|
Those clowns in Congress sure are clowns, aren't they?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 10:58 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 04:25 |
|
Ive gotta say this, this kind of stuff drives me nuts. They have sex in a theater and then right afterwards, without showering or cleaning off his cum-dick or her washing her genitals from all of their sex fluids, they go straight to dinner? That's loving gross. They're the people eating next to you at Denny's that smell like sex and body fluid and cigarettes and shame.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 11:34 |
Stevoblunt posted:Ive gotta say this, this kind of stuff drives me nuts. They have sex in a theater and then right afterwards, without showering or cleaning off his cum-dick or her washing her genitals from all of their sex fluids, they go straight to dinner? That's loving gross. They're the people eating next to you at Denny's that smell like sex and body fluid and cigarettes and shame. Grandpa, I didn't know you got an SA account! Or that you were still alive!
|
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 11:39 |
Stevoblunt posted:Ive gotta say this, this kind of stuff drives me nuts. They have sex in a theater and then right afterwards, without showering or cleaning off his cum-dick or her washing her genitals from all of their sex fluids, they go straight to dinner? That's loving gross. They're the people eating next to you at Denny's that smell like sex and body fluid and cigarettes and shame. Agreed
|
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 11:48 |
|
Lurdiak posted:Grandpa, I didn't know you got an SA account! Yo I dont care that they had sex or that they had sex in a theater or that they dressed up like clowns and she pegged him or whatever but have some basic hygiene about it.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 12:19 |
|
I hope they at least had sex quietly. People using their phones in a cinema is bad enough, I can't imagine trying to truly appreciate the cinematic art like the refined movie-goer I am when the people behind me are making all kinds of sex noises. Harumph.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 12:21 |
|
More bible literalism from Dan. Zesty fucked around with this message at 13:12 on Jan 20, 2018 |
# ? Jan 20, 2018 12:32 |
|
"Sex is good, disrupting the movie or restaurant experience of others is bad" - something only old grumpy people would say, apparently.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 12:34 |
|
Zesty posted:More bible literalism from Adam.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 12:46 |
|
Ditocoaf posted:"Sex is good, disrupting the movie or restaurant experience of others is bad" - something only old grumpy people would say, apparently. I generally assume all of my opinions about ways people have fun are things only old grumpy people would say, it's worked out to be pretty accurate so far drat kids and their gizmos
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 12:54 |
|
Stevoblunt posted:Ive gotta say this, this kind of stuff drives me nuts. They have sex in a theater and then right afterwards, without showering or cleaning off his cum-dick or her washing her genitals from all of their sex fluids, they go straight to dinner? That's loving gross. They're the people eating next to you at Denny's that smell like sex and body fluid and cigarettes and shame. Make it a wafflehouse and that sounds like a wonderful evening
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 12:57 |
Zesty posted:More bible literalism from Dan. He's right. better to just reject the whole thing.
|
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 13:16 |
|
Agreed, your book is poo poo.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 13:56 |
|
The guy in the final panel looks familiar:
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 14:40 |
|
Not even medieval Jewish scholars took Genesis literally.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 14:42 |
|
And Augustine of Hippo specifically warned against naive, literal readings of scripture. Dan Lietha and his ilk are at least 1600 years behind the times.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 14:47 |
|
BigglesSWE posted:Not even medieval Jewish scholars took Genesis literally. Nor did many Christians from late antiquity. Full Biblical literalism is a very recent thing.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 14:50 |
|
BigglesSWE posted:Not even medieval Jewish scholars took Genesis literally. Stultus Maximus posted:Nor did many Christians from late antiquity. Full Biblical literalism is a very recent thing. It's specific to American schools of Protestantism (like Lietha's). In particular, I should add, Jews and literalism don't mix. Rabbis have been arguing about what such-and-such passage really means for as long as there have been rabbis. That's a decent chunk of what the Talmud is. Scholarly interpretation is pretty core to Judaism.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 15:11 |
|
loquacius posted:It's specific to American schools of Protestantism (like Lietha's). In particular, I should add, Jews and literalism don't mix. Rabbis have been arguing about what such-and-such passage really means for as long as there have been rabbis. That's a decent chunk of what the Talmud is. Scholarly interpretation is pretty core to Judaism. It's literaly a book with a passage of text, and then a comments section written around it where they argue.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 15:15 |
|
That sure sounds like a lot more enjoyable and mentally stimulating way to examine texts than to say "It says she was made from a rib so I guess that's what happened, case closed".
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 15:19 |
|
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/257950538816188417?lang=en
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 15:19 |
|
Samurai Sanders posted:That sure sounds like a lot more enjoyable and mentally stimulating way to examine texts than to say "It says she was made from a rib so I guess that's what happened, case closed". As I understand it it's also what you spend all your time doing if you actually go to seminary or divinity school or whatever, but Lietha is probably one of those guys who sneers at ivory-tower ministers because really all you need is a bible which you have read at least once
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 15:20 |
|
Samurai Sanders posted:That sure sounds like a lot more enjoyable and mentally stimulating way to examine texts than to say "It says she was made from a rib so I guess that's what happened, case closed". Honestly it's probably a product of antisemitism. When the next pogrom comes you really don't want to carry two books.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 15:39 |
|
There are actually thousands of Jewish and Christian books dedicated to interpreting the bible, and I'd like to use them to bury Dan Liatha under.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 16:12 |
|
Jerusalem posted:Agreed. Of course let's not forget that the whole year before the 2020 Election will also feature Ted Rall posting cartoon after cartoon ripping on whoever the Democratic candidate is and insisting they're worse than Hitler while barely mentioning Trump even exists. Oh for sure, but Vlad Shawl being an idiot doesn't mean the democrats aren't going to completely poo poo the bed again.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 16:12 |
|
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 16:31 |
|
So, the guy on the left got enough to purchase a single McDonald's franchise? According to this you will need at least $500000 to be considered. That amount of money would go far in supporting a family of four. (Seriously, do people actually refer to meals from McD as "a McDonald's" in this fashion?)
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 16:45 |
|
Christian cartoonist in this thread have this uncanny ability to make really edit worthy cartoons without realizing it.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 16:51 |
|
Kopijeger posted:So, the guy on the left got enough to purchase a single McDonald's franchise? According to this you will need at least $500000 to be considered. That amount of money would go far in supporting a family of four. It would probably read better if you switched the speech bubbles.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 16:51 |
|
Electric Phantasm posted:It would probably read better if you switched the speech bubbles. Probably, but I think most people don't realize how lucrative owning a McDonald's franchise is, so they don't associate it with wealth.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 16:56 |
|
Kopijeger posted:(Seriously, do people actually refer to meals from McD as "a McDonald's" in this fashion?) Yes? All the time? What do you call it?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 16:59 |
|
Tenebrais posted:Yes? All the time? I'd usually call it "McDonald's." "I'm getting McDonald's" is what I've always heard people say, not "I'm getting a McDonald's."
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:01 |
|
Stevoblunt posted:Ive gotta say this, this kind of stuff drives me nuts. They have sex in a theater and then right afterwards, without showering or cleaning off his cum-dick or her washing her genitals from all of their sex fluids, they go straight to dinner? That's loving gross. They're the people eating next to you at Denny's that smell like sex and body fluid and cigarettes and shame. Someone's jelly
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:02 |
|
loquacius posted:It's specific to American schools of Protestantism (like Lietha's). In particular, I should add, Jews and literalism don't mix. Rabbis have been arguing about what such-and-such passage really means for as long as there have been rabbis. That's a decent chunk of what the Talmud is. Scholarly interpretation is pretty core to Judaism.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:09 |
|
Pakled posted:Probably, but I think most people don't realize how lucrative owning a McDonald's franchise is, so they don't associate it with wealth. Also, according to this, the market value of the corporation is around $100 billion. Even allowing for hyperbole, it seems unlikely that any individual would have enough liquid assets on hand to buy the entire thing outright. Tenebrais posted:Yes? All the time? "A [burger or other menu item] from McDonald's". "A McDonald's" sounds like it refers to a restaurant that is part of the McD chain.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:11 |
|
Lord Hydronium posted:Hell, there's stuff in the Talmud of rabbis arguing with God about what certain passages mean. And winning. Judaism is that XKCD where Gary Gigax died and he plays DnD with death. If you pull out enough splat books God will relent and you'll get into heaven.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:12 |
|
Koishi Komeiji posted:Christian cartoonist in this thread have this uncanny ability to make really edit worthy cartoons without realizing it. Oh, please touch the poop with this one. At the very least, remind me to put it up as a Best Edit candidate when the Gaybie repository goes up. Pants Donkey posted:This isn't to excuse democrats giving us lovely candidates, but Rall also criticizes whatever form of protest pops up so you literally cannot win with him unless you're running a "Ted Rall is Amazing" march. I wonder. If you did have a "Ted Rall is the Best" march, would he inevitably complain about it because it didn't draw in a large enough (any) crowd, or would he take the Trump approach and convince himself that the entire world attended? Crabtree posted:Imagine what would happen if there was a decent out of the blue candidate that wasn't Oprah and he actually had to find something on this person. "I wrote them a letter detailing my plans for everybody else to rise up in Revolution, but give ME, Ted Rall, the credit for leading and organizing it. But they never wrote me back, clearly they do not care about their constituents."
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:16 |
|
Sandpuppy posted:Yeah, I was confusing it with this one from Eric Allie: Fun fact, back when he was regularly blogging, he'd immediately delete it whenever someone would post that in response to whatever hacky Obama take he was on that day. Within seconds, like he had a red alert system installed.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:36 |
|
Kopijeger posted:So, the guy on the left got enough to purchase a single McDonald's franchise? According to this you will need at least $500000 to be considered. That amount of money would go far in supporting a family of four. Guys c'mon, the rule is don't be deliberately obtuse.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 04:25 |
|
Pants Donkey posted:Literally nothing is good enough for Rall. He simply cannot wrap his head around the idea that humans are flawed and working in a flawed system, so naturally every person in history is going to have something negative you can bring up. Is he or isn't he basically a Russian at this point? Like I know he accepts dark rubles now, but how far is he on the path to being like Steven Segal?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2018 17:48 |