come up to the coast and just sail north for a bit intensifying before making landfall in south carolina. Irma is currently cat 4, has an extremely low pressure eye, and is only getting stronger.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
Barry should write Trump another letter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kQhG_uVu6U&t=77s "Please listen, as if you were sober and intelligent, and not a piss-sodden sex(with your daughter) addled, wreck" gently caress Marc Antony even has Donnie's exact smug face 
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 22:54
|
|
|
I literally just learned about this and was going to post it. Question answered! Payne needs to not wear a badge anymore.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
I sleep well at night knowing that Threads and The Day After didn't even show how much worse it will actually be. I'm getting vaporized in the first salvo. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 23:33
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Also Rick Scott just declared state of emergency in prep for Irma. If you haven't kept track, it's trending to hit florida hard as gently caress in the next week. It potentially is going to come up to the coast and just sail north for a bit intensifying before making landfall in south carolina. Irma is currently cat 4, has an extremely low pressure eye, and is only getting stronger. Hey Florida will be just fine. Governor Skeletor hasn't spent years defunding everything in sight, denying climate change to the point where officials are not allowed to even use the words and refusing to put programs and regulations in place to mitigate the complete cluster gently caress something like this could beco- *puts finger to ear piece* Oh...oh...uh, y'all are screwed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
tastefully arranged labia posted:I sleep well at night knowing that Threads and The Day After didn't even show how much worse it will actually be. I'm not. I'm in a city with so little industrial production it's not worth spending a missile on, but is close enough to both Vancouver and Seattle to at least eat some mild overpressure and fallout. Y'all are going to be drinking fifths of Jack with Lucifer and I'm going to be stuck here in post-nuclear societal collapse.
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
In a true 1980s full exchange everything got nuked. everything poo poo, in the 1998 SIOP a single target in Moscow had sixty loving eight nuclear weapons of various types targeted on it.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2017 00:21
|
|
|
Smiling Jack posted:In a true 1980s full exchange everything got nuked. everything I thought the point of SIOP was to prevent that sort of over targeting?
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2017 00:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 00:18 |
|
Flikken posted:I thought the point of SIOP was to prevent that sort of over targeting? yeah 68 warheads wasnt considered overkill
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2017 00:29
|
|