|
Westmountdke posted:Hey guys, Can you post the code somewhere?
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 01:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 10:19 |
|
|
Evil_Greven posted:You realize there are other mentioned studies besides that particular one, such as the one that initially drove his curiosity, right? Is there anything specific you want to highlight from the article because I've gone through the article as well as the paper that's the focus of the article, and the Politico article is scaremongering with stuff like quote:The ratio of carbohydrates to minerals was going up. The plants, like the algae, were becoming junk food. when the research linked to posits a 5% decrease in mineral content of plants.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
Uh, maybe the thing I quoted initially, which was not the paper by the math professor?quote:Ziska devised an experiment that eliminated the complicating factor of plant breeding: He decided to look at bee food. Ziska isn't the math guy; Loladze is: quote:Lewis Ziska, a plant physiologist at the Agricultural Research Service headquarters in Beltsville, Maryland, is drilling down on some of the questions that Loladze That "Agricultural Research Service" being part of the USDA: https://www.ars.usda.gov/ Evil_Greven fucked around with this message at 02:04 on Sep 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
Oh so you ignored 90% of the article focusing on human agriculture and drilled down to the section on a weed? Good job I guess.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
There's also this study and this mentioned in the same article. The gist of the Politico article focuses somewhat on a person who first saw some weirdness and talks a bit about other research... it happened that the first person is the math guy. Similar things have now been found by a very accomplished person in the field in a particular species over a longer time period and to greater cumulative effect, along with the other research on other species. Shall we ignore the rest because the first is a bit sketchy? Evil_Greven fucked around with this message at 02:16 on Sep 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 02:13
|
|
|
 my black gold
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 02:34
|
|
|
Evil_Greven posted:Can you post the code somewhere? So here is a link to the program: https://realclimatescience.com/unhiding-the-decline-for-windows/ and here is the code: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5SDvLexTZmGY2p5NzFiZnBnV00/view My former professor (engineering professor) posted a graph showing that the average temperature in the US has actually been decreasing and I reverse googled it to find it on the realclimatescience webpage. Then I looked at the code he posted and it seems like the author is assuming the average temperature of the continental united states can be assumed as the average of all temperatures recorded for that date and ignoring the fact that there are a different number of temperatures recorded in different areas on even the number of measurements taken in various locations changes over the years. I didn't look too hard at the code but I figured someone here might be able to figure it out quicker than me if I went through each line. Westmountdke fucked around with this message at 05:25 on Sep 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 04:56
|
|
|
Love this sign
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 07:18
|
|
|
VideoGameVet posted:Love this sign
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 07:50
|
|
|
like who cares if pollen has less protein, nerds, i don't eat pollen so that doesn't affect me
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 07:54
|
|
|
VideoGameVet posted:Love this sign accurate, my dad both denies climate change and insists on driving over the tappan zee bridge
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 13:28
|
|
|
Just hit the gas and get across that bridge before it collapses!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 15:47
|
|
|
Polio Vax Scene posted:Just hit the gas and get across that bridge before it collapses!! *Dukes of Hazzard theme plays as a Confederate flag made of smog envelops the US*
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 15:51
|
|
|
donoteat posted:accurate, my dad both denies climate change and insists on driving over the tappan zee bridge God drat it, this was the first thing I thought of when I read that sign too.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
donoteat posted:accurate, my dad both denies climate change and insists on driving over the tappan zee bridge I know that bridge. Good point.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 16:34
|
|
|
Goon project: Convince Donald Trump to do something extreme about telemarketers. It'd be a huge populist bipartisan win for him and I'm getting like a dozen calls a day about my car's warranty.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
Same but for my cat
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:Goon project: Convince Donald Trump to do something extreme about telemarketers. It'd be a huge populist bipartisan win for him and I'm getting like a dozen calls a day about my car's warranty. Yeah sure go ahead and tell trump about another way that scummy people can make money
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
I was eating a 16 ounce steak last night and I thought of you guys!  I'm allowed to eat steak because I'm not planning on having kids.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
Everyone should have kids, the world of the future will need more Amazon Flex delivery drivers (at least until that job is automated)
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
Wow sorry, I post in this thread like once a week with a post meant for the trump thread. I really like reading climate news but I guess I'm actually bad at the mechanics of posting.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
i only just now realized the stupid newbie avatar has changed, i thought it was all just one white noise poster on a tear
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 03:39
|
|
|
enraged_camel posted:I was eating a 16 ounce steak last night and I thought of you guys! White child meat is the most carbon negative diet.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 04:52
|
|
|
Arglebargle III posted:White child meat is the most carbon negative diet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufzNMqqKCi8
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 13:45
|
|
|
Arglebargle III posted:White child meat is the most carbon negative diet. "Carbon offsets"
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
Trump might stay in the Paris agreement lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
Lawman 0 posted:Trump might stay in the Paris agreement lol Did he just flip flop back 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 22:00
|
|
I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!
|
blowfish posted:Did he just flip flop back https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/909153122764943362?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Some good news for people in this  thread
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
E;fb on the WSJ link
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
i'm having a baby
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
the old ceremony posted:i'm having a baby kill you're self and you're famil - general goonthink itt
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 00:02
|
|
|
the old ceremony posted:i'm having a baby Congratulations op remember to train your child the ways to survive the future wasteland.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
Lawman 0 posted:https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/909153122764943362?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw 5D Chess
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 00:26
|
|
|
Sunday on CBSs Face The Nation, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said President Donald Trump would be open to remaining in the Paris climate accord. Tillerson said, The position is being led and developed by Gary Cohn over at the National Economic Council. I think if you recall, the president also said, look, we are willing to work with partners in the Paris climate accord. If we can construct a set of terms that we believe is fair and balanced for the American people and recognizes our economy, our economic interests, relative to others, in particular, the second-largest economy in the world, China. He added, I think under the right conditions, the president said hes open to finding those conditions where we can remain engaged with others on what we all agree is still a challenging issue.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 22:07
|
|
|
Lawman 0 posted:https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/909153122764943362?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw This was denied by the White House, fwiw.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
enraged_camel posted:This was denied by the White House, fwiw. Tillerson waffled like VideoGameVet pointed out, but who cares? If Trump got back on board the Paris Accord, it would be in the wake of undermining it, or a Kyoto Protocol-esque non-commital "ok ok, we're sort of aboard, now gently caress off" situation. It's not like the Accord is anything but weak anyway. This pingponging is more a side effect of the Chaos Presidency than anything else.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 22:41
|
|
|
enraged_camel posted:This was denied by the White House, fwiw. Before Tillerson's comments though. So who knows what's happening. Note: Tillerson is the ex CEO of Exxon and was rumored to be in favor of staying in the Paris Accords. After all, Exxon has 40 years of climate science to back that up :-)
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2017 22:48
|
|
|
We can only hope... WSJ: President may stay in Paris Accord White House: The president would never stay in the Paris Accord Trump's Twitter: TIME TO GO GREEN BABY
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 04:05
|
|
|
VideoGameVet posted:Before Tillerson's comments though. So who knows what's happening. Well it also just doesn't make sense to leave it. It's basically a non-binding statement of intent. If you leave you lose political capital now and every time anyone mentions the Paris Accord henceforth it will be with the side note that the US left it. If you stay in it and fail to reach the goal you can at least claim you tried.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2017 11:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 10:19 |
|
|
I like the new thread title.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2017 02:24
|
|