|
BigDave posted:Damnit, who turned on auto-subscribe for hurricanes?! This year's got two in the chest, one in the head, and one in the balls for good measure. I mean it's no 2005 season but houston ain't even dry, miami is probably never unflooding, we still haven't found the keys, puerto rico is a loving humanitarian disaster in the making, and now there's a hurricane eyeballing new orleans like a spring breaker who just realized they can't afford Cabo.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 16:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 17:20 |
|
It's going to nail my favourite vacation spot, Cozumel too. They got hosed up real bad like 10 years ago when a hurricane sat outside the island for days. There are still some abandoned buildings there last time I was there (3 years ago?)
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 16:59 |
|
Who gets fired today?
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 17:19 |
|
Might not be anybody fired, Donnie Dumbfuck's current carnival barker act is to talk about military people, say this is the calm before the storm, then "we'll see" in response to everyone saying "what the gently caress?" so he can have better ratings over the break.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 17:22 |
|
Pesticide20 posted:Who gets fired today? Louis W. Uccellini, for causing all these hurricanes.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 17:25 |
|
BigDave posted:It's not gonna be a huge recession but it's gonna be a ugly 18 months or so when it finally hits. Well it'll be well timed for 2020 I'd nothing else.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 17:27 |
|
Sorry for the Grant comparison. The only thing I remembered of his Presidency was the corrupt crony bullshit.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 17:29 |
|
Pesticide20 posted:Who gets fired today? Some chatter that Pompeo might be replacing Tillerson, but who knows because trying to figure out what's going on at the WH is dumber Kremlinology.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 17:34 |
Waroduce posted:The United States Navy is going to expand from approx 280 ships to around 325/50ish (i forget) and all of those contracts were signed under Obama, most around 2014. The Navy fell to 280 under Bush due to Republican budget cuts and sequester and all that bullshit. Trump is going to take that W for supporting our troops and expanding american power and he has dick all to do with it. This is the point SecNav Mabus kept making. He did a good interview on Pod Save the World this week where he said the same things again, but with emphasis and more making GBS threads on Orange.
|
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 17:48 |
I wonder if anyone actually likes Trump on a personal level
|
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 18:00 |
|
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:I wonder if anyone actually likes Trump on a personal level The nicest things I've ever heard anybody (not a pundit/politician) say about him was Pauly Shore stating in an interview that the only thing Donnie was interested in was slaying pussy.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 18:16 |
|
Pesticide20 posted:Who gets fired today? Birth control.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 18:25 |
|
bulletsponge13 posted:Sorry for the Grant comparison. The only thing I remembered of his Presidency was the corrupt crony bullshit. Harding would work better. Packed the cabinet with cronies or friends of friends, both his Interior Secratary and AG went to prison for taking bribes, had at least one affair that went public and lost the White House china in a poker game. About the only successful thing he did was die in office.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 19:02 |
|
AOL Instant Messenger https://help.aol.com/articles/aim-discontinued
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 19:02 |
|
Mike-o posted:AOL Instant Messenger https://help.aol.com/articles/aim-discontinued
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 19:03 |
|
RIP my last screen name, SkaBoy247, 1997-1999
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 19:15 |
|
Wtf is the difference between "not re-certifying" the Iran Deal and just getting rid of it completely? Probably the worst thing Donny Donny Donny is doing, either way.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 19:21 |
|
Mike-o posted:AOL Instant Messenger https://help.aol.com/articles/aim-discontinued Well where I am supposed to put this now? ╔═════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ════════════════╗ ~ ~ ~ Post this in your profile if ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ you are a beautiful strong black woman ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ who don’t need no man ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ╚═════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ════════════════╝
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 20:05 |
|
Handsome Ralph posted:Well where I am supposed to put this now? Twitter can support 280 characters now
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 20:10 |
|
Manning would probably love it #wecandoit 😎😍😁
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 20:12 |
|
Mike-o posted:AOL Instant Messenger https://help.aol.com/articles/aim-discontinued Some pretty drat impressive corporate speak in that announcement. quote:Why is AIM shutting down?
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 20:14 |
|
How does AOL even make money? Do people still have it in their monthly credit card bills?
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 20:15 |
|
Hot Karl Marx posted:How does AOL even make money? Do people still have it in their monthly credit card bills? My parents were paying AOL monthly up until fairly recently. They were afraid of having to change their @aol.com email accounts they've been using since the early 90s.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 20:19 |
|
Peetown Manning posted:Wtf is the difference between "not re-certifying" the Iran Deal and just getting rid of it completely? Punts it over to Congress, where they get to decided whether or not to reimpose the sanctions that were lifted under JPCOA. Tillerson, McMaster etc are apparently letting Trump have his way with the 'decertifying' bit but are working behind the scenes to get Congress to effectively preserve the deal by keeping the current sanctions status quo despite JPCOA going away. Bottom line is it all depends on Congress stepping in to be the adults in the room (), and the rest of the world ignoring Trump's circus shenanigans.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 20:23 |
|
Farewell sweet prince E: I feel like this final a closing of the book on our misspent youths deserves a round of buddy icon avatars shame on an IGA fucked around with this message at 20:36 on Oct 6, 2017 |
# ? Oct 6, 2017 20:32 |
|
What in the flying gently caress? https://twitter.com/MikeDelMoro/status/916381519643586561 I've never heard of any kind of attorney/justice meeting like this happening, though it could be standard-ish. What isn't standard is that the U.S. District Court in DC is basically the court that oversees immediate issues in the DC area, including the White House and Congress. Donnie usually gets crazier whenever Russia poo poo comes up, so could be a factor in his latest War Reality Show nonsense.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 21:07 |
|
Would this be part of the process for empaneling a new jury?
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 21:20 |
|
bird food bathtub posted:Some pretty drat impressive corporate speak in that announcement. That is not true. ICQ was from before them. edit : it's owned by mail.ru now
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 21:34 |
|
facialimpediment posted:What in the flying gently caress? "How do I go about arresting the entire Executive branch?"
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 21:38 |
|
What do they mean by unknown group of attorneys? Like just an unknown number of his posse of 16? Or literally new people they haven't seen previously involved?
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 21:40 |
|
How can there even be a chance of North Korea peacefully giving up it's nuclear weapons if the US reneges on the Iran deal? For all of Obama's foreign policy failures, the Iran Nuclear Deal really was the crowning foreign policy achievement, and it's a pretty good one. Iran gave up it's weapon's program and agreed to be put under the most intrusive weapons inspections regime in history. It's huge success, even though it's opponents try to use a lot of misleading statements and outright lies to cast it in a bad light. A little overview: The deal intentionally only covers Iran's nuclear weapons program. That's because there could have been no agreement otherwise, because either Iran, or Russia and China wouldn't have agreed to the deal/continue to place sanctions on Iran. For example, the deal initially should have included a ban on testing ballistic missiles, but Russia and China purposefully watered down the language of the deal, so that Iran is only "called on" not to test ballistic missiles. The Iranians can't violate the deal by continuing their missile tests, and that's by design. For that reason, Iranian activities in the Middle East, like supporting Assad, aren't violating the nuclear deal either. The sanctions regime only came into being because the Russians, Chinese and Europeans genuinely feared that Iran would get the bomb, other Iranian activities didn't convince them to place heavy sanctions on the Persians. And the sanctions regime would have collapsed if Iran agreed to limit it's nuclear program while the US insisted on including unrelated issues in the deal. And then there would have been no nuclear deal, and no limit on the Iranian weapons program. The fact that the deal has a sunset clause is also no problem as such. Treaties either have a withdrawal mechanism or a sunset clause, or both. NATO members are bound by the NATO treaties forever, unless they use the withdrawal mechanism and leave NATO. The USA and Russia are bound by arms reduction treaties, most (all?) of which have sunset clauses (like SORT would have run out on 31 December 2012, if it hadn't been superseded by New START). Iran can't withdraw from the Nuclear Deal, so the deal has a sunset clause. If everything works out alright, it will be renewed, perhaps after some revisions. But that's just a normal function of international treaties, not some evil way for Obama to grant Iran permission to develop nuclear weapons in 15 years or so. Iran has little trade with the USA, the EU sanctions especially were what brought them to the negotiation table. Without at least European and Chinese support, there's little the US can do to further hurt Iran economically. Of course, the US could sanction European and Chinese corporations and banks that do business with Iran, but that's very much a double edged sword. It would only compound the diplomatic problems that will be caused by breaking the Iran Nuclear Deal. There's no way that the other P5+1 powers would agree to renegotiate the deal, and there are some neocon demands that Iran simply cannot accept. Giving a known hostile power unlimited access to all your military installations to prove that there is no secret nuclear weapons program is an obvious non-starter. And negotiating with the USA as such is difficult to justify. In negotiations, both sides are supposed to get something. But what can the USA offer Iran in exchange for yet more restrictions on it? Relief from sanctions that Iran already paid for being abolished by joining the Nuclear Deal in the first place? Never mind that Trump has no chance to assemble the international coalition that supported Obama in creating the Nuclear Deal in the first place. This whole thing will be a huge foreign policy disaster, and it will definitely harm America's standing in the world and even reduce it's global power. And I suspect the only reason for this course of action is that Trump hates all things Obama and simply can't resist trashing Barack Obama's biggest foreign policy achievement.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 21:47 |
|
Torrannor posted:How can there even be a chance of North Korea peacefully giving up it's nuclear weapons if the US reneges on the Iran deal? Yes but have you considered....
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 21:52 |
|
You see the Iran deal was signed by Obama. Obama was bad. Ergo, the deal Obama signed was bad. This applies to everything everywhere, no matter what. OBAMA: Eat healthier! TRUMP: Drink bacon fat!
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 22:00 |
|
facialimpediment posted:What in the flying gently caress? The Chief judge oversees the grand juries and settles any disputes that come up, like whether a witness can assert a privilege, whether a subpoena (for person or documents) has to be honored, etc. DC District Court rules, page 59 posted:In addition to the trial of such cases as he/she may undertake and other duties provided by these Rules, the Chief Judge shall:
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 22:16 |
|
Hot Karl Marx posted:How does AOL even make money? Do people still have it in their monthly credit card bills? They own a poo poo ton of news websites. At this point they're really more of a holding company for media. But they also still offer their email and dialup service. My girlfriend's mom still has an AOL email account that she uses.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 22:30 |
|
joat mon posted:The Chief judge oversees the grand juries and settles any disputes that come up, like whether a witness can assert a privilege, whether a subpoena (for person or documents) has to be honored, etc. Alrighty, that makes a ton more sense as to what's going on, probably some type of Grand Jury dispute. No wonder the news feeds *aren't* going nuts about it. Thanks!
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 22:31 |
|
Torrannor posted:How can there even be a chance of North Korea peacefully giving up it's nuclear weapons if the US reneges on the Iran deal? They won't. From a geopolitical perspective they only need to look at the examples of Libya, Ukraine, and probably soon Iran to see what happens to countries who willingly give up their nuclear arsenal. Not that I'm saying North Korea is in the right, because quite frankly gently caress them. But if you are looking at it from the regime perspective, giving up your one deterrent to invasion when the U.S. can elect a moron like Trump who will tear up any "deal" you might have previously made is suicide.
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 22:31 |
My step dad still pays for an AOL subscription even though he has DSL from Windstream. AOL still makes millions off of dial up subscribers.
|
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 22:33 |
|
facialimpediment posted:Alrighty, that makes a ton more sense as to what's going on, probably some type of Grand Jury dispute. No wonder the news feeds *aren't* going nuts about it. Thanks! And not newsotainment worthy at all, because everything is under seal (p. 138)
|
# ? Oct 6, 2017 22:54 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 17:20 |
|
Ralphie May died. He was 45
|
# ? Oct 7, 2017 00:00 |