|
the Russians used a pencil
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 03:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:24 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgBH_UoTu_U movies going to suck becuase raised black levels and not shot in 8k
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
what is a DIP that one guy with a lisp in the sony video was called a DIP, were they making fun of him?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 05:00
|
|
|
pagancow posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgBH_UoTu_U have there been any major films released which were shot and mastered in 8K?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 05:33
|
|
|
all stories are 8k when you read a book read a book, friends
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 05:38
|
|
|
Displeased Moo Cow posted:all stories are 8k when you read a book kindle has a resolution of 1440 x 1080. checkmate athiest
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 05:43
|
|
|
I will be viewing the new Star Wars film in retina searing Dolby Cinema. Thanks and G-d bless.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 07:29
|
|
|
Jimmy Carter posted:have there been any major films released which were shot and mastered in 8K? poo poo, star wars episode 3 (and possibly episode 2 as well, i forget) were shot with 1080p cameras
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 12:50
|
|
|
to be fair to them, those were the top digital cinema cameras in existence at the time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 13:01
|
|
|
univbee posted:poo poo, star wars episode 3 (and possibly episode 2 as well, i forget) were shot with 1080p cameras  edit: actually since the movie was shot onto HDCAM cassettes it's even worse quote:Each D11 source frame is composed of a luminance channel at 1920 x 1080 pixels and a chrominance channel at 960 x 1080 pixels. During compression, each frame's luminance channel is subsampled at 1440 x 1080, while the chrominance channel is subsampled at 480 x 1080. Linguica fucked around with this message at 15:27 on Oct 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 15:22
|
|
|
pagancow posted:
ban this racist filth!!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 15:24
|
|
|
josh04 posted:to be fair to them, those were the top digital cinema cameras in existence at the time. it was a terrible loving idea, they should have just shot on film. Then they could milk 4k and 8k remasters for years.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 15:44
|
|
|
Wheany posted:kindle has a resolution of 1440 x 1080. checkmate athiest
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 15:47
|
|
|
wasn't 28 days later shot on minidv
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 15:52
|
|
|
yes and it looked like dog poo poo smeared on the floor
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 16:02
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:it was a terrible loving idea, they should have just shot on film. Then they could milk 4k and 8k remasters for years. 99% of the frame is cg bullshit anyway so it can just be rerendered
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
i cannot wait for the screaming hamster in the star war
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
i have preordered the plush
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 16:48
|
|
|
Guardians of the Galaxy 2 was shot in 8K but VFX and mastering were at 2K
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
BONGHITZ posted:i cannot wait for the screaming hamster in the star war Looks like some kinda hosed up penguin
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 16:53
|
|
|
AtomD posted:wasn't 28 days later shot on minidv and did any other movies get shot on miniDV after that?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
pagancow posted:and did any other movies get shot on miniDV after that? was takeshi miike's "dysfunctional incestuous family brought together by necrophilia" masterpiece visitor q before or after that?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
pagancow posted:and did any other movies get shot on miniDV after that? all three hours of Inland Empire
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
i hear peter jackson shot the hobbit on gopros, but I've never seen the movie
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nM7byUTrSZA lmao at this
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
The barrel scene was very bad The GoPro footage is very jarring The Hobbit movies are absolutely awful
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
so was that a million dollars a minute? and do they not have cinema-grade gopro equivalents that cost at least a few grand but shoot less shittily? or do they and peter jackson decided to cheap out?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
go professionally
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2017 23:21
|
|
|
The answer is, as always, Sony has a random model for you https://www.sony.com/electronics/cyber-shot-compact-cameras/dsc-rx0
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
holy poo poo is that what that movie looked like? what loving garbage
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 05:54
|
|
|
a garbage look for a garbage movie
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 06:21
|
|
|
Peter Jackson is a hack
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 07:50
|
|
|
that's Sir Peter Jackson to you, pleb
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 10:15
|
|
|
AtomD posted:wasn't 28 days later shot on minidv it was shot on dvcpro50 which is 422 so it doesnt look that bad, i remember at the time i actually liked the style just cause it was ~different~ so if someone says the bluray of that movie is useless you can not only say the ending was shot on 35mm but also... the dvd has loving chroma subsampling!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 11:53
|
|
|
nah dude it looked like that pic where a dog has a poo poo-crusted tapeworm hanging out it’s rear end. it was a good movie but shooting it on video was a mistake.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 15:20
|
|
|
what was the budget per finished minute?
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
if no-one made films with the bad digital cameras which were available at the time, it's hard to see where the drive towards decent quality digital cameras would have come from.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 15:35
|
|
|
meh I got the impression at the time that people in those days were doing it to ~Rebel Against The Hollywood System~. almost like a Dogme 95 thing but video instead of 35mm film. circa 2005 i went to a film festival where the head guy was all “We’ve got people sending in submissions shot on DIGITAL VIDEO!” like it was some big DiGiTaL ReVoLuTiOn thing, and not because it was cheaper and because a lot of newbie independents were lazy babies that whined shooting on film was So HardTM. there were a bunch of wannabes around that time who called themselves poo poo like Digital Filmmakers because they were totally Rebels and Revolutionaries and not just idiots without the budget to afford 35mm. IIRC and IMHO digital movie cameras didn’t start to not suck until they started making them try to be more than just high end video cameras. which started happening around the time the Panavision Genesis, Red One, etc. started to get on the scene. Doc Block fucked around with this message at 18:06 on Oct 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 16:03
|
|
|
Wheany posted:what was the budget per finished minute? $70796 according to my extensively researched wikipedia calculations
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 18:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:24 |
|
|
Doc Block posted:I got the impression at the time that people in those days were doing it to ~Rebel Against The Hollywood System~. almost like a Dogme 95 thing but video instead of 35mm film. i would imagine that a significant chunk of blair witch being shot on hi-8 and still making a mountain of money had something to do with it
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2017 18:44
|
|
