|
Raskolnikov posted:Something tells me that Sandi isn't into exclusivity. 
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 22:02 |
|
|
Foo Diddley posted:You know, technically it's always nighttime somewhere
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:24
|
|
|
I've watched a fair bit of judge Judy, and she always says that when the terms of the contract are ambiguous it is interpreted in favor of the party who didn't write it. Not sure if that is a factor in big boy law, but who would that be in this case? The actual person who wrote it worked for crytek at the time but now works for cig?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:25
|
|
|
MyRadar! For those of our users who are also PC gamers, you may be interested to learn that MyRadar has teamed up with Cloud Imperium Games, the makers of the exciting, up-coming AAA title "Star Citizen", to render maps of their virtual moons right here in our weather app! Now users can explore these virtual moons right in MyRadar - tap the "Map Types" icon (second in from the left) to embark on your armchair moon expedition! Veteran news journalist Miles O'Brien sat down with the creators of Star Citizen for MyRadar and delved further into the game's origins and development progress. Check out the interview below! ! !! https://motd-content.azureedge.net/messages/active/en_android_20171128T0140.html @4:50 Chris Roberts: So we're not really running this business as a business that we're sort of socking a bunch of money away as PROFIT, we're running it as, 'OK, you guys are supporting us to THIS level therefore we can afford THIS many engineers, THIS many artists, THIS many designers, you know, THIS many musicians, THIS many... sound designers, whatever... and, uh... you know... we can make a world THIS big now instead of THIS big. And, uh... and... and that... and that's GREAT... and the SCOPE expands with the SUPPORT and, uh... ultimately it lends... letting us get to the point where... I think if I pitched this game to anyone 5 years ago they would have looked me in the eye and said, 'you are absolutely NUTS you will NEVER be able to do that', ah... ahm... but I THINK we'll be able to get there and that's pretty awesome. Tony Zurovek: The decisions that you make early on in development are basically, you know, that's the SCAFFOLDING that's going to, you know, INHIBIT or ALLOW you to do more ambitious, evolutionary things later on, but at least for some of these systems it's like, you don't have anything until you've got the FOUNDATION.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:27
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Meahwhile over at Section 2.4 Can someone post a section of the GLA that CIG *didn't* breach, thx
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:33
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:What's that in the road ahead? Lesson two: I want a lawyer, dog. I want a lawyerdog
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:35
|
|
|
quote:SC probably will have one of the healthiest communities online when it's done. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:36
|
|
|
Lesson three: That's not my sandwich That's not my sandwich
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:36
|
|
|
Facebook Aunt posted:I've watched a fair bit of judge Judy, and she always says that when the terms of the contract are ambiguous it is interpreted in favor of the party who didn't write it. Not sure if that is a factor in big boy law, but who would that be in this case? The actual person who wrote it worked for crytek at the time but now works for cig? Are you calling Judge Judy NOT big boy law?!?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:36
|
|
|
Thoatse posted:Lesson two: I want a pinstripe fish
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:40
|
|
|
tuo posted:
”With Lumberyard, there was little to no effort to switch. And that’s 100% honest.”
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:44
|
|
|
The legal pain is tripling every second. You are the worst kind of lawyers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:44
|
|
|
ortwin's also incorporated a shitload of weird businesses for his friends which I can only loving assume have some kinda tax loophole or shady poo poo of some goddamn kind because none of them actually have a physical address besides a bev hills PO Box at http://www.beverlyhillsmailbox.com/ I mean, what the gently caress is the producer of a chinese financed picture staring samuel l jackson about the world turning upside down including some digital effects by some people working in the games industry in germany and LA that cost $120m to make opening a loving bounce house business with a single employee
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:45
|
|
|
Someone asked for this a few pages back, can't remember who.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:46
|
|
|
Galarox posted:Someone asked for this a few pages back, can't remember who. paaarpest hour
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:46
|
|
|
Phi230 posted:paaarpest hour Not enough fidelity. I can't see the air bubbles when he opens his mouth.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:49
|
|
|
Galarox posted:Someone asked for this a few pages back, can't remember who. lmao
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:49
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:ortwin's also incorporated a shitload of weird businesses for his friends which I can only loving assume have some kinda tax loophole or shady poo poo of some goddamn kind because none of them actually have a physical address besides a bev hills PO Box at http://www.beverlyhillsmailbox.com/ That's some breaking bad poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:50
|
|
|
SO I found out today that croberts used to be the [remote] CCO of Blink Media in Vancouver He worked for this guy: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bruce-mcmillan-04a40444/ Also... http://www.wcnews.com/news/update/11311 quote:BREAKING NEWS: More Wing Commander Details Come to Light ----------------
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:52
|
|
|
Colostomy Bag posted:I think the biggest conundrum that gives this thread a forum of legal paralysis is how they will replace bug smashers. The Lore? There are so many hours in the day to shoehorn another planet that will never exist. Here is your answer: “Reverse the Verse is back!” I’m not sure but it seems like Erin is hosting? I’d be excited if we saw Ben & the Old Gang back on a weekly basis because lord knows we had a lot of laughs watching that, but if they’re rebooting with Erin as host then it’s certain to be a far more anodyne viewing experience. With the LA Gang it just can’t hope to achieve its former moments of glory — and it gave us so, so many.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:54
|
|
|
Brian Chambers: With Lumberyard, yeah there was really little to no effort that it took us to switch, and that's 100% honest, I think we could have switched a lot earlier but in stuff like this there's always lawyers involved and so on, right? I know we got a little bit of flak of not being... as vocal about it early on when, you know, we started looking at it... but again, there's lawyers involved and until we kind of had clearance for everything we just wanted to go, 'OK, let's wait until it's official and everything is inked and dotted' I think one of the big advantages we get is if you look at where Lumberyard's going to go and HOPE to go, there's gonna be a lot of support for the gaming community. There's a lot of money behind that company, they have a tremendous amount of engineers and marketing staff and backend staff, so I think it's actually going to aid us all over the place. I have calls with them every other week were I talk with one of their tech guys and I get information from them and we share our stuff back and forth, there's an interest in, you know, if we ever struggle with something or we see something else they're pushing out or using, that's potentially something we have immediate access to. CryEngine was an incredibly strong base, right? The CryEngine support, ah... is fairly MINIMAL at this point. So if you look at even the support side and the amount that they're pushing and progressing, if you line those up side by side then Lumberyard definitely is the smarter route to take.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 01:59
|
|
|
Phi230 posted:paaarpest hour because we aim to please (also wish I'd thought of it but I been on the beer) 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:00
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:There's no 500mil investment in Turkey. There's no extreme extra capital from assets sold at a fraction. What there is, however - is a company desperate to pay off the various workers suing them for unpaid wages. A company so desperate that they're even trying a hand at cryptocurrency, or selling off entire forks of their engine for a quick cash infusion. Instead, you get a company that is doing exactly what you do when you're flailing about and think you have an opportunity at quick cash while thinking you've been wronged by a business partner: you sue the gently caress out of them with everything you can possible think of and see if any of the poo poo sticks to the wall. I've seen this tactic with small business, with landlord/tennant disputes and with small construction jobs contracts. It looks and smells like a cash grab and hope for a settlement. So basically like RSI/CIG and their million shell companies then, milking backer whales to stay afloat. Got it. ps: we know you NOT have ANY evidence for any of that poo poo; but we love to lol at you. So 
----------------
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:00
|
|
|
Galarox posted:because we aim to please (also wish I'd thought of it but I been on the beer) 
----------------
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:10
|
|
|
seriously ortwin what the gently caress are you and your hollywood buddies doing some of them, like the company that helped finance 2 Guns, okay, I get that but what the gently caress are Fs Entertainment Hindsight Unlimited Graceling Distribution and he's deep, deep in with Mark Damon and his Foresight group. like crazy fuckin deep
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:18
|
|
|
MOMA is seriously still here defending a piece of poo poo that spent 300K+ of backer funds on new sports cars so far and has delivered nothing? Same old loving shtick every year. It doesn't really matter whether SC is good or bad or is ever released or not. You're supporting a piece of poo poo human garbage liar and his talent-less ex-pornstar wife in their scam. Just overall pathetic that you're dedicating your free time to do that. They're objectively garbage people and don't deserve any defense. It doesn't matter if lawsuit comes to anything. I hope goons continue to point out their lies and hypocrisy as long as they're running this poo poo show. This is what we're all here for. I hope we're in some way responsible in limiting the amount of people that that continue to get scammed or will get scammed in the future.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:23
|
|
|
Beer/Beet I really need you to change the title to "skip the last 30 pages" or something when things get like this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:25
|
|
|
thatguy posted:Beer/Beet I really need you to change the title to "skip the last 30 pages" or something when things get like this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:26
|
|
|
SomethingJones posted:MyRadar! Croberts also says toward the end of the
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:26
|
|
|
I have never hated a word as much as I currently hate the word exclusive.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:28
|
|
|
Midnight Voyager posted:I have never hated a word as much as I currently hate the word exclusive. Do you excusively hate it? ....sorry.... I'll just get me coat 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:35
|
|
|
thatguy posted:Beer/Beet I really need you to change the title to "skip the last 30 pages" or something when things get like this. Negative, that would make you miss my effort posts and they are the light of the thread.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:37
|
|
|
Colostomy Bag posted:It looks like a drat Rav 4 with $500 leather optioned key fobs or something. Go turbo or stay at home. wasn't there a citizen meetup where chris arrived in a bmw similar to that? or there was one idling in the driveway or something
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:40
|
|
|
Galarox posted:Do you excusively hate it? Well that really depends on what you mean by 'exclusively'
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:44
|
|
|
Zzr posted:Negative, that would make you miss my effort posts and they are the light of the thread.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:45
|
|
|
Blue On Blue posted:wasn't there a citizen meetup where chris arrived in a bmw similar to that? Probably during his used cars days.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:51
|
|
C-Bangin' it 
|
peter gabriel posted:Well that really depends on what you mean by 'exclusively' Wee-eeel I meant to exclusively include exclusivity in a non inclusive exclusion of inclusion. Exclusively. e - spelling. Galarox fucked around with this message at 02:55 on Jan 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:51
|
|
|
Galarox posted:Wee-eeel I meant to exclusively include exclusivity in a non inclusive exclusion of inclusion. Exclusively. How long do we have you for? Can you toss up some quick greatness?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 22:02 |
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Well that really depends on what you mean by 'exclusively' Oh god not this again
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:57
|
|