|
 bitcoin is the gift that keeps on giving.
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 02:46 |
|
|
Blitz7x posted:Let's check in with r/legaladvice This is basically the boat he'd be on if the bitcoin had been paid
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:Then they found out that I'm 31 and couldn't believe it because apparently I act old. Which I guess is a nice way to say grumpy? I've gotten this at work a few times and it is almost certainly from being grumpy. That or because I've had gray hair on the sides of my head since before I graduated college.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
Your opponent is a man who's raped kids and believes child rape shouldn't be a crime: https://twitter.com/costareports/status/938138861460484098
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Your opponent is a man who's raped kids and believes child rape shouldn't be a crime: drat I hope he wins
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
hahahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
Well I saw an SUV with a "Another Christian Voter for President Trump" bumper sticker on it. Along with an I LOVE JESUS sticker too of course
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Your opponent is a man who's raped kids and believes child rape shouldn't be a crime: As much as framing things through business interests raises my hackles, I do get what he’s saying, I just want him to say it more clearly. “Toyota won’t move here because we will have elected a child molester, and that’s goddamn creepy and evil, y’all.”
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Your opponent is a man who's raped kids and believes child rape shouldn't be a crime: I feel like he's trying to bait Toyota into saying they won't do business with a state that elects a child predator It might work
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Your opponent is a man who's raped kids and believes child rape shouldn't be a crime: He also said this so.... https://twitter.com/aseitzwald/status/938113548173086720
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
P solid imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
If Toyota literally comes out in the next week and says they won't do business with Alabama if Moore is elected I'll laugh and laugh It'd also be fun to see the "HMM BOEING WON'T DO BUSINESS WITH UNION STATES" republicans lose their minds about it
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:27
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:P solid imo The full gun comment owns because you know it made Moore so loving mad https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/938110994466922496
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
Jota posted:The full gun comment owns because you know it made Moore so loving mad Deer blinds are lame as gently caress too though
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Never heard of a deer blind. I've heard of a deer stand. And a duck blind.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
Jota posted:He also said this so.... Yeah, that's better, but really his campaign should be nothing but fully tying the republicans to the pedophile rapists they are/support. The gun thing is whatever, because 99% of Republicans are also into gun lyfe more then being an actual responsible gun owner.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:52
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Demographics are a scary thing, because younger people are also all moving to metropolitan areas, and the easiest voter suppression mechanic is to simply understaff and limit polling stations, leading to the horrific lines in minority dominated areas. Not even that Republicans will always have a built-in advantager due to out agrarian based system
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
Republicans are going to see how effective a tactic Jones (obviously rightly) accusing his opponent of being a child molester is and are going to begin falsely accusing their opponents of being pedophiles this coming election cycle. Can't wait.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ClickHole/status/938146203325394945
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 22:09
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Yeah, that's better, but really his campaign should be nothing but fully tying the republicans to the pedophile rapists they are/support. That seems like it could backfire in Alabama really easily.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Rest in Power scariest thing in my childhood: I share a birthday with Large Marge. Okay sure, why not?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
oooh boy that's a spicy one
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
God bless the onion
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
No Butt Stuff posted:Never heard of a deer blind. I've heard of a deer stand. And a duck blind. Not that much different between all the options tbh. https://www.dickssportinggoods.com/products/deer-blind.jsp http://www.awsblinds.com/hunting-blinds/5x7-blind/
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 22:47
|
|
|
I just got an email from my boss giving me poo poo because she felt I didnt put the correct people in the To: and CC: lines in response to an email I sent like 10 people. Bitch it was a general email to 10 people I just added them at random. Also I can’t remember ever paying attention to who was in which line on an email. I sent her a response asking her if there was an outline for SOP so I didnt mess it up in the future.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
Joey Freshwater posted:I just got an email from my boss giving me poo poo because she felt I didnt put the correct people in the To: and CC: lines in response to an email I sent like 10 people. When you replied, did you put her name in the CC: field and leave the TO: blank?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
Joey Freshwater posted:I just got an email from my boss giving me poo poo because she felt I didnt put the correct people in the To: and CC: lines in response to an email I sent like 10 people. Eh, I have to agree with your boss. This is the way I saw it put and it stuck with me: quote:Be discerning about your use of To: vs. Cc:. Why? Ever receive an email where it's unclear who has the action because everyone is in the "To:" field? We designate the To: field for who has the action (could be multiple people). Cc: is simply for their information—with no expectation that they will take action on the email, other than receive it. Seems like a small thing, but really helps in long email chains with lots of people.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
CC is for people who aren't the intended audience for the email but you still want them to see the email for cover your rear end/FYI purposes. TO is for the actual audience, especially those you are expecting a response or action from
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
It was a general email that a response wasn’t directly needed on. Just an “FYI” informing the people in the email some info I found out. Oh, she also followed up her first email with “oh, I didnt read your email but it looks good thanks”
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Quiet Feet posted:My first hope was for a more horror styled show with the Punisher as more of a Jason Voorhees lurking in the background. It's not as action-oriented as I might've expected but I can't argue with the end result, and the violence is primarily treated in the same way a slasher movie uses it; you don't want to see it. Even thought it's the show's "hero" taking on some real assholes, watching it makes you feel anxious and uncomfortable. Frank Castle isn't a super hero, dude's a hosed up serial killer even if he's murdering terrible people. They manage to humanize him while also keeping him at arms length from the viewer. Long story short, different from what I expected, avoided a lot of bad tropes. The use of a PMC instead of Generic Crime Family was totally a breath of fresh air. Punisher takes on Generic Crime Family #27 would've been a waste. Are people really this disconnected from warfare? The parallel plot with the McVeigh-esque Lewis character who didn't know wtf to do with himself was actually exposition/insight in Frank Castle's m.o. by comparison/contrast. Castle can't come home mentally, and the murder of his family banished him into permanent battle mode. It's a tenuous, but all together believable thing that can happen, imo. Especially with special forces because you literally have to be a sociopath to perform at that level of brutality, so I guess he's like a serial killer in that respect.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Joey Freshwater posted:It was a general email that a response wasn’t directly needed on. Just an “FYI” informing the people in the email some info I found out. Such a corporate thing to complain about. I mean...I get it...but so dumb. Email etiquette Joey!!! Next time just BCC everyone and watch the chaos unfold.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Joey Freshwater posted:It was a general email that a response wasn’t directly needed on. Just an “FYI” informing the people in the email some info I found out. e: unrelated but lmao https://twitter.com/JoeMyGod/status/938160328214396928
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:12
|
|
|
reply all why am I being copied on this? please advise
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
Ehud posted:reply all ahhhhhhhhhhh i clenched my fist just imagining receiving this Jota fucked around with this message at 23:26 on Dec 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
Reply all Hey can you explain what you mean by this [Quote that is explicit and could not possibly be viewed in more than one way] Thanks
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
I always love that in every goddamn organization there is some fucker who feels the need to reply all. I remember at my call center job, we had an internal wiki, and one of the pages someone created was a "funny names you've come across in your calls" for all call center agents which, surprise! Ended up being an HR nightmare. The best was a guy posted that he came across a guy named King Wang. Not content with that, someone replied with "LOL! That's funny because the stereotype is that Asian men have small penises!" The kicker was that anytime a wiki page was updated, it sent out an email to people notifying them as such. Our CEO got an email that had Asian small penis in it, and shortly thereafter the page was gone and we were given training on business etiquette.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
We have an NFL pickem pool at my office and every week a guy does reply all with his picks Every. Week. lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:36
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:We have an NFL pickem pool at my office and every week a guy does reply all with his picks He's also the guy that probably averages like 7 out of 16 correct too isn't he? STOP SENDING YOUR WRONG PICKS TO EVERYONE, PAUL!
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 02:46 |
|
|
weird Asian candy posted:Such a corporate thing to complain about. I mean...I get it...but so dumb. Email etiquette Joey!!! Going forward, we'll circle back next week when I've got the bandwidth to touch base
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2017 23:44
|
|