|
That just makes it seem like his father's legacy is some Lee press on nails
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 17:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 06:23 |
|
|
He's just sad 'cause his face itches.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 17:27
|
|
|
He just realized that there’s no more toilet paper in the stall.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
fruit on the bottom posted:He just realized that there’s no more toilet paper in the stall. No TP for BP.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
That was not the first nor only BP poster that was put out yesterday. https://twitter.com/BlackGirlNerds/status/928672389193502721
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 17:53
|
|
|
RevKrule posted:That was not the first nor only BP poster that was put out yesterday. Looks like Angela Bassett could use a hand.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
RevKrule posted:That was not the first nor only BP poster that was put out yesterday. That's a lot of gray.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
The Andy Serkis poster, lmao
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
Justice League embargo for social media is lifted. A lot of people are sharing similar impressions. It's fun and the cast has good chemistry but there's a lot of poo poo that's rushed through and the villain is as throw-away as they come. It's got some tone issues and tries to cram way too much story into too little movie. Better than BvS and MoS but not exactly a great movie (probably C+/B- is what I'd rate it).
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 19:32
|
|
|
RevKrule posted:Justice League embargo for social media is lifted. A lot of people are sharing similar impressions. It's fun and the cast has good chemistry but there's a lot of poo poo that's rushed through and the villain is as throw-away as they come. It's got some tone issues and tries to cram way too much story into too little movie. Better than BvS and MoS but not exactly a great movie (probably C+/B- is what I'd rate it). A few of them also report that there's an uncanny valley effect from the CG used to remove Cavill's MI6 mustache from the reshoots, which I look forward to seeing for myself. Anyway, the prevailing sense I get from the Twitter impressions is less one of genuine enthusiasm for the film than one of palpable relief that it's not as bad as BvS, which can't be what WB was hoping for. I expect pretty middling reviews from the mainstream film critics next week.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:A few of them also report that there's an uncanny valley effect from the CG used to remove Cavill's MI6 mustache from the reshoots, which I look forward to seeing for myself. Wish he had a mustache the whole time. Like a full on Tom of Finland Superman.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
I want every superhero to have a distracting mustache. Spider-Man Homecoming would have been way better if Tom Holland never shaved his Lost City of Z facial hair.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 19:58
|
|
|
Jinkies, so many people saying "It's okay!" and "It's fine!". One even says "it's not that bad, I suppose". How can one fail to be moved by such joyous enthusiasm?
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:A few of them also report that there's an uncanny valley effect from the CG used to remove Cavill's MI6 mustache from the reshoots, which I look forward to seeing for myself. Lobok posted:Wish he had a mustache the whole time. Like a full on Tom of Finland Superman. “Clark?” “N-no, I’m his brother... Mark. Mark Trent.” “Your last name is different?” “No? Maybe. I was... adopted. As well.” “But you’re wearing Superman’s costume.” “I’m Superman too” “Superman Too?” “Sure”
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
RevKrule posted:Justice League embargo for social media is lifted. A lot of people are sharing similar impressions. It's fun and the cast has good chemistry but there's a lot of poo poo that's rushed through and the villain is as throw-away as they come. It's got some tone issues and tries to cram way too much story into too little movie. Better than BvS and MoS but not exactly a great movie (probably C+/B- is what I'd rate it). So it's Ultron.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
Who are the people who have seen it so far?
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:06
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:So it's Ultron. I was going to say, that sounds about like an Avengers film if it's accurate.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
Nah, I liked Ultron for what he was and while I won't claim he was a terribly compelling villain I will say he was at least an interesting performance.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
Arist posted:Nah, I liked Ultron for what he was and while I won't claim he was a terribly compelling villain I will say he was at least an interesting performance. I liked Spaderbot but even I have to admit most people did not. At all.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
mycot posted:I liked Spaderbot but even I have to admit most people did not. At all. How are you defining most people? Like, this forum? Maybe that's true, although I'm not sure. If you're talking most people that saw the movie in general I don't think its remotely true at all.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:A few of them also report that there's an uncanny valley effect from the CG used to remove Cavill's MI6 mustache from the reshoots, which I look forward to seeing for myself. I kind of read it the opposite, it seemed apologetic for not saying it's bad.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
mycot posted:I liked Spaderbot but even I have to admit most people did not. At all. Hell same. I saw AoU at least a year after it came out and having read all the hyperbole on this forum I was pretty surprised how not awful it was.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:So it's Ultron. I would say it's about on par with Ultron. It's definitely serviceable and watchable and Ezra Miller's great but if this movie didn't have Justice League attached to it, people would forget it existed a day after they saw it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:37
|
|
|
fruit on the bottom posted:“Clark?” So you're saying Clark is Superman? No... I mean I'm the second Superman. *holds up two fingers* Superman Twoooo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 20:48
|
|
|
I’m also envisioning that he’s having this conversation with Lois or Batman where he has no real reason to lie, and then when an unshaven Clark shows up at the end of the movie denying the encounter you’re left to wonder if maybe, just maybe, it actually was a separate guy who just happens to always sound like he’s lying badly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Lobok posted:Wish he had a mustache the whole time. B-but then he'd be a bad guy...  
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
teagone posted:That's a lot of gray. At least it's not blue and orange.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
RevKrule posted:I would say it's about on par with Ultron. It's definitely serviceable and watchable and Ezra Miller's great but if this movie didn't have Justice League attached to it, people would forget it existed a day after they saw it. So was the trailer misleading or do you just really enjoy Flash's quips?
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 22:09
|
|
|
Ragnarok is really good...there's a lot in there that I liked more than even GOTG2, which was also great. It certainly sets a new direction for the Thor stuff.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
mikeraskol posted:How are you defining most people? Like, this forum? Maybe that's true, although I'm not sure. Of course outside of this dead humor forum. I always hear, pretty much always coupled with every mention of AOU, is disappointment that Ultron wasn't intimidating or scary. These Justice League comments are honestly similar to how I feel about the first Avengers movie, but of course in context the unreal hype at the time made the reception completely different.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 22:46
|
|
|
SonicRulez posted:So was the trailer misleading or do you just really enjoy Flash's quips? Ezra's good and the quips are basically pure Joss Whedon. Plus his feelings on brunch really speak to me. There's some jokes that fall flat but on the whole, him and Jason Mamoa are the ones that keep the movie from being BvS2.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
Seeing that the villain is pretty blah in this is bumming me out because Ciaran Hinds is one of my favorite actors; what's with Marvel and DC wasting really good British actors as villains, that's like the easiest thing to do when making a movie, I mean just look at Tim Curry's career!
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 23:43
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:Seeing that the villain is pretty blah in this is bumming me out because Ciaran Hinds is one of my favorite actors; what's with Marvel and DC wasting really good British actors as villains, that's like the easiest thing to do when making a movie, I mean just look at Tim Curry's career! Reading an interview with Cate Blanchett about Thor: Ragnarok was entertaining. She specifically took the role because very little was required of her: she showed up, played a huge ham with nothing further required nor desired of her, and collected a fat paycheck. She said it was good, relaxing fun, a nice break from demanding roles.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Remember he shot the whole film without a mustache. It wasn't until the reshoot he had to have it due to other obligations. So they would have had to cg one in in every other scene.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:Seeing that the villain is pretty blah in this is bumming me out because Ciaran Hinds is one of my favorite actors; what's with Marvel and DC wasting really good British actors as villains, that's like the easiest thing to do when making a movie, I mean just look at Tim Curry's career!
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Remember he shot the whole film without a mustache. It wasn't until the reshoot he had to have it due to other obligations. So they would have had to cg one in in every other scene. It might've been arguably cheaper to give him a mustache in the rest of the movie than the cg it out... Besides, the technology for digitally adding mustaches already exists: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAEAbqrE5Zw
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2017 00:02
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Remember he shot the whole film without a mustache. It wasn't until the reshoot he had to have it due to other obligations. So they would have had to cg one in in every other scene. That sounds way better imo Or even gently caress it, mustache that disappears between shots!
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2017 00:03
|
|
|
Arist posted:That sounds way better imo They should have done that then just had Mr. Mxyzptlk pop in each time it changed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Remember he shot the whole film without a mustache. It wasn't until the reshoot he had to have it due to other obligations. So they would have had to cg one in in every other scene. Then the ironic part was that Mission Impossible got shooting delayed long enough that he probably could have just shaved it off and regrow it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 06:23 |
|
|
Wait holy poo poo, so mustachegate is definitely confirmed real now and not just the usual doomsaying rumor mill stuff? We can absolutely see Cavill's CGI lips in full XD glory? Man, it's getting to the point where you can actually trust weird bullshit-sounding rumors nowadays.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2017 00:15
|
|
