|
mik posted:What qualifies as being rural? I need to know what side I'm on here. Do you live in what would otherwise be considered a suburb or bedroom community, with a population in the 10s of thousands? Do you own a pristine pickup truck that has never seen anything heavier than a load of groceries from Costco in the bed? Congratulations, you're rural.
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 23:52 |
|
|
If we are going to earnestly discuss rural genocide we need some definitions. What is rural? Living within a population center of sub-100k? Sub-10k? Sub 1k? Only those who live on family farms? What about people who live in the ex-urbs? Do all rurals get soylent greened, even those who are minoritieed peoples, or are progressively inclined politically? What about the reserves? What about people who don’t own any vehicle, much less a jacked up one tonne. What about civil servants who are providing essential services? It’s this kind of lack of attention to detail that will doom our efforts before they’ve even begun. Bush league.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
Dammit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
Do you live in a town without a Walmart and a McDonalds?? You are rural fucker
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
I thought the plan was forcible relocation into downtown condos
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:Do you live in what would otherwise be considered a suburb or bedroom community, with a population in the 10s of thousands? Do you own a pristine pickup truck that has never seen anything heavier than a load of groceries from Costco in the bed? There's no Costco in my province 
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:I thought the plan was forcible relocation into downtown condos See we don’t even know what particular flavour of genocide we want to pursue. If you simply let RURALS move into the city, won’t we lose our CANADIAN VALUES?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:I thought the plan was forcible relocation into downtown condos Last time we decided that eating the rurals would solve the relocation and lack of food problems.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
Postess with the Mostest posted:Last time we decided that eating the rurals would solve the relocation and lack of food problems. Oh, good thinking. No sense letting them go to waste. Stickarts posted:See we don’t even know what particular flavour of genocide we want to pursue. If you simply let RURALS move into the city, won’t we lose our CANADIAN VALUES? Yes, as a resident of Toronto, the whole city went to poo poo the minute we let the suburbs in. Maybe there's some way to force them to assimilate, some kind of schooling perhaps, that would engender their children to our way of life.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
If you support supply management, abolition of carbon taxes, pipeline construction, your a loving rural
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
lmao shut the gently caress up mark https://twitter.com/marissenmark/status/925788986592788481
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
mik posted:Also no-one in the CoE/Anglican Church believes in divine right, it hasn't been a thing since the 17th century. It doesn't even matter what the Anglican position is, it's very explicit that Parliament gets to choose the monarch.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 21:22
|
|
Yes, it's like a lava lamp.
|
THC posted:lmao shut the gently caress up mark As if other governments magically solved the problem at a snap of the fingers. Now that it's a crisis, there's (1) how to limit new cases of substance dependence, (2) how to better prevent overdoses in the current user population, and (3) how to better treat current cases of substance dependence. It was never going to be easy. At least Horgan is trying to do something about instead of opposing any attempts. EvidenceBasedQuack fucked around with this message at 21:33 on Nov 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
Reince Penis posted:You're going to want to start in 1534 with the Church of England. Which is the mother church of the Anglican Church of Canada. The supreme monarch of the CoE is the Queen, who rules over England and the church by divine right. i read a history book not even the anglican church held that the monarchy was divinely chosen after the glorious revolution
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:17
|
|
|
This is like Bill Maher's "but how can intelligent people believe in a talking snake???" nonsense, but even dumber.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
"Rural Genocide" sounds like an amazing band name.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:Do you live in what would otherwise be considered a suburb or bedroom community, with a population in the 10s of thousands? Do you own a pristine pickup truck that has never seen anything heavier than a load of groceries from Costco in the bed? Wouldn’t a rural person have a well used pickup truck?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
the perception that all religious adherents believe in an interventionist sky wizard who personally judges them is laughable. most people counted amongst members of a religion are just in it for the community or cultural reasons. the percentage of people who identify as religious and actually pray is under 25% and it's only that high because of american evangelicals religion is pretty archaic and silly, but it's basically just elk's lodge at this point
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
can we please redirect our class hatred at the rich and not some jackass with a pickup truck that works at kmart
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:34
|
|
|
cougar cub posted:Wouldn’t a rural person have a well used pickup truck? Yes, the joke is all the people who do not live in rural areas or live the lifestyle, but somehow identify as rural peoples. Hence the bit about suburbs and bedroom communities. See: The entire population of Peterborough, On.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
I'd like to ~disrupt~ class hatred by turning towards debt load as a new criteria rather than old concepts such as actual wealth and membership to men's clubs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 22:39
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:Yes, the joke is all the people who do not live in rural areas or live the lifestyle, but somehow identify as rural peoples. Hence the bit about suburbs and bedroom communities. Internet joke —> my head Swooooooosh
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/richardzussman/status/926217900314181632 e: it's not HQ2, stand down action stations, set condition two 
Juul-Whip fucked around with this message at 00:08 on Nov 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
Horgan is happy to announce a new labour provision for people employed in technology related fields where the employer is no longer obliged to pay the agreed upon salary.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
Langford wins the Amazon bid. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
weren't they running some drone delivery pilot project in BC?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 00:58
|
|
|
Dreylad posted:weren't they running some drone delivery pilot project in BC? oh god I hope not
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 01:03
|
|
|
Drone delivering the winning bid confirmation to Langford City Hall. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 01:05
|
|
|
McGavin posted:Drone delivering the winning bid confirmation to Langford City Hall. ~*loses control in a gust of wind and savages John Horgan*~
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 01:16
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:~*loses control in a gust of wind and savages John Horgan*~ That would never happen to Langford's messiah.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
namaste faggots posted:Horgan is happy to announce a new labour provision for people employed in technology related fields where the employer is no longer obliged to pay the agreed upon salary. very disruptive
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
Think of all the middle class jobs that will be created
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 02:36
|
|
|
I'm sure techlords would welcome it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 02:39
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/cbcnews/status/925912856209559552 Sjws defend this And Karla homolka while we're at it Cmon loving morons
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 02:43
|
|
|
Yeah take that sjws! And millennials and neocons too!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
namaste faggots posted:Horgan is happy to announce a new labour provision for people employed in technology related fields where the employer is no longer obliged to pay the agreed upon salary. This fits with the NDP historical precedent wrt tech labour rights.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
McGavin posted:That would never happen to Langford's messiah. Don't blame that poo poo on Horgan. The bid was made by our libertarian lunatic mayor.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 03:04
|
|
|
McGavin posted:Langford wins the Amazon bid. loving lol. Finally a reason for Royal Bay to exist.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
.
James Baud fucked around with this message at 12:12 on Aug 26, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 04:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 23:52 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 04:59
|
|
