Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

svenkatesh posted:

Does Pakistan qualify for this thread?

https://www.dawn.com/news/1372856/
https://www.dawn.com/news/1376718/pakistan-could-lose-territory-to-terrorists-us

US rhetoric against Pakistan has been getting stronger in the past few months.

Seems like good staging for a 2-front war with Iran. /s

I put little stock in rhetoric. The US has long complained about Pakistan but has rarely taken any action that could potentially force them to change their policy. Although aid to Pakistan has been declining since Obama's surge, I'm not sure if that actually represents punishment for the tacit(?) support for the Taliban or is just a reflection of the general decrease in American resources devoted to the Afghan war.

edit: i also find it difficult to draw much meaning from shifting rhetoric in the Trump era. The Trump adminstration handles public statements and rhetoric much differently than past administrations so dramatic shifts in language can't necessarily be taken as reflecting a meaningful shift in policy. Remember the incident earlier this year where China got Sec of State Rex Tillerson to say the world should be more considerate of Chinese feelings. This is the kind of language the Chinese government pushes in their diplomacy and China watchers treated it as a minor coup for mainland China. . . but it didn't actually mean poo poo because Trump and Tillerson didn't know or care at all about the nuances of diplomatic signalling. They've acculturated a bit into the norms of international diplomacy since but there's still a major element of reading into the tea-leaves with this kind of statement.

Squalid fucked around with this message at 05:09 on Dec 16, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007

Tillerson is also supposedly on the outs and Trump contradicted him on North Korea, so US foreign policy is profoundly unclear at the moment.

CrazyLoon
Aug 10, 2015

"..."

mlmp08 posted:

At a time when the US is flowing even more forces to Afghanistan, truly and severely pissing on Pakistan would be a poor choice.

Unless...

Ohmygod! Iran's just a smokescreen, they're really gonna invade Pakistan! :allears:

Which would be even dumber

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747
Just distract Pakistan from Afghanistan by providing arms and support to the Baluchistan separatists. India can help. :unsmigghh:

Spergin Morlock
Aug 8, 2009

Cat Mattress posted:

Just distract Pakistan from Afghanistan by providing arms and support to the Baluchistan separatists. India can help. :unsmigghh:

This is a bad idea.

Toplowtech
Aug 31, 2004

Chadderbox posted:

This is a bad idea.
Yes but did it sounded like a good one "at the time"?

mediadave
Sep 8, 2011
Another article about the nationalist push in Iran:

The genesis of a new Iranian nationalism
https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/12/iran-new-nationalism-religion-politics-trump-saudi-isis.html

quote:

Among the most prominent examples of this turn to nationalism is the multimillion-dollar Sacred Defense Garden and Museum in northern Tehran, which opened in late 2012. One of the main exhibits displays large maps that show the Persian Empire ruling swaths of Asia over 3,000 years ago. It juxtaposes this map against shrinking Iranian territory throughout the centuries. Iran’s size today is minuscule in comparison with the glorified empire painted on the wall. The message of the museum is clear: Past monarchs ceded territory, thinking more about their own pockets than the nation. It was only the Islamic Republic that defended Iran’s borders, and by extension, its dignity as an ancient civilization.

The museum presents a different narrative of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War from the older, more traditional martyrs’ museums that dot every city and town in the country. In an attempt to gain more visitors, it has invited independent artists to make installations with nationalist themes to them, consciously welcoming those it pushed away for many years.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

mediadave posted:

Another article about the nationalist push in Iran:

The genesis of a new Iranian nationalism
https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/12/iran-new-nationalism-religion-politics-trump-saudi-isis.html

This one is much better than Erdbrink's article. Lots of important context he left unmentioned.

fishmech
Jul 16, 2006

by VideoGames
Salad Prong

Duckbox posted:

Tillerson is also supposedly on the outs and Trump contradicted him on North Korea, so US foreign policy is profoundly unclear at the moment.

No, no, it's very clear. The Trump Administration foreign policy is "whatever's the worst decision".

khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.
So this is pretty small in the grand scheme of things but utterly poo poo regardless:

The family of Miss Iraq in the Miss Universe pageant has had to flee the country because of a single photo she took with the Israeli contestant.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/942065808234205185

Lol saudi bootlicker twitter is going bananas over the NYT reporting of the $300 million dollar house, mind you this is a week and a half after they published one of the most fawning and rear end licking editorials I have ever read in my life, sometimes you cant please everybody I guess. :shrug:


no I actually agree with this. any Arab person or official or contestant who cavorts and gives comfort and aid or positively aids normalization with Israel in any way should be disqualified, harassed and have their careers ruined. Of course the whole 'literally run out of the country' is bad but lol if you promote good relations with apartheid racism while they're exterminating the Palestinians then you loving deserve what's coming. ESPECIALLY now that Israel is making it's grab for jerusalem.

There was a similar incident a few years ago when an IDF oval office tried to embarrass miss Lebanon by taking a surprise selfie with her without her consent, Israelis do this loving thing all the time to try and give people the impression that arabs are OK when what they're doing to the Palestinians. However in this case the miss Iraq KNEW what she was doing and KNEW what message she was sending, so she's reaping what she sowed so gently caress her and I hope she gets cancer.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.

Al-Saqr posted:


no I actually agree with this. any Arab person or official or contestant who cavorts and gives comfort and aid or positively aids normalization with Israel in any way should be disqualified. Of course the whole 'literally run out of the country' is bad but lol if you promote good relations with apartheid racism while they're exterminating the Palestinians then you loving deserve what's coming. ESPECIALLY now that Israel is making it's grab for jerusalem.

There was a similar incident a few years ago when an IDF oval office tried to embarrass miss Lebanon by taking a surprise selfie with her without her consent, Israelis do this loving thing all the time to try and give people the impression that arabs are OK when what they're doing to the Palestinians. However in this case the miss Iraq KNEW what she was doing and KNEW what message she was sending, so she's reaping what she sowed so gently caress her and I hope she gets cancer.

Taking a picture with somebody is not giving comfort and aid to the enemy. It's also possible to have relationships with people from a country who does terrible things without supporting that country.

Also stop using the word 'oval office' so liberally.

Longpig Bard
Dec 29, 2004



I don't believe Miss Whatever beauty pageant contestants are intelligent people.

Toplowtech
Aug 31, 2004

Al-Saqr posted:

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/942065808234205185

Lol saudi bootlicker twitter is going bananas over the NYT reporting of the $300 million dollar house, mind you this is a week and a half after they published one of the most fawning and rear end licking editorials I have ever read in my life, sometimes you cant please everybody I guess. :shrug:
Hey, it's the Du Barry's castle. She ended up guillotined during the terror. What a fantastic choice for a king.

54.4 crowns
Apr 7, 2011

To think before you speak is like wiping your arse before you shit.
I remember the frontpage so many years ago...."Hope"(got removed after a while of course)

I know I really sound like I'm putting myself on a cross but...how i wish i was a sociopath.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Al-Saqr posted:

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/942065808234205185

Lol saudi bootlicker twitter is going bananas over the NYT reporting of the $300 million dollar house, mind you this is a week and a half after they published one of the most fawning and rear end licking editorials I have ever read in my life, sometimes you cant please everybody I guess. :shrug:


no I actually agree with this. any Arab person or official or contestant who cavorts and gives comfort and aid or positively aids normalization with Israel in any way should be disqualified, harassed and have their careers ruined. Of course the whole 'literally run out of the country' is bad but lol if you promote good relations with apartheid racism while they're exterminating the Palestinians then you loving deserve what's coming. ESPECIALLY now that Israel is making it's grab for jerusalem.

There was a similar incident a few years ago when an IDF oval office tried to embarrass miss Lebanon by taking a surprise selfie with her without her consent, Israelis do this loving thing all the time to try and give people the impression that arabs are OK when what they're doing to the Palestinians. However in this case the miss Iraq KNEW what she was doing and KNEW what message she was sending, so she's reaping what she sowed so gently caress her and I hope she gets cancer.

But tell us how you really feel.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

khwarezm posted:

Taking a picture with somebody is not giving comfort and aid to the enemy.
I think that's why it included "aids normalization" as another reason.

khwarezm posted:

It's also possible to have relationships with people from a country who does terrible things without supporting that country.
She did it in an "official capacity" though, on top of her friend being explicitly named as a "representative" of Israel. I mean, obviously neither are like, state titles, but I don't think you can pretend like using the "Miss Country" title is entirely compatible with "just representing myself". Not defending the reaction, but I don't think a reaction is unwarranted.

54.4 crowns
Apr 7, 2011

To think before you speak is like wiping your arse before you shit.
BTW, Al-Saqr I only paid a tenner.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Al-Saqr posted:

no I actually agree with this. any Arab person or official or contestant who cavorts and gives comfort and aid or positively aids normalization with Israel in any way should be disqualified, harassed and have their careers ruined. Of course the whole 'literally run out of the country' is bad

This does not really compute for me.

"I agree with this, but it's bad" is an interesting take.

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Toplowtech posted:

Hey, it's the Du Barry's castle. She ended up guillotined during the terror. What a fantastic choice for a king.

FYI that house was built like 10 years ago.

The X-man cometh
Nov 1, 2009

Al-Saqr posted:

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/942065808234205185

Lol saudi bootlicker twitter is going bananas over the NYT reporting of the $300 million dollar house, mind you this is a week and a half after they published one of the most fawning and rear end licking editorials I have ever read in my life, sometimes you cant please everybody I guess. :shrug:


no I actually agree with this. any Arab person or official or contestant who cavorts and gives comfort and aid or positively aids normalization with Israel in any way should be disqualified, harassed and have their careers ruined. Of course the whole 'literally run out of the country' is bad but lol if you promote good relations with apartheid racism while they're exterminating the Palestinians then you loving deserve what's coming. ESPECIALLY now that Israel is making it's grab for jerusalem.

There was a similar incident a few years ago when an IDF oval office tried to embarrass miss Lebanon by taking a surprise selfie with her without her consent, Israelis do this loving thing all the time to try and give people the impression that arabs are OK when what they're doing to the Palestinians. However in this case the miss Iraq KNEW what she was doing and KNEW what message she was sending, so she's reaping what she sowed so gently caress her and I hope she gets cancer.

Saudi is just as bad as Israel now, should Miss Pakistan or Miss Philippines be harassed because she posed with a Saudi? (Does such a person exist?)

double nine
Aug 8, 2013

https://twitter.com/RealNetanyahu/status/941913301189124097




a parody account :ssh:

ughhhh
Oct 17, 2012


Its also a modification of a Golda Meir quote. The early Israeli statesmen/women were some terrifying and messed up people.

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos

khwarezm posted:

Also stop using the word 'oval office' so liberally.

Hey, at least he tries to restrain himself, last time it was "horse faced murderous oval office" and before that it was "I'd gently caress pigs before I'd touch an Israeli woman" or some poo poo, must have been heartbreaking for all those israeli women lining up for their turn.

khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.

A Buttery Pastry posted:

I think that's why it included "aids normalization" as another reason.

She did it in an "official capacity" though, on top of her friend being explicitly named as a "representative" of Israel. I mean, obviously neither are like, state titles, but I don't think you can pretend like using the "Miss Country" title is entirely compatible with "just representing myself". Not defending the reaction, but I don't think a reaction is unwarranted.

Well, I think 'Aids normalization' is very watery and vague concern in my view, and I think in this context the situation was so petty and unimportant that seeing this sort of reaction is really unpleasant, was any reaction other than some rolled eyes actually warranted? The original instagram post was a milquetoasty 'Peace and love, everyone should get along :)' that came about when everyone was backstage. I suppose they do represent their countries, but it's a tacky beauty pageant not an international summit, and the fallout of this kind of thing tends to give the worst kind of people more ammo (the story is making rounds in places like the noted Islamophilic bastion that is Reddit).

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007

Seriously Saqr, when your response to someone getting death threats over a selfie is "oval office had it coming," it's probably time for a little introspection.

Saladin Rising
Nov 12, 2016

When there is no real hope we must
mint our own. If the coin be
counterfeit it may still be passed.

The regime's over-reliance on paramilitary groups is continuing to bite them; ISIS attacked regime controlled areas in-between Mayadin and Abu Kamal, and ISIS was able to take back control for a little bit. The knives are already out over whose fault it is:
https://www.reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar/comments/7k77cb/syria_deirezzor_according_to_a_tiger_forces/
https://twitter.com/IvanSidorenko1/status/942001223288356864

quote:

#Syria #DeirEzZor According to a Tiger Forces Commander you can thank all the losses at the Euphrates front to Liwa al Quds & Fatemiyoun who just straight up suck at defending. Tiger Forces handed over the Areas they captured to them and then they lost most of it days after.
https://twitter.com/IvanSidorenko1/status/942086876068044802

quote:

#Syria #DeirEzZor Post from the Commander of #Tiger_Forces Shaheen Group about the failures of Liwa al Quds & Iranian Fatimiyoun who took over the Areas after Tiger Forces were supposed to begin work @ Idlib & Hama. 17th Armored Divsiion & #SRG & AL-Ridda Forces Took over the Job

AlexanderCA
Jul 21, 2010

by Cyrano4747

The X-man cometh posted:

Saudi is just as bad as Israel now, should Miss Pakistan or Miss Philippines be harassed because she posed with a Saudi? (Does such a person exist?)

Hell Saudi is worse. At least Israel tolerates internal dissidents to a degree. Better noone ever associate with any Saudi nationals. Guess we all have to put al saqr on ignore.

Coldwar timewarp
May 8, 2007



Saladin Rising posted:

The regime's over-reliance on paramilitary groups is continuing to bite them; ISIS attacked regime controlled areas in-between Mayadin and Abu Kamal, and ISIS was able to take back control for a little bit. The knives are already out over whose fault it is:
https://www.reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar/comments/7k77cb/syria_deirezzor_according_to_a_tiger_forces/
https://twitter.com/IvanSidorenko1/status/942001223288356864

https://twitter.com/IvanSidorenko1/status/942086876068044802

Their pivot to NE Hama was too fast. It’s not like this same scenario hasn’t happened before. Palmyra in particular. They should have just waited to campaign in Idlib for a few months to allow some rebuilding time and maintain local superiority over IS. I get their resources are stretched but this lesson should have been learned. The Iraqi’s had a much more realistic timetable for Mosul, Tel Afar, Hawija and then the desert areas, they consistently consolidated and it worked quite well to keep IS from recapturing things.

Brother Friendship
Jul 12, 2013

I'm the best canned foods and nuts.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

khwarezm posted:

Well, I think 'Aids normalization' is very watery and vague concern in my view
How so? Normalization of extremist views is a pretty legit thing to be worried about in domestic politics, why not in international too? The more often Israel is shown as just another country, the more easily it can deflect from its crimes.

khwarezm posted:

I suppose they do represent their countries, but it's a tacky beauty pageant not an international summit
Given the undue importance people, perhaps especially in the countries most able to put pressure on Israel, put on celebrity and pop culture, I'm not sure it should be dismissed so easily. Sure, the facts should speak for themselves, but the majority probably bases their political views on what a few celebrities say.

AlexanderCA posted:

Hell Saudi is worse. At least Israel tolerates internal dissidents to a degree. Better noone ever associate with any Saudi nationals. Guess we all have to put al saqr on ignore.
Do...do the Palestinians not count here? Plus al saqr isn't here as the Saudi ambassador/Miss Saudi Arabia.

Toplowtech
Aug 31, 2004

Bip Roberts posted:

FYI that house was built like 10 years ago.
"The developer bulldozed a 19th-century castle in Louveciennes to make way for the new chateau in 2009." Yeah, great historical value.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

khwarezm posted:

Taking a picture with somebody is not giving comfort and aid to the enemy. It's also possible to have relationships with people from a country who does terrible things without supporting that country.

Also stop using the word 'oval office' so liberally.

The X-man cometh posted:

Saudi is just as bad as Israel now, should Miss Pakistan or Miss Philippines be harassed because she posed with a Saudi? (Does such a person exist?)

Saudi is not a democracy, and the citizens of Saudi Arabia dont have any choice or say in the matter of what their government does or says, it's as ridiculous as saying that 500,000 iraqi kids had to starve to death because of saddam husseins behavior, in the end the Iraqi's just suffered and the dictators went on business as usual. Israel however is a 'democracy' in which all of it's citizens are soldiers, fresh colonizers from abroad, taxpayers and have the full freedom to change the nature and behavior of their government. that's the difference. In Israel, the governments change, but the fundamental nature of the society and the policies it produces reflects the will of the people and doesn't change, the few times it did change was when they were forced to do so ( e.g. Israel doesn't attack Lebanon as much as they used to because hezbollah sent a message to the voting public in Israel that they're not safe from their actions) therefore, if it's fair that if the Iraqi's, Iranians, etc. have to suffer immensely for the crimes of their unelected and unaccountable governments, then it's quadruple fair that Arab civil society gives the entire voting and supportive population (the racist and unrepentant parts) of Israel the cold shoulder they deserve for committing what they're committing without remorse and without any serious attempt to change their ways.

Arab civil society is currently under occupation by arab fascist governments backed by the US and Israel (and Iran in multiple places), we have no ability to send the Palestinians money, weapons, etc. to defend themselves. Arab civil society has no way to deliver help to the Palestinians beyond some money or some food and even that is kinda on and off. Boycotting is one of the few ways people are able to express their political So one of the few ways we can send a message to the Israelis that they're doing something wrong is to collectively boycott all interactions with them until the palestinians are treated like human beings.

Symbols Matter, and the narrative matters, if you give a rapist the kind of treatment he wants with no punishment or consequences for what he's done, then he's got no reason to change his ways and will continue as is because he's been positively re-informed to keep as is.

if an Arab person in an official and representative capacity aids normalization with Israel, he is not only giving Israeli Apartheid a narrative and symbolic victory, they are also weakening the already dire need the Palestinians need for their fight for human rights because Israel can go ahead and say " hey look Arabs are friendly with us therefore is OK to destroy the Palestinians and throw them into cages and cast them into the four corners of the earth so that my cousin from Hoboken can get a new condo!!"

No, gently caress that. It's bad enough we're imprisoned by governments who work with Israel to secure their thrones, it's another that pieces of poo poo individuals decide to throw in their lot with fascism and racism.

mlmp08 posted:

But tell us how you really feel.

I just did.

mlmp08 posted:

This does not really compute for me.


"I agree with this, but it's bad" is an interesting take.

I agreed with the fact that since she did this without apologizing afterwards that she should be stripped of all her titles and have her career ruined and become a social pariah until she apologizes and takes steps to truly change her ways, I disagree with death threats and literally throwing her out of the country.

Duckbox posted:

Seriously Saqr, when your response to someone getting death threats over a selfie is "oval office had it coming," it's probably time for a little introspection.

I'm not sexist about this, if it was a dude I would also hate him. And yes any person who helps israels goals of sidelining the palestinian cause and normalizing their apartheid racism has whatever bad things happen to them. gently caress them.

Why introspection? There's nothing left to introspect about, the Arab spring made things crystal clear. There Re two groups of people, there is the Arab civil society that wants freedom, democracy, human rights and for everybody to live as human beings free of oppression and fear, who hold the Palestinian cause as the ultimate symbol of the cause for humanity and the struggle to not be wiped out from the face of the earth, and then there are the fascists, the oppressors, the torturers, the sectarian murderers, the racists, the child gassers, the colonizers and the reactionary forces that sponsor them, Israel falls squarely on the the second camp, and any person that chooses that camp over his own humanity deserves to be treated like poo poo. I will never have even a tiny bit of respect or empathy or feelings towards them, gently caress them, they don't deserve to be treated with any kindness and I hope they choke on their poo poo and die.

emanresu tnuocca posted:

Hey, at least he tries to restrain himself, last time it was "horse faced murderous oval office" and before that it was "I'd gently caress pigs before I'd touch an Israeli woman" or some poo poo, must have been heartbreaking for all those israeli women lining up for their turn.

Lol it's amazing that you're still butt hurt about that, hey buddy, guess what, turns out I was right, that trained soldier actively harassed miss Lebanon and tried to embarrass her, I don't regret a god drat thing I said about that rear end in a top hat.

Al-Saqr fucked around with this message at 08:10 on Dec 17, 2017

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007

She's a human being not just a symbol. Both those women are. I agree that Israeli policy is poo poo but we're not talking about government representatives here. These women are, at most, cultural ambassadors. I think it's a good thing that people for rival countries can still connect on a human level and be friends and if there was a "political" message to the picture it was certainly that and not "settlements are actually good."

Do you really think she should denounce and deny her friend over geopolitics? Why is an honest expression of affection between two civilians who've committed no crimes so threatening it deserves threats, exclusion, and pariah status.

Look, I hate Israel too and I gave my dad some poo poo for taking a work trip there few years ago (he was somewhat horrified by how much worse it's gotten in the last 30 years), but even if this woman had said "maybe Zionism isn't so bad" that still wouldn't justify the way she's been treated. Everyone else in the thread thought she was a victim. You called her a oval office. I don't think being Arab gives you a pass for victim blaming someone whose only crime was being friends with an Israeli.

When you rage and moan about fascists, oppression, and the death of civil society and then advocate the vicious suppression of speech and speakers you disagree with, it makes you sound like an enormous hypocrite. Do you like sounding like a caustic reactionary who can't tolerate dissent or a woman who doesn't know her place? Is that the person you intended to be? I don't think that's you and I respect you enough to say so.

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos
Keep fighting that good fight Al saqr, there are oh so many Jewish women deserving of your impotent misogyny.

I bet seeing all those Gal Gadot posters all over the place is hard on you, that's nice.

CrazyLoon
Aug 10, 2015

"..."

emanresu tnuocca posted:

Keep fighting that good fight Al saqr, there are oh so many Jewish women deserving of your impotent misogyny.

I bet seeing all those Gal Gadot posters all over the place is hard on you, that's nice.

The thing about her, tho, is that she straight up did tweet some support to Israel's poo poo and was all 'patriotic' of the crap that happens there, so I can actually understand the anger towards her a lot more.

This though is just...seriously, if you had a RL job that involves being photographed a lot, sooner or later you'd get a snap made of you while you were in a 'professional capacity' with someone that would be a contentious figure to others (whether rightfully so or not). By your logic, anyone who took a picture with any person that was so much as accused (not even convicted of) the recent sexual harassment scandals going on about the celebrity world, would be an automatic piece of poo poo.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost
Taking a photo with a private citizen isn’t the same as endorsing Israeli policy or being anti-Palestinian.

Also you sound like a big ole hypocrite with a healthy dose of misogyny to boot.

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010
Going to chime in with the rest here, that it's really ironic that Al-Saqr cries "fascist" several times in every post, but then thinks it's OK to shame, fire, and humiliate someone for having taken a photo with someone from a country that he don't like. Guess what? That's one of the hallmarks of being a huge fascist sack of poo poo. I guess it's seeped into his skin by osmosis from growing up in KSA.

I work with some Iranian dudes (I'm a US citizen). I hope no one posts photos from our Christmas party on Friday of me sitting next to them and laughing together since then we'd both be fired and shamed by our families and suffer death threats.

Saladman fucked around with this message at 13:20 on Dec 17, 2017

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007

The Intercept has a article up about the phony ceasefire in Syria. Thread regulars will know a lot of it already, but it's still interesting.

The Intercept posted:

The recent escalation in Eastern Ghouta took place against the backdrop of various rounds of peace talks in Astana, Kazakstan; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; and Sochi, Russia. Human rights advocates warned that the protection of civilians ought to be a focus of those talks.

“If Russia is serious about protecting civilians in Syria, it needs to do more to spare civilians from airstrikes and ensure that its ally in Damascus allows aid into besieged areas,” Human Rights Watch’s Nadim Houry said in a statement ahead of the Sochi talks. “Many of the de-escalation agreements have failed to deliver the promised [protection] for the residents there.”

Members of the Syrian opposition saw an irony in Russia — which has indiscriminately bombed civilian centers since intervening on behalf of the Syrian government two years ago — acting as a guarantor of peace. Opposition figures walked out of the Astana meetings when the de-escalation agreement was first proposed in May.

There are few options for enforcing the agreement. “The only mechanism is to continue to exert pressure, such that the Russians don’t feel they are the only player in the region,” said Osama Abu Zeid, a Syrian activist who served as the rebel spokesperson for the first three rounds of talks in Astana. “But what we’re seeing is that the United States has totally retreated and this is giving Russia great satisfaction, which, as a result, is giving Iran a lot of satisfaction, particularly in the area of Damascus and the surrounding area and in the south.”


The Syrian government initially agreed to a Russian plan for a two-day cease-fire in Eastern Ghouta in late November, just ahead of the latest round of Geneva peace talks, but reversed itself later in the day.

“Clashes with terrorists continue there,” a Russian government spokesperson said, explaining the decision. “There have been no clashes with the armed opposition, it is terrorists from ISIL” — an acronym for the Islamic State — “who are active there.” Yet the Islamic State, while it controls some regions of Damascus, does not have a presence in Eastern Ghouta.

The promises to halt the violence, whether they go into effect or not, have made no difference to the lives of people on the ground. Many of those in areas like Eastern Ghouta say the agreements being negotiated by political leaders in Astana have done nothing to affect their painful daily reality.

“When the de-escalation zones started, it was just in the media,” media activist and Eastern Ghouta resident Nour Adam told The Intercept. “On the ground, no part of the de-escalation plan happened. The regime continued to storm the towns of Eastern Ghouta, in Ein Tarma and Jobar and Harasta. The regime, of course, has not stopped its raids. The shelling didn’t stop.”

The ceasefire doesn't apply to fighting ISIS or HTS so the Russians and Assad just bomb whoever they want and say there were ISIS guys there.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Achernar
Sep 2, 2011
Here's a nice little story that made me :unsmith: a little.

Christmas market opens in Algerian capital

I didn't realize there were so many migrants/refugees in Algeria.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply