Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


jfc i went to michael shermer's twitter and he's one of these "free speech" guys. never have heroes, kids.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BigRed0427
Mar 23, 2007

There's no one I'd rather be than me.

Groovelord Neato posted:

jfc i went to michael shermer's twitter and he's one of these "free speech" guys. never have heroes, kids.

*Looks him up, never having heard him before.*

Are there any people from the Nu-Atheist Movement that aren't shitheels? Also, we have established that Nu-Atheism is just conservatism that rejects religion. Right?

noether
May 1, 2017

some kinda cutesy shoggoth

BigRed0427 posted:

*Looks him up, never having heard him before.*

Are there any people from the Nu-Atheist Movement that aren't shitheels? Also, we have established that Nu-Atheism is just conservatism that rejects religion. Right?

does zinnia jones qualify? she doesn't really do atheism stuff anymore, though

I think the relatively normal people split off into the "atheism plus" crowd a while back. no idea what happened to them after that, though

BigRed0427
Mar 23, 2007

There's no one I'd rather be than me.

noether posted:

does zinnia jones qualify? she doesn't really do atheism stuff anymore, though

I think the relatively normal people split off into the "atheism plus" crowd a while back. no idea what happened to them after that, though

Did not know that. Only know her through her trans stuff. She pretty much just does academic research and porn these days. Right?

noether
May 1, 2017

some kinda cutesy shoggoth

BigRed0427 posted:

Did not know that. Only know her through her trans stuff. She pretty much just does academic research and porn these days. Right?

she does porn?

but yeah, most of the stuff on her channel from like 2007-2009 is atheism-related stuff

BigRed0427
Mar 23, 2007

There's no one I'd rather be than me.

noether posted:

she does porn?

but yeah, most of the stuff on her channel from like 2007-2009 is atheism-related stuff

Eyep.

SteelMentor
Oct 15, 2012

TOXIC
Coughlin's still around and is just the same as ever, smart and funny if a little bit incoherent at points.

I've heard the AronRa is still around and never jumped on the regressive boat like a lot of his contemporaries, but I never bothered to check, he was always a little dry for my tastes.

noether posted:

she does porn?

but yeah, most of the stuff on her channel from like 2007-2009 is atheism-related stuff

I see shitlords try to dunk on her by bringing up her porn, but she freely advertises it and it's just so sad when they keep bringing it up as an own.

She's pretty alright if at times teeth-grindingly liberal. She's still very, very behind Hilary.

Mundrial Mantis
Aug 15, 2017


Mr Interweb posted:

How the hell is Peterson so successful? I mean, he's like THE most successful alt-right pandering youtuber (that's not already a well known factor like Alex Jones, etc.) in history. The amount of money he collects on his patreon far surpasses that of even Sargon. And yet, the main source of his claim to fame is that he...didn't want to use certain pronouns for transgender people.

I think Peterson's success among the alt-right and related is that they view him as someone trying to help them find purpose in their lives while also being "one of the good ones" in academia. There is a clip from The Majority Report that talks about that the appeal of Joe Rogan among alt-right adjacent groups is that his show gives the listener a sense of community for self-improvement. Peterson seems to have that aspect of Rogan in addition to the "mature professor dispensing insight and fighting against the system" that his fans seem to see in him. This makes sense if you think of young men looking for something great and feel cheated out of it, i.e. those susceptible to the alt-right.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJsGmAjje3Y

Mundrial Mantis fucked around with this message at 06:39 on Dec 2, 2017

bebaloorpabopalo
Nov 23, 2005

I'm not interested in constructive criticism, believe me.
While only tangentially related to the types of people usually discussed in this thread, Alan Melikdjanian (Captain Disillusion) did a talk recently at a Skeptic conference and some of it is very relevant:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqfWm6z84t0

Maybe avoid the comments, even though the ratio is somehow fine. A lot of his fans don't seem aware he's kind of talking to them.

temple
Jul 29, 2006

I have actual skeletons in my closet

Mundrial Mantis posted:

I think Peterson's success among the alt-right and related is that they view him as someone trying to help them find purpose in their lives while also being "one of the good ones" in academia. There is a clip from The Majority Report that talks about that the appeal of Joe Rogan among alt-right adjacent groups is that his show gives the listener a sense of community for self-improvement. Peterson seems to have that aspect of Rogan in addition to the "mature professor dispensing insight and fighting against the system" that his fans seem to see in him. This makes sense if you think of young men looking for something great and feel cheated out of it, i.e. those susceptible to the alt-right.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJsGmAjje3Y

zero books has a (critical) series on him.

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer

SteelMentor posted:

Coughlin's still around and is just the same as ever, smart and funny if a little bit incoherent at points.

I've heard the AronRa is still around and never jumped on the regressive boat like a lot of his contemporaries, but I never bothered to check, he was always a little dry for my tastes.


I see shitlords try to dunk on her by bringing up her porn, but she freely advertises it and it's just so sad when they keep bringing it up as an own.

She's pretty alright if at times teeth-grindingly liberal. She's still very, very behind Hilary.

The human condition: consuming vast amounts of porn but thinking that demeans the people who make it and not them whacking off to it.

To be clear I don't think either is demeaning in concept (the actual porn industry is horrific but it needn't be) but these guys sure love sex while using slut as an insult.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


BigRed0427 posted:

*Looks him up, never having heard him before.*

Are there any people from the Nu-Atheist Movement that aren't shitheels? Also, we have established that Nu-Atheism is just conservatism that rejects religion. Right?

it sucks rear end also cuz he wrote one of the best books about holocaust denial https://www.amazon.com/Denying-History-Holocaust-Happened-Expanded/dp/0520260988

it's so good i own the original and expanded versions.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Groovelord Neato posted:

it sucks rear end also cuz he wrote one of the best books about holocaust denial https://www.amazon.com/Denying-History-Holocaust-Happened-Expanded/dp/0520260988

it's so good i own the original and expanded versions.

Shermer’s almost certainly a rapist. There are multiple stories of him trying to get women falling-down drunk and take them back to his hotel at events where he speaks.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

So uh...Destiny has new video up where he debates Amos Yee about pedophilia:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uw9NWF7Z6w

I'm three minutes in and Yee says that children of 2 to 3 years old can engage in sex, but in terms of actual penetration, he's willing to wait until they're 7.

I stopped the video after that. :suicide:

Yardbomb
Jul 11, 2011

What's with the eh... bretonnian dance, sir?

Holy poo poo Yee sounds like a kiddy fiddling garden gnome.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I'm not sure I can rejig my brain into a sufficiently low gear to begin to address that argument.

bebaloorpabopalo
Nov 23, 2005

I'm not interested in constructive criticism, believe me.
It's real telling the chuds are focusing on (out of context, misinterpreted) things Destiny said in this debate and using them to attack him instead of maybe going after the guy he was debating, the Dude Who Literally Thinks It's Morally Okay To gently caress Babies.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Pretty sure even if someone came to me with a 100% foolproof plan to do full communism now, I wouldn't sign off on it if it included the rider "also I get to gently caress babies"

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


business hammocks posted:

Shermer’s almost certainly a rapist. There are multiple stories of him trying to get women falling-down drunk and take them back to his hotel at events where he speaks.

i'll just pretend the co-author wrote the whole thing from now on.

amos yee might be the most broken brained human alive.

also lol

Groovelord Neato fucked around with this message at 13:38 on Dec 2, 2017

bessantj
Jul 27, 2004


Mr Interweb posted:

So uh...Destiny has new video up where he debates Amos Yee about pedophilia:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uw9NWF7Z6w

I'm three minutes in and Yee says that children of 2 to 3 years old can engage in sex, but in terms of actual penetration, he's willing to wait until they're 7.

I stopped the video after that. :suicide:

I made it six and a half mins in before I just felt too sick to continue. If Yee isn't a troll (and I have to believe he is) then he is a fundamentally broken human being.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Is Yee an idiot who’s just doing this poo poo like a kid who eats worms because he likes the attention, or is he a rapist of children?

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


the latter. he thinks informed consent doesn't matter.

edit: destiny is really bad at this.

Groovelord Neato fucked around with this message at 14:06 on Dec 2, 2017

crime weed
Nov 9, 2009

bebaloorpabopalo posted:

It's real telling the chuds are focusing on (out of context, misinterpreted) things Destiny said in this debate and using them to attack him instead of maybe going after the guy he was debating, the Dude Who Literally Thinks It's Morally Okay To gently caress Babies.
but what if the chuds literally want to gently caress babies themselves

Monglo
Mar 19, 2015
Destiny and Amos debate, unfortunately for Destiny, Amos is making the same argument for pedophilia's moral neutrality as he himself did for incest just a couple of weeks before. So it's awkward to see him try to make arguments against, basically, himself and failing pretty hard.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


yeah.

i wanna punch amos yee through a wall because consent is only acceptable when it's informed consent.

edit: hahah amos thinks children should be able to sign contracts and vote. also thinks it's immoral to give a child a cigarette or have them sign a one-sided contract. but not rape them. hmmm.

Groovelord Neato fucked around with this message at 14:24 on Dec 2, 2017

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

Monglo posted:

Destiny and Amos debate, unfortunately for Destiny, Amos is making the same argument for pedophilia's moral neutrality as he himself did for incest just a couple of weeks before. So it's awkward to see him try to make arguments against, basically, himself and failing pretty hard.

Yeah. I'm usually good about watching vile stuff to the end, but this seemed so weaselly, smug and dumb that I started skipping ahead, and it just got worse.

"So, if someone REALLY likes to rape, a utilitarian mindset would have to let them rape, because they get more pleasure out of it than other people get out of NOT being raped!" And that's Destiny, not Yee. Truly, the way to defeat any libertarian is to go for maximum monstrosity, since they only feel the fire if you try to help someone and will twist into a knot to excuse actual abuse.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


that was my problem with destiny's stance. even if we lived in a society where pedophilia was deemed permissible it'd still be wrong because a child cannot consent. if we lived in a society where rape was permissible it'd still be wrong because the person being raped is being harmed. slavery was still morally wrong when it was socially permissible because it was harmful to the enslaved.

and he shouldn't just drop the study stuff - all evidence shows it to be psychologically harmful and yee keeps saying no no all the evidence shows it's beneficial.

Monglo
Mar 19, 2015
Destiny did a weird strawman of starting to argue utilitarianism at the end, if I remember correctly. He asked if Amos considered himself a utilitarianist and if his pro-pedophilia stance comes from it. And then proceeded to do the usual deconstructive thought experiments against it.
But the problem is, Amos admitted to not even knowing about utilitarianism and even though he subscribed to it after Destiny's quick explanation of what it is, it was a strange way to argue against pedophilia by attaching the label of utilitarianism to it and attacking that.
I'm usually satisfied with how Destiny holds himself in his debates but I find he failed to make a convincing argument for pedophilia's immorality. Unfortunately, there is only a single point to made for it, as far as I see it - that it's universally harmful to the child. Destiny conceded that that's not always the case.
Just curious, for people who checked that debate out. What arguments would you use?

Monglo fucked around with this message at 14:41 on Dec 2, 2017

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


having a debate is useless with yee because he cannot grasp that the only consent is informed consent. he also kept lying about child abuse not being harmful and kept making a distinction between child abuse and consensual adult-child relationships (there's no distinction, they're the same). his stance is indefensible.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Monglo posted:

What arguments would you use?

"Children are incapable of consenting to sexual acts"

You know, because they're CHILDREN.

Monglo
Mar 19, 2015
Devil's advocate: but children can't give an informed consent about most things. And are subjected to thing daily, that they actively give no consent to.

Goon Danton
May 24, 2012

Don't forget to show my shitposts to the people. They're well worth seeing.

Monglo posted:

Devil's advocate:

This is not a loving road you want to go down, dude.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


those things are not psychologically harmful and usually don't violate bodily autonomy.

it's always weird to me how these people act like sex is the same as walking down to the store.

edit: lol how has he never heard of the trolley problem.

Groovelord Neato fucked around with this message at 14:53 on Dec 2, 2017

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Monglo posted:

Devil's advocate: but children can't give an informed consent about most things. And are subjected to thing daily, that they actively give no consent to.

Do you honestly not get how sex is different from most things?

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

On the other hand feeding children is necessary for their continued survival, loving them is not.

Monglo
Mar 19, 2015
I thought an interesting discussion on the merits of arguments made in the Destiny's debate and general arguments against pedophilia might be had, but if only responses people here are capable of are personal attacks, then forget about it.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Hey don't get mad at me I'm just devil's advocating for pedophilia cos y'know I'm not sure everyone here is philosophically rigorous in their dislike of it.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Monglo posted:

I thought an interesting discussion on the merits of arguments made in the Destiny's debate and general arguments against pedophilia might be had, but if only responses people here are capable of are personal attacks, then forget about it.

Literally no one personally attacked you unless you consider

Goon Danton posted:

This is not a loving road you want to go down, dude.

an attack.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Monglo posted:

Devil's advocate: but children can't give an informed consent about most things. And are subjected to thing daily, that they actively give no consent to.

That’s the point, silly billy: children literally can’t consent to anything. That’s why adults have to look after them and make choices about what it in their best interests. loving adults is never in their best interests. Look at what it did to Milo Yianoppolous.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Goon Danton
May 24, 2012

Don't forget to show my shitposts to the people. They're well worth seeing.

OwlFancier posted:

Hey don't get mad at me I'm just devil's advocating for pedophilia cos y'know I'm not sure everyone here is philosophically rigorous in their dislike of it.

calmhitler.jpg

  • Locked thread