|
TheAgent posted:like I have no idea how 3.0 is right now have you factored they said he couldn't do it BUT HE DID IT in your assessment that the video game is a bad?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:11 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 11:41 |
|
The version number is 3.0, but how do the actual features compare with what they promised a year ago? It's not even close is it?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:13 |
|
I think you'll find imaginary triumph and spite makes even the shittiest poorly managed project into something very special and a good use of those thousands I didn't need anyway
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:15 |
Man it's almost like having an NDA on something as stupid as a pre-release patch for a pre-release game opens up a huge empty void for people to speculate in and nobody actually knows what the gently caress is going on, huh guys?
|
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:16 |
|
Meanwhile, in Cambridge.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVnk3yT2Lgo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qSX0kkUbgU
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:16 |
|
Dante80 posted:Meanwhile, in Cambridge.. Fairly impressive how they were able to obtain dinosaurs and mocap them.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:22 |
|
Colostomy Bag posted:Fairly impressive how they were able to obtain dinosaurs and mocap them. Sandi has been on worse roles in the past.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:23 |
|
Should've just bought the rights to Aurora and slapped a visualizer over it.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:26 |
|
Dante80 posted:Meanwhile, in Cambridge.. That's gorgeous, but not enough feathers
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:27 |
|
Toops posted:Did you play D:OS1? If so, is there anything in the game mechanics in 2 that differentiates? D:OS1 was a good game, D:OS2 feels like a pretty notable improvement across the board. I can't believe that when I finally catch up my first post is about a different game and the thread is facing down the full force of the goon conquering 3.0. I guess the thread will die as it lived... rubbing.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:30 |
|
Dante80 posted:Sandi has been on worse roles in the past.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:32 |
|
tooterfish posted:She's been the cleverest girl since she was a little girl. shoot her imo
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:34 |
|
please don't shoot endangered species, cloned or otherwise
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:36 |
|
AlbieQuirky posted:That's gorgeous, but not enough feathers I brought it up in stream and was told that their IP forced them to do that since they have to have everything look like the movies. So Jurassic Park the movie needs to get with the times first and stop depicting on the big screen fake looking dinosaurs that never existed as shown.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:38 |
|
Enchanted Hat posted:lol, subtle work there, CIG Because people are still viewing it as a "game in development". It's not though. It's a "money making vehicle". The more it looks like all your dreams are coming true, and the more reality of what it really is they can obfuscate, the more money they make. I have no doubt there are people buying it probably daily and saying "how do I start Squadron 42? I don't see the menu option for it" and "how do I customize my character?" These deluded buyers are still supporting CIG because they've been fooled into thinking the product is significantly further along than it really is. I'm hoping there's some quality 3.0 stuff to prove me wrong; but I doubt it.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:38 |
|
New leak from the guy who leaked the other stuff. Looks like he's successfully removed the watermark with a neato filter as well as blurred the names. This leads me to believe we should expect more/longer leaks in the future. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-wMcs-2lbQ
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:46 |
|
thatguy posted:New leak from the guy who leaked the other stuff. Looks like he's successfully removed the watermark with a neato filter as well as blurred the names. This leads me to believe we should expect more/longer leaks in the future.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:47 |
|
tooterfish posted:Looks amazing. Definitely well worth the 2 years of dev time.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:48 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Derek, baby: you originally said 3.0 didn't exist, couldn't exist. And yet, it's out to a testing group and soon the whole pop. Whyyyyyy should anyone believe any of the drivel that you spew? You sure are worked up with all the "poo poo stains" and "loving projects" and "loving deads" that you're throwing around. Uhm, you realize that the 3.0 which is currently out has nearly nothing to do with what was advertised one year ago. At least I hope so... did you miss the gorf effort-poster? Seems like you did. You want 3.0? I can get you a 3.0, believe me. There are ways, Toast. You don't wanna know about it, believe me. Hell, I can get you 3.0 by 3 o'clock this afternoon... without any polish. These loving amateurs... drluv fucked around with this message at 19:00 on Oct 9, 2017 |
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:56 |
|
thatguy posted:New leak from the guy who leaked the other stuff. Looks like he's successfully removed the watermark with a neato filter as well as blurred the names. This leads me to believe we should expect more/longer leaks in the future. Oh no! It's 3dfx Voodoo II all over again.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:57 |
|
thatguy posted:New leak from the guy who leaked the other stuff. Looks like he's successfully removed the watermark with a neato filter as well as blurred the names. This leads me to believe we should expect more/longer leaks in the future.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:57 |
|
thatguy posted:New leak from the guy who leaked the other stuff. Looks like he's successfully removed the watermark with a neato filter as well as blurred the names. This leads me to believe we should expect more/longer leaks in the future. this should not be happening this far into development it means they need a serious rewrite of their physics, collisions and god knows what else fuckin lol
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 18:58 |
|
thatguy posted:New leak from the guy who leaked the other stuff. Looks like he's successfully removed the watermark with a neato filter as well as blurred the names. This leads me to believe we should expect more/longer leaks in the future. Parp.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:08 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Derek, baby: you originally said 3.0 didn't exist, couldn't exist. And yet, it's out to a testing group and soon the whole pop. Whyyyyyy should anyone believe any of the drivel that you spew? You sure are worked up with all the "poo poo stains" and "loving projects" and "loving deads" that you're throwing around. When's 3.1 out with all the stuff missing from 3.0?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:09 |
|
thatguy posted:New leak from the guy who leaked the other stuff. Looks like he's successfully removed the watermark with a neato filter as well as blurred the names. This leads me to believe we should expect more/longer leaks in the future. lmfao Gitches into the grid...which I can somewhat understand...but the last few seconds...bwahahaha.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:10 |
|
I don't think I made it clear -- in that 1 minute video there's at least 3 massively fuckin huge problems they need to address, and since we've seen variants of those same bugs since project inception, I'm guessing it will take at least six months to about two years to fix without adding additional content just those problems. just those 3 fuckin problems like how can anyone see that and think "wow they ahve this nailed down! this is going to be awesome!" no its poo poo. its going to remain poo poo. enjoy your poo poo.0
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:10 |
|
TheAgent posted:I don't think I made it clear -- in that 1 minute video there's at least 3 massively fuckin huge problems they need to address, and since we've seen variants of those same bugs since project inception, I'm guessing it will take at least six months to about two years to fix without adding additional content 4.0, which is developed in parallel with 3.0, will fix it
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:12 |
|
A person who got super secret access to a publicly funded alpha that is made proudly with 'open development' but only shown to a select few makes a video and has to use video editing software to remove a watermark from it and blur his name to remain anonymous. The video shows the culmination of over half a decade and $160 million worth of work carried out by 400 people. In the video a space bike jitters wildly and flickers into view. Over 25% of the 1 minute long video is glitches. The rest looks remarkable in how dull it is. This is it, this is Star Citizen.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:13 |
|
The amazing thing it happens with how many on at the same time?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:13 |
|
when your spacebike glitches through the hull, sending you out at 12km/second and then the server crashes and you log back on to find yourself in the middle of nowhere but now you can't suicide because of persistence or something and the super harsh death penalty you call for a pickup from your friend but he's not online so you have to hound him via text to come get you and after 2 hours his ship is finally there and while trying to enter the same loving thing happens and you go whizzing off deeper into the black and then you go gently caress YOU DEREK SMART and pledge more because its obviously derek smart doing this to you, its always been derek smart because it has to be, it has to be, chris roberts said it was going to be everything and more and more and its fuckin perfect and and and derek derek dereks HUGE COCK gently caress
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:15 |
|
lol at the end you don't even hear collision sounds e: or is it open space without forcefields?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:18 |
|
AlbieQuirky posted:That's gorgeous, but not enough feathers I'm glad they weren't tricked by the liberal media into making dinos into lame birds
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:19 |
|
TheAgent posted:it means they need a serious rewrite of Fixed.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:21 |
|
I'm amazed CIG's AAAQA team didn't catch that bug.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:25 |
|
thatguy posted:New leak from the guy who leaked the other stuff. Looks like he's successfully removed the watermark with a neato filter as well as blurred the names. This leads me to believe we should expect more/longer leaks in the future.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:25 |
|
collision detection is the last part of game development right after private servers
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:35 |
|
Colostomy Bag posted:I'm amazed CIG's AAAQA team didn't catch that bug. They did, but it was reduced in priority after someone extrapolated the actual release date of 3.0 from the burndown chart
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:37 |
|
peter gabriel posted:A person who got super secret access to a publicly funded alpha that is made proudly with 'open development' but only shown to a select few makes a video and has to use video editing software to remove a watermark from it and blur his name to remain anonymous. buy more ships
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:39 |
|
TheAgent posted:Like how can anyone see that and think "wow they ahve this nailed down! this is going to be awesome!" Same reason movies like Jupiter Ascending keep getting made- people have been using visual quality as an easy metric for actual production value. If it looks pretty, it must be good. Chris Roberts also subscribes to this philosophy. That's it, that's the secret of Star Citizen's success.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:39 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 11:41 |
|
cig could just add in cartoon sound effects to the game like its a blooper reel and I think it could pull the whole product together into a modest goat sim knockoff
|
# ? Oct 9, 2017 19:41 |