|
Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:even with blood flow analysis there's only so much data you can capture with a camera's ir sensor a foot or two away from the face. it's not high definition and i'd put the number of influencing factors on the verification of a face compared to a fingerprint at several order of magnitudes. there's a ton of leeway that someone will have a proof of concept together pretty quickly. a fingerprint at least has surface contact to grab a lot more measurements with yeah its likely blood flow detection is one of many factors and is primarily used in determining if this is a human or a mask/photo/etc...
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 03:51 |
|
|
flakeloaf posted:yeah whatever happened to that fangled microsoft webcam technology that was supposed to be able to do this I believe that claim was made about Kinect 2 (the Xbox One version) at one point, and AFAIK some of the FaceID team worked on Kinect in the past. From the little information in the presentation it looks like FaceID works very similarly to Kinect as far as its 3D mapping goes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 15:19
|
|
|
Jewel posted:there was a lot of equifax talk but i didnt know a db was admin/admin lol jfc at some point you really should just run towards the telecom cabinet and start wailing on stuff with the fire axe
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 15:35
|
|
|
..oof  https://twitter.com/torproject/status/907677742690439171
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 16:12
|
|
|
did we already talk about how comodo ignores caa and just issues certificates despite caa records for those domains not authorizing them to do so?
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:19
|
|
|
I said lol comodo a couple days ago but everybody else was too busy making fun of the equifax CSO's resume
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
Tor project posted:This is a major human rights breach - thousands in Turkey were arrested for downloading an encrypted messaging app Encryption is not a human right and neither is downloading apps, in fact both could well be illegal in some places, so where's the human rights violation?
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:33
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:Encryption is not a human right and neither is downloading apps, in fact both could well be illegal in some places, so where's the human rights violation? Saying that downloading an app makes you a Gülen supporter.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:Encryption is not a human right and neither is downloading apps, in fact both could well be illegal in some places, so where's the human rights violation? turkey is theoretically trying to become an EU member and this would be absurdly illegal in an EU country
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:turkey is theoretically trying to become an EU member and this would be absurdly illegal in an EU country They are already signed on to the ECHR
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:36
|
|
|
and they've spent over a year trampling all over it
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:and they've spent over a year trampling all over it and merkel has made a public statement that turkey is unfit for eu membership
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
Yeah they're not joining any time soon and all the better imo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:45
|
|
|
just got this error from firefox:code:
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:45
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:Encryption is not a human right and neither is downloading apps, in fact both could well be illegal in some places, so where's the human rights violation? Get the hell out you rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:Encryption is not a human right and neither is downloading apps, in fact both could well be illegal in some places, so where's the human rights violation? Encryption isn't, but Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Thought are, Turkey is a member of the UN, and laws don't exist in a vaccuum. The current political climate in Turkey (and in almost any country, really) pretty much guarantees that a law forbidding encryption is passed with the express purpose of supressing ideas and viewpoints that oppose the government's and thus judges should interpret them accordingly. Interpretation of the law isn't binary, much less international law.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:48
|
|
|
i missed hacking movie talk but goldeneye came out in 1995
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:51
|
|
|
more than simple free speech, ECHR has an explicit right to private correspondences. it's blatantly illegal turkey isn't even pretending to not be a dictatorship now
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:Encryption is not a human right and neither is downloading apps, in fact both could well be illegal in some places, so where's the human rights violation? in a general sense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrary_arrest_and_detention ianal, especially not one with a specialty in turkish law, but it's reported that the searches and arrests are being conducted by local police forces on their own authority (presumably after obtaining telemetry from local isps). however, in a case requiring signal intercept or other telecom related work, a warrant can only be issued by a superior court. the larger issue is that this happened in the wake of last year's failed coup in turkey where some revolutionaries did in fact use bylock, however it's download and use was made illegal retroactively in an effort to root out participants not already detained. the sad part is that the app was a piece of poo poo: quote:“ByLock is an insecure messaging application that is not widely used today,” Tim Strazzere, director of mobile research at US-Israeli security firm SentinelOne told Reuters. “Anyone who wanted to reverse-engineer the app could do so in minutes.”
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
well it's official now https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/908017220919468037 DHS: all Kaspersky product use by the executive branch must be discontinued within 90 days
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
lol great more idiotic Russia posturing
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
What's funny is that it was even being used in the first place. government procurement 101 is that you go with vendors in the US so you can exercise legal and executive authority over them and it makes sense to use products that you can exercise some level of control over as the state but of course this is going to get blown out of proportion
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:What's funny is that it was even being used in the first place. government procurement 101 is that you go with vendors in the US so you can exercise legal and executive authority over them and it makes sense to use products that you can exercise some level of control over as the state but of course this is going to get blown out of proportion
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:What's funny is that it was even being used in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:i would assume this is strictly a political move and that no dod agencies are actively using it. not all government agencies are dod though
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:gonna assume it's because a few people bought laptops from best buy with kaspersky on em yup.
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 19:26
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:I said lol comodo a couple days ago but everybody else was too busy making fun of the equifax CSO's resume yeah you literally posted "lol comodo" with no further information, so of course everyone ignored you
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:lol comodo
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 19:59
|
|
|
tough crowd today
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
today in 'overheard hot takes from management' i bring you: "we can always add more security later, but if we add too much security from the beginning it's really inflexible and very hard to remove!"
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
layer in the
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:today in 'overheard hot takes from management' i bring you: in some cases this is the correct thing to do if you're doing like a new workflow and just go h-a-m on security from the start you won't get users or you'll get user resentment and your project will wither on the vine so think real hard (i.e. take a security enthusiast coworker drinking at lunch) about what security you actually need from the beginning and what you might want to add later and do the initial work in a way that provides the security you need and doesn't make it actively difficult to add later
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:in some cases this is the correct thing to do yeah nah this is pertaining to something much dumber
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:today in 'overheard hot takes from management' i bring you: have you ever watched a filthy computing casual try to remove the three bundled avs installed on his $400 staples special laptop?
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 22:23
|
|
|
surebet posted:have you ever watched a filthy computing casual try to remove the three bundled avs installed on his $400 staples special laptop? well yeah you generally look at someone when they're asking you to work on their laptop
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:yeah nah this is pertaining to something much dumber you should tell us the funny part, it'll be funnier
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 23:05
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:well yeah you generally look at someone when they're asking you to work on their laptop i fixed the "be the free family computer janitor" issue by making people do the work while i'm there to explain what's up, at least for the easy stuff that way there's an inbuilt "i'll gladly help but you're going to have to listen to me talk about computers" factor that keeps the most idiotic requests at bay, and now that they're used to it, people come expecting to learn something. lots of bitching early on, but even if this takes a bit longer i think it's win-win
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
Babies Getting Rabies posted:did we already talk about how comodo ignores caa and just issues certificates despite caa records for those domains not authorizing them to do so? quote:Yesterday morning (Monday 11th), when investigating the Problem Reports, the original developer discovered that as a result of that BIND upgrade all of our calls to `dig` were returning the following response:
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 04:07
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:you should tell us the funny part, it'll be funnier but using your imagination is more fun  (it's a backend API-type thing we're overhauling, and without getting into too much detail one of the main reasons we're overhauling is "it has basically no security" so uhhh)
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 04:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 03:51 |
|
|
quote:WHAT WENT WRONG
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2017 05:21
|
|