|
Typo posted:the segment of the electorate energized by white people idpol lives in more strategically placed locations than hillary voters I can buy that.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:11 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 03:36 |
|
Yinlock posted:tbf what works for the right doesn't necessarily work for the left this is true
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:11 |
|
Real men wear tiny rear end shorts
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:12 |
|
Ellison/Monae 2020 or i fuckin walk
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:15 |
|
Yinlock posted:tbf what works for the right doesn't necessarily work for the left truth, and i really wonder why some people cant learn that. "WHY CANT YOU OVER LOOK MY LACK OF A PLATFORM! IF WE WERE REPUBLICANS I"
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:16 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:Ellison/Monae 2020 or i fuckin walk
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:16 |
|
the only thing im truly stridently suckzone about is the belief that putting Janelle Monae on a side stage and making Katy Perry the DNC headliner was what really lost the election
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:16 |
|
Ellison/Ja Rule
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:17 |
|
Frijolero posted:Real men wear tiny rear end shorts tight booty shorts btw where is he did he eat another monther
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:18 |
|
tulsi gabbard is pretty cool, and not only because she supports the heroic leader of syrian revolution
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:19 |
|
Ja Rule can be Secretary of Music Festivals
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:19 |
|
isn't this the crazy guy that was going to primary bernie
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:23 |
Raskolnikov38 posted:isn't this the crazy guy that was going to primary bernie is it? lol if so
|
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:24 |
|
tulsi is my mom
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:24 |
|
steinrokkan posted:tulsi gabbard is pretty cool, and not only because she supports the heroic leader of syrian revolution Uuhhh, did you know Bashar is an Assadist? Problematic to say the least
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:25 |
|
Lastgirl posted:sometimes its not about winning I've got some bad news,
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:27 |
|
is tulsi actually a leftist, like, does she, believe in class struggle
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:28 |
|
deadgoon posted:is tulsi actually a leftist, like, does she, believe in class struggle She hates banks so she can't be all bad She's no Bernie tho
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:29 |
|
democrats have no control over one of those three
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:29 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:democrats have no control over one of those three Only because they control no state governments, lmao
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:30 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:democrats have no control over one of those three they do in ny and ca but mostly Vox Nihili posted:Only because they control no state governments, lmao
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:31 |
|
But seriously, in all four or five or so remaining blue states Dems are 100% responsible for all the terrible voting laws
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:31 |
|
Vox Nihili posted:I've got some bad news, idk, long term it seems like it galvanized some glaring issues
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:32 |
|
steinrokkan posted:tulsi gabbard is pretty cool, and not only because she supports the heroic leader of syrian revolution it is time for us to make the curse of Assad work for us not against us, for once
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:33 |
|
Dems aren't even willing to fight for votes. If Republicans want to suppress voters, those spineless Dems should be pushing instant registration and mandatory voting.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:34 |
|
Vox Nihili posted:But seriously, in all four or five or so remaining blue states Dems are 100% responsible for all the terrible voting laws Dems don’t control NY because Republicans ran on the Democratic ballot line laffo
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:34 |
|
If Democrats were serious, they would basically do whatever Lenin did. That seemed to work out pretty well
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:35 |
|
Corbyn is currently pushing for 16 year old voting, he's a real loving badass.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:36 |
|
Vox Nihili posted:She hates banks so she can't be all bad how can u believe anything she says
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:36 |
|
deadgoon posted:how can u believe anything she says how can you believe anything anyone says our own reality constructs has to coincide with other people's reality constructs to come together on an issue again, america is too big with localized issues that take precedent over other priorities and people are too busy hustling to come together against a perceived common enemy, and its even harder to suggest an enemy that is abstracted like big bank you think we're a nation state, but we're still tribal within our communities Lastgirl has issued a correction as of 22:41 on Nov 3, 2017 |
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:38 |
|
we also know how amazing dems are at the local level right? right?~
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:42 |
|
welp it just leaked lol https://twitter.com/aseitzwald/status/926565766522171392
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:46 |
|
Zikan posted:welp it just leaked lol yesssss
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:50 |
|
The responses to that tweet are something alright. Tf?
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:53 |
|
Zikan posted:welp it just leaked lol This owns
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:57 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:democrats have no control over one of those three who cares, make them do it anyway
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 22:58 |
|
Frijolero posted:Can we stop doing this please? Well that or you might as well work for Revolutionary Vangaurdism then. But yeah, this really needs to stop. The idea that we should be concerned about what the GOP will say is ridiculous. They're sociopaths who wills straight up make up poo poo to win, so don't worry about them being horrible about facts. Just be ready to both inspire your own cohorts, and play as dirty as possible to destroy the GOP. Do as Huey Long would have.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 23:02 |
|
Mr Hootington posted:This owns lol quote:In exchange for Hillary for America's (HFA) helping the cash-strapped DNC raise money, the committee agreed "that HFA personnel will be consulted and have joint authority over strategic decisions over the staffing, budget, expenditures, and general election related communications, data, technology, analytics, and research." But dems sell out for cash, what a shocking plot twist?
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 23:03 |
|
so apparently this was in it: quote:"Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to violate the DNC's obligation of impartiality and neutrality through the Nominating process. All activities performed under this agreement will be focused exclusively on preparations for the General Election and not the Democratic Primary," the memo states. which nbc is casting as "the agreement didn't take effect till the general", but nothing i read in that actually says "doesn't take effect until the general", just that the activities for this agreement are for general elections preparations and should not be taken as violating the impartiality of the DNC (even though it does). Condiv has issued a correction as of 23:07 on Nov 3, 2017 |
# ? Nov 3, 2017 23:03 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 03:36 |
|
Typo posted:the basic conclusion I've reached is that at this point ideology don't really matter anymore for the American electorate and as long as you run a charismatic figure with anti-establishment credentials and "authenticity" you can attach whatever ideology/policy agenda you want to him/her and win this is a retarded conclusion for morons. the right conclusion is: most people dont fuckin vote and hillary lost because the rust belt working class got tired of being lied to and stayed at home, run a good candidate with an actually good platform and you'll win.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2017 23:04 |