|
I see 1password 7 for iOS has some IAP poo poo, If I still have my own vault and sync it (not using their family cloud thing) is upgrading to 7 going to not work / nag me?WAR DOGS OF SOCHI posted:agreed -- it's pretty loving dumb for just this reason It's already seen as an official mouthpiece of whatever the account is. Remember when AP News tweeted there was an attack and POTUS Obama was injured and it blipped the stock market? That kind of stuff is going to be hard to unwind at this point.
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 00:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 07:25 |
|
|
anthonypants posted:that's what i assume happened, because the alternative is that people have arbitrary access to delete tweets twitter employees most definitely have direct access to tweets, why wouldnt they? twitter management obviously doesnt give a poo poo about anything except ad dollars & VC cash and yeah if it was in response to a report, someone woulda thrown an anonymized "thx for your report, we banned him" response out by now cause you know more than one person reported him more likely you get banned from twitter if you keep reporting trump tweets for inciting violence or something
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 01:01
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:twitter employees most definitely have direct access to tweets, why wouldnt they? twitter management obviously doesnt give a poo poo about anything except ad dollars & VC cash
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 01:04
|
|
|
there's no way anybody is reviewing the probably insane amount of reported @donald tweets, no loving way. watson couldn't even do it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 01:13
|
|
|
why would they need to review them? there is absolutely nothing donald trump could tweet that would result in suspending his account he is literally the highest profile user of the entire platform and also the potus. twitter ain't never gonna enforce a tos violation against his accounts iirc they even left themselves an out by refusing to censor things considered "newsworthy". the the president says it, it's newsworthy
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
ugh its all hosed up and the world is going to become more hosed up because of greedy idiots and bullshit assfuckaghrsfxv sorry but seriously
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 02:21
|
|
|
serious question: do you think the potus account has 2fa enabled?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 02:37
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:serious question: do you think the potus account has 2fa enabled? well hes logged in already on his lovely android, and thats probably the extent of thought that security has been given unless idk ivanka or kushner or someone forced him i dont think so
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
this prob goes in here https://twitter.com/dnlongen/status/926255160195678215
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 02:41
|
|
|
Kuvo posted:this prob goes in here
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 03:18
|
|
|
spoiler: it's opendns
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:what if someone reported one of trumps warmonger tweets for advocating violence and the twitter person was just like "yeah, that checks out - BAN" this used to happen (probably still does), and eventually tweeter's official line after he said he'd nuke NoKo was that he's and elected official and too important to ban or something.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:i mean, the obvious solution would be to nationalize twitter. i wonder why no one's suggesting that. sure would be hosed up to put the us directly in charge of a massively popular global network
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:00
|
|
|
you understand that if twitter were nationalized it would be unconstitutional to ban the nazis right
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:13
|
|
|
so at least they'd have an excuse
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:so at least they'd have an excuse
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
how to de-anonymize tor users with seven characters
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:18
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:so at least they'd have an excuse
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
rjmccall posted:you understand that if twitter were nationalized it would be unconstitutional to ban the nazis right
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
maybe you guys should make a distinction between free political speech and hatespeech
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:48
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:maybe you guys should make a distinction between free political speech and hatespeech the point is that the government can't be trusted not to abuse that by defining hatespeech as whatever they want. our constitution was written by men who had just had a revolution because of the government abusing definitions to gently caress with them, and so wrote thing to try and prevent those abuses. can you imagine if our current government could redefine hatespeech? it wouldn't be the nazis who had a problem
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 04:59
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:maybe you guys should make a distinction between free political speech and hatespeech first amendment means that the only hate speech that can be prosecuted are "fighting words" in person
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:01
|
|
|
the founding fathers, who all barely washed their dicks, want me to yell fire in a crowded theater
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:09
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:first amendment means that the only hate speech that can be prosecuted are "fighting words" in person im saying maybe "fighting words" dont have to be in person
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:16
|
|
|
Powaqoatse posted:im saying maybe "fighting words" dont have to be in person you wanna take this outside buddy
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:can you imagine if our current government could redefine hatespeech? it wouldn't be the nazis who had a problem “it seems you have two lives mr anderson... in one life you’re a mild mannered computer toucher who pays his taxes. in the other, you go by the name “maskenfreiheit” and post vile hate speech such as ‘police the police’. it is a demonstrated fact that a small number of bad apples are responsible for misconduct, the vast majority of police being faithful public servants. posts claiming otherwise incite violence and unrest against blue lives, which are a protected class under our new hate speech laws. you have been found guilty of criminal libel with a suspended sentence. under the terms of your parole you will be banned from using any forms of social media, including dead Internet forums”
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:20
|
|
|
imagine believing in the moral superiority of slavers lmao
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
Rufus Ping posted:you wanna take this outside buddy lmao
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
germany: a country now notably free of nazi ideology due to its comprehensive banning of the subject
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:35
|
|
|
rjmccall posted:germany: a country now notably free of nazi ideology due to its comprehensive banning of the subject theyre definitely not at all free of nazis but nazis go to jail for being nazis so thats a plus for germany imo
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
if we're going to be updating constitutional amendments i can think of a much better one to start with than the 1st
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:if we're going to be updating constitutional amendments i can think of a much better one to start with than the 1st It's the Third right? Engblom v. Carey makes me soooo fuckkin mad...
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 06:06
|
|
|
Schadenboner posted:It's the Third right? i was thinking the twentieth. i mean, what's the rush?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 06:25
|
|
|
twitter is on record stating that trump's being president and using twitter as an official channel for government communication overrides their terms of service and they will never ban him for anything he tweets
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 06:44
|
|
|
WAR DOGS OF SOCHI posted:twitter is on record stating that trump's being president and using twitter as an official channel for government communication overrides their terms of service and they will never ban him for anything he tweets theyre kinda painting themselves into a corner though, you know? threatening or attacking part A is bad form, so that leaves part B...
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 07:42
|
|
|
I think it's loving great that the us president uses a social media platform which is (almost) completely outside of whitehouse control, as the premier official outlet
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 07:57
|
|
|
WAR DOGS OF SOCHI posted:twitter is on record stating that trump's being president and using twitter as an official channel for government communication overrides their terms of service and they will never ban him for anything he tweets someone should file an FTC complaint that twitter claiming to have a code of conduct is a deceptive trade practice
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 08:35
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:I think it's loving great that the us president uses a social media platform which is (almost) completely outside of whitehouse control, as the premier official outlet it would be better if they didnt let him delete lovely typo-tweets not a lot of heads of state that get to just yell poo poo at 5am and then silently correct it cause they garbled some words
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 08:41
|
|
|
i thought any and all communications by the White House had to be preserved? so even if he deleted his tweets there will still be record of it some place? also lol like delete on twitter doesn’t actually mean update twits set deleted=now() instead actually deleting
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 08:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 07:25 |
|
|
lol do you really think they preserve anything with a russia probe going on? every room in the white house is at all times a true copy of a back office in the tehran embassy circa 1979
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2017 08:58
|
|