|
NorgLyle posted:I want anyone who doesn't feel like clicking the link to realize that this: That looks nice? Like if you told me it was steak I'd ask why you'd overcooked it, but if they're presenting it as a new food product it looks tasty voiceless anal fricative has a new favorite as of 23:58 on Oct 22, 2017 |
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 06:48 |
|
|
Yeah, just looks like beef done in a crockpot or something. I would ask why you chose to serve it on a shiso leaf with exactly 4 peas and a sprig of microgreens.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
They're very important peas.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
Ibblebibble posted:
More like two great tastes that taste great together
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
bike tory posted:That looks nice? Like if you told me it was steak I'd ask why you'd overcooked it, but if they're presenting it as a new food product it looks tasty angerbeet posted:Yeah, just looks like beef done in a crockpot or something.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
NorgLyle posted:Man, if you think synthetic diamonds got done dirty by the creepy colonialist weirdos who run the diamond market just wait until you see what Smithfield rolls out the first time someone tries to market the first styrofoam tray of lab-grown sausage. You'll see more 'concerned' 'mothers' on TV talking about Frankenfoods and it will be another example of the capitalist ruling class laughing themselves to the bank while they harness the hilarious ignorance of the greens. The moment that producing a pound of lab-slab beef is cheaper than from a cow it's over. All the time, cost and energy in turning cows into beef just being undone by growing it in a lab somewhere. Imagine you are a restaurant, or a food service place. People don't give a hot poo poo about nutrition in those places and you are going to try to drum up concern if their tendies are 'real' meat or not? Cost crushes all and even if there was some sort of beef De Beers.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 00:47
|
|
|
NorgLyle posted:If you ordered steak and that was what the kitchen sent out (and remember, it's supposed to be steak; that's the entire premise of the article) and you ate without complaint... I mean... I guess that's your choice? But it doesn't look like good steak and it doesn't, to me, look particularly appetizing. It looks like, uh, old roast beef. In no way steak-like. I have to agree fully with you there.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
NorgLyle posted:If you ordered steak and that was what the kitchen sent out (and remember, it's supposed to be steak; that's the entire premise of the article) and you ate without complaint... I mean... I guess that's your choice? But it doesn't look like good steak and it doesn't, to me, look particularly appetizing. Steak doesn't usually chunk apart in big flakes
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
NorgLyle posted:I want anyone who doesn't feel like clicking the link to realize that this: If they marketed this as shortribs I'd be convinced.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 01:49
|
|
|
If they would just market it honestly, it would be fine. Plant based meat replacement. Not "a steak" or "brisket" or "short ribs". I mean, come up with a new name that's a little catchier, but stop selling poo poo like this as something it's not, pretending the whole way. Make it it's own thing!
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 02:18
|
|
|
That looks like cat food, straight up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 02:20
|
|
|
I would be ok with bad looking meat if they got the taste right and it wasn't full of bad poo poo like pet food standards.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 02:34
|
|
|
What's with the article they linked saying meat causes cancer? Given who linked it, I assume it's fake or incredibly misinterpreted so they can spread their own message.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 02:51
|
|
|
Admiral Joeslop posted:What's with the article they linked saying meat causes cancer? Given who linked it, I assume it's fake or incredibly misinterpreted so they can spread their own message. https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/world-health-organization-says-processed-meat-causes-cancer.html It turns out that eating a moderate amount of processed meat every day, such as hotdogs or bacon, raises your risk of colorectal cancer by 18%. For comparison, smoking raises your chance of getting lung cancer by around 2300%. Ziv Zulander has a new favorite as of 03:05 on Oct 23, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 03:02
|
|
|
Admiral Joeslop posted:What's with the article they linked saying meat causes cancer? Given who linked it, I assume it's fake or incredibly misinterpreted so they can spread their own message. Everything causes cancer eventually.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
quote:Overall, the lifetime risk of someone developing colon cancer is 5%. To put the numbers into perspective, the increased risk from eating the amount of processed meat in the study would raise average lifetime risk to almost 6%. Yup, there it is. You don't suddenly have an 18% chance of cancer, your already low chance is increased by 18% of that number. I hate science liars.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
Admiral Joeslop posted:What's with the article they linked saying meat causes cancer? Given who linked it, I assume it's fake or incredibly misinterpreted so they can spread their own message. Like almost every "normal thing causes cancer" study, there's some evidence for it under extremely specific circumstances that can be created in laboratory research but don't really exist.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
pft, next they are going to come out with a study saying that drinking a liter of whisky a day causes cancer.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/maullarmaullar/status/922297374440960000
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
NorgLyle posted:I want anyone who doesn't feel like clicking the link to realize that this: I like how they're so far removed from normal cuisine that they think that steak is just a solid mass of protein, without any fat. e: content dump          "Chicken fried bacon" PubicMice has a new favorite as of 05:58 on Oct 23, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 05:49
|
|
|
I'd try the plant steak. But I wouldn't pay for it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 05:53
|
|
|
It's better than spiders.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 05:58
|
|
|
Picnic Princess posted:It's better than spiders. So, how's it feel to be SOOOOO wrong? And a shill for Big Spider too?
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 07:11
|
|
|
Someone learned not to put melamine plates in the microwave
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 07:41
|
|
|
idk what melamine plates are but it sucks to know that there's a lovely brand of plates that I won't know not to put in the microwave until it's too late
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 08:04
|
|
|
I.C. posted:That looks like cat food, straight up. Looks like stroganoff to me? Maybe add some mushrooms or veggies, but there's nothing majorly wrong with it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 08:32
|
|
|
g0lbez posted:idk what melamine plates are but it sucks to know that there's a lovely brand of plates that I won't know not to put in the microwave until it's too late It's not a brand, it is a material that can be formed into a resin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melamine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melamine_resin
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 08:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 08:52
|
|
|
w-w-would
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 08:58
|
|
|
this is art
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 09:36
|
|
|
NorgLyle posted:I want anyone who doesn't feel like clicking the link to realize that this: I hope someone uses the tech to make more realistic chicken nuggets. I hate spongy meat. Meanwhile, it's nice to know some one is getting use out of meh.coms ton of candy corn they're still trying to offload every other day.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 10:01
|
|
|
I've made sous vided apples before, and they were amazing. Bananas are good too, right? I'll add some bananas with the apples and cinnamon. I forgot what temp I'd cooked the apples at, so I tried 75. It's like 13 degrees hotter than the chicken was!  I made 2 perfectly good apples into completely inedible hot uncooked apples in dissolved banana slime.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 11:21
|
|
|
PubicMice posted:I like how they're so far removed from normal cuisine that they think that steak is just a solid mass of protein, without any fat. This person has their sexy wrong.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 11:36
|
|
|
What is that...meat triangle?
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 12:09
|
|
|
Why do people keep saying that the fake meat will be somehow more hygienic then regular meat? Still going to be made in a processing plant with plenty of opportunity for horror.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 12:36
|
|
|
It shouldn't have parasites though. Meat triangle looks like a side of something with the fat on the outside but was possibly vomited on before putting it in the oven. If I had to guess it's pork joint.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 12:45
|
|
|
bongwizzard posted:Why do people keep saying that the fake meat will be somehow more hygienic then regular meat? Still going to be made in a processing plant with plenty of opportunity for horror. Because they need an argument to sway people who don't believe that slaughtering animals for consumption is inhumane. Thus: "It's filthy!" I did a longform piece on a local pork plant as a midterm project when I was studying broadcasting years ago. Looked like a normal production facility--everyone was wearing PPE, tools and work surfaces were sterilized regularly, and the company's rules for personal hygiene were being enforced (hairnets on facial hair, etc.). The inputs were sterilized at least three different ways before the first cut was even made. All in all, it looked more than fine to me. Of course, they're not all going to be like that, but PETA and the like want you to immediately think of those grainy "hidden camera" films from the 1960s where there's blood all over the floor and nobody is wearing gloves and people are sneezing into product containers and poo poo. Fake edit: Maccarony Chease test run went surprisingly well this weekend, so I'll set aside time to whip up the real deal this week (waiting on a delivery before I can start). I was originally going to do a joke write-up where I screwed up the ingredients and instructions in general but I got to thinking about it and decided it would be a neato experience to try to actually make it the way someone would've back then.
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 13:07
|
|
|
"'Sheets of cultivated muscle tissue don't have colons' is a PETA vegan conspiracy. Besides, I did an ocular patdown of the butchering facility and it seemed OK"
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 13:49
|
|
|
A HUNGRY MOUTH posted:"'Sheets of cultivated muscle tissue don't have colons' is a PETA vegan conspiracy. Besides, I did an ocular patdown of the butchering facility and it seemed OK" This is a great post. It's like you took everything he said and condensed it for us to laugh at more! 
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 14:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 06:48 |
|
|
You've just messily slaughtered my lovely post, contaminating the entire thread!! Oh no!! e: you're right A HUNGRY MOUTH has a new favorite as of 14:37 on Oct 23, 2017 |
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2017 14:25
|
|