|
albany academy posted:Also looking forward to this I'm betting Garrison is going to completely ignore this, just like he does everything he can't spin/blame on the usual bogeymen.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 03:04 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:07 |
|
I usually skip posting the non-political Dan Lietha drivel. But gently caress him.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:16 |
|
Notably absent: "Trickle Down Economics" and "The Complete Encyclopedia of Donald Trump Campaign Promises, Stump Speeches, and Tweets". Maybe they'll be found in the Kids Corner.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:17 |
|
Zesty posted:I usually skip posting the non-political Dan Lietha drivel. But gently caress him.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:19 |
|
Zesty posted:I usually skip posting the non-political Dan Lietha drivel. But gently caress him. That forbidden fruit looks like a bunch of grapes than an apple. Is there a consensus on what the forbidden fruit looks like?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:27 |
|
toanoradian posted:That forbidden fruit looks like a bunch of grapes than an apple. Is there a consensus on what the forbidden fruit looks like? Everybody has seemed to settle on it being an apple.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:28 |
|
I thought that Jesus' sacrifice was supposed to redeem mankind from original sin
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:28 |
|
toanoradian posted:That forbidden fruit looks like a bunch of grapes than an apple. Is there a consensus on what the forbidden fruit looks like? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden_fruit#Identifications_and_depictions
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:31 |
|
toanoradian posted:That forbidden fruit looks like a bunch of grapes than an apple. Is there a consensus on what the forbidden fruit looks like?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:33 |
|
It was actually durians. They were forbidden for a reason.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 04:35 |
|
toanoradian posted:That forbidden fruit looks like a bunch of grapes than an apple. Is there a consensus on what the forbidden fruit looks like? That's a mutfruit. A fallout cartoon.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 05:04 |
|
Interestingly, Muslims believe the forbidden fruit was a banana, while Yazidis believe it was wheat.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 05:07 |
|
Zesty posted:I usually skip posting the non-political Dan Lietha drivel. But gently caress him. Romans 8:22 posted:22 We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. Genesis 2:15-17 posted:15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.” Genesis 3:1-24 posted:3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?” Some times when I see messages quoting a dozen verses of the Bible, I like to actually look them up and see what the hell is being quoted as so meaningful. The message here is rather... muddled. Obviously, Romans 8:22 is being taken painfully out of context - Romans:18-30 posted:18 I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. 19 For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. 20 For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21 that[h] the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God. But even worse, the implication seems to be that a Loving God is justified in sending Harvey/Irma/Jose upon us because of original sin. Which uh, well... let me quote good ol' Job here: Job 9:14-35 posted:14 “How then can I dispute with him? TL:DR: FUUUUUUCK YOUUUUUUU DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 05:12 |
|
toanoradian posted:That forbidden fruit looks like a bunch of grapes than an apple. Is there a consensus on what the forbidden fruit looks like?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 05:25 |
|
Here are the last few Two Bulls we're going to see for a while: You can see the anger...
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 05:34 |
|
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 06:10 |
|
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 06:56 |
|
albany academy posted:Also looking forward to this Feel like you're going to be waiting a bit he's probably now focused on a free speech cartoon about this. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-41222593
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 07:02 |
|
Being an anti-Trump Republican is an ultimately effortless and useless gesture and nobody should applaud them for staying in the broken shambling corpse of a party that hasn't even been good for over half a century. A Good Cartoon.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 07:08 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 07:16 |
|
Throwing Turtles posted:7. I would really, really like to get my hands on this speech. It's potential gold for several different purposes simultaneously, because, um, yes, it's that Lehman. Does anyone know where I might be able to find a good record of it? Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 07:26 on Sep 11, 2017 |
# ? Sep 11, 2017 07:21 |
|
Electric Phantasm posted:Feel like you're going to be waiting a bit he's probably now focused on a free speech cartoon about this. I saw some talk about this that raised a good point: the way he delivers the slur is tellingly natural and easy. Some people, you hear them say it for a "joke" or some forced, edgy insult, and they trip over the word, or they pause. It feels uncomfortable. Here, it was nothing like that. It was spoken like second nature. I'm not bringing this up to police the tone, but it reveals something about his character. This isn't a guy getting so frustrated he said something he would never normally say. This is a guy who got so frustrated he forgot his "I'm being filmed" filter. This is a guy who says that word all the time in private, or among friends, but in a moment of impulse forgot he was live and his true nature showed. This is a word he uses all the time, and he's just told the whole world as much.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 10:00 |
|
Maybe as a non-American he had not received the same amount of social pressure to not use the n-word.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 10:17 |
|
A combo of: National party votes to remove all subsidies for renewable energy: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/fed...908-gydw5m.html and: https://twitter.com/adamgartrell/status/907012239592275968
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 10:19 |
|
toanoradian posted:Maybe as a non-American he had not received the same amount of social pressure to not use the n-word. 'friend of the family' pretty much has the same negative connotation in his native Swedish tongue.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 10:25 |
|
Never thought I'd see the day when anti-climate change denial cartoons got as annoyingly trite as climate change denial cartoons, but this recent flood of them is making me reconsider.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 10:58 |
|
toanoradian posted:Maybe as a non-American he had not received the same amount of social pressure to not use the n-word.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 10:59 |
|
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:03 |
|
Vib Rib posted:He, in particular, sure did at least. Primarily because he's been in trouble for language and topics in the past and is aware of his online presence (as a matter of necessity for protecting his income). The thing is that he's basically a morning-zoo DJ/shockjock and those thrive on controversy. So there's also the "be offensive, but not too much" needle he's threading (and failing as of late) for that income.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:25 |
|
...of course.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:34 |
|
Did Howard Stern ever drop the n-bomb
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:34 |
|
Starving Wolf posted:
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:35 |
|
Starving Wolf posted:
Current stardate: 2017. Obama's still captain of the ship, apparently.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:40 |
|
Starving Wolf posted:
Hahaha this is revised?!
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:50 |
|
dougdrums posted:Hahaha this is revised?! Time is a flat circle.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:53 |
|
Six plus years ,,, of comma-ellipses ,,,
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 11:55 |
|
Self-reliance is pretty futile though.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 12:36 |
|
Every shithead conservative is being really smug that we have lead in our water because Pittsburgh has had Democratic leadership for nearly a century and they can go "Run by democrats. Go ahead Rob, keep on pulling the "D" lever. You get what you vote for." While the problem is the Republicans have been able to stonewall any attempts to fix our ancient infrastructure leading to our dumb mayor to hire a French company that surprise surprise cut corners and used a chemical that degraded the pipes to leech lead into the water. Same dumbass mayor has also gotten some suit who worked with Reagan to help privatize public services because god forbid the rich fucks in this city pay taxes for public services and not stadiums for the sports teams.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 12:53 |
|
Starving Wolf posted:
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 13:12 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:07 |
|
Do you think that news corporations would eventually stop hiring lazy cartoonists?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2017 13:14 |