|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:and you don't have a loving clue of what you're talking about, feel free to tell me what is mistagged here you dumb gently caress lmfao
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 16:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 02:44 |
|
|
did itunes get rid of the "group compilations together" option in their "focus on music" or whatever the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 16:36
|
|
|
loving ios 11 killed noby noby boy. i will never forgive apple
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 16:36
|
|
|
The Management posted:pretty much everything. also the disc should be tagged, not part of the freaking album name. what a dumb-rear end this person is, for thinking his MP3 was tagged correctly.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 16:37
|
|
|
GameCube posted:loving ios 11 killed noby noby boy. i will never forgive apple never heard of it. but i don't play games on my cell phone lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 16:43
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:this is dumb as gently caress Try setting it up like this. (You don't need to do the Album Artist thing, I only did that for this album. Usually it's blank.) All my compilations are grouped at the bottom of my music list.  EDIT: If that's the only artist you have on that album, then it sends it to the artist, regardless of being marked as a compilation. So make sure you have other artists also with that exact album title.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:01
|
|
|
Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:been using the touch bar since release, still loving stinks and there hasn't been a single day I go "oh that was very cool and useful" the touchbar esc key is so bad, they move it over an inch and literally have an empty bezel in the spot where a physical escape key could be just as an extra gently caress you to the user. just abort the whole thing and put face id in next year's model timb
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:13
|
|
|
[quote="“coke”" post="“476884110”"] yeah and now apple is even dumber to use them for baseband/modem like you know, the chip that allows cellular devices to connect to the internet and the whole point of having a mobile phone in the first place like stymie said, tims lust for margin is killimg apple and should be fired [/quote] what's wrong with intel basebands? works for me
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
I think apple wanted to go back to infineon or whatever the company that made the original iPhone baseband chips was, which is now owned by intel LOL
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:38
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:I think apple wanted to go back to infineon or whatever the company that made the original iPhone baseband chips was, which is now owned by intel LOL they wanted to not give qualcomm a percentage of the price of the final product, which is what their licensing terms demand, and instead just pay for the chip they're buying.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:41
|
|
|
http://appleinsider.com/articles/17/09/29/apple-looking-to-develop-custom-arm-chips-for-future-macs-cutting-out-intel---reportquote:Apple looking to develop custom ARM chips for future Macs, cutting out Intel - report
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
Mr. Apollo posted:http://appleinsider.com/articles/17/09/29/apple-looking-to-develop-custom-arm-chips-for-future-macs-cutting-out-intel---report i bet this is mainly for negotiating with intel for now
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 19:23
|
|
|
how would that even work Apple's ARM chip would need some x86 emulation for compatability, and I don't think intel would just license that out
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
maybe Apple can run them through AMD somehow
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 20:06
|
|
|
nah they'll just do the same as the ppc->intel move: dump hardware compability entirely and use a limited software emulation layer for a few years
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
i mean, it's not news that they're trying - just as they're doing their own tv whether it ever gets released is another matter, but they'd also have to do this as a general hedge; anything else would be irresponsible we're probably going to see windows on arm before macos, especially given the low priority mac is getting
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
ufarn posted:we're probably going to see windows on arm before macos, especially given the low priority mac is getting
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 20:38
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:this is dumb as gently caress wow this is so badly tagged im getting physically sick
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 20:39
|
|
|
Crime on a Dime posted:not if you bought the cd and use iTunes to rip it what the gently caress? how are you posting from 2003?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:how would that even work like microsoft is and like apple did before, software level translation. the only problem is your ARM needs to be faster than the x86 cpu it's replacing to have comparable performance. during the ppc->x86 transition that wasn't hard because PPC was absolute dogshit. x86->arm remains to be seen ms claims "near native" performance on their windows-on-arm platform using some qualcomm SoC
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
all apple needs to do is help the cpu-intensive x86 developers to support ipad pro, which already exists. they can make a switch once the important apps that would suffer under emulation are on board
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
Important apps that would suffer from emulation that are still used by professionals in OS X: - XCode 
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 22:04
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:nah they'll just do the same as the ppc->intel move: dump hardware compability entirely and use a limited software emulation layer for a few years hasn't intel recently been trying to scare off anyone who even thinks about maybe possibly emulating x86?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:hasn't intel recently been trying to scare off anyone who even thinks about maybe possibly emulating x86? that's why I proposed sheep dipping them as AMD chips
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
also AMD's endgame being propped up as an end run around intel's patents would be hilarious (the patent licenses for x86 are void if amd is bought by someone else supposedly)
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
lomarf https://9to5mac.com/2017/09/29/iphone-8-plus-casing-split-open/
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 23:01
|
|
|
pre-bent for your convenience
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 23:18
|
|
quote:investigations into charging-related incidents often reveal that a third-party charger was used, even when an owner initially claims to have used the supplied Apple one you're charging it wrong?
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 23:58
|
|
|
these are apple's first quick-charge capable phones iirc, you need a good charger for that to work
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 00:01
|
|
|
got my 8 that bump tho
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
qirex posted:these are apple's first quick-charge capable phones iirc, you need a good charger for that to work lol, i thought my 6s charged slow
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:also AMD's endgame being propped up as an end run around intel's patents would be hilarious i wonder if intel voiding amd's x86 license would cost intel the rights to x86-64
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
I was driving in my coworkers BMW today and he has a qi charging pad in it. It was rad as hell. Also the seat had massage function and in retrospect that was better.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 01:05
|
|
|
qirex posted:these are apple's first quick-charge capable phones iirc, you need a good charger for that to work You would think the phone's internal charging circuit would um, take care of that if it had any sort of engineering behind it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
emoji posted:if it had any sort of engineering behind it. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 04:46
|
|
|
now we know why apple are in a rush to suddenly push inductive charging
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 12:30
|
|
|
apple is a linux https://github.com/apple/darwin-xnu
Linguica fucked around with this message at 22:01 on Sep 30, 2017 |
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:i wonder if intel voiding amd's x86 license would cost intel the rights to x86-64 supposedly that's the suicide pact they've made
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 22:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 02:44 |
|
|
Linguica posted:apple is a linux https://github.com/apple/darwin-xnu xnu was always open sourced. they just added the ARM code to the public repo now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 22:08
|
|