Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Uncle Wemus
Mar 4, 2004

Do they know who Comcast and Verizon is

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

Uncle Wemus posted:

Do they know who Comcast and Verizon is

They trigger the libs.

Phobophilia
Apr 26, 2008

by Hand Knit
4chan going against net neutrality because daddy is too lazy to oppose the republicans is an enormous self cuck

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

I like how the "what reddit says will happen" part is what actually happened in portugal (if I remember correctly)

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

Kilmers Elbow posted:



chinos.....lots of chinos

:ocelot::c00l:

A Gnarlacious Bro
Apr 25, 2007

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Ague Proof posted:

They trigger the libs.

Lib trigging ftw

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

ded redd
Aug 1, 2010


i don’t know what kind of emotion he’s trying to provoke but it worked i think

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:
things are not going the way that little hitler wannabe planned

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Office Pig posted:

i don’t know what kind of emotion he’s trying to provoke but it worked i think


You came to the wrong cracker barrel motherfucker

Pornographic Memory
Dec 17, 2008

Uncle Wemus posted:

Do they know who Comcast and Verizon is

Not like they pay the bills so this is all completely abstract for them anyway.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
here's a panel from the NPI conference. RIP your recommendations:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kH7CJtEHgeI

listening and there's a lot of :words: about their various adventures. it's kind of interesting in that spencer loves the opposition to him (attention) and it definitely comes across as him chasing an adrenaline rush. 'and then i had police escort me into the building! that never happened before! wow!' that kind of thing.

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

here's a panel from the NPI conference. RIP your recommendations:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kH7CJtEHgeI

listening and there's a lot of :words: about their various adventures. it's kind of interesting in that spencer loves the opposition to him (attention) and it definitely comes across as him chasing an adrenaline rush. 'and then i had police escort me into the building! that never happened before! wow!' that kind of thing.

Someday he's gonna get popped by one of his chucklefuck hangers-on and I'm going to laugh.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
they reject taking a 'long march through the institutions' as the crisis is too imminent. the focus instead should be to "raise the consciousness of the people"

i can understand that.

quote:

There is yet another aspect to the cultural strategy of the new left, and this is the transformation of political identity at the individual level
in the context of small "consciousness-raising" groups. This approach, largely but not exclusively identified with the women's movement, involved bringing unconscious cultural assumptions to awareness in order to free the individual from oppression in personal life. Social roles were particular targets of attack, on the assumption that the domination introjected along with the roles could only be fought when the roles themselves were consciously contested.

https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/books/Paths_to_Failure_RacePoliticsCulture.pdf
https://twitter.com/CoreyRobin/status/933079910855446528
on the other hand

quote:

For many in the movement, its ostensible goal of social change was never a primary preoccupation in any case: the movement was so weak, the prospect of real revolution so dim, the actual achievements of political activism so difficult to compass that the mere existence of the movement became more important to many of its members than any political objective. The scene of the revolution shifted from society at large to the movement itself, where individuals could have an immediate effect on their surroundings through grasping and manipulating the movement's own codes of behavior. These codes made the pursuit of revolutionary purity a respected role through which personal desires for accomplishment and status frustrated in the larger society could be fulfilled.

In the course of making endlessly involuted revolutions within revolutions, the movement's perceptions of the political as an autonomous sphere of social reality grew increasingly dim. Activists tended less and less to measure their actions by their real effects, and more and more sought to conform to symbolic archetypes drawn from the history of revolutions, which came to signify power magically through association with it in theory or in other times and places. Internal movement struggle over the choice of archetypes replaced politically oriented social struggle.

Finally, the most compelling contest in which the movement was engaged placed it not in conflict with the state or the ruling groups but with itself. It was in such an environment that cultural action turned inward and destroyed the movement. Through sectarianism and ultraleftism the individuals could transform their own personal self-definition, if not the world around them.

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Business Gorillas posted:

the dude who posted that didn't out anyone, whoever made that image and posted that on 4chan did

edit: also lmao gently caress these people when they'd gleefully harass LGBT people in the drop of a hat. people that refuse to give sympathy don't deserve any

gently caress, my bad :( I thought they put out the pics themselves.


Zeroisanumber posted:

If you think I'll blanch at using literally any tactic against these people you're badly mistaken.

Oh I believe you, you just don't understand the consequences. A society reflects the means used to achieve it, if outing queer people is an acceptable tactic it's an acceptable tactic, and it's going to be around long after the nazis are defeated.

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

Tias posted:

gently caress, my bad :( I thought they put out the pics themselves.


Oh I believe you, you just don't understand the consequences. A society reflects the means used to achieve it, if outing queer people is an acceptable tactic it's an acceptable tactic, and it's going to be around long after the nazis are defeated.

I perfectly understand.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!
lol someone unironically using the slippery slope argument

don longjohns
Mar 2, 2012

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

they reject taking a 'long march through the institutions' as the crisis is too imminent. the focus instead should be to "raise the consciousness of the people"

i can understand that.

https://twitter.com/CoreyRobin/status/933079910855446528
on the other hand

Wait isn't this just a rehashing and rebranding of "the personal is political," a feminist idea?

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

CharlestheHammer posted:

lol someone unironically using the slippery slope argument

Prefigurativity of tactics isn't slippery slope, I'm sorry understanding basic civic science terms are too hard for you.

For instance, violent tactics are perfectly fine against nazis because a) societal monopolies on violence are often if not usually on their side and b) violence, particularly in self-defense, is not a necessarily bad trait for a society to have.

Outing people to target them for trans/bi/homophobic harassment is bad, even against nazis, because you reinforce the notion that being non-binary/hetero should make you a target for harassment, which is a particularly lovely trait to have remaning in society even after nazis are destroyed.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

failing forward posted:

Wait isn't this just a rehashing and rebranding of "the personal is political," a feminist idea?

He directly acknowledges that the feminists knew this.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

Tias posted:

Prefigurativity of tactics isn't slippery slope, I'm sorry understanding basic civic science terms are too hard for you.

For instance, violent tactics are perfectly fine against nazis because a) societal monopolies on violence are often if not usually on their side and b) violence, particularly in self-defense, is not a necessarily bad trait for a society to have.

Outing people to target them for trans/bi/homophobic harassment is bad, even against nazis, because you reinforce the notion that being non-binary/hetero should make you a target for harassment, which is a particularly lovely trait to have remaning in society even after nazis are destroyed.

Not to mention possibly reinforcing the idea that liberal or leftist allies will throw LBGT people under the bus the moment they're not entirely convenient.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

Tias posted:

Prefigurativity of tactics isn't slippery slope, I'm sorry understanding basic civic science terms are too hard for you.

For instance, violent tactics are perfectly fine against nazis because a) societal monopolies on violence are often if not usually on their side and b) violence, particularly in self-defense, is not a necessarily bad trait for a society to have.

Outing people to target them for trans/bi/homophobic harassment is bad, even against nazis, because you reinforce the notion that being non-binary/hetero should make you a target for harassment, which is a particularly lovely trait to have remaning in society even after nazis are destroyed.

you can dress it up how you like but it's still dumb as gently caress.

Tias
May 25, 2008

Pictured: the patron saint of internet political arguments (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

CharlestheHammer posted:

you can dress it up how you like but it's still dumb as gently caress.

I forgot who you were for a moment, sorry. Go yell at clouds, I hear they'll fight you for free.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Inescapable Duck posted:

Not to mention possibly reinforcing the idea that liberal or leftist allies will throw LBGT people under the bus the moment they're not entirely convenient.

LGBT people have already thrown L, B, or T people under the bus themselves when they're not convenient allies. Liberal individualism has a more corrosive effect on solidarity than whether or not it's ok to out a family values crusader who fucks rent boys. Really, the entire concept of allyship is deeply flawed from a political standpoint, because it accepts from the outset that support is conditional.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

Tias posted:

I forgot who you were for a moment, sorry. Go yell at clouds, I hear they'll fight you for free.

glass houses my dude. though I have no idea who you are so I don't know how you know who I am or whatever.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

BrutalistMcDonalds posted:

they reject taking a 'long march through the institutions' as the crisis is too imminent. the focus instead should be to "raise the consciousness of the people"

i can understand that.

https://twitter.com/CoreyRobin/status/933079910855446528
on the other hand
I usually respect corey, but this is a misreading - the defense of franken has 100% been motivated by practical political considerations, not some stupid private/public distinction on the part of his defenders.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
that charge was more relevant to the defense of bill clinton, where liberals were arguing that womanizing adultery was a private matter that didn't impune the ability to govern. This ruckus has taken more the line of the standard misinformation campaign, as resulting from the confirmation bias of having someone you like turn out less than stellar

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

rudatron posted:

I usually respect corey, but this is a misreading - the defense of franken has 100% been motivated by practical political considerations, not some stupid private/public distinction on the part of his defenders.

Al Franken is a senator from a safe blue district, and defending him has zero political efficacy. He's not even that great as a senator.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
that's not the issue, the point is the public image of left/liberals overall. that he can be replaced directly isn't much of a concern.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
it's also damaging, because the charges around roy moore get to be deflected by interested parties, through your standard tu quoque

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

rudatron posted:

that's not the issue, the point is the public image of left/liberals overall. that he can be replaced directly isn't much of a concern.

The public image of the left and liberals overall is precisely why they immediately threw Anthony Weiner under the bus, and it was the right call to make. Liberal defense of Franken is all a bunch of variations on "that bitch be lyin," which is 100% the private life of power.

rudatron posted:

it's also damaging, because the charges around roy moore get to be deflected by interested parties, through your standard tu quoque

This is especially stupid, lmao.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Weiner is not Franken, weiner hosed up constantly and wasn't ever really at the political center of any democratic party wing. Franken is a big fish. it's different.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

rudatron posted:

Weiner is not Franken, weiner hosed up constantly and wasn't ever really at the political center of any democratic party wing. Franken is a big fish. it's different.

Defending Franken from allegations he's already admitted to is what damages the image of liberals, my dude.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
for sure, but so does simply having Franken ever be a dem. liberals are doubling down for the same reason conservative double down in this exact same situation: they don't want to admit it, because if it's true, it undermines them, politically and personally.

at this point, Franken has to face the music. it's not about regaining what was lost, because that's already happened. the damage has already been done. it's cutting further loses.

but the idea of restoring the past is always seductive, which is why we're seeing what we're seeing.

hackbunny
Jul 22, 2007

I haven't been on SA for years but the person who gave me my previous av as a joke felt guilty for doing so and decided to get me a non-shitty av

Office Pig posted:

i don’t know what kind of emotion he’s trying to provoke but it worked i think

I literally can no longer see him without wondering how long until he's punched in the head

BONGHITZ
Jan 1, 1970

why do all the men take videos of themselves exercising?

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!

BONGHITZ posted:

why do all the men take videos of themselves exercising?

I wanna see a Trump exercise video

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit
On the flip side Styx had a double life as a transwoman and probably had access to various online safe-spaces for transpeople as well as probably having the trust of various trans individuals. Trust that they 100% would not have hesitated to abuse for their own selfish amusement. Styx represented a serious risk to a bunch of innocent people and doxxing Styx has protected the trans community from a predator. So personally I would argue that outing an individual like Styx is actually making the trans community a safer place.

To address the larger discussion of what tactics should be off limits I would like to share the angle I approach the topic from. Under ideal (most humane, most compassionate, best for the human race overall) circumstances the solution to all the radicalized Nazi's in Germany during WWII would have been to isolate each one of them in a long-term care facility staffed by highly trained and compassionate cult deprogrammers- so that the Nazi's could each be individually assessed and given the resources needed to guide them towards reintegrating with larger society.. Radicalized Germans were still human beings after all and under the right circumstances the bulk of them could have been.

Of course then (as now) the resources required to undertake/implement such an ideal solution simply do not exist. As a result the only actual solution available to the Allies during WWII was to ruthlessly annihilate Nazi's until their weren't enough Nazi's left to fight back anymore. That's just the harshness of life on this crazy planet. Fighting for your survival ain't loving pretty and there is no such thing as a "moral" way to win a fight to the death.

Prester Jane has issued a correction as of 12:37 on Nov 22, 2017

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
https://twitter.com/VicBergerIV/status/933013953537552385

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Ague Proof posted:

Legitimately insane.

if chuds actually thought about any of the issues logically they wouldn't be hateful chuds
its all bants for them, let them rot

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply