|
LeeMajors posted:I really wish we played Miami every year. It's dumb that we don't. If Miami was a public school, the state would have already "hinted" that it would be in the best interest of both schools to play every year, same as they did when UF didn't wanna play FSU back in the day. And now we're the Gators number one rivals! Well, some older fans still have a hate on for Georgia, but people my age (born in 79), tend to view that as the Gators secondary rival.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 20:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 08:22 |
|
Vertical Lime posted:fixed it Holy poo poo, that's
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 20:45 |
|
Mahoning posted:Holy poo poo, that's It's actually a top-tier stadium (except for how bad the field is). It's loud, there's good food (but pricy), and you can drink in it. Parking has become super easy as well.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:02 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Notre Dame is super fun this year and, ignoring the front-running assholes in their fan base, I hope they beat UGA and Bama in the playoffs. Notre Dame is run by a murderer.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:17 |
|
vyst posted:Notre Dame is run by a murderer. Murder is a little strong. Manslaughter is closer but still wrong. Somewhat negligent red-faced rear end in a top hat is closest. I'm not a judge. Having said that, ND is fun to watch and gently caress Bama and furthermore gently caress UGA.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:21 |
|
Counterpoint: gently caress ND
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:41 |
|
gently caress Notre Dame always and forever amen
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:50 |
|
Playoff consisting of Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, and Penn State who do you root for
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:53 |
|
https://twitter.com/Chandler_Rome/status/925740121722441728
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:54 |
|
Ghost of Reagan Past posted:Playoff consisting of Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, and Penn State Roll Tide.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:55 |
|
KKKLIP ART posted:What do y’all run to make these here fancy moon polls For the one I posted I'm just doing some math with php and storing the results in a mysql database. I don't have any access to data so I by hand enter the result of every single game (I've tried automating it but haven't found a consistent source I was able to get enough results to strip stuff away from). I usually do it while watching TV or something though so it's not as laborious as it sounds.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:56 |
|
yeah, that's a straight up roll tide
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 21:58 |
|
Alabama does not deserve nice things.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 22:04 |
|
I can't imagine that Coach O knows how to operate a computer.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 22:12 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Alabama does not deserve nice things. None of the schools do but at least for Alabama it's just one more on the pile rather than vindicating any of those other teams and/or the Big Ten. Words can barely express how much I want Ohio State to just go away at this point, and the single reason I rooted for them they year they won it because the alternative was Oregon, otherwise that was a loving Meteor Game.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 22:15 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Alabama does not deserve nice things. It ranks near the bottom in all QoL metrics, its people deserve this one piece of joy to cling to in the overwhelming hideousness of the modern world. I beseech you
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 22:25 |
|
Rick posted:For the one I posted I'm just doing some math with php and storing the results in a mysql database. This looks very good as well but I haven't used it yet. I'm working my stuff up into something useful and portable, eventually, so when I do have a reasonable source of data that's clean and ready to use I can alert anyone interested--probably in the off season.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 23:22 |
|
I just looked and VT is a road favorite against an undefeated top 10 team
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 23:28 |
|
Ghost of Reagan Past posted:Playoff consisting of Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, and Penn State Giant Meteor (Notre Dame, if only because it's someone new who is not Penn State)
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 23:44 |
|
Crotch Bat posted:I just looked and VT is a road favorite against an undefeated top 10 team It's really dumb. We played our worst game against UNC, and still managed to win. We don't come out that bad again.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 23:45 |
|
Dilber posted:It's really dumb. We played our worst game against UNC, and still managed to win. We don't come out that bad again. I think they're weighing more than just the UNC game against you guys. Your last 4 games could easily be 4 losses, especially FSU and GT. You're either playing to the competition's level or winning on borrowed time.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 23:50 |
|
Dilber posted:It's really dumb. We played our worst game against UNC, and still managed to win. We don't come out that bad again. Someone hasn't watched lots of recent Mark Richt football in Big Games. I hope for your sake it's different than what it was recently at UGA.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 23:51 |
|
Mahoning posted:This is a pretty good resume snapshot. LOL Bama. The line for Georgia. They only have wins over two .500+ teams, and those two teams have a 0.929 win percentage? Am I understanding that right?
|
# ? Nov 1, 2017 23:56 |
|
Crotch Bat posted:I think they're weighing more than just the UNC game against you guys. Your last 4 games could easily be 4 losses, especially FSU and GT. You're either playing to the competition's level or winning on borrowed time. Honestly, go and rewatch them. GT we statistically dominated after their first two drives. The only reason they were ahead was because of the worlds worst onside kick call. FSU/Miami is always wild (regardless of how good or bad the teams are). Syracuse we beat wire to wire. UNC was the worst game played by the team, and that was with Rosier getting injured in the first quarter and playing with a hurt throwing shoulder the rest of the game. We're finally getting healthy. The playing every weekend thanks to the schedule move really hurt us a bit. Our run game should be better this week. The main reason it wasn't working the last two games was because our best Olineman was hurt. He's back and healthy this game. Our starting CB should be back this week as well. Every single week it was "Miami on upset alert!" followed by "well, that team wasn't good anyways." Win the games you have. Honestly, I think this game is a tossup, but I don't think VT should be favored. Our stadium will be similarly loud to the FSU game last year, and that was almost deafening. You've got a Redshirt Freshman QB making his third away start, with the others being ECU (where you guys looked bad in the beginning), and BC before they found an offense. VT gives up big plays, which is what Miami's offense with Rosier does. We're the best defense you'll play, outside of probably clemson, and they dismantled you. I expect a defensive struggle for both teams, but it's Miami/VT. It wouldn't surprise me if it's a blowout either way. Dilber fucked around with this message at 00:02 on Nov 2, 2017 |
# ? Nov 1, 2017 23:58 |
|
Dilber posted:Honestly, go and rewatch them. GT we statistically dominated after their first two drives. The only reason they were ahead was because of the worlds worst onside kick call. FSU/Miami is always wild (regardless of how good or bad the teams are). Syracuse we beat wire to wire. UNC was the worst game played by the team, and that was with Rosier getting injured in the first quarter and playing with a hurt throwing shoulder the rest of the game. We're finally getting healthy. The playing every weekend thanks to the schedule move really hurt us a bit. Our run game should be better this week. The main reason it wasn't working the last two games was because our best Olineman was hurt. He's back and healthy this game. Our starting CB should be back this week as well. Every single week it was "Miami on upset alert!" followed by "well, that team wasn't good anyways." Win the games you have. I think you are severely underrating VT's D. By like a whole, whole bunch.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:08 |
|
Crotch Bat posted:I think you are severely underrating VT's D. By like a whole, whole bunch. I'm not. We have similar defenses in terms of stats. VT's big defensive struggle has been big plays, and that's what our team has been thriving on. I also think you dline feasts on our offensive line, especially since Foster is used to the way our O-line coach teaches and our guard play going up against your DTs isn't a good matchup for us. That said, you might be without your starting LT going up against our deepest position. Our d-line is really, really good. Dilber fucked around with this message at 00:13 on Nov 2, 2017 |
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:11 |
|
Miami & VT is basically a pick-em per S&P+ numbers, which sounds about right. The thing I see with Miami is they can't run block at all , that freshman LT that went down a few games ago is probably their best run blocker.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:16 |
|
Lasagna Pilot posted:Miami & VT is basically a pick-em per S&P+ numbers, which sounds about right. He's our RG actually! That was who I was referring to being back at full speed this week, which is why I think our run blocking will be better this week. His replacement was a golden special and another true freshman that doesn't have the same level of strength. They're good depth players this year, but shouldn't be starting. Like I said, I think it's a pick'em. I don't think VT should be favored in Miami. They're basically saying that VT would be a touchdown favorite at home, and I think that spread is a bit big.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:17 |
Emron posted:It ranks near the bottom in all QoL metrics, its people deserve this one piece of joy to cling to in the overwhelming hideousness of the modern world. I beseech you So does West Virginia and that doesn't stop WVU from collapsing anytime they look like they have a chance of making a championship game in anything but shooting.
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:20 |
|
Dilber posted:He's our RG actually! That was who I was referring to being back at full speed this week, which is why I think our run blocking will be better this week. His replacement was a golden special and another true freshman that doesn't have the same level of strength. They're good depth players this year, but shouldn't be starting. Think it actually means they’d be 8.5 pt favorites at home right? Home field worth 3 points. Does seem like you’re supposed to take the points here.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:24 |
|
Line I saw was VT -3 unless it shifted more.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:26 |
|
Dilber posted:Line I saw was VT -3 unless it shifted more. Right so VT -9 at home seems aggressive
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:27 |
|
Dilber posted:I'm not. We have similar defenses in terms of stats. VT's big defensive struggle has been big plays, and that's what our team has been thriving on. I also think you dline feasts on our offensive line, especially since Foster is used to the way our O-line coach teaches and our guard play going up against your DTs isn't a good matchup for us. That said, you might be without your starting LT going up against our deepest position. Our d-line is really, really good. I'll disagree there, our D is a fairly substantial bit better in every major defensive category. You guys are also incredibly bad on 3rd down offense and VT is like #2 for 3rd down D.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:27 |
|
Adun posted:Think it actually means they’d be 8.5 pt favorites at home right? Home field worth 3 points. Does seem like you’re supposed to take the points here. Home field fluctuates in college, the standard is 3 but a good home field can be worth 5-6 if the team has been lights out at home. VT's pretty average at home recently so theirs might be 3.5 to 4.5. Yea, logic would dictate VT would probably go fairly high at home for this line but I'm sure it'd dive in an instant. This should be a pick'em @Miami and I'd say probably a FG favorite for VT at home.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:31 |
|
Crotch Bat posted:I'll disagree there, our D is a fairly substantial bit better in every major defensive category. We're bad on third downs, but pretty decent on second down. This is what Miami goes for on defense: TFL per game: 3rd (8.9) - Turnover Margin: 6th (+10) - Total Sacks: 4th (25) - Pass Efficiency D: 3rd (97.90) Like I said, I think it's a defensive struggle.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:42 |
|
vikingstrike posted:Someone hasn't watched lots of recent Mark Richt football in Big Games. I hope for your sake it's different than what it was recently at UGA. Note: Big Game is defined exclusively in hindsight and only to games Richt lost
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 00:57 |
|
Just looking through Wikipedia Mark Richt appears to have been 4 - 7 in games where Georgia and their opponent are both ranked in the Top 10 which doesn't seem that great.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 01:29 |
|
Ghost of Reagan Past posted:Playoff consisting of Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, and Penn State As an Auburn fan I'd very likely be leaning Alabama and would just have to drown out the misery in one of those stupid "conference supremacy" arguments and be happy for Emron. Either that or somehow convince myself Urbz is my guy.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 01:30 |
|
Two directional Michigan teams are facing off right now, espn2
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 01:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 08:22 |
|
MourningView posted:Note: Big Game is defined exclusively in hindsight and only to games Richt lost Since 2010, away games versus top 25 times at the time of play: 2010 (0-2) #24 South Carolina L 17-6 #2 Auburn L 49-31 2011 (1-0) #23 Georgia Tech W 31-17 2012 (0-1) #6 South Carolina L 35-7 2013 (0-2) #8 Clemson L 38-35 #7 Auburn L 43-38 2014 (1-1) #24 South Carolina L 38-35 #23 Missouri W 34-0 2015 (0-0) None Total record of 2-6. 14-23 against all ranked teams over last 8 years of tenure at UGA. What am I missing? I'm assuming watching almost every game of his career at UGA is working against me here, based on your comment.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2017 01:45 |