|
25th Anniversary Masters should just be Alpha, all the way down to missing Circle of Protection:Black, and Island in the rare slot.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 22:56 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 22:14 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:But seriously, why is Iconic Masters even a product when they have another Masters set coming out in less than three loving months which as far as I can tell, is the exact same poo poo except different cards. channel is pretty iconic beyond that ... mana drain?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 22:58 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:But seriously, why is Iconic Masters even a product when they have another Masters set coming out in less than three loving months which as far as I can tell, is the exact same poo poo except different cards. it's called "iconic masters" because it has a bunch of angels, sphinxes, demons, dragons, and hydras in it, and those are the iconics for each color
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 22:58 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:But seriously, why is Iconic Masters even a product when they have another Masters set coming out in less than three loving months which as far as I can tell, is the exact same poo poo except different cards. BUT MANA DRAIN
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:02 |
|
Elyv posted:it's called "iconic masters" because it has a bunch of angels, sphinxes, demons, dragons, and hydras in it, and those are the iconics for each color so it's a name that only makes sense if you read Maro's blog
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:03 |
|
Lone Goat posted:25th Anniversary Masters should just be Alpha, all the way down to missing Circle of Protection:Black, and Island in the rare slot. And the weird rounded off corners. Count Bleck posted:BUT MANA DRAIN less iconic than literally just counterspell
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:03 |
|
Lone Goat posted:25th Anniversary Masters should just be Alpha, all the way down to missing Circle of Protection:Black, and Island in the rare slot.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:03 |
|
cheetah7071 posted:so it's a name that only makes sense if you read Maro's blog quote:dawritowins said quote:So, looking back, do you feel you should have named Iconic Masters something akin to "Tribal Masters"?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:07 |
|
Haha holy poo poo.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:25 |
|
I made a thing for a buddy for christmas, but since it's MTG stuff I figured I'd share.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:27 |
|
they look good but gently caress tron
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:50 |
|
Pac-Manioc Root posted:And the weird rounded off corners Please print all new cards like this. Put Beta purists in their place.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2017 23:58 |
|
I cracked a Vial in the one Iconic Masters pack that I opened so it gets an A+ from me.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 00:11 |
|
C-Euro posted:I cracked a Vial in the one Iconic Masters pack that I opened so it gets an A+ from me. The two Eternal Masters packs I opened had Argonian Enchantress, a foil Blood Artist, and Jace the Mind Sculptor but I still think that set was poo poo.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 00:16 |
|
Lone Goat posted:25th Anniversary Masters should just be Alpha, all the way down to missing Circle of Protection:Black, and Island in the rare slot. Just reprint Limited Edition with no changes whatsoever. It doesn’t violate the Reserved List. They just resumed production of the original set.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 00:23 |
|
Count Bleck posted:The two Eternal Masters packs I opened had Argonian Enchantress, a foil Blood Artist, and Jace the Mind Sculptor but I still think that set was poo poo. EMA was great though. Angry Grimace posted:Just reprint Limited Edition with no changes whatsoever. It doesn’t violate the Reserved List. They just resumed production of the original set. Unlimited says its print run right in the name.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 00:30 |
|
suicidesteve posted:EMA was great though. lol Like Wizards wants to pay those artists.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 00:40 |
|
Reanimate in the Cube: cool and good
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 00:43 |
|
Mezzanon posted:lol Like Wizards wants to pay those artists. They presumably just paid them for the VMA redo so And if you think Really Actually Unlimited wouldn't be the biggest selling set ever, you're high.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 00:59 |
|
I didn't even come close to dropping a game with that reanimate cube deck, easy 3-0. Funniest moments: 1) Opponent concedes on Turn 2 to Animate Dead ---> Grave Titan 2) Opponent casts Force of Will on a Thoughtseize targetting myself on Turn 2 3) Opponent tries to avoid lethal from Corpse Dance (put top creature on battlefield, gets haste until end then sac), so he casts Brain Freeze. Mill 6, put Grave Titan on top.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 01:04 |
|
wow maro sure is being a baby about people not being super stoked about the EV on their seventy two dollar packs of magic cards. i might feel some sympathy for him if the entire purpose of the set wasnt to sell forty dollar drafts.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 01:18 |
|
the "____ masters" poo poo being made to be a ~draftable set!~ is the most unbearable nakedly greedy garbage ever. i absolutely guarantee it was the result of sitting down and saying "okay how can we reprint SOME stuff while still justifying having Keiga take up a mythic slot and putting nickel uncommons in packs"
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 01:20 |
|
rabidsquid posted:the "____ masters" poo poo being made to be a ~draftable set!~ is the most unbearable nakedly greedy garbage ever. i absolutely guarantee it was the result of sitting down and saying "okay how can we reprint SOME stuff while still justifying having Keiga take up a mythic slot and putting nickel uncommons in packs" Literally every set they've made since like, Mirage, has been designed for the packs to be drafted. There was never a "should we make it draftable?" conversation for any ______ Masters set, because packs of random cards that aren't explicitly designed for Limited play is something that they haven't done since about 1996.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 01:36 |
|
They released a set in 2004 where the intended way to play was to open the packs and chuckle.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 01:46 |
|
hey man, putting fifty cent mythics in the ten dollar pack isnt something they WANTED to, they had to. its the law, its been that way since the economy was printed on the stone tablets in 1994
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 01:47 |
|
rabidsquid posted:the "____ masters" poo poo being made to be a ~draftable set!~ is the most unbearable nakedly greedy garbage ever. i absolutely guarantee it was the result of sitting down and saying "okay how can we reprint SOME stuff while still justifying having Keiga take up a mythic slot and putting nickel uncommons in packs" Especially when 1/3 of the X Masters sets haven't actually been draftable.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 01:51 |
|
Jesus Christ, you people are some whiny fuckers.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 02:42 |
|
Reprint Alpha
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 02:50 |
|
AlternateNu posted:Jesus Christ, you people are some whiny fuckers. Personally I love paying $10 for a pack and opening a *opens pack* Void. With really horrible art.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 02:51 |
|
Count Bleck posted:The two Eternal Masters packs I opened had Argonian Enchantress, a foil Blood Artist, and Jace the Mind Sculptor but I still think that set was poo poo. A comic store near my apartment has a small collection of Magic products for sale and still has EMA packs available. For $15 a pop
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:10 |
|
AlternateNu posted:Jesus Christ, you people are some whiny fuckers. You've posted in this thread nearly 300 times, are you just now realizing this?
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:13 |
|
personally i don't buy packs in the hopes of getting anything good because the vast majority of the time there's a negative ROI on them just buy singles if you're not drafting you dorks
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:16 |
|
suicidesteve posted:Personally I love paying $10 for a pack and opening a *opens pack* Void. With really horrible art.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:23 |
|
suicidesteve posted:Personally I love paying $10 for a pack and opening a *opens pack* Void. With really horrible art. Void rules, but it needs to be in Standard again to really assert it. Still with laser robot art, natch. It costs 5 which is waaaay too much in eternal formats, and removal down there is so efficient that Void isn't really going to blow anyone's mind anyway.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:27 |
|
the mecha void art is soooo good, and i hate wizards for changing it bc of branding or whatever
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:33 |
|
Matsuri posted:personally i don't buy packs in the hopes of getting anything good because the vast majority of the time there's a negative ROI on them I just like to open one pack of every set that comes up, be it in a draft or as a lotto ticket, just to look and say "oh that's what's going on these days". I've had pretty good luck with Masters sets (Mox Opal in my one MM15 pack, Damnation Goblin Guide in my one MM17 draft, Vial in my one IMA pack) and poo poo luck with everything else, which I guess is better than the other way around.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:34 |
|
Remember kids, the only good Magic player is a dead one.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:35 |
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:You've posted in this thread nearly 300 times, are you just now realizing this? No. But, I've hit the point where I felt it necessary to make a uselessly pithy statement about it because holy gently caress!
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:36 |
|
C-Euro posted:I just like to open one pack of every set that comes up, be it in a draft or as a lotto ticket, just to look and say "oh that's what's going on these days". Yeah. I buy a pack every time I go to fnm as a way to support the store (their singles are lacking so I buy online mostly). I know it's a waste of cash but it's a nice way to be sure they're not paying processing fees on my $5 entry fee when I charge it.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 22:14 |
|
C-Euro posted:I just like to open one pack of every set that comes up, be it in a draft or as a lotto ticket, just to look and say "oh that's what's going on these days". Oh, I don't see any issue opening a pack just for the hell of it-- you're paying more for the experience of a random chance rather than anything inside the pack. Even I do that sometimes, just for the fun of opening a pack. But if you're opening packs on a gamble of getting a big money card, you're ultimately wasting your money more often than not. Better to just buy the single than spend money on a small chance of getting it.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2017 03:55 |