|
This is really all you need to know about bitcoin.
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 23:27 |
|
|
Efb, missed it earlier.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:49
|
|
|
Nick Soapdish posted:DJT is just like an event in a Paradox game, each action just closes the MTTT for it. Just pretend I posted the XCOM gif of missing the 99% shot.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:50
|
|
|
Oh hey people in previously safe seats are suddenly concerned about the tax bill 
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
Thwomp posted:Bullshit. Ballless will cave because that’s what he does. this
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
UP THE BUM NO BABY posted:Oh hey people in previously safe seats are suddenly concerned about the tax bill Good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
UP THE BUM NO BABY posted:Oh hey people in previously safe seats are suddenly concerned about the tax bill Rubio isn’t up for election until 2022.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
UP THE BUM NO BABY posted:Oh hey people in previously safe seats are suddenly concerned about the tax bill If Texas goes blue in 2018 I will laugh so loving hard.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Rubio isn’t up for election until 2022. Rubio doesn't want to be a Senator, he wants to be President. 2020.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:58
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:Rubio doesn't want to be a Senator, he wants to be President. 2020. Yeah, this. He wants to be in a position where if Trump leaves office early or is completely discredited, Rubio can take advantage. That said, he’s still the wishy-washiest politician currently in office. He’ll fold when push comes to shove.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:59
|
|
|
DoktorLoken posted:Rubio a no on tax bill. Looks like someone wants to run for President again.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
BigDave posted:If Texas goes blue in 2018 I will laugh so loving hard. There's a very small chance Cruz could lose since no one actually likes him, and yeah Texas is slowly shifting blue but it isn't going to be as quick as anyone thinks since the only good jobs left in this state for unskilled labor are oil related and thats an anathema to Democrats. The big problem is that Dems gave up on Texas so there is gently caress all support for blues outside of big city mayor races.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
KildarX posted:Welp, net neutrality is dead.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:11
|
|
|
Gobbeldygook posted:Back in 2014 then the internet was a blighted hellscape full of bandits, beggars, and bastards. Packs of hungry Chihuahuas roamed the information super highway. Then in 2015 net neutrality came along and everything changed! Now its all rainbows, butterflies, all that sort of poo poo. Oh look, the anti-net neutrality troll is here
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
I always trust in our corporate benefactors to do whats best for me, the consumer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
That's definitely some red text.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
mods change my name posted:I always trust in our corporate benefactors to do whats best for me, the consumer. If you don't your ISP just switch to their competitor, that's how the free market works. Oh there's no competitor? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
The argument of "everything was fine in 2014" doesn't really work anymore when the ISPs are basically on record saying they're going to discriminate traffic. They tried before and got their rear end handed to them before the 2015 reg, now the only asskickers remaining are toothless government agencies with broken legs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
Net neutrality happened around the time that isps were obviously throttling Netflix, but I'm sure they wouldn't do something like that again!
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
They'll just obviously throttle Hulu now
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:24
|
|
|
This will end up being the most disastrous move the current administration has made. They should have never stepped between the alt-right and their access to Rick and Morty.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Prop Wash posted:This will end up being the most disastrous move the current administration has made. They should have never stepped between the alt-right and their access to Rick and Morty. If that happens I say good, let them destroy each other. Although it's probably like AVP - "Whoever wins, we lose" or whatever
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
Proud Christian Mom posted:There's a very small chance Cruz could lose since no one actually likes him, and yeah Texas is slowly shifting blue but it isn't going to be as quick as anyone thinks since the only good jobs left in this state for unskilled labor are oil related and thats an anathema to Democrats. The big problem is that Dems gave up on Texas so there is gently caress all support for blues outside of big city mayor races. None of this means anything because Jones and Trump happened. For all we know Texas flips sooner rather than later.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:39
|
|
|
WAR CRIME SYNDICAT posted:Oh look, the anti-net neutrality troll is here Slim Pickens posted:Net neutrality happened around the time that isps were obviously throttling Netflix, but I'm sure they wouldn't do something like that again!
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
So, the guy who made this video is pro-neutrality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKD-lBrZ_Gg But he still presents a fairly good view of why you can argue against it, and the guy he's debating with is the guy from the excellent channel 3blue1brown
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
Gobbeldygook posted:The passage of net neutrality had no effect on your life. It's repeal will also probably have no effect on your life. Your favorite corporate dystopia fiction isn't becoming real just because we're returning to the rules from two years ago. gently caress off back to whatever forum tolerates you
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
Gobbeldygook posted:The passage of net neutrality had no effect on your life. It's repeal will also probably have no effect on your life. Your favorite corporate dystopia fiction isn't becoming real just because we're returning to the rules from two years ago. So, why exactly should ISPs be able to follow the cable model of having basic and extended services?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
SimonCat posted:So, why exactly should ISPs be able to follow the cable model of having basic and extended services? Because he only uses five sites everyday that's good enough 4 me
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
Gobbeldygook posted:The passage of net neutrality had no effect on your life. It's repeal will also probably have no effect on your life. Your favorite corporate dystopia fiction isn't becoming real just because we're returning to the rules from two years ago. Net neutrality rules were the culmination of a decade of legislation formalizing restrictions regulators had enforced for 20-30 years. Assuming good faith, your argument is rooted in incorrect facts. It's going to take decades to undo the damage this administration has done in a matter of months, isn't it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
Just in time for another piece of poo poo to tear it all down on the basis that regulations stifle industry
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
UP THE BUM NO BABY posted:Just in time for another piece of poo poo to tear it all down on the basis that regulations stifle industry Well, they do. Regulations stifle industries from dumping chemical waste next to a elementary school, or selling a car that will blow up if you crash it at 20 MPH. Those are all things that need stifling.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/941399537779961858
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
Prop Wash posted:gently caress off back to whatever forum tolerates you
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
SimonCat posted:So, why exactly should ISPs be able to follow the cable model of having basic and extended services? If that's the end of the world to you, get a hobby.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:16
|
|
|
The appropriate threshold for getting mad about something is the apocalypse.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
at the date posted:The appropriate threshold for getting mad about something is the apocalypse. Look at this sinner 
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
Prop Wash posted:gently caress off back to whatever forum tolerates you
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:24
|
|
|
at the date posted:The appropriate threshold for getting mad about something is the apocalypse. Why would you care? Not like you’ll be around afterwards. If net neutrality really wasn’t such a big deal, why did telecoms have to AstroTurf support for it? Comcast has a de facto monopoly on the area that I live in, how do I get to vote with my dollars in this glorious capitalist paradise that we live in when I’m unhappy with their service?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:25
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/janawinter/status/941407018165915653
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 23:27 |
|
|
Looks like Shim's gonna need another name change
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 21:48
|
|