|
Dusty Lens posted:Has anyone said 10 to 20 for the chairman yet I think someone said 10 to life for the chairman earlier, but 10 to 20 is still available for you to claim or call. Dogeh posted:Leonard French has already not read it and ready to stream about it on Youtube
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:00 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 16:43 |
|
Golli posted:Which is higher on the JACKED scale - ON or TO ? Jacked ON the tits is clearly higher than jacked TO the tits from a psychological angle. Jacked TO the tits is more important if you're just concerned about physics. I'm mostly interested in matters of the mind, so for me, Jacked ON the Tits is more impressive than TO.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:00 |
|
Ohhhh wow!!!
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:01 |
|
History Comes Inside! posted:Is Leonard French a backer or just a bad lawyer He is a backer. He shows the same faith based reasoning that the stereotypical "true believers" do except he is either dishonest or delusional enough to try and pretend he is some blind justice weighing the scales of this lawsuit while having an extremely clear bias. "I'm impartial on this subject. Speaking purely neutrally. I'm speaking as an experienced lawyer who is not taking sides to give a fair look at this subject and be impartial .......so obviously every possible outcome in any possible conflict is the best case scenario for Cloud Imperium Games." Backers eat this poo poo up because it's an "authority" reinforcing their views. That "authority" asserts itself as neutral and unbiased so therefore when it takes their side that means they are really, totally and truly in the right. It would be funny if it were something like bitcoin where a lawyer spins some kind of regulation as being a good thing for bitcoin because that's how his bias flows but this is about thousands of mentally ill people being scammed. Now that courts are involved and may indirectly save these people from themselves one of the idiots being scammed has taken the lead on reassuring everyone that they will still allowed to be scammed. Bonus points for anyone that tries to sue this guy after bankruptcy "Because he said everything was fine! He is a lawyer! He said everything was fine!"
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:02 |
|
thatguy posted:Should I buy my tickets now? I was told by a very reliable source with a very many aliases that this was a big nothingburger. The court will sell 20 tickets at a time starting at the intervals of 1,3,5 PM EST for $350 each.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:03 |
|
Two and a half pages devoted to "wrong company" defense. Nice.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:03 |
|
TheAgent posted:not only settle, but settle and remove every and all aspect of cryengine code from their game, including improvements or forks from the original code How will this work? I mean... If Lumberyard is 97% Cryengine code (I have no idea of the actual difference between the two engines, but AFAIK Lumberyard has some code changes for improved networking, the rest is the same). If you take some Lumberyard source code (for example a rendering library), that apart from the Lumberyard copyright notice at the top, is identical to the CryEngine source, can CryTek argue that this is CryEngine source code, and demand its removal? Fangrim fucked around with this message at 21:08 on Jan 19, 2018 |
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:03 |
|
I hope all the Reddit Faithful buy many spaceship JPEGs to reaffirm to themselves and others that CIG has got this. Dear Reddit please buy more spaceships.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:04 |
|
If development is amiss you must dismiss. Hire me for your legal team, Chris. I'm not really a lawyer but then neither are you really a game developer.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:04 |
|
Raskolnikov posted:I hope all the Reddit Faithful buy many spaceship JPEGs to reaffirm to themselves and others that CIG has got this. They should also send a bunch of money to youtube lawyer patreons.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:05 |
|
Beet Wagon posted:Wait what, that poo poo just came out 5 minutes ago, and now I'm gonna miss a Leonard stream? Trust me, you aren't missing much except almost limitless stupidity from the chat.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:05 |
|
I hope that guy thinks that’s going to happen. Because I love crazy people and their crazy antics.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:07 |
|
quote:It is well settled that parties can manifest acceptance of a contract by Wrong company? Burned.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:07 |
|
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:08 |
|
Golli posted:Dear Ortwin- If Skadden's assertion that Ortwin never mentioned his co-founder status with CIG is accurate, and I don't see why it would not be, that's probably what Derek was talking about. Would the warlord like to confirm or deny this?
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:09 |
|
VictorianQueerLit posted:Backers eat this poo poo up because it's an "authority" reinforcing their views. That "authority" asserts itself as neutral and unbiased so therefore when it takes their side that means they are really, totally and truly in the right. And then at the end the authority links his Patreon. Circle of life.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:09 |
|
Propagandist posted:"All rise," bellowed the bailiff. Oh dear.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:11 |
|
Youtube lawyer looks a bit lost.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:12 |
|
Somebody with mega Google fu skills needs to dig out Chris’s old rambling asides about possibly licensing their heavily modified engine to other parties. I’m pretty sure that was a brief Croberts fever dream from a couple years back, and I’m not the only person who remembers it that way. The theorycrafters were still running wild with that lunacy in the months leading up to the lawsuit. But I think Chris kicked that off with some ill-chosen bloviating way back when, I just haven’t found the source yet.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:12 |
|
TheAgent posted:who will be in the court audience with me. I will buy us hotdogs on the court steps like we're in law & order: space edition I would totally do that if it wasn't for the fact that I would have to cross the Atlantic and the entirety of the North American continent to get there. I'll be there in parp spirit, though, or something
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:12 |
|
VictorianQueerLit posted:He is a backer. He shows the same faith based reasoning that the stereotypical "true believers" do except he is either dishonest or delusional enough to try and pretend he is some blind justice weighing the scales of this lawsuit while having an extremely clear bias. It's probably a lot simpler than that. Does the guy saying Star Citizen is good and the dream is safe have a Patreon account? Because apparently there's a lot of money to be made in telling the permanent victims of Chris Roberts what they want to hear.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:12 |
|
quote:Exhibit 2 loving lol. Star Citizen: Exhibit 2: SC is not a game, it's a destination
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:12 |
|
quote:Defendants' interpretation of the word "exclusively" in Section 2.1.2 is that Now I'm rubbing.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:13 |
|
TheAgent posted:not only settle, but settle and remove every and all aspect of cryengine code from their game, including improvements or forks from the original code SC changing engines is an exclusive good thing for the project. If Erin can get Chris off his fidelity horse and port the assets into Unity they might have a playable alpha in 2029.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:13 |
|
Bofast posted:If Skadden's assertion that Ortwin never mentioned his co-founder status with CIG is accurate, and I don't see why it would not be, that's probably what Derek was talking about. Would the warlord like to confirm or deny this? Yes, that's what I'm talking about. His waiver doesn't disclose it. That's why Crytek even made it an issue. ----------------
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:13 |
|
if CIG/RSI/etc goes belly up does that mean that documents that partner companies have legal or ethical obligations to withhold might start leaking out to the wild (like the Letter to AMD or whatever that was)
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:14 |
|
“I’m being told there is no Squadron 42 that is separate...” You are an idiot being fed revisionist lies by anonymous deluded Zealots on a YouTube stream, French.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:14 |
|
reddit backer: THEY AREN't loving SEPERATE GAMES CIG: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/pledge/Packages/Squadron-42-Standalone-Pledge lol
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:15 |
|
Snazzy Frocks posted:if CIG/RSI/etc goes belly up does that mean that documents that partner companies have legal or ethical obligations to withhold might start leaking out to the wild (like the Letter to AMD or whatever that was) Oh please let us read The Letter
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:16 |
|
I really need to take my time with this, tho yea atm it's basically just Skadden's reply and we'll see what comes of it, but this one:quote:Defendants rely on Justice Holmes's remark, quoted in a concurring and dissenting opinion in Freeman, that entering into a contract "means a prediction that you must pay damages if you do not keep it." 11 Cal. 4th at 106. Here, Defendants make the remarkable argument that notwithstanding having intentionally breached the GLA they could never be required to pay any damages at all. (Defts.' Br. at 13.) ...is easily my favorite. CIG confirmed using literally the same bullshit arguments they use to handwave away refund requests in a legal fight that could very well cost them millions.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:16 |
|
No you don't understand it's basically like a lootbox skin it's part of the base game but you can't access it.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:16 |
|
G0RF posted:Somebody with mega Google fu skills needs to dig out Chris’s old rambling asides about possibly licensing their heavily modified engine to other parties. I’m pretty sure that was a brief Croberts fever dream from a couple years back, and I’m not the only person who remembers it that way. I remember this, but I’m not sure if it was CIG directly or rampant backers coming up with ways CIG could be self sustaining after the release of Star Citizen based on the fact there was no subscription model and no way for CIG to actually keep the doors open once the jpegs could be purchased in game instead of with real money on a pay to play website.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:17 |
|
VictorianQueerLit posted:He is a backer. He shows the same faith based reasoning that the stereotypical "true believers" do except he is either dishonest or delusional enough to try and pretend he is some blind justice weighing the scales of this lawsuit while having an extremely clear bias. Are we sure hes a backer and not some paid CIG shill though?
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:17 |
|
Gejnor posted:Are we sure hes a backer and not some paid CIG shill though? Dude said so himself. He hasn't actually played the game, though; his computer can't handle it
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:19 |
|
Skadden's researchers could probably make a 30 minute montage of CIG people talking about "developing 2 AAA games"
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:19 |
|
SPERMCUBE.ORG posted:It's probably a lot simpler than that. Does the guy saying Star Citizen is good and the dream is safe have a Patreon account? Because apparently there's a lot of money to be made in telling the permanent victims of Chris Roberts what they want to hear. Yeah that is right too. Sarsapariller posted:And then at the end the authority links his Patreon. All you need to do is look at the changes from his first stream to this one. He went from scheduling a short stream a few days after the news broke to immediately streaming any court updates minutes after they happen for 4x the amount of time. I guess I wouldn't fault him for smelling the money but it gets pretty exploitative when you are reinforcing a scam to the victims of that scam.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:20 |
|
quote:Defendants' interpretation would also require the Court to entertain the Leonard French, get on this.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:20 |
|
Dusty Lens posted:We jacked too greedily and too deep and have awoken an ancient edging. Oh no, we unleashed the Blue Ballrog again
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:20 |
|
Gejnor posted:Are we sure hes a backer and not some paid CIG shill though? Yeah - he disclosed it on his December stream.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:20 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 16:43 |
|
what the gently caress, you can buy squadron 42 without buying into star citizen you can play (supposedly) sq42 without buying star citizen how is it DLC goddamn you loving idiots. goddamn
|
# ? Jan 19, 2018 21:21 |