|
I'm at a playground with my kid presently. I'll see how gross it is when I get home. It's going to have food detritus on it so in before "lol he jerked off on it".
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 12:35 |
|
|
I'm sure glad I didn't send you the clone a willy statue of my dong for secret santa that I had planned.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:
joat mon fucked around with this message at 18:18 on Oct 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:I received a letter in the mail from famed traffic ticket attorney and thread untermensch Blarzgh today. The letter contained my drivers license, which I lost in his local courthouse. Thank you for the good deed, blarzgh. hahah
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 18:20
|
|
|
Here it is:
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 19:50
|
|
|
o7
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 19:59
|
|
|
Newfie posted:I went to Albert with a team that could not compete because one of our teammates hosed up their part of the written submissions so badly we had a 15/100 point penalty going in. The Jessup usually comes down to a couple point spread. Met some cool Vancouver lawyers who I still talk to though What the gently caress was your coach doing?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:Here it is:
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Don't go to law school. It's really boring.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Jaded Burnout posted:Don't go to law school. It's really boring. That was quick
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
Well, it vacillates constantly between very interesting and tremendously boring. When issues of the Harvard Law Review from the 1800s are the most modern documents you've read all week by half a millennium, you know you're in for a fun ride. I'm used to "old" RFCs from the 1980s, not the 1380s.
Jaded Burnout fucked around with this message at 22:10 on Oct 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:07
|
|
|
Jaded Burnout posted:Well, it vacillates constantly between very interesting and tremendously boring. When issues of the Harvard Law Review from the 1800s are the most modern documents you've read all week by half a millennium, you know you're in for a fun ride. Huh, I guess there are benefits to my legal system being 25 years old after all
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:09
|
|
|
Jaded Burnout posted:Well, it vacillates constantly between very interesting and tremendously boring. When issues of the Harvard Law Review from the 1800s are the most modern documents you've read all week by half a millennium, you know you're in for a fun ride. I'm used to "old" RFCs from the 1980s, not the 1380s. Isn't it exciting though, to be part of a historic field of study that's been part of human civilization since the Roman Empire? Aren't you excited to develop the finest, most acute grasp of jurisprudential skill? Be the finest of legal minds?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:14
|
|
|
Aren't you excited for the possibility of working all of saturday evening for some pissant, ungrateful moron of a client who couldn't reason his way out of a sovereign citizen's argument, much less devote rational thought towards not loving up his life and your job by making idiotic decisions and making unreasonable demands on your time, patience, moral code and ethical conduct to accomplish absolutely nothing worthwhile or even morally right? Because if the answer is yes, then boy do we not have any jobs for you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:18
|
|
|
Nice piece of fish posted:Aren't you excited for the possibility of working all of saturday evening for some pissant, ungrateful moron of a client who couldn't reason his way out of a sovereign citizen's argument, much less devote rational thought towards not loving up his life and your job by making idiotic decisions and making unreasonable demands on your time, patience, moral code and ethical conduct to accomplish absolutely nothing worthwhile or even morally right? Sorry for a moment I thought I was reading the Working in IT thread. Edit: as for the other bit, I don't find anything exciting anymore, if that helps.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:24
|
|
|
Jaded Burnout posted:Sorry for a moment I thought I was reading the Working in IT thread. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
 E: 
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
It is risible, risible indeed, that one would need to master ancient legal concepts in order to check punctuation and decimals in a 47 page contract. Or to argue for less child support and alimony for your deadbeat client who lost his fifth job this year.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
Yep. In a similar vein I can run two's complement on paper and can explain the historical origins of ASCII and EBCDIC or Berkeley and AT&T unix, but I spend most of my day nagging juniors about indentation or paging through thousands of lines of code to find a missing comma.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Don't worry. Both of those things will be completely automated within the next five years. You won't have work doing either! So at least there's that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:41
|
|
|
They're automated now, and yet.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 22:49
|
|
|
And yet, you went into a field even more arcane for no particular reason.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Law school was fun. Doing my tax llm was fun because I spent the year watching hockey instead of studying. Being a lawyer is still terrible because you have to spend your day with lawyers.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:It is risible, risible indeed, that one would need to master ancient legal concepts in order to check punctuation and decimals in a 47 page contract. Or to argue for less child support and alimony for your deadbeat client who lost his fifth job this year. Lol if you don't argue the nuances of the Erie Doctrine during an argument about child support.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:And yet, you went into a field even more arcane for no particular reason. I do love me some learnin'
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 03:24
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:It is risible, risible indeed, that one would need to master ancient legal concepts in order to check punctuation and decimals in a 47 page contract. Or to argue for less child support and alimony for your deadbeat client who lost his fifth job this year. Wisible? He has a wife, you know. Do you know what she's called?
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 13:55
|
|
|
Check out the affidavit sworn by one of papa bears victims. Pretty normal, nothing to see here, totally innocent man here https://t.co/rGdVIF3SDD
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 14:13
|
|
|
Definitely not something signed after a seven or eight figure settlement agreement was reached.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 14:48
|
|
|
I would not make those allegations again, because the settlement agreement that paid me $32 million contractually forbids me to
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 15:46
|
|
|
Fwiw, I too am willing to have no claims against anyone for the small sum of $32,000,000.00.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 20:11
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Wisible? He has a wife, you know. Do you know what she's called? I think Woger should be wequiwed to weply.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
nm posted:Fwiw, I too am willing to have no claims against anyone for the small sum of $32,000,000.00. I’d be willing to be sexually harassed for 3.2 million.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
Roger_Mudd posted:I’d be willing to be sexually harassed for 3.2 million. What a cheap whore you are!
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 02:00
|
|
|
.
Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 03:54 on Jul 13, 2021 |
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 02:51
|
|
|
Alexeythegreat posted:What the gently caress was your coach doing? A lot of yelling, but by the time he stepped in to correct things we were too far gone. The teammate was able to feign competency for the first two practices which I think threw off the scent. When we got to start of crunch time another teammate had to finish the work for them so we actually submitted something. Long story short, don't agree to do a moot till you know the entire team makeup.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 03:44
|
|
|
Roger_Mudd posted:I’d be willing to be sexually harassed for 3.2 million. I'd do it for $32.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 04:04
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:Here it is: Missed the opportunity to label it "Exhibit D"
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 17:00
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:I trashed it because it made me have feelings I'm not comfortable with. Now I know how Toona's ex-wife/wife feels. Oh nevermind you did the thing. Redeemed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 18:53
|
|
|
CellBlock posted:Missed the opportunity to label it "Exhibit D" Too much gold in one post would cause inflation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 12:35 |
|
|
Odd question: we have anyone ergo practices in El Paso, Texas on these dead non-binary forums?
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2017 01:46
|
|