|
its me. I'm the Goon. snipe
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 09:23 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 02:00 |
|
Codeacious posted:I'm in a few SA discords and play stuff with Goons, who encouraged me to register here
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 09:24 |
|
great success ive finally found what I always wanted and using ffmpeg to convert an image sequence directly into a x264 mp4 and then upload that, and skip using gifs as an interim and killing my colour depth holla
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 09:26 |
|
Yeah pretty much
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 09:26 |
|
bump_fn posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuNRzo9REH8 quote:Consumption of male ejaculate is fine, but not female, and although acts implying strangulation or choking are banned, videos showing women gagging on erect penises are apparently OK. Some critics say many of the rules constitute an attack on female sexuality. clearly breaching UK pornography laws
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 09:52 |
|
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 09:53 |
|
this rules reminds me of this guys stuff https://www.flickr.com/photos/move_lachine/
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 10:01 |
|
echinopsis posted:great success ive finally found what I always wanted oh jeez dude, you should've asked lmao
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 10:02 |
|
echinopsis posted:heh i found this. the detail on the mountina when you look is good
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 11:09 |
|
i am eb developer
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 12:01 |
|
https://twitter.com/scunnytrader/status/922417657609183232
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 12:15 |
|
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 12:17 |
|
How.... four times??
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 12:43 |
|
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 13:02 |
|
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 13:12 |
|
idgi
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 13:45 |
|
prefect posted:idgi It's you
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 13:47 |
|
the real one is just as absurd
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 14:29 |
|
Cat Face Joe posted:the real one is just as absurd It's good.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 14:30 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:It's good.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 14:36 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:It's good. https://twitter.com/dasharez0ne/status/921466821307523074
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 14:37 |
|
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 15:04 |
|
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 15:12 |
|
Why is Amtrak subject to FOIA requests?
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 15:39 |
|
akadajet posted:Why is Amtrak subject to FOIA requests? it's this weird quasi-government agency / for profit corp hybrid because reasons
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 16:09 |
|
https://twitter.com/gantaikid/status/921628209463959552
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 16:19 |
|
I have never understood why she sounds like a mountain lion being pulled into a jet engine when she does it
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 16:30 |
|
theflyingorc posted:I have never understood why she sounds like a mountain lion being pulled into a jet engine when she does it that's because you've never had T H E S U C C
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 17:39 |
|
theflyingorc posted:I have never understood why she sounds like a mountain lion being pulled into a jet engine when she does it yeah i dont understand why she sounds like your mom either
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 17:43 |
|
theflyingorc posted:I have never understood why she sounds like a mountain lion being pulled into a jet engine when she does it she's got a throat mic on so it picks up the normal slobbery throat sounds at greatly increased volume, which is why it sounds like a bathtub of honey being vacuumed up mods please rename me SLOBBERY THROAT SOUNDS
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:11 |
|
Agile Vector posted:yeah i dont understand why she sounds like your mom either dang, not bad
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:13 |
|
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:15 |
|
what sort of case was this that it merited a 138-page judgment to begin with
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:21 |
|
Agile Vector posted:yeah i dont understand why she sounds like your mom either
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:22 |
|
Sombrerotron posted:what sort of case was this that it merited a 138-page judgment to begin with Wagga Wagga
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:24 |
|
Sombrerotron posted:what sort of case was this that it merited a 138-page judgment to begin with No. No, there is no explanation to be had as to why Judge Garry Nielson insisted on reading his 138-page opinion aloud in court, a performance that apparently consumed 17 hours over a four-day period in May 2016. This occurred, as shown in the excerpt above, in Wagga Wagga at the Wagga Wagga Courthouse, which is not far from the Gobbagombalin Bridge over the Murrumbidgee River. Obviously, that’s in Australia. Nor is there any explanation as to why it required 138 pages to resolve a case in which the main issue was whether someone falling off a horse involved a “motor accident.” To be fair, the issue was more complicated than that makes it sound, because the injured party claimed that his horse had been spooked by a car. For purposes of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999: “motor accident” means an incident or accident involving the use or operation of a motor vehicle that causes the death of or injury to a person where the death or injury is a result of and is caused (whether or not as a result of a defect in the vehicle) during: (a) the driving of the vehicle, or (b) a collision, or action taken to avoid a collision, with the vehicle, or (c) the vehicle’s running out of control, or (d) a dangerous situation caused by the driving of the vehicle, a collision or action taken to avoid a collision with the vehicle, or the vehicle’s running out of control. If that was a “motor accident” under the MACA, then the plaintiff could recover damages; if it wasn’t, he couldn’t.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:25 |
|
why would a person with cast iron job security not use said job security to occasionally troll the gently caress out of some noobs
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:28 |
|
prefect posted:No. No, there is no explanation to be had as to why Judge Garry Nielson insisted on reading his 138-page opinion aloud in court, a performance that apparently consumed 17 hours over a four-day period in May 2016. This occurred, as shown in the excerpt above, in Wagga Wagga at the Wagga Wagga Courthouse, which is not far from the Gobbagombalin Bridge over the Murrumbidgee River. quote:Nor is there any explanation as to why it required 138 pages to resolve a case in which the main issue was whether someone falling off a horse involved a “motor accident.” To be fair, the issue was more complicated than that makes it sound, because the injured party claimed that his horse had been spooked by a car. For purposes of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999: Sapozhnik posted:why would a person with cast iron job security not use said job security to occasionally troll the gently caress out of some noobs
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:30 |
|
prefect posted:No. No, there is no explanation to be had as to why Judge Garry Nielson insisted on reading his 138-page opinion aloud in court, a performance that apparently consumed 17 hours over a four-day period in May 2016. This occurred, as shown in the excerpt above, in Wagga Wagga at the Wagga Wagga Courthouse, which is not far from the Gobbagombalin Bridge over the Murrumbidgee River.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:42 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 02:00 |
|
theflyingorc posted:I have never understood why she sounds like a mountain lion being pulled into a jet engine when she does it lmao if u a JOSPOSTER have never succ the bepis just lotring on the fralmo with brunkeberg
|
# ? Oct 23, 2017 18:44 |