|
Digging the Communicator watch
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 21:58 |
|
|
please dpph
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2017 16:36
|
|
|
He's got biceps to spare!
Snowglobe of Doom has a new favorite as of 17:56 on Sep 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
"One punch!"
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2017 08:46
|
|
|
 Warcraft 3's Tyrande Whisperwind as cosplayed by narga-lifestream.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
man that's the sort of cosplay you seriously need help with. All that blue paint.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 15:59
|
|
|
How long does it even take? Is it like how actors have to spend hours in the makeup chair?
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 16:10
|
|
|
Some body paints can be applied pretty quickly, especially if you have good practice. I'm willing to bet this took no more than a couple of hours to put on and set. It helps that it's only the one shade! Well, aside from the facial markings.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 16:20
|
|
|
Yeah, I've seen borderlands cosplays where they replicated the cell shading all over, that must be a hell of a job to put on.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 16:23
|
|
|
Horrible Lurkbeast posted:How long does it even take? Is it like how actors have to spend hours in the makeup chair? Not that long. For a costume like that, you can expect to be on the con floor for about an hour so an old standby trick is to mix your body paint with lotion. It goes on smooth and is easy to wash off. In other news, because I will always pimp his work, PreztelBot got on Kotaku AGAIN https://cosplay.kotaku.com/more-nier-cosplay-1803099083
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 16:40
|
|
|
Amazing. I'm glad that the art of practical effects will not disappear once Hollywood goes full CGI.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
The day cosplay goes full CGI I am out!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
Horrible Lurkbeast posted:Amazing. Practicals are really common on lower budget indie movies, enough that some make a point of it A recent-ish movie, Harbinger Down is almost entirely practical effects, i think they only used CGI to erase like wires and poo poo
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
Sloober posted:Practicals are really common on lower budget indie movies, enough that some make a point of it Dunkirk used very little too. In fact it was kinda bad that they didn't add some to the ship sinking scene.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
A friend of mine used to do something similar for this group: https://www.flickr.com/photos/meryddian/sets/72157612170858129/ It was almost all airbrushed, which I imagine speeds things up as well.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:Dunkirk used very little too. In fact it was kinda bad that they didn't add some to the ship sinking scene. To be fair, that's a Christopher Nolan film and he's known for eschewing CGI for practical effects in just about anything he directs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 22:39
|
|
|
ChaosArgate posted:To be fair, that's a Christopher Nolan film and he's known for eschewing CGI for practical effects in just about anything he directs. What I love is how painfully literal the explanations are. How did they do that bit in TDK where they flip the truck? They got a truck, and they flipped it . How did they do the rotating corridor in Inception? They built a corridor, and they rotated it. How did they do the bit in TDKR with the plane hanging from a bigger plane? They got a plane, and they hung it from a bigger plane.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
ChaosArgate posted:To be fair, that's a Christopher Nolan film and he's known for eschewing CGI for practical effects in just about anything he directs. Yeah but adding smoke to a smokestack of a ship going down while steaming away is no big deal to do.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
Strom Cuzewon posted:What I love is how painfully literal the explanations are. "Practical" effects.
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:"One punch!" They got the reaction shot so close with Shazam and Beetle there. I'm sure they could have dug up a Canary, Mister Miracle, and Martian Manhunter instead of those plebs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 02:47
|
|
|
Yume Nikki.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 10:45
|
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/N9pQEEY.mp4
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 12:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 03:38
|
|
|
Why do people keep dressing up as orange sadness? I just don't get it. I kind of hope "Orange Sadness" catches on as a nickname for Velma now
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 14:59
|
|
|
She's not even the star of the show!
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
CzarChasm posted:Why do people keep dressing up as orange sadness? I just don't get it. Because DeviantArt decided she was sexy https://www.deviantart.com/tag/velma 
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 17:44
|
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:Because DeviantArt decided she was sexy DeviantArt makes a lot of terrible decisions.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
Mad Max: Fury Road did tons of awesome stuff with not a lot in the way of CGI enhancement. Mostly it was to remove the wires stuntmen were wearing, or to give explosions a bit bigger punch. All those cars and trucks, they built multiple copies, and smashed the poo poo out of them out in the desert. Here's a YT video that shows some of the stuff they did. Be warned that Mad Max behind the scenes videos is an easy rabbit hole to fall down.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
Fury road is the best recent example of what makes practical effects awesome, also of why CGI is just one tool in the filmmaker's bag.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 21:28
|
|
|
Horrible Lurkbeast posted:Fury road is the best recent example of what makes practical effects awesome, also of why CGI is just one tool in the filmmaker's bag. I usually don't give a crap about the Academy Awards because I know what a joke they are, however Fury Road actually made me caremad because not winning best director as well was a complete travesty.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
Fury Road probably could also have done that stuff in CGI and nobody would have noticed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 01:16
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:Fury Road probably could also have done that stuff in CGI and nobody would have noticed. Uh yeah, some folks would have. Because cgi cars are visibly different from real ones. Condolences for your malfunctioning eyes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 01:18
|
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:Because DeviantArt decided she was sexy I didn't need deviantart to tell me this.  (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 01:54
|
|
|
I think I found a clue on why people find it attractive.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 02:38
|
|
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:Uh yeah, some folks would have. Because cgi cars are visibly different from real ones. Condolences for your malfunctioning eyes. Fury Road already has plenty of computer inserted cars.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 02:53
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:Fury Road already has plenty of computer inserted cars. No poo poo. What's your point?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
Please don't get creepy about Velma cosplay! 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 03:51
|
|
|
my cat is norris posted:Please don't get creepy about Velma cosplay! You're like 4 threads too late
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 03:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 21:58 |
|
|
some 40ks   ]                              
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 04:42
|
|
