|
Sir Kodiak posted:Though in terms of design it reminds me most of The Signal (also with Laurence Fishburne!): Dang that looks interesting. Not familiar with it, will have to check it out.
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 02:22 |
|
|
Violator posted:Dang that looks interesting. Not familiar with it, will have to check it out. I absolutely cannot recommend that you do that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 00:01
|
|
|
Gonz posted:Got my hands on three sets of these at a local AT&T store yesterday. The store manager apparently had tons of them, and didn’t mind if I took extras. I can't tell how big those are. Are they 11x17? 8x10?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 00:01
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Ohhh. So you were talking about design similarities to a specific CG element of a specific older movie, Nah, I was using that specific older movie as an example of how I thought the design and CGI looked. You're awfully worked up over this. McSpanky posted:One of these uses of "objectively" is actually the complete opposite of that and should be replaced with "subjectively", can you tell which one?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
McSpanky posted:That's why the Spectre owns. gently caress all this namby tiptoeing "super advanced aliens indistinguishable from magic" stuff, The Spectre is The. Wrath. Of. GOD. Deal with it Yeah I can't understand why they didn't pick the literally omnipotent dude who killed two countries in the blibk of an eye and has never really been popular except when he a) had no human component and b) was written by a theology student to basically just do a comic about moral dilemmas for the justice league movie Or steel, the guy who shaq played
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
teagone posted:I can't tell how big those are. Are they 11x17? 8x10? 13.5 x 20
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 03:22
|
|
|
Get LeBron James to play Steel, he's been branching into acting anyway.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 03:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WBPictures_Mx/status/925442818943971329 Cute
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
What was this? It’s gone now. edit - I found it. It looks like one of those clips they place during a late late night talk show before they interview someone about their latest movie. https://vimeo.com/240725294 Someone said the full line was You have the blood of the Old Gods in you. Do you know what happened to them? The Gods died. Mr. Apollo fucked around with this message at 05:05 on Nov 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
Jonny_Rocket posted:As of right now, he looks like a goddamn video game character. Are we talking Sega Genesis or like Atari?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 14:25
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:This is precisely what I like about his design. The character literally made from alien tech visually fits in better with the CG hellscape of the alien invasion. That seems appropriate. Fair enough. With that rationale it makes some sense, but I really feel like they could've simplified his design a little bit, especially in the midsection area. As I said earlier, maybe it'll look better in motion, but the stills I've seen doesn't inspire much confidence. UmOk posted:Are we talking Sega Genesis or like Atari? Nintendo 64
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 15:36
|
|
|
Jonny_Rocket posted:Fair enough. With that rationale it makes some sense, but I really feel like they could've simplified his design a little bit, especially in the midsection area. As I said earlier, maybe it'll look better in motion, but the stills I've seen doesn't inspire much confidence. So Justice League looks like Superman 64
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 17:22
|
|
|
Habibi posted:Nah, I was using that specific older movie as an example of how I thought the design and CGI looked. You're awfully worked up over this. Yeah, I know, that's why I posted pictures of The Matrix's blurry-textured relatively-undetailed models. Which looked good for the time, of course. And, buddy, this is a movie discussion forum. We don't have to get worked up to talk about movies here.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
UmOk posted:So Justice League looks like Superman 64
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
McSpanky posted:Forget Cyborg, what iconographic reject pile did that Batman logo fall out of. I love bAtman
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2017 23:39
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Which looked good for the time, of course. quote:for the time, of course quote:for the time, of course In my head this has a nice remix beat to it. quote:And, buddy, this is a movie discussion forum. We don't have to get worked up to talk about movies here. Those sufficient conditions can be so pesky.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 14:48
|
|
|
What's the most overused phrase going to be in reviews for this? I'm guessing "unearned"
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 15:54
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:What's the most overused phrase going to be in reviews for this? I'm guessing "unearned" Plot hole
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 16:28
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:What's the most overused phrase going to be in reviews for this? I'm guessing "unearned" "Where Zack Snyder failed, Joss Whedon succeeded" Except where it'd be the opposite in Armond White's review because I'm convinced the dude is a contrarian.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 16:30
|
|
|
Zack Snyder failed to sexually harass a bunch of women and destroy his entire brand in the process.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 16:41
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:What's the most overused phrase going to be in reviews for this? I'm guessing "unearned" "lighter"
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 16:42
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:What's the most overused phrase going to be in reviews for this? I'm guessing "unearned" "Marvel already did it" "Tonal whiplash"
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 16:43
|
|
|
Maybe this will be the one where "Is Zack Snyder a fascist?" gets a mainstream airing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
josh04 posted:Maybe this will be the one where "Is Zack Snyder a fascist?" gets a mainstream airing. That would be pretty funny. Thought that sort of retreat from making any kind of direct claim about a movie, which risks the embarrassment of being shown to be wrong, to purely focus on subjective impressions of personality, is more of an Internet shitposter sort of thing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
Habibi posted:Nah, I was using that specific older movie as an example of how I thought the design and CGI looked. You're awfully worked up over this. Stop telling people on a pay-to-post movie discussion forum that they're worked up for wanting to discuss a factual statement about a movie, please. Also I don't like the aesthetics of the new Cyborg. Has nothing to do with the quality of the CGI, he just looks over-done and busy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
josh04 posted:Maybe this will be the one where "Is Zack Snyder a fascist?" gets a mainstream airing. I can't wait.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
Where did that originate anyway? Was around these forums or was it from a lovely review? All that stuff kind of blended together. I'm not looking forward to the reviews praising the soundtrack. From the music that made it out there, it is not good on any scale.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
Jimbot posted:Where did that originate anyway? Was around these forums or was it from a lovely review? All that stuff kind of blended together. 300 reviews iirc, Chapo also did an episode dedicated to 300 and it's connection to Alt-Right ideas
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
Also AV Club did a piece where they compared 300 to Birth of a Nation.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 18:11
|
|
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:Also I don't like the aesthetics of the new Cyborg. Has nothing to do with the quality of the CGI, he just looks over-done and busy. Totally. It's just that "over-done and busy" look is what makes it come off as dated CGI to me. I wasn't trying to imply that the CGI itself was actually bad, rather, that the design made it look like too obviously CGI (you know - like how CGI used to be, where it was always 110% obvious what was and wasn't computer generated). By contrast, plenty of things in those trailers ARE obviously CGI (because they can't be real) but they don't LOOK obviously CGI. Does that make sense?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
I think what you're trying to say is that it's very clear that it's not a practical costume because it's too fiddly and doesn't move naturally (perhaps intentionally, but nonetheless there is an air of unreality about it). Yes?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
  Yeah, that makes more sense, though The Matrix's Sentinels, which are blobs with tentacles, don't strike me as being that fiddly. For 2000s CGI, I'd associate that overly-busy look more with the Transformers series, which is all gears within gears to the point that the characters are just masses of whirling polygons.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WBPictures_Mx/status/926161996818423808
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:11
|
|
|
Hey, that fuckin' owns
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:Batwing is garbage and the Spectre is the literal wrath of literal capital letter Christian God which Batwing are you talking about, the first or second one? because yeah the second one, Lucius Fox's kid, kinda sucks, but the Batman of Africa one they did first was fuckin awesome and yeah the Spectre fuckin owns what's your problem
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WBPictures_Mx/status/926191924750323712
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
Somebody post the panels from the time The Spectre decided that Death Row wasn't good enough.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:54
|
|
|
Cyborg's got a Mickey Mouth going on.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Justice League: THEY LIVE
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 03:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 02:22 |
|
|
Superman looks on, concerned.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 15:51
|
|