|
So “Death of the author” is a complete bullshit philosophy, right?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 20:58 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 23:22 |
|
No, it's more important now than ever. It's also a cute pun.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 21:01 |
|
Mordiceius posted:So “Death of the author” is a complete bullshit philosophy, right? Why would you think that?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 21:07 |
|
Mordiceius posted:So “Death of the author” is a complete bullshit philosophy, right? Of course not. It justified that man and thousands like him claiming their random babbling was worth a paycheck. What higher calling could there be?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 21:12 |
|
Mordiceius posted:So “Death of the author” is a complete bullshit philosophy, right? Nah Mark Millar probably won't say that Kick-rear end as a franchise (and also Superior and Nemesis but mostly Kick-rear end) is about him working through his issues with comic book fans and the industry and what people expect from him but gently caress you that's absolutely what's going on
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 21:18 |
|
Mordiceius posted:So “Death of the author” is a complete bullshit philosophy, right? However did you come to that conclusion?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:01 |
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:However did you come to that conclusion? The first step, presumably, is to not read "The Death of the Author" by Roland Barthes.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:11 |
|
Mordiceius posted:So “Death of the author” is a complete bullshit philosophy, right?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:16 |
|
Mulva posted:Of course not. It justified that man and thousands like him claiming their random babbling was worth a paycheck. What higher calling could there be?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:16 |
|
In what it can only be the start of an endless amount of rumors, now is being said that Reeves is eyeing Jake Gyllenhaal to replace Affleck, with the idea of The Batman being moved to the Elseworld line of films or making it a prequel to BvS
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:23 |
|
In a couple months they'll announce their bringing Bale back and go through with the Affleck as Deathstroke rumors.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:24 |
|
If they decide to replace Affleck already, they should just end the current Justice League universe with WW2, and start over.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:25 |
|
Crows Turn Off posted:If they decide to replace Affleck already, they should just end the current Justice League universe with WW2, and start over. This but without starting over because none of the people at DC who are involved in the films are good
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:30 |
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:This but without starting over because none of the people at DC who are involved in the films are good Especially after Snyder left.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:34 |
|
BravestOfTheLamps posted:Especially after Snyder left. I said at DC, unless you mean Scott which lmbo if he was involved they didn't pay any attention to him in favor of a long slow jack of DKR
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:37 |
|
Mordiceius posted:So “Death of the author” is a complete bullshit philosophy, right? The rule is, you're not allowed to talk smack about post-structuralism unless you're going to put up a sterling defence of structuralism. I demand you ascertain the science of Snyder so that we may project forwards a 'Justice League' from first principles, and find the existing film lacking in its wake.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:41 |
|
A good justice league film exists entirely on it's own and doesn't spend half the movie introducing the team it just drops you into the time they all got possessed by Starro and Tommy Monaghan had to shoot astronauts
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:43 |
|
Maybe they'll give Benefit Bendis some position of power in the film division
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:46 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Maybe they'll give Benefit Please no he's not good at the kind of story they want to do Like, I wouldn't mind him writing Batman because it would basically be like Miller getting DKR and Year One on the strength of his Daredevil, but once he gets above the street level and the personal drama he falls apart
|
# ? Nov 16, 2017 22:48 |
|
A good JL film would also at least pay lip service to Green Lantern. DC really hosed this thing up and rushed it. They didn't even have to follow Marvel's world building template but having their two most famous properties face off then killing one and resurrecting him over the course of two just films and wantonly diving into an ensemble and then announcing stand alone unconnected films just seems chaotic and aimless. Like, you could start with the entire team and then work backwards but the way the universe comes off feels like they're just randomly throwing darts and hoping for breakout moment. It has no cohesion, tonal consistency or any long term vision whatsoever. It shows in the product too. It's no accident that WW is their best film, I'd argue largely for this reason. Two out of their first four movies were ensembles and a third was a fight to the death showdown that shoehorned WW and Flash in. None of it's earned and one could argue not really shown. It's more to with pacing than anything really. DC seems to want to adapt all their best stories all at once and the product suffers for it.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:13 |
|
BiggerBoat posted:DC seems to want to adapt all their best stories all at once and the product suffers for it. It's Snyder, I think. He loves all these stories and wants to direct as many of them as possible. That's why his Superman movie is Superman 1 + Superman 2 put together.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:16 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Maybe they'll give Benefit He's a better fit for the CW shows I think.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:19 |
|
BiggerBoat posted:A good JL film would also at least pay lip service to Green Lantern. Er, the film does exactly that. Two Lanterns are part of the army that repelled Stepenwolf's first invasion Anyways, the WSJ is reporting that Comcast has also approached Fox, interested on buying similar assets to those discussed by Disney. https://www.newsarama.com/37409-fox-has-announcer-suitor-in-acquisition-buyout-report.html https://www.wsj.com/articles/comcast-approached-21st-century-fox-over-acquisition-interest-1510869129
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:25 |
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:In what it can only be the start of an endless amount of rumors, now is being said that Reeves is eyeing Jake Gyllenhaal to replace Affleck, with the idea of The Batman being moved to the Elseworld line of films or making it a prequel to BvS gyllenhall would be a terrible replacement for Affleck's Batman, but probably a good replacement for Bale's Batman. Gyllenhaal would also be much better served as a Bat-villain of some sort though. Like, that dude as Riddler? Dope as hell.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:27 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:Gyllenhaal would also be much better served as a Bat-villain of some sort though. Like, that dude as Riddler? Dope as hell.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:28 |
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:It's Snyder, I think. He loves all these stories and wants to direct as many of them as possible. That's why his Superman movie is Superman 1 + Superman 2 put together. And BvS was The Dark Knight Returns and The Death of Superman. I rather liked MoS Dark_Tzitzimine posted:Er, the film does exactly that. OK sorry then. Haven't seen it and heard zero about GL.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:30 |
|
Justice League looks to not be good, but at least I didn't have to pay for my ticket.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:41 |
|
Like it's okay to trust any loving critics. Judge it for yourself. E: If you don't like it based on the trailers though - thats fine.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:48 |
|
In a world where the abysmally-reviewed The Orville is regarded as being the best Star Trek series since DS9, I wonder if people still read reviews anymore.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:52 |
|
Its also okay if you completely lost interest when you saw that Joss Whedon was attached to it.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 00:52 |
|
Vintersorg posted:Like it's okay to trust any loving critics. Judge it for yourself. It's fine to trust critics when it comes to going to a theater. Which includes paying for the gas, and the ticket. Food/drink/candy is optional, but still. You're looking at a 20-30$ night just to see something you may not like for 2 hours. Plus lovely audience members around you talking and being entitled pieces of poo poo. If seeing films isn't your passion, that could seem like a real chore to do. And hey, you can always catch it later at your house on Redbox, and maybe you'll enjoy it! Who knows!
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 01:24 |
|
i lost interest about halfway into bvs
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 01:26 |
|
CelticPredator posted:It's fine to trust critics when it comes to going to a theater. Which includes paying for the gas, and the ticket. Food/drink/candy is optional, but still. You're looking at a 20-30$ night just to see something you may not like for 2 hours. Plus lovely audience members around you talking and being entitled pieces of poo poo. The primary purpose of criticism is apparently to help you get your money's worth by avoiding bad cinema visits. You need to listen to critics so that you won't be annoyed by other audience members. That seems rather paranoid.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 01:33 |
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:It's Snyder, I think. He loves all these stories and wants to direct as many of them as possible. That's why his Superman movie is Superman 1 + Superman 2 put together. CelticPredator posted:It's fine to trust critics when it comes to going to a theater. Which includes paying for the gas, and the ticket. Food/drink/candy is optional, but still. You're looking at a 20-30$ night just to see something you may not like for 2 hours. Plus lovely audience members around you talking and being entitled pieces of poo poo.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 01:53 |
|
Kinda funny James Franco is being tapped for Multiple Man. There was a controversy where Madrox was apparently dating an underaged character, except the character was actually an adult when they were dating but everyone thought she's a child because she was when first introduced but Madrox's comic had time move forward faster than the other Marvel comics at the time. James Franco, on the hand, was accused of dating a high school girl but it turned out to be one of his weird ways of promoting his movie or something. Also I heard Jason Momoa is going to be The Crow.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 02:21 |
|
My thoughts on Death of the Author: https://twitter.com/danaschwartzzz/status/931325744667680768
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 02:53 |
|
I mean there's pretty much nothing they could do about that do to contracts. Well, I supposed they could have just kept the original version of the film instead of pointlessly changing it. Like, I guess audiences need a scene of Superman talking to teens so you know he's cool?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 03:18 |
|
does henry cavill have some sort of weird disease which makes it impossible for him to grow more than one mustache in his life
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 03:23 |
|
They could have just done bearded Superman which we all would have loved.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 03:24 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 23:22 |
|
Serf posted:does henry cavill have some sort of weird disease which makes it impossible for him to grow more than one mustache in his life He had to film Mission Impossible in the same week
|
# ? Nov 17, 2017 03:26 |