|
Steelers are incredibly dumb
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 01:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 22:19 |
|
|
NFL rigged so what
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
The future refused to change
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
Amy Pole Her posted:He’s so bad holy hell That last pick was magnificent.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 01:46
|
|
|
You play to win the game -dumbass big ben refusing to spike
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 01:47
|
|
|
Real hurthling! posted:You play to win the game It wasn't a bad idea to take a shot, but you throw a safe throw like a fade or something.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 02:19
|
|
|
Or when you see that the Patriots aren’t asleep you throw it out of the back of the end zone, instead of stepping up, hesitating and trying to rifle it between 4 defenders.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 02:34
|
|
|
gently caress, this feels like the closest we've been. https://twitter.com/yardsperpass/status/942553080008146948
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 02:47
|
|
|
I think I'm actually numb to the NFL giving the evil fucks games! It's just what I expect to happen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
The catch rule is stupid, but it was pretty obviously called correctly there. Also, the Steelers were still absolutely in that game - they were down by 3 at the 10 yard line.They had an almost guaranteed overtime if they hadn't bizarrely thrown the ball into extremely heavy coverage on a blown fake play. Rogue0071 fucked around with this message at 04:32 on Dec 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
Rogue0071 posted:The catch rule is stupid, but it was pretty obviously called correctly there. He's over the plane with the ball. That is a touchdown. This was almost as blatant a robbery as the ASJ call in the Jets game. That one was better for sheer comedy value since Riveron had to "spike the ball" by creating a fumble on a play where the ball never hit the ground to give the scumbags a win.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
If you're catching a ball and going to the ground you don't just have to cross the plane you also have to complete the catch to the ground. I would 10/10 agree that the rule creates dumb scenarios like this but that is how the rule works as written.quote:Item 1. Player Going to the Ground. A player is considered to be going to the ground if he does not remain upright long enough to demonstrate that he is clearly a runner. If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball until after his initial contact with the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete. Rogue0071 fucked around with this message at 04:42 on Dec 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 04:40
|
|
|
Romo even called it before the ruling too. It's a dumb fuckin' rule and I won't be sad to see it go
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 04:44
|
|
|
GonadTheBallbarian posted:Romo even called it before the ruling too. It's a dumb fuckin' rule and I won't be sad to see it go Romo is very familar with getting screwed by that rule.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 04:45
|
|
|
dolphins will lose to kc next week and then close out their pointless season by ruining the bills' playoff hopes because misery loves company and that's how we roll
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 06:34
|
|
|
Mulaney Power Move posted:dolphins will lose to kc next week and then close out their pointless season by ruining the bills' playoff hopes because misery loves company and that's how we roll Alternatively, we win out, ruin the Chiefs and Bills hopes whilst getting to 8-8, our spiritual destiny
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 09:30
|
|
|
Mulaney Power Move posted:dolphins will lose to kc next week and then close out their pointless season by ruining the bills' playoff hopes because misery loves company and that's how we roll no please don't not like this that's exactly the billsiest result so of coarse that's how it'll go
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 10:57
|
|
|
So where will Tyrod be quarterbacking next year, since lord knows the Bills despise him for whatever reason? Jets, Cardinals? Backing up Brady? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 15:21
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:It wasn't a bad idea to take a shot, but you throw a safe throw like a fade or something. By design you literally look for your shot, abs if at first glance it’s not there you throw it 10 yards above your head out of the end zone You don’t triple pump then chuck it in the middle
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 15:31
|
|
|
Amy Pole Her posted:By design you literally look for your shot, abs if at first glance it’s not there you throw it 10 yards above your head out of the end zone Yeah, I finally looked at the play a bunch and no one else moves so the entire Pats secondary is around the guy: https://twitter.com/DanLevyThinks/status/942550023228870658
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 15:36
|
|
|
3 of the 5 Jets wins come from current AFC playoff teams. That's dumb.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 19:29
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:He's over the plane with the ball. That is a touchdown. that's not the only criteria for it being a touchdown, but good to see you haven't read literally any rules since like 2005 you have to catch the ball before you can break the plane. falling down is part of the catch process whether you want to get mad and stomp your feet real hard or not. sorry you disagree with a lovely rule that was called correctly? lol we've spent all night talking about how dumb the rule is. it's still the current rule
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 19:34
|
|
|
if the refs had any balls they'd call the lovely rules incorrectly. civil. disobedience.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
it's not like this call is revolutionary, even in the current decade of NFL football. remember Lee Evans getting the ball swatted out of his hands by Sterling Moore? they ruled that Evans didn't maintain possession throughout the catch despite the replay seemingly showing that his second foot touched the turf
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
Turdsdown Tom posted:it's not like this call is revolutionary, even in the current decade of NFL football. remember Lee Evans getting the ball swatted out of his hands by Sterling Moore? they ruled that Evans didn't maintain possession throughout the catch despite the replay seemingly showing that his second foot touched the turf People genuinely can’t get past, myself included, the arbitrary goal line rules. But yeah clearly not a catch as they describe it in the weekly anger. Big Ben lost that game
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 19:45
|
|
|
Amy Pole Her posted:People genuinely can’t get past, myself included, the arbitrary goal line rules. yeah, bad rule, correctly applied here but bad rule. honestly the whole nfl defense against changing the rules to make it a catch earlier of "but then there would be more fumbles!" is bad. so? that'd own, fumbles after a bomb would be hilarious swings instead of bullshit "well, its a catch in every sense of the word except the rulebook sense"
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 19:50
|
|
|
Mo fumble mo betta
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
Is there any reason you can't have the rule be that anytime you have control over the ball when it goes over the goal line it's a touchdown? Is there some weird scenario I'm not seeing where making that the rule produces some new kind of dumb poo poo instead of the current kind of dumb poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
No one is going to believe Pats fans saying the bad rule was called correctly so, as a Patriots hater, I'll echo that it was probably the "correct" call. It doesn't matter that he crossed the plane because (according to the dumbass rule) he never had possession. If the receiver was in mid-air and crossed the plane with the ball in his hands but it was knocked out before he hit the ground, it also wouldn't be a touchdown because he never properly caught it in the first place. It's the same principle here. The only point of contention, I think, is whether or not James contorting his body to stretch across the goal line is a "football move". I don't know if "football move" is actually defined in any formal way, but the precedent I've seen is that it generally translates to "takes a couple steps or holds onto it tight for at least two full seconds". The lunge was neither of these things.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
sean10mm posted:Is there any reason you can't have the rule be that anytime you have control over the ball when it goes over the goal line it's a touchdown? Is there some weird scenario I'm not seeing where making that the rule produces some new kind of dumb poo poo instead of the current kind of dumb poo poo? I think the only concern there would be things that are not a catch on the field are a catch at the goal line so you'd have some weirdness there. Not a reason not to do it though, but I think it's better to just fix the rule in general so if you have control of the ball for some amount of time (a second?), if it wiggles when you hit the ground it's a fumble and if its one of these tiny wiggles, then it looks like you recovered your own fumble.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 21:44
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TheAdams_era/status/943288279084032000
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2017 02:30
|
|
|
He probably deserved it over Reshad Jones but rookies generally dont get love their first year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:He probably deserved it over Reshad Jones but rookies generally dont get love their first year. He said he didn't think he deserved it this year too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:He probably deserved it over Reshad Jones but rookies generally dont get love their first year. Based off what, exactly
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2017 15:35
|
|
|
Amy Pole Her posted:Based off what, exactly Well, Adams had fewer tackles, fewer passes defended, fewer interceptions, fewer fumbles recovered. Clearly better than Jones in every measurable way.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2017 15:42
|
|
|
It makes SOOOOO much sense to re sign Sheldon Richardson since they won SOOOOO much when he was here...
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
Bowles probably won't be fired this year but anyone who thinks he's a long term answer is nuts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
Aaaand Bowles just got a 2 year extension  http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000899858/article/jets-extend-contracts-of-todd-bowles-mike-maccagnan
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Dre2Dee2 posted:Aaaand Bowles just got a 2 year extension Lol.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 22:19 |
|
|
As long as woodys in the uk the team wont make moves id reckon. Lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2017 23:20
|
|