|
Tetracube posted:Many queer people embrace an expansive and ambiguous concept of queer as any sort of non-normative sex–that stretches far beyond just the gender/sex of the person you’re having sex with. See: The Charmed Circle. Why can't folks trying to have a baby enjoy porn?
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 02:56 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 09:31 |
|
Ahh, the two sex locations. At home, or in the park
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 03:03 |
|
Dreddout posted:Ahh, the two sex locations. At home, or in the park Antonymous, even! If the other examples are followed.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 03:16 |
|
gleebster posted:Why can't folks trying to have a baby enjoy porn? I don't think opposite sides of the circle are meant to be opposed - it's so you can create a sort of radar diagram of sexual behaviour.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 03:17 |
|
Whoever made this hates vegetables.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 03:28 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:me reading: inner circle = cishet outer circle = queer
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 03:34 |
|
having sex with your same-sex spouse in your bedroom: 2 points in queer being hetero and masturbating to hetero porn: 2 points in queer being paid by your grandma to stick a dildo in her rear end in the middle of the park: 8 points in queer
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 03:36 |
|
Tetracube posted:having sex with your same-sex spouse in your bedroom: 2 points in queer
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 03:48 |
|
This is a weird spinner replacement for "The Game of Life"
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 03:57 |
|
what if i like procreative pornography though not talking about creampie, im talking documentary style followup
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 04:53 |
|
"Cross-generational"
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 04:59 |
|
My computer made this visualization the other day before R crashed. (some visualization module I was trying to learn to use; I don't remember which). I think I was trying to visualize a time series comparison of some kind with an active and control group. None of these values have anything to do with my study, they must be intermediate values that it uses to compute the visualization or something.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 05:07 |
|
This is art.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 05:14 |
|
zakharov posted:"Cross-generational" Now to be fair, it's apparently a section on that disc, whether it's "same" or "cross" generation. So hopefully it's like milf/sugardaddy type stuff But now I weirdly and grossly realize that the disc lacks an intra/extra-family thing *cough* sorry fwiw i prefer "alone or in groups" over "coupled"
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 06:36 |
|
Masturbation gets like six queer points. Add a painful toy for two more.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 06:43 |
|
Platystemon posted:Masturbation gets like six queer points. incels are gonna be in the next version of the LGBTQIAP+ acronym, huh
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 06:45 |
|
Platystemon posted:Masturbation gets like six queer points.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 06:56 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Does it count as monogamous or promiscuous? It counts as Cucumis sativus
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 07:03 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Does it count as monogamous or promiscuous? I didn’t count it. I did count: Alone, Non‐procreative, Casual, In sin, Homosexual, and Pornography
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 07:19 |
|
Homosexual seems like a stretch...
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 07:25 |
|
The Count looking at the last two pages, biting nails, trying to figure out where to start
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 08:33 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Homosexual seems like a stretch... Not the way I do it.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 14:11 |
|
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 14:42 |
|
2 pages too late.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 14:53 |
|
WrenP-Complete posted:My computer made this visualization the other day before R crashed. (some visualization module I was trying to learn to use; I don't remember which). I think I was trying to visualize a time series comparison of some kind with an active and control group. Platystemon posted:This is art.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2017 15:44 |
|
This is beautiful.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2017 08:08 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:wtf is up with damores ratio on that tweet though Probably botnet boosting and a lack of non-idiots caring what he has to say about anything enough to comment on his manbood.
|
# ? Nov 19, 2017 10:51 |
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 00:34 |
|
Well, it's not WRONG.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 01:06 |
|
"Oh, poo poo, the syllabus says it needs to have four graphs. Uhhhhhh..."
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 01:44 |
|
from the accidental art blog
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 03:17 |
|
Möbius has arrived. Well, almost arrived. Gotta bridge that gap with telemetric innovation.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 03:36 |
|
That's not a chart it's a pokemon
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 06:19 |
|
frankenfreak posted:Yeah, it would fit nicely on the Accidental aRt tumblr. Oh goodness, I need to figure out how to submit my things here. ninja edit: http://accidental-art.tumblr.com/submit !
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 07:33 |
|
WrenP-Complete posted:Oh goodness, I need to figure out how to submit my things here. Remember, http://viz.wtf/ is THE goto tumblr for awful graphs. You can submit stuff there, too. Or just post it here.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 08:04 |
|
i know everybody's tired of these so this is the last one, i promise
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 13:52 |
|
Tree Goat posted:i know everybody's tired of these so this is the last one, i promise I can say with 100% certainty that whenever someone tells the creator that his graph is total nonsense, that he takes it as further proof that he's the smartest person in the world.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 14:26 |
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 15:11 |
|
Carbon dioxide posted:Remember, http://viz.wtf/ is THE goto tumblr for awful graphs. You can submit stuff there, too. Or just post it here. http://viz.wtf/image/162403143973
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 15:32 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 09:31 |
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2017 16:32 |