|
Yeah I don't see anything short of plague or several targeted airstrikes keeping the Browns from the #1 pick at this point.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2017 17:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 15:55 |
|
Fenrir posted:Yeah I don't see anything short of plague or several targeted airstrikes keeping the Browns from the #1 pick at this point. Would it make you feel better if Cleveland is the #1 target from North Korea?
|
# ? Dec 4, 2017 19:25 |
the Steelers are going to clinch the #1 seed before the final week and will do a Favre-esque slide into the dirt for Strahan to give the Browns their lone win of the season
|
|
# ? Dec 4, 2017 19:28 |
|
I don't want the Browns to win again ever. I want to see how many consecutive losses will happen before they move or they contract the team.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2017 19:57 |
|
XxGirlKisserxX posted:the Steelers are going to clinch the #1 seed before the final week and will do a Favre-esque slide into the dirt for Strahan to give the Browns their lone win of the season The Browns got beat by the Landy Jones-led Steelers in week 17 last year.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2017 20:20 |
|
Hockles posted:I don't want the Browns to win again ever. I want to see how many consecutive losses will happen before they move or they contract the team. Agreed.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2017 21:03 |
|
Bigass Moth posted:Have you seen the Browns play football? have you seen the bears?
|
# ? Dec 4, 2017 21:07 |
|
Dexo posted:have you seen the bears? I saw them beat the Steelers. Haven't seen the Browns beat anyone.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2017 21:39 |
|
the browns could beat the broncos imo
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 05:47 |
|
Eli Wiggum posted:the browns could beat the broncos imo Could and would are two different words for a reason.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 07:05 |
|
Eli Wiggum posted:the browns could beat the broncos imo honestly i could believe that
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 07:48 |
|
i just realized the browns won all their preseason games
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 07:55 |
|
So did the Broncos
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:35 |
|
hifi posted:i just realized the browns won all their preseason games they used up all of their wins
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:37 |
|
hifi posted:i just realized the browns won all their preseason games So did the 2008 Lions.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 08:46 |
|
Eli Wiggum posted:the browns could beat the broncos imo Skwirl posted:Could and would are two different words for a reason. Kalli posted:DVOA Rankings: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2017/week-13-dvoa-ratings
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 18:54 |
|
Eli Wiggum posted:the browns could beat the broncos imo Right now, especially with Josh Gordon? Absolutely
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 19:04 |
|
Packers @ Browns, Ravens @ Browns, Browns @ Bears, and Browns @ Steelers. Which is the easiest game left? Easiest to hardest game to win in my opinion: Bears Packers Ravens Steelers (unless the Steelers are resting their starters)
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 20:39 |
|
Unfortunately I'm a resident of Northeast Ohio so I see a tremendous amount of Browns fans and can confirm that their souls are even more empty than normal for this time of the season. It's kind of sad and pathetic and they don't deserve a team with ownership this bad but I do agree that they need to lose until Haslam is forced to sell.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 21:22 |
|
I have a feeling that if it's Steelers vs. Browns and the Steelers have a chance to make the Browns go winless, they'll play their starters for a good chunk of the game. I legit think the Browns can beat the Bears, especially if Gordon significantly improves their passing offense. The San Francisco game was deceivingly close. SF kicked five field goals, but the longest was from 35 yards away. SF was getting into the redzone, they just couldn't finish. The Bears O was just terrible all game. If SF could have put converted one of those into a TD, then they would have been leading most of the game. Cleveland has a good D and could cause the Bears O to stall constantly.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 21:22 |
|
GyroNinja posted:So did the 2008 Lions. yeah, thats what got me thinking
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 21:33 |
|
Columbus, Ohio, is trying to keep their pro soccer team from moving to Austin and threw in a burn on the Browns.quote:The basis for the action, he said, is a 1996 law that says no owner of a professional sports team in Ohio that uses tax-supported facilities or gets public financial assistance can move out of town unless the owner gives six months advance notice and gives the city or local individuals who reside in the area the opportunity to purchase the team. http://www.dispatch.com/news/20171206/lawmaker-wants-to-use-law-passed-after-browns-move-to-block-crew-from-leaving
|
# ? Dec 6, 2017 23:57 |
|
Lote posted:Packers @ Browns, Ravens @ Browns, Browns @ Bears, and Browns @ Steelers. I agree. I think they honestly could squeak out two wins to the bears and Rodgers-less Packers.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 00:14 |
|
Bird in a Blender posted:I have a feeling that if it's Steelers vs. Browns and the Steelers have a chance to make the Browns go winless, they'll play their starters for a good chunk of the game. No they won't. The Steelers tried to gift wrap them a holiday win last year with virtually all of their starters sitting out, and the Browns tried to return it for in-store credit, and somehow hosed around and accidentally lost to Landry Jones in OT
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 00:18 |
|
The Twinkie Czar posted:Columbus, Ohio, is trying to keep their pro soccer team from moving to Austin and threw in a burn on the Browns. lmao that is beautiful
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 01:24 |
|
MY NIGGA D-LINK posted:No they won't. The Steelers tried to gift wrap them a holiday win last year with virtually all of their starters sitting out, and the Browns tried to return it for in-store credit, and somehow hosed around and accidentally lost to Landry Jones in OT The Browns would definitely use layaway.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 02:46 |
|
https://twitter.com/bostonsportsinf/status/936726131633541120
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 04:58 |
|
The best part is the guy in the replies dying on the hill of "why did you cut it off at 30 years and exclude Marty Schottenheimer's 44 wins"
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 05:21 |
|
fast cars loose anus posted:The best part is the guy in the replies dying on the hill of "why did you cut it off at 30 years and exclude Marty Schottenheimer's 44 wins" The stat itself is extremely dumb and arbitrary so I understand getting mad on it on an equally meaningless platform such as twitter or somethingawful dot com
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 11:21 |
30 years is a long time. that's why it's funny
|
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 12:56 |
|
XxGirlKisserxX posted:30 years is a long time. that's why it's funny
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 13:06 |
|
XxGirlKisserxX posted:30 years is a long time. that's why it's funny
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 13:39 |
|
Please don’t make fun of the Browns.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 13:40 |
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Please don’t make fun of the Browns. please do, in a kind and loving way
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 15:05 |
|
fast cars loose anus posted:The best part is the guy in the replies dying on the hill of "why did you cut it off at 30 years and exclude Marty Schottenheimer's 44 wins" Well that guy is right, making an arbitrary cutoff date that excludes much of one coach's tenure is kind of silly. It's still pretty sad.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 15:17 |
|
I have to agree, picking an arbitrary date in the middle of a successful coach's tenure is kinda odd. I'm by no means going to go post a meltdown on social media about it, though.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 15:19 |
|
XxGirlKisserxX posted:30 years is a long time. that's why it's funny
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 15:35 |
|
Sashi fired. Browns
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 17:10 |
|
Can’t wait for the Browns to continue assimilating the Bengals. They’re going for go for Lewis and/or McCarron.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 17:24 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 15:55 |
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Can’t wait for the Browns to continue assimilating the Bengals. They’re going for go for Lewis and/or McCarron. AJ's an RFA next year and Marv's contract runs out at the end of the league year so go for it yall
|
# ? Dec 7, 2017 17:26 |