Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Chris Knight
Jun 5, 2002

me @ ur posts


Fun Shoe
cool
https://twitter.com/duckduckgo/status/923531330121433088

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

“can’t be disabled” is interesting. wonder why that is

I bet someone in this thread knows!

Cocoa Crispies
Jul 20, 2001

Vehicular Manslaughter!

Pillbug

Subjunctive posted:

“can’t be disabled” is interesting. wonder why that is

I bet someone in this thread knows!

well it says "walking" so you can't be disabled for that one at least

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Subjunctive posted:

“can’t be disabled” is interesting. wonder why that is

I bet someone in this thread knows!
you do need the com.google.android.gms.permission.ACTIVITY_RECOGNITION permission, it's more that the duckduckgo source is reddit complaining that the permission isn't listed if you install via the webstore. copperhead joins in and has far more intimiate knowledge of android's privacy issues but the end result is sensor data is free for any app in android for convenience.

re: disabling. lately they've been trying to push on-body detection as a convenience security mechanism for knowing when to keep your phone unlocked. the activity recogition api gives confidence values on: in_vehicle, on_bicycle, on_foot, running, still, tilting, unknown, walking. there's no real consideration for the privacy impact of using these readings over a long-term basis, but the intended approach is more "don't alert a person while they're driving"

mrmcd
Feb 22, 2003

Pictured: The only good cop (a fictional one).

I think I helped train that ML model. They gave me a cool tshirt that has a space rabbit on it and everyone thinks it's for a band. :)

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



some more fun with voltage fault injection: https://www.riscure.com/uploads/2017/10/Riscure_Whitepaper_Escalating_Privileges_in_Linux_using_Fault_Injection.pdf

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






Riscure owns I hope do to my Master's thesis there

mrmcd
Feb 22, 2003

Pictured: The only good cop (a fictional one).


My friend was (is?) working on something like this using a targeted EM pulse to gently caress with secure boot or something. It involved melon sized capacitors that could kill a horse, and last I heard he was trying to figure out how to publish his research without some amateur secfuck artist stopping his heart trying to reproduce it.

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:

you do need the com.google.android.gms.permission.ACTIVITY_RECOGNITION permission, it's more that the duckduckgo source is reddit complaining that the permission isn't listed if you install via the webstore. copperhead joins in and has far more intimiate knowledge of android's privacy issues but the end result is sensor data is free for any app in android for convenience.

re: disabling. lately they've been trying to push on-body detection as a convenience security mechanism for knowing when to keep your phone unlocked. the activity recogition api gives confidence values on: in_vehicle, on_bicycle, on_foot, running, still, tilting, unknown, walking. there's no real consideration for the privacy impact of using these readings over a long-term basis, but the intended approach is more "don't alert a person while they're driving"

i fuckin' love tilting

just standing around tilting at fun new angles heck yes

mrmcd posted:

My friend was (is?) working on something like this using a targeted EM pulse to gently caress with secure boot or something. It involved melon sized capacitors that could kill a horse, and last I heard he was trying to figure out how to publish his research without some amateur secfuck artist stopping his heart trying to reproduce it.

horses can be killed incredibly easily so i'm imagining this thing puts out roughly the electrical charge of a fart

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy
killed isn't the same as suicided

Wasabi the J
Jan 23, 2008

MOM WAS RIGHT
Poor old freckles, thought of ant+ and died.

Shaggar
Apr 26, 2006

Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:

you do need the com.google.android.gms.permission.ACTIVITY_RECOGNITION permission, it's more that the duckduckgo source is reddit complaining that the permission isn't listed if you install via the webstore. copperhead joins in and has far more intimiate knowledge of android's privacy issues but the end result is sensor data is free for any app in android for convenience.

re: disabling. lately they've been trying to push on-body detection as a convenience security mechanism for knowing when to keep your phone unlocked. the activity recogition api gives confidence values on: in_vehicle, on_bicycle, on_foot, running, still, tilting, unknown, walking. there's no real consideration for the privacy impact of using these readings over a long-term basis, but the intended approach is more "don't alert a person while they're driving"

for something like "don't alert a person while driving" why would that not by a system wide setting?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Shaggar posted:

for something like "don't alert a person while driving" why would that not by a system wide setting?
it effectively is a system-wide setting, just that the application is notified so it can change its actions accordingly. blame fitness apps as well

Shaggar
Apr 26, 2006
ah, makes sense. yeah I could see how that's a hard choice to make. on the one hand its the system notifying the app of a change of status, but on the other its somewhat private info.

fisting by many
Dec 25, 2009



Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:

you do need the com.google.android.gms.permission.ACTIVITY_RECOGNITION permission, it's more that the duckduckgo source is reddit complaining that the permission isn't listed if you install via the webstore. copperhead joins in and has far more intimiate knowledge of android's privacy issues but the end result is sensor data is free for any app in android for convenience.

re: disabling. lately they've been trying to push on-body detection as a convenience security mechanism for knowing when to keep your phone unlocked. the activity recogition api gives confidence values on: in_vehicle, on_bicycle, on_foot, running, still, tilting, unknown, walking. there's no real consideration for the privacy impact of using these readings over a long-term basis, but the intended approach is more "don't alert a person while they're driving"

i hate the sensing when a user is driving thing because how can it tell you're not just a passenger? or even a bus rider

but i also don't want a phone that really can tell the difference between driver and passenger, that's scary

Cocoa Crispies
Jul 20, 2001

Vehicular Manslaughter!

Pillbug

Wasabi the J posted:

Poor old freckles, thought of ant+ and died.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

fisting by many posted:

i hate the sensing when a user is driving thing because how can it tell you're not just a passenger? or even a bus rider

but i also don't want a phone that really can tell the difference between driver and passenger, that's scary

it can’t but it can pop up the new ios11 “click here if you’re a passenger” thing

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

hobbesmaster posted:

it can’t but it can pop up the new ios11 “click here if you’re a passenger” thing

that's just for the sovcit types who insist that only a horse and carriage can be driven and a car is just traveling as a passenger or whatever so you can't give them tickets

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

James Baud posted:

Pretty much every housing (re)development in Canada since the early/mid 1990s has them, regardless of the area's density.

They were actually in the process of rolling them out universally for the older urban neighborhoods that still had door to door delivery up until the winner of the last federal election put an end to that (but if you had been changed to one even the week before, too bad, no backsies!)

Oh so it's a "we're spending too much on the postal service" conservatives thing

redleader
Aug 18, 2005

Engage according to operational parameters

mrmcd posted:

My friend was (is?) working on something like this using a targeted EM pulse to gently caress with secure boot or something. It involved melon sized capacitors that could kill a horse, and last I heard he was trying to figure out how to publish his research without some amateur secfuck artist stopping his heart trying to reproduce it.

so there are no downsides to publishing?

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:

you do need the com.google.android.gms.permission.ACTIVITY_RECOGNITION permission, it's more that the duckduckgo source is reddit complaining that the permission isn't listed if you install via the webstore. copperhead joins in and has far more intimiate knowledge of android's privacy issues but the end result is sensor data is free for any app in android for convenience.

re: disabling. lately they've been trying to push on-body detection as a convenience security mechanism for knowing when to keep your phone unlocked. the activity recogition api gives confidence values on: in_vehicle, on_bicycle, on_foot, running, still, tilting, unknown, walking. there's no real consideration for the privacy impact of using these readings over a long-term basis, but the intended approach is more "don't alert a person while they're driving"

uh why does the app need to know any of this poo poo? isnt it up for the os (and user settings) to decide whether to say keep your phone unlocked or supress alerts??

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Powaqoatse posted:

uh why does the app need to know any of this poo poo? isnt it up for the os (and user settings) to decide whether to say keep your phone unlocked or supress alerts??

there are apps that want to be in different UI modes when you're driving or jogging or whatever

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



hobbesmaster posted:

there are apps that want to be in different UI modes when you're driving or jogging or whatever

ok so those apps should have a special permission

Volmarias
Dec 31, 2002

EMAIL... THE INTERNET... SEARCH ENGINES...
... which they do. You're granting it by accepting.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

except everything in android asks for all the permissions all the time so

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



hobbesmaster posted:

except everything in android asks for all the permissions all the time so

^^ yeah this is the problem ^^

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:
android apps ask for so many permissions that you could have some profound conversations on where android's security policy lies relative to the line between deny by default and block by exception

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:
when u think about it, if you put enough holes in swiss cheese, the cheese eventually becomes the holes to the air

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



i mean at the very very least, the activity recognition stuff should go in the "location" category instead of "other"

or they could create a kind of idk "always on handsfree mode" type permissions category and put that in there with "prevent sleep" etc

but jeez yeah the real problem is how badly its communicated to the users by google, who (to be fair) dont give a poo poo

Dylan16807
May 12, 2010
android permissions are so bad

skype, despite explicitly revoking everything, can still take over fullscreen whenever anyone calls me

Lysidas
Jul 26, 2002

John Diefenbaker is a madman who thinks he's John Diefenbaker.
Pillbug
anroid still does the horrible dumb all-or-nothing permisions right? where when you install a app it says what it wants to do and you have to say overall yes/no? as opposed to individual permission requests for each thing a app wants to do like camera or microphone

if so lmfao

Volmarias
Dec 31, 2002

EMAIL... THE INTERNET... SEARCH ENGINES...

Lysidas posted:

anroid still does the horrible dumb all-or-nothing permisions right? where when you install a app it says what it wants to do and you have to say overall yes/no? as opposed to individual permission requests for each thing a app wants to do like camera or microphone

if so lmfao

That's no longer the case for Android M and above, although apps that don't yet target M have the old "all or nothing" behavior. I'm assuming in the future once enough time has settled there will be a point where the old behavior is no longer supported at all and it will just silently provide zeros and nulls from API calls for privacy protected things.

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:
Isn't Peel Smart Remote super hosed for Samsung devices? I've heard that is does something like circumvent android API permissions and runs as root so it can draw ads on your screen at any time?

Djeser
Mar 22, 2013


it's crow time again

one of the schools i'm a contractor for has a guest wifi i have to use, where it takes me to a page and makes me enter a password. problem is their https is broken (i think the certificate it out of date? idk i'm just a secfuck spectator) so badly that i can't actually access the page on chrome or firefox, both of them either just give me https error pages or do an infinite loop of "you must log into the network"

i eventually had to put IE11 back on my computer because that was the only browser dumb enough to let me log in

for some reason chrome on my phone lets me do an exception to the certificate while desktop chrome won't

i'm assuming this is pretty whatever in terms of secfuck but its my story :shobon:

Thanks Ants
May 21, 2004

#essereFerrari


probably a captive portal trying to pop up on a domain with hsts enabled

Cocoa Crispies
Jul 20, 2001

Vehicular Manslaughter!

Pillbug

Thanks Ants posted:

probably a captive portal trying to pop up on a domain with hsts enabled

yeah, and enough sites are https-only that lol

you can either use something benign like http://kitten.zone/ as your unencrypted http test or remember the obnoxious unmemorable urls like http://captive.apple.com/ that computer vendors use to probe for captive portal

Mr.Radar
Nov 5, 2005

You guys aren't going to believe this, but that guy is our games teacher.

Cocoa Crispies posted:

yeah, and enough sites are https-only that lol

you can either use something benign like http://kitten.zone/ as your unencrypted http test or remember the obnoxious unmemorable urls like http://captive.apple.com/ that computer vendors use to probe for captive portal

http://neverssl.com/ is the one I use

Carbon dioxide
Oct 9, 2012

Cocoa Crispies posted:

yeah, and enough sites are https-only that lol

you can either use something benign like http://kitten.zone/ as your unencrypted http test or remember the obnoxious unmemorable urls like http://captive.apple.com/ that computer vendors use to probe for captive portal

it is a place where yarn is not safe. where birds lie dead, placed upon doormats and newspapers. it is a place where laser pointers drive one to question existence itself. it is... the Kitten Zone.

crazysim
May 23, 2004
I AM SOOOOO GAY

Djeser posted:

one of the schools i'm a contractor for has a guest wifi i have to use, where it takes me to a page and makes me enter a password. problem is their https is broken (i think the certificate it out of date? idk i'm just a secfuck spectator) so badly that i can't actually access the page on chrome or firefox, both of them either just give me https error pages or do an infinite loop of "you must log into the network"

i eventually had to put IE11 back on my computer because that was the only browser dumb enough to let me log in

for some reason chrome on my phone lets me do an exception to the certificate while desktop chrome won't

i'm assuming this is pretty whatever in terms of secfuck but its my story :shobon:

Does typing 'badidea' work?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Djeser
Mar 22, 2013


it's crow time again

no but the contractor password is contractor :ssh:

iirc it's the portal page itself that tries to do HTTPS and that's what makes it gently caress up so badly--plenty of other schools have portal pages that don't make chrome throw a fit

my only other story was a school that had blocked Minecraft connections and then tried to teach a class using Minecraft and went "wait why can't we connect" though i guess working at the "spiritual center" where if the internet went down i was supposed to go back into the kitchen and climb over jugs of kombucha to unplug/replug the modem kinda counts

e: the spiritual center also had a room where the ceiling was maybe six and a half feet high, with these big sheets draped across it that hung low enough my head would brush up against them. i believe there were also candles in this room.

Djeser fucked around with this message at 20:59 on Oct 28, 2017

  • Locked thread