|
JeffersonClay posted:What why is it important victims come forward to be smeared? That's why I'm saying this whole stupid argument is about either protecting men in power or shaming women for being victimized - you're salivating over getting more details on what he did. Have you considered just visiting literotica.com instead? 
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 01:48 |
|
|
NathanScottPhillips posted:#ElsaGate is real! What the holy gently caress. That's not something I wanted to read about today. The internet was a mistake.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:What the holy gently caress. That's not something I wanted to read about today. The internet was a mistake. The internet is probably fine, if you remove comment sections, facebook and twitter. I mean really, think about who's bright idea comment sections were. I bet you it involved the words "Marketing" and "Engagement"
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 22:54
|
|
|
The forums are just one big comment section
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
Boon posted:The forums are just one big comment section We know what we signed up for, terrible terrible people and things. SA never risked Nuclear War for the sake of protecting Nazis.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
Harik posted:why is it important victims come forward to be smeared? That's why I'm saying this whole stupid argument is about either protecting men in power or shaming women for being victimized - you're salivating over getting more details on what he did. I’m pretty sure “you just want more victims to come forward so you can jerk it to their plight” is the dumbest argument so far, and that’s saying a lot. It certainly beats “senate investigations are misogyny” and “it’s bad if democrats get more power to investigate sexual assault”. But at least you’re making a coherent argument, terrible as it may be, so you’re doing better than the majority of posters here.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 01:18
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:I’m pretty sure “you just want more victims to come forward so you can jerk it to their plight” is the dumbest argument so far, and that’s saying a lot. It certainly beats “senate investigations are misogyny” and “it’s bad if democrats get more power to investigate sexual assault”. But at least you’re making a coherent argument, terrible as it may be, so you’re doing better than the majority of posters here. is the rape apologist part of your red tag new? it really suits you
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 01:45
|
|
|
Condiv posted:is the rape apologist part of your red tag new? it really suits you I tend to view the criticism of idiots with terrible opinions as encouraging, so thanks!
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:I tend to view the criticism of idiots with terrible opinions as encouraging, so thanks!
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:I tend to view the criticism of idiots with terrible opinions as encouraging, so thanks! personally, i find weak comebacks from slavery and rape apologists encouraging 
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 02:59
|
|
|
Condiv posted:personally, i find weak comebacks from slavery and rape apologists encouraging I think you’d struggle to find a post where I’m apologizing for rape, and our forum is modded by someone who will defend the GULAG, so
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 04:50
|
|
|
I salute your bravery, jeffclay, in the face of dnd's oppressive mod regime and its clear anti-liberal bias
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
*rises. the only man standing in a field of seated comrads* I will defend the GULAG.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:*rises. the only man standing in a field of seated comrads* Do you know who else supported forced labor for the state? Hillary Clinton 
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 06:38
|
|
|
Calibanibal posted:I salute your bravery, jeffclay, in the face of dnd's oppressive mod regime and its clear anti-liberal bias Which form of liberalism has Jefferson Clay been manifesting today? I would also like to remind you all that China provided a wonderful solution to liberalism.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 06:45
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:and our forum is modded by someone who will defend the GULAG, so tbf you make a persuasive argument for it yourself
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 08:29
|
|
|
These things usually come in threes, so what is JC going to defend next? Payday loans? Civil asset forfeiture? Genocide?
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 09:01
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:I tend to view the criticism of idiots with terrible opinions as encouraging, so thanks! Basically "i'm a deplorable bc it triggers the libs"
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 14:17
|
|
|
Was there a net neutrality thread? I keep seeing libertarians go on about how NN is an attempt to prop up monopolies like it's buried in the Title II. Where the hell does this idea keep coming from?
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 14:31
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:Was there a net neutrality thread? libertarians have brain spiders hth
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 16:55
|
|
|
stone cold posted:libertarians have brain spiders hth Libertarians are dumber than spiders.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
Rent-A-Cop posted:Even spiders are smart enough to cooperate and act in concert for the betterment of the whole. having brain spiders does not mean being a spider you see but also, you are technically correct a wash
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 17:33
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Do you know who else supported forced labor for the state? This is a good post and I thank you for making it, friend.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
Just a reminder that the libertarians you encounter on the internet who mostly talk about drug decriminalization and ending mass incarceration and foreign wars are absolutely not representative of the ideology. The goofy college stoner libertarian is way less relevant or influential than the state's rights libertarians who absolutely do believe in social coordination and assistance - specifically in that they want the freedom to use local government more brutally than what is currently allowed. Here's famous libertarian Murray Rothbard calling for a program of "libertarian populism" back in 92. Some representative positions:quote:4. Take Back the Streets: Crush Criminals. And by this I mean, of course, not “white collar criminals” or “inside traders” but violent street criminals – robbers, muggers, rapists, murderers. Cops must be unleashed, and allowed to administer instant punishment, subject of course to liability when they are in error. quote:8. Defend Family Values. Which means, get the State out of the family, and replace State control with parental control. In the long run, this means ending public schools, and replacing them with private schools. But we must realize that voucher and even tax credit schemes are not, despite Milton Friedman, transitional demands on the path to privatized education; instead, they will make matters worse by fastening government control more totally upon the private schools. Within the sound alternative is decentralization, and back to local, community neighborhood control of the schools. Libertarians are not anarchists. They are actually in favour of must stricter and harsher social controls and key libertarian philosophers (Hans Herman Hoppe is another good example, read literally anything he's written and keep in mind the guy regularly win awards and gives presentations at libertarian conferences), and influential libertarians have the same degree of contempt for the college-stoner-libertarian crowd that everyone else does. Actual libertarians just want to undo any hint of wealth redistribution or enforced racial equality.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 20:06
|
|
|
Helsing posted:Just a reminder that the libertarians you encounter on the internet who mostly talk about drug decriminalization and ending mass incarceration and foreign wars are absolutely not representative of the ideology. The goofy college stoner libertarian is way less relevant or influential than the state's rights libertarians who absolutely do believe in social coordination and assistance - specifically in that they want the freedom to use local government more brutally than what is currently allowed. Here's famous libertarian Murray Rothbard calling for a program of "libertarian populism" back in 92. Some representative positions: yeah like idk what part of brain spiders you missed
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
I was responding to Rent-a-Cop's insinuation that the Libertarians are primarily dumb and that their surface level ideas about abolishing society are sincere. Actual libertarians are well aware that the state (in particular the police) are necessary to create and enforce their ideal society.
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 22:24
|
|
|
Helsing posted:I was responding to Rent-a-Cop's insinuation that the Libertarians are primarily dumb and that their surface level ideas about abolishing society are sincere. Actual libertarians are well aware that the state (in particular the police) are necessary to create and enforce their ideal society. yeah, because they have mondo brain spiders also there’s the ones like john mcafee that are just straight up murderers or the ones here that are on about “it’s ephebophilia!!!”
|
|
#
?
Nov 25, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
JeffersonClay posted:I’m pretty sure “you just want more victims to come forward so you can jerk it to their plight” is the dumbest argument so far, and that’s saying a lot. It certainly beats “senate investigations are misogyny” and “it’s bad if democrats get more power to investigate sexual assault”. But at least you’re making a coherent argument, terrible as it may be, so you’re doing better than the majority of posters here. Hey look you're refusing to engage with my argument again, even after I bolstered it with a quip and dog tax. Why, forums poster JeffersonClay, do more women need to come forward? You're treating it as axiomatic but it's unfounded. How do these hidden women benefit from their assaulter staying in power until enough (defined always as N+1) come forward? How is their justice not served by watching Franken et al being forced to resign in disgrace without having to endure the media spotlight themselves?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 03:29
|
|
|
Helsing posted:Libertarians are primarily dumb
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 07:07
|
|
|
Helsing posted:I was responding to Rent-a-Cop's insinuation that the Libertarians are primarily dumb and that their surface level ideas about abolishing society are sincere. Actual libertarians are well aware that the state (in particular the police) are necessary to create and enforce their ideal society. Not far enough. Coin operated light posts is the future (or well the present. The future it just scans your credit card and you get billed for how many you come near)
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 10:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NBCNewsPR/status/934798127319732233
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JamilSmith/status/934804550900260869 welcum to the sex pest spin zone
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
 get out pelosi
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
Really want to hear the pelosi defenders have a go at this
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
yikes no way dude i may be nancy pelosi's most ardent defender on these forums, but not even i am willing touch this
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
If you said last year that a major party is facing collapse of its establishment figures because of a massive amount of sex scandals and tone-deaf responses to them...
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Inescapable Duck posted:If you said last year that a major party is facing collapse of its establishment figures because of a massive amount of sex scandals and tone-deaf responses to them... Well we knew it wasn't going to be the GOP, their voters don't care as long as someone dog-whistles racism.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WaywardWinifred/status/934843667768111105 dem leadership obv. doesn't care either
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 19:42
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:Really want to hear the pelosi defenders have a go at this The_Pelosi_Defender has logged on
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 19:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 01:48 |
|
|
As a reminder, the public option actually passed by the House was weakened to the point it would actually charge higher than private rates and would have estimated to have only covered 6 million people. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/711728
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2017 19:54
|
|
