Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
No Butt Stuff
Jun 10, 2004

Quorum posted:

A national holiday would not meaningfully benefit most working class people, you'd need a national day where businesses are required to offer people the whole day off, which isn't impossible but would be a staggeringly huge endeavor.

or vote early by mail.

voting should be a two week thing and if you can't manage to find a loving stamp and send in your ballot then maybe you should be fined.

e: this is all hypothetical because i'm not sure compulsory voting would be a good thing for the good guys

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011

Rappaport posted:

"lol US isn't Scandinavia there's only four people there" and all that, but you do realize this is a thing some industrialized nations do, right?

Why should the government subsidize the creation of more business majors/MBAs?

Calibanibal
Aug 25, 2015

you've forced the millions of detached nonvoters to glance at a ballot

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

No Butt Stuff posted:

e: this is all hypothetical because i'm not sure compulsory voting would be a good thing for the good guys

This is my stance. Sure, hypothetically mandatory voting seems ideal for us because Dems win when turnout is high, but I think a shitload of of the non-voting public are idiots who would be easily swayed by conservative bullshit.

Absolutely I'm in favor of mail in voting, early voting, and paid voting holiday. Make it easy as gently caress to vote everywhere, but not mandatory.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

No Butt Stuff posted:

or vote early by mail.

voting should be a two week thing and if you can't manage to find a loving stamp and send in your ballot then maybe you should be fined.

e: this is all hypothetical because i'm not sure compulsory voting would be a good thing for the good guys

You do realize that the United States is currently a country where ~42 million people are below the poverty line, millions more are poor in practice, and many of them work long hours at hard jobs with no flexibility?

“Having free time” is a privilege in our corporate nightmare world, friend.

Broadly speaking, more people voting is a good thing for non-conservatives. I just remain skeptical that a system of mandatory voting wouldn’t be used to harm minorities and the poor in a country with a proven track record of using voting regulations to do just that.

“Oh sorry, we didn’t receive your vote on time. You now have a bill.”

No Butt Stuff
Jun 10, 2004

Lightning Knight posted:

You do realize that the United States is currently a country where ~42 million people are below the poverty line, millions more are poor in practice, and many of them work long hours at hard jobs with no flexibility?

“Having free time” is a privilege in our corporate nightmare world, friend.

Broadly speaking, more people voting is a good thing for non-conservatives. I just remain skeptical that a system of mandatory voting wouldn’t be used to harm minorities and the poor in a country with a proven track record of using voting regulations to do just that.

“Oh sorry, we didn’t receive your vote on time. You now have a bill.”

in this context you are arguing against something that would take 45 seconds and 45 cents (hell include a postage included envelope to return the ballot)

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

No Butt Stuff posted:

in this context you are arguing against something that would take 45 seconds and 45 cents (hell include a postage included envelope to return the ballot)

What happens when someone loses it, or their mail is stolen, or etc.

I really don’t see the value in implementing a system that would be very easy to abuse to harm the most vulnerable in a country that routinely, explicitly uses the voting system to harm the poor and minorities.

I also can’t imagine we wouldn’t see the votes of non-white people conveniently disappear with more frequency that white people.

Calibanibal
Aug 25, 2015

i dont think your skepticism is unjustified at all, I'm simply observing that mandatory voting has been employed in a country nearly as lovely the US with regards to minority rights and the poor, and its been very effective in getting people to vote

No Butt Stuff
Jun 10, 2004

Lightning Knight posted:

What happens when someone loses it, or their mail is stolen, or etc.

I really don’t see the value in implementing a system that would be very easy to abuse to harm the most vulnerable in a country that routinely, explicitly uses the voting system to harm the poor and minorities.

I also can’t imagine we wouldn’t see the votes of non-white people conveniently disappear with more frequency that white people.

You drop the ballot in a mailbox. How are they gonna know which envelopes to lose? If they get to a collection/counting area and the barcode is fed in, it would just show they had voted.

This is like arguing that you should never issue parking tickets because the meter might have eaten someone's quarters

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004
Any flat fine is regressive as gently caress.

Just expand voting to the Friday before through the 2nd Tuesday and require that everyone have at least one day off in that time frame.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
I generally like mandatory voting but if we're going to advocate radical change to the US voting system it's not something I'd choose to focus on.

And lol if you think they wouldn't practice redlining on undesirable districts.

We were able to pick up all the mail from the white suburb but we missed a lot in the black part of the city. Just the way it goes . . .

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

No Butt Stuff posted:

You drop the ballot in a mailbox. How are they gonna know which envelopes to lose? If they get to a collection/counting area and the barcode is fed in, it would just show they had voted.

This is like arguing that you should never issue parking tickets because the meter might have eaten someone's quarters

You really don’t seem to understand how pervasive historically the usage of voting regulations has been to poo poo on minorities and the poor.

Also arguably our entire system of parking and traffic tickets is discriminatory and poorly conceived, soooooo.

Calibanibal posted:

i dont think your skepticism is unjustified at all, I'm simply observing that mandatory voting has been employed in a country nearly as lovely the US with regards to minority rights and the poor, and its been very effective in getting people to vote

This is fair.

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

Lightning Knight posted:

What happens when someone loses it, or their mail is stolen, or etc.

if you don't vote, you get a letter telling you that you didn't vote and to pay a 20 dollar fine. you can then write to the voting commission and explain why you were unable to vote. if there is a "valid and sufficient" reason your vote never came through, you're exempt from the fine.

(this post is not intended as an argument for or against mandatory voting, just as information.)

No Butt Stuff
Jun 10, 2004

Lightning Knight posted:

You really don’t seem to understand how pervasive historically the usage of voting regulations has been to poo poo on minorities and the poor.

Also arguably our entire system of parking and traffic tickets is discriminatory and poorly conceived, soooooo.

how the gently caress is parking discriminatory?

and yes I understand the history of how voting regulations have been abused but i think you use that to bake protections into a new system (especially when you're doing something as radical as instituting mandatory voting), not use it as an excuse for inaction.

SKULL.GIF
Jan 20, 2017


Potato Salad posted:

I mean, depending on how twisted your media consumption has become in the last two years, you could absolutely believe 💯% that he's among the worst people alive.

The theory I've developed on the really, really bad wolves in sheep's clothing itt is that they're reading just enough toxic waste that they instinctively think of a certain framing to find when reading news from outside their waste foundries such that their analysis of events is essentially preordained.

Potato Salad posted:

I've been given a 24h probe for this before, not it's right so I'll say it again:

A lot of the links and responses Condiv whips out are "but, actually" cherry-picked or intentionally-out-of-context talking points that also feature on /r/the_donald. I'm not suggesting Condiv reads that subreddit, I'm suggesting that he lenses and frames media in the same way.

A question that almost asks itself: "What common grievances lead to the interpretations Condiv and t_d derive?"

Potato Salad posted:

I'm so loving furious with you right now that I'm nearly frothing.

It's been fascinating watching the paranoia develop and escalate into psychosis.

Ogmius815 posted:

Obama was a good president though.

Don't bother quoting this to whine about drones or the "global south", I'm a normal person.

Ogmius815 posted:

This is what you don't understand about the dead-ender leftist crowd. For them, how you campaign matters much MORE than boring poo poo like how many felons get their voting rights back. These people are motivated exclusively by opportunities for self righteous caterwauling, and these opportunities are created mostly by superficial nonsense like campaigns. What matters is getting to feel morally superior and telling others about that feeling. A leftist would rather have a "pure" candidate who does nothing than a less pure candidate who does a lot of good things because of how the pure candidate makes them feel.

This guy too, though the smug arrogance is interfering with the patterns. Calling Northam out on adopting Trump's racial rhetoric is "self-righteous caterwauling" now, which is one of the more impressively delusional takes I've seen all week.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

No Butt Stuff posted:

how the gently caress is parking discriminatory?

and yes I understand the history of how voting regulations have been abused but i think you use that to bake protections into a new system (especially when you're doing something as radical as instituting mandatory voting), not use it as an excuse for inaction.

As noted, flat fees are inherently regressive. A 50 dollar parking ticket means a lot more to someone who makes 400 dollars a week than to someone who makes 4,000. There was a very good article a few weeks back about poor people entering cycles of fines because of parking situations near their work, losing their licenses, and having to drive illegally to keep working to pay off the fines.

It’s never as simple as we wish.

Brony Car
May 22, 2014

by Cyrano4747

Calibanibal posted:

you've forced the millions of detached nonvoters to glance at a ballot

“Awesome! I can vote for Kid Rock!”

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011
OTOH, fines are probably the most humane enforcement mechanism we have, and parking enforcement is a thing that needs to exist. Yes, it's tougher when you're poor, but so is interacting with literally every other aspect of the government.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene

No Butt Stuff posted:

how the gently caress is parking discriminatory?

and yes I understand the history of how voting regulations have been abused but i think you use that to bake protections into a new system (especially when you're doing something as radical as instituting mandatory voting), not use it as an excuse for inaction.

In a poor area where I used to live street parking was every 1st and 3rd Wednesday on one side and every 1st and 3rd Friday on the other. It was that way for ~2 square miles. If you left town, boom, ticket.

In richer neighborhoods it alternates weeks so 1st and 3rd on one side and 2nd and 4th on the other. Longer trips need more planning but day to day business travel isn't affected.

Rockopolis
Dec 21, 2012

I MAKE FUN OF QUEER STORYGAMES BECAUSE I HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO WITH MY LIFE THAN MAKE OTHER PEOPLE CRY

I can't understand these kinds of games, and not getting it bugs me almost as much as me being weird
You know how DT's election is evidence that being an awful person nets free advertising from the news?? And how big money donors don't want the DNC to move leftward and will spend against it? It makes it sound like in addition to entryism, lefties need to diversify their propaganda to include propaganda of the deed. Knocking over banks and flinging the cash at people is pretty classic social banditry. Support with graffiti and narcocorridos.

Crabtree
Oct 17, 2012

ARRRGH! Get that wallet out!
Everybody: Lowtax in a Pickle!
Pickle! Pickle! Pickle! Pickle!

Dinosaur Gum

Rockopolis posted:

You know how DT's election is evidence that being an awful person nets free advertising from the news?? And how big money donors don't want the DNC to move leftward and will spend against it? It makes it sound like in addition to entryism, lefties need to diversify their propaganda to include propaganda of the deed. Knocking over banks and flinging the cash at people is pretty classic social banditry. Support with graffiti and narcocorridos.

So basically the left needs to become a socialist mafia.

Rockopolis
Dec 21, 2012

I MAKE FUN OF QUEER STORYGAMES BECAUSE I HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO WITH MY LIFE THAN MAKE OTHER PEOPLE CRY

I can't understand these kinds of games, and not getting it bugs me almost as much as me being weird

Crabtree posted:

So basically the left needs to become a socialist mafia.
Worked for Stalin, certainly. Or the revolutionary societies in China. Or unions!
Also Payday needs a Bernie mask.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Rockopolis posted:

Worked for Stalin, certainly. Or the revolutionary societies in China. Or unions!
Also Payday needs a Bernie mask.

It “worked” for the Soviet Union or PRC in the very limited sense that they were able to materially improve the conditions of many people at the expense of millions of lives and survive outside attempts to destroy them, but not in the sense that I would ever characterize those countries as role models for the ideal socialist state.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


SKULL.GIF posted:

It's been fascinating watching the paranoia develop and escalate into psychosis.



This guy too, though the smug arrogance is interfering with the patterns. Calling Northam out on adopting Trump's racial rhetoric is "self-righteous caterwauling" now, which is one of the more impressively delusional takes I've seen all week.

Hey look, Skull.gif jumped at an opportunity for self righteous caterwauling.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


Not going to lie, that low-content personal attack felt kinda good, I can see why it's so addictive.

gowb
Apr 14, 2005

Pages ago, someone said that the AFL CIO withdrew support from the Dems. Is that true? I can't find anything on google that isn't from 2011.

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Potato Salad posted:

Not going to lie, that low-content personal attack felt kinda good, I can see why it's so addictive.

i have to assume there's a hell of a rush in dismissing people upset by democratic candidates openly embracing racism as "self-righteous," the alternative is that the people who do so are genuinely just terrible people.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

gowb posted:

Pages ago, someone said that the AFL CIO withdrew support from the Dems. Is that true? I can't find anything on google that isn't from 2011.

They drafted a resolution with unspecific language calling for distancing from lesser of the two voting and the creation of a new labor party. In practice it’s essentially a warning, not material action.

botany
Apr 27, 2013

by Lowtax

gowb posted:

Pages ago, someone said that the AFL CIO withdrew support from the Dems. Is that true? I can't find anything on google that isn't from 2011.

not in any real sense, no. they passed a resolution that basically warned the dems not to take the union vote for granted and demanded a return to pro-worker politics. there is, however, nothing that would translate that resolution into action. so for now it's basically a press release. nothing substantial has changed.

Rockopolis
Dec 21, 2012

I MAKE FUN OF QUEER STORYGAMES BECAUSE I HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO WITH MY LIFE THAN MAKE OTHER PEOPLE CRY

I can't understand these kinds of games, and not getting it bugs me almost as much as me being weird

Lightning Knight posted:

It “worked” for the Soviet Union or PRC in the very limited sense that they were able to materially improve the conditions of many people at the expense of millions of lives and survive outside attempts to destroy them, but not in the sense that I would ever characterize those countries as role models for the ideal socialist state.
While that is doubtless true, I was being specific when referring to it working for Stalin, in that he went from being a cobbler's son to being the Tsar of the Russian empire like a fairytale hero.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Rockopolis posted:

While that is doubtless true, I was being specific when referring to it working for Stalin, in that he went from being a cobbler's son to being the Tsar of the Russian empire like a fairytale hero.

He was also a shitter all things considered and I wouldn’t look to him as a role model any time soon.

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006
remember, everyone: it is important to remain decorous and civilized in your discussion of democratic candidates.

when one of them announces Mexicans are a lesser class of human being than white people, in order to avoid accusations of "self-righteous caterwauling" please limit your criticisms to privately questioning the specific word choice involved. anything more than that is Letting The Terrorists Win.

Quorum
Sep 24, 2014

REMIND ME AGAIN HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED ONES MOVE?
https://mobile.twitter.com/ElectProject/status/926222450836361216

Filthy centrist vote looking good so far, good work YourBoyFancy! :kiddo:

Rockopolis
Dec 21, 2012

I MAKE FUN OF QUEER STORYGAMES BECAUSE I HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO WITH MY LIFE THAN MAKE OTHER PEOPLE CRY

I can't understand these kinds of games, and not getting it bugs me almost as much as me being weird

Lightning Knight posted:

He was also a shitter all things considered and I wouldn’t look to him as a role model any time soon.
No doubt, no doubt, but you gotta be pragmatic to win, and you gotta to win if you want the opportunity to be moral.
Good and bad, it's probably worth analyzing his successes - and failures.

Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

volts5000 posted:

Wife is sending me articles about Brazile backtracking and how they got the years wrong. Apparently, they're saying that the public has already seen the Joint Fundraising Agreement because it was in the Wikileaks dump. I know some shady poo poo happened in the primary, but I don't know what to think. I doubt Brazile's publishers would've gone through the hassle over something so easily disprovable, but Cruz and Huckabee get to publish bullshit all of the time. I just don't know. What am I missing?

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1712377

This one had waaay too much venom for me.
https://deepstatenation.com/primary-error-donna-brazile-mixed-up-two-different-clinton-dnc-agreements/

https://twitter.com/ahumorlessfem/status/926249997376638976

https://twitter.com/ahumorlessfem/status/926252308068958208%5C

If only Bernie had known the primary was a charade all along, maybe this could have been avoided?

The Muppets On PCP
Nov 13, 2016

by Fluffdaddy
kind of a bizarre argument to make that they were hamstrung from disbursing that money to state parties when the dnc recently argued successfully in court that they're not legally obligated to follow any of their own internal bylaws, nor that there should be any expectation from state party fundraisers that any money raised for hvf will ever come back to local orgs

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


Ze Pollack posted:

remember, everyone: it is important to remain decorous and civilized in your discussion of democratic candidates.

when one of them announces Mexicans are a lesser class of human being than white people, in order to avoid accusations of "self-righteous caterwauling" please limit your criticisms to privately questioning the specific word choice involved. anything more than that is Letting The Terrorists Win.

gently caress, which right wing "no u" talking point did this all stem from again, the Latino Victory Fund ad? The sanctuary cities that don't exist in Virginia?

I feel like I'm missing something here, because there seems to be something substantive driving the claims in this thread. So far, all I've found is the typical:
-Republican candidate runs horrifyingly racist ads for weeks
-Right gets called out for being racist fucks
-Right finds a way to take something out of context or just straight up lies. Regardless, the message spreads like disease online, attack dog variants of the left pick it up as an attack of opportunity.

This kept happening during most special elections earlier this year, so please someone explain to me why Northam is very very racist. I have an open mind on this; I'm looking for something I had to miss recently.

Potato Salad fucked around with this message at 22:23 on Nov 3, 2017

JeffersonClay
Jun 17, 2003

by R. Guyovich

The Muppets On PCP posted:

kind of a bizarre argument to make that they were hamstrung from disbursing that money to state parties when the dnc recently argued successfully in court that they're not legally obligated to follow any of their own internal bylaws, nor that there should be any expectation from state party fundraisers that any money raised for hvf will ever come back to local orgs

Contracts and internal bylaws are very different things.

Mr.Unique-Name
Jul 5, 2002

Potato Salad posted:

This kept happening during most special elections earlier this year, so please someone explain to me why Northam is very very racist. I have an open mind on this; I'm looking for something I had to miss recently.

Because he said he would support a ban on sanctuary cities, from what I can tell. Did he say something more?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


Mr.Unique-Name posted:

Because he said he would support a ban on sanctuary cities, from what I can tell. Did he say something more?

That can't be all. People are full-bore equating the two candidates or at the very least posting "I'd proudly write someone in" in a race where Gillespie is basically running on the Stars and Bars.

Like, there's a voice clip somewhere released today and I didn't see it. Or Northam has a loving awful vote in his history that's just been brought up.

Potato Salad fucked around with this message at 22:35 on Nov 3, 2017

  • Locked thread