|
rkajdi posted:Yes, they had their thin layer of plausible deniability set up. Actually I had no idea PJ was trans until people started assuming that was why I was "attacking" them. But sure, whatever you say.
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 13:18 |
|
|
The primary was rigged like a three-master, and if even total flacks like Brazile can see it, you dopes aren't winning any kind of party unity by denying it. You may not be Dale Earnhardt, but you're gonna hit the loving wall because you can't go left.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
show me the context that makes this seems like an attack on PJ being trans and not you making a mistake and being unwilling to admit it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:You realize they weren't calling her mentally ill for being trans, right? Right, they were just bringing up her mental illness to use as an insult and bludgeon against her ideas, they weren't explicitly connecting it to her being trans. That part was just implied, so that they couldn't be called on it. Verranicus posted:Actually I had no idea PJ was trans until people started assuming that was why I was "attacking" them. But sure, whatever you say. lol @ you feeling weird about using the correct pronouns and using 'them' instead.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
Crow Jane posted:If anything, be a little extra aware of dorky white guys when you're out tomorrow I'm in Harlem today. I don't own anything explicitly antifa, but I sure look like a travelling hippy activist - I forgot to pack a shirt (!?) on my way to the train. Maybe I'll get kilt at random! I ain't afeared.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
Ghetto SuperCzar posted:Pretty much this I agree in principle but Donna Brazile's excerpt is dumb and written like textbook poo poo that didn't happen. The DNC is pretty atrocious but it's not really for the reasons Brazile claims (and, as has been noted numerous times, nothing she said is revelatory; so, either she was intentionally sensationalist, or she was wildly out of touch when she started the gig).
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
Guys, I believe PJ asked that we not discuss this topic.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:The primary was rigged like a three-master, and if even total flacks like Brazile can see it, you dopes aren't winning any kind of party unity by denying it.  I laughed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
  at Poster Shamin' again  You can tell when Trumps having a very bad unproductive week when....
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
Rex-Goliath posted:I haven't watched this video in particular so maybe he's changed his tune but in previous lectures his solution has always boiled down to 'the rich aren't paying their fare share and they need to ante up' and 'placing morality solely on debtors while absolving creditors is a huge pile of horseshit' This was a small part of that video but let everything fall part was the conclusion when he took the Q&A.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
Holy poo poo shut up about PJ you goonsCrow Jane posted:If anything, be a little extra aware of dorky white guys when you're out tomorrow Honestly hoping that nothing will happen because the nutjobs are self assured and assume that all antifa will cower from the threat of violence.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
Please guys this all goes nowhere fast and I genuinely detest being the center of such absurd drama. There are both people who are disagreeing with me in good faith and people who have a real problem with me that has nothing to do with my ideas. Trying to sort one out from the other is only going to cause dumb dumb drama. I'm happy to debate or defend my ideas, I'd prefer that if my posts are going to engaged or referenced it is in that context. (I appreciate the people trying to stick up for me but it is only going to make things worse right now.)
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
i am the bird posted:I agree in principle but Donna Brazile's excerpt is dumb and written like textbook poo poo that didn't happen. The DNC is pretty atrocious but it's not really for the reasons Brazile claims (and, as has been noted numerous times, nothing she said is revelatory; so, either she was intentionally sensationalist, or she was wildly out of touch when she started the gig). It's pretty easy to confirm, just show the agreements each camp signed. I guaranfuckingtee you that what we'll see is control was handed over to Clinton in '15, and Sanders had no such equivalent sway written into the agreement over hiring, firing, messaging and strategy decisions. That's rigged by any metric. It's a pretty simple put up or shut up conversation at this point. Either you think Brazile is lying about the content of Clinton's agreement, or you think she's mendaciously omitting that Sanders' agreement had all the same stipulations (which makes no logical loving sense, but then again, it's 2017) or you're just stupid or dishonest. It's really only one of the 3.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:55
|
|
|
DreamShipWrecked posted:Honestly hoping that nothing will happen because the nutjobs are self assured and assume that all antifa will cower from the threat of violence. The victory posts from the usual suspects will be very annoying. We might get a Trump tweet out of it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
empty whippet box posted:What??? You play Go??? I'm a 6k player on pandanet, we shall discuss this further. By the way, there is a Go thread in ask/tell. Eripsa just introduced me to the tile game 'Hive', which is a sort of cross between Go and Chess. I really dig it!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:It's pretty easy to confirm, just show the agreements each camp signed. We, the DNC, agree to give over full and complete control of Everything Ever to Hillary Rodham Clinton so that she may defeat The One True Savior of Democracy: Bernie Sanders, and ensure that ineffectual centrism continues to do nothing in this country. It is her time. -DNC
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
i am the bird posted:I agree in principle but Donna Brazile's excerpt is dumb and written like textbook poo poo that didn't happen. The DNC is pretty atrocious but it's not really for the reasons Brazile claims (and, as has been noted numerous times, nothing she said is revelatory; so, either she was intentionally sensationalist, or she was wildly out of touch when she started the gig). She was conflating the agreement signed when Hillary won the primary with the one she signed during the primary. The story is complete bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
Brothers to the bone, right McMaster?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
1337JiveTurkey posted:Huy Fong also comes in open mouth jars with the seeds etc still in there. That’s sambal not sriracha
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
Taerkar posted:The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings. You're right, this is pretty bad when you just look at it honestly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:It's pretty easy to confirm, just show the agreements each camp signed. Both of their agreements were the same, you colossal moron https://twitter.com/scottdetrow/status/926492339987800064
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
Ague Proof posted:The victory posts from the usual suspects will be very annoying. Oh I'm sure we'll get to hear about them in this thread when people post their twitter bullshit to do reaction type posting too. Honestly the only people's twitter bullshit I kind of care about are Trump (solely because it's what the thread is about and it's almost always utterly laughable), reputable news organizations/pundits with insight into a situation, and politicians who actually wield influence over governments. Crazy man daily partisan bullshit from the private sector is literally just "who cares?" trash at least to me. Clearly it interests other goons though.  Nobody actually loving wins anything in these dumb as gently caress rallies, that's just my take. Prester Jane posted:Please guys this all goes nowhere fast and I genuinely detest being the center of such absurd drama. There are both people who are disagreeing with me in good faith and people who have a real problem with me that has nothing to do with my ideas. Trying to sort one out from the other is only going to cause dumb dumb drama. I'm happy to debate or defend my ideas, I'd prefer that if my posts are going to engaged or referenced it is in that context. (I appreciate the people trying to stick up for me but it is only going to make things worse right now.) You seem cool, I think people should listen to what you have to say here. Kale fucked around with this message at 21:04 on Nov 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:You're right, this is pretty bad when you just look at it honestly. it isn't, unless you're looking for reasons to be angry which, you know, is pretty popular, but you don't need to turn this thread into your pillow beating session
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
aware of dog posted:Both of their agreements were the same, you colossal moron Great, then just show us the copies of the agreements that were signed, and the dates they were signed. It's not that tough, right?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:Great, then just show us the copies of the agreements that were signed, and the dates they were signed. It's not that tough, right? agreed, we need to see the long form copies
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:agreed, we need to see the long form copies Unironically agree. We're not all party bootlicks, some of us have the smarts to distrust large organizations with millions of dollars to play with and who seem to be short on accountability but long on explanations.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:Unironically agree. We're not all party bootlicks, some of us have the smarts to distrust large organizations with millions of dollars to play with and who seem to be short on accountability but long on explanations. i too am smart enough to question where obama was really born i will not be swayed by the cheap mewling excuses of the mainstream media, i am far too intelligent to be convinced by such blatantly threadbare pandering, ipso facto quid pro quo
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:Unironically agree. We're not all party bootlicks, some of us have the smarts to distrust large organizations with millions of dollars to play with and who seem to be short on accountability but long on explanations. That flew right over your head so high it's in orbit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:i too am smart enough Let's not go saying things we can't take back. For real though, if you're right, wouldn't this be the ultimate smackdown of dumbshits like me? Why are you scared of getting to perform the chokeslam you dream of? Unless you're scared that this isn't as open and shut as you'd like it to be, I don't see the downside if everything's on the up and up. Finally us stupid Bernard Brothers would get the evidence-based comeuppance we've deserved for so long!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:Let's not go saying things we can't take back. yeah why wouldn't i want to watch you get owned 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:You're right, this is pretty bad when you just look at it honestly. That not honest. That's the agreement that was signed AFTER the primary was over. The one signed during the primary didn't have any of that stuff.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
ClancyEverafter posted:Great, then just show us the copies of the agreements that were signed, and the dates they were signed. It's not that tough, right? You just got interested in politics about 2 years ago, didn't you?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:i too am smart enough to question where obama was really born Brazile was DNC chairperson. The comparison to the Obama Kenyan conspiracy theory only works if it had been started by his mother.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
7c Nickel posted:That not honest. That's the agreement that was signed AFTER the primary was over. The one signed during the primary didn't have any of that stuff. Great, then show us. "There's two agreements, but trust us, the one that looks really suspicious that we're not going to show you a dated copy of? Not the one you think it is." Christ, just show the documents and put it to bed. Tom Perez could handle this with a few screenshots pulled off Sharepoint. poo poo, he could probably make Keith Ellison do it for him.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
Caros posted:How about you play a game that isn't hot trash. Have you considered that? Like the one I mentioned? Yeah, we're considering playing it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
Taerkar posted:You just got interested in politics about 2 years ago, didn't you? Nope, I've been voting Democrat since 1995. I took years to get this dumb.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
joepinetree posted:Brazile was DNC chairperson. so the DNC insiders are awful when they say something we don't like, but great when they do say something we like. got it ClancyEverafter posted:Great, then show us. hold on, i'm logging in to the DNC server now to get the long form documents and i will show you them, in a moment
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:so the DNC insiders are awful when they say something we don't like, but great when they do say something we like. got it You are scared shitless that this won't fade and they'll have to produce the actual documents.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
oh my god the goddamn joint fundraising agreement that the clinton campaign signed has been in the open since the podesta leaks you uninformed morons. it's here: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/fileid/28674/7815 it says nothing about clinton getting to control everything. it doesn't do so because that's a standard contract and donna brazille mixed two different things up because guess what, now everyone talks about her upcoming book. all of this is old news, and the fact that none of you can even do a goddamn google search before you start spouting off about what a shitbitch Killary KKKlinton is is loving annoying
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 13:18 |
|
|
I'm sorry, but did Trump just fuckin' say that climate change is a man-made catastrophe!?  https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...m=.fec99421e3cd
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2017 21:11
|
|
