Are you a This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
homeowner | 39 | 22.41% | |
renter | 69 | 39.66% | |
stupid peace of poo poo | 66 | 37.93% | |
Total: | 174 votes |
Pretty much any of those options are four terms and a damehood for jacinda.
|
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 21:47 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 23:29 |
|
Ghostlight posted:So within context it's clear that the whole stolen election thing wasn't just pr politicking, but actually the result of most National MPs not knowing how our democracy works? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor Also imagine the hilarious quotes we'll get from PaulaB while she is in opposition for the next 8 years.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 21:58 |
|
A Stuff article totally posted:Finance spokesman Steven Joyce is also being fingered.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 22:06 |
|
Nats have the same problem as Labour did after so long with a strong and popular leader in that it doesn't foster leadership among the other members. I don't think Bill would beat Jacinda in the next election but I don't think any of the other high ranking Nat members have a better shot than him.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 22:38 |
leader of the opposition david bennett 🙏
|
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 22:57 |
what owns is that, no matter whether or not it's true, the national instability narrative has started
|
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 23:00 |
|
Lmao everybody said a three-way coalition was going to be a disaster and National can't even keep it together for 6 months.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 23:48 |
Their whole gimmick relies on painting themselves as strong, wealthy, winners which doesn't work when you just lost an election.
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 01:58 |
|
But but it was stolen More importantly Jacinda was in town today but I didn’t realise until after she had finished her public appearance. Missed my chance to go be
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 02:25 |
|
Blinglish is of course saying it's all just gossip. If there is a leadership change I honestly think their best bet would be someone like Amy Adams. Well enough established in the party that donors know who she is, enough of an outsider to not be tarred with the current leadership and in-fighting among the highest ranked members, and to the left of the party enough that she can challenge an election during a swing to the left. Her only downside is that she looks just like Nikki Kaye, who has more visibility then her anyway. Of course, I actually hope Gerry Brownlee takes over and drives the party into the loving dirt.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 03:40 |
|
I hope it's Steven Joyce just so we can have an entire election overshadowed by dildo throwing.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 03:52 |
|
bike tory posted:Blinglish is of course saying it's all just gossip. If there is a leadership change I honestly think their best bet would be someone like Amy Adams. Well enough established in the party that donors know who she is, enough of an outsider to not be tarred with the current leadership and in-fighting among the highest ranked members, and to the left of the party enough that she can challenge an election during a swing to the left. Her only downside is that she looks just like Nikki Kaye, who has more visibility then her anyway. Amy Adams is kind of an idiot, but probably their best bet.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 05:32 |
i've always thought woodhouse would do well as national leader, he comes across as decent while being a lowkey piece of poo poo amy adams looks like nikki kaye drawn in the bob's burgers style to me, and i feel bad for thinking it
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 06:00 |
perfect timing
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 06:15 |
|
sebmojo posted:Amy Adams is kind of an idiot, but probably their best bet. Experienced, generally seen as competent due to no real involvement with any scandals, no real gaffes coming from her (although she's also entirely forgettable, like some sort of vague person-shaped void). Yeah, sounds about right.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 07:15 |
|
Now is a good time to remind everyone that Amy Adams doesn’t want the citizens in Canterbury to vote for a regional council. All so her family’s farms can make more profit.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 07:15 |
|
It's not just her farms. She also owns shares in a Canterbury irrigation company.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 07:31 |
hosed up
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 07:39 |
|
Meanwhile Chloe Swarbricks medicinal cannabis bill didn't pass She needed a couple of votes from Nats that she didn't get, because dickheads like Shane Jones and a few more conservative Labourites didn't support it
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 08:17 |
|
exmarx posted:
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 08:38 |
|
bike tory posted:Meanwhile Chloe Swarbricks medicinal cannabis bill didn't pass I'm in a bit of pain right now, how do I find out who voted against this so I can abuse them?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 09:31 |
https://twitter.com/henrycooke/status/958606913725333504 national unanimously voted against
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 09:49 |
|
Plus all of NZ first and 8 Labour mps. poo poo sucks. I have fibromyalgia and since labour's bill doesn't cover chronic pain out of the gate I will probably end up waiting years for change. In the mean time, opioids for when pain flares gently caress up my life.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 10:01 |
|
Yeah I feel ya. I have an arthritis and the drugs they give me don't do poo poo. It would be nice to have something to take the edge off on bad days.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 10:18 |
|
How has a considerable amount (half? most?) of the States got medicinal weed and we still seem to be years if not decades away? The loving States, how are we more conservative than the States about this?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 12:01 |
|
Wafflecopper posted:How has a considerable amount (half? most?) of the States got medicinal weed and we still seem to be years if not decades away? The loving States, how are we more conservative than the States about this? Morons run this country, but they think they're not morons.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 14:04 |
|
Yeah, they're the adults in the room haven't you heard? What are you, one of them looney Greens!? edit: I still hear people talking about "looney greens" on a regular basis in goddamn 2018. Oh the joys of living in the deep south Rahul fucked around with this message at 15:05 on Jan 31, 2018 |
# ? Jan 31, 2018 14:56 |
|
Love that Labour made it a conscience vote and the Nats clearly whipped it to be unanimously against or maybe that's too generous to National MPs are they are all in fact gibbering shitbirds who enjoy the suffering of the injured and dying
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 18:56 |
|
Why not both?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 20:14 |
|
Wafflecopper posted:How has a considerable amount (half? most?) of the States got medicinal weed and we still seem to be years if not decades away? The loving States, how are we more conservative than the States about this?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 21:47 |
|
Ghostlight posted:The States has the advantage of being able to legalise things in Auckland without consulting Canterbury. This is a Good Post™ and holy poo poo that would be blissful. Imagine being able to do something without the people of Gore having a cry about it?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 22:00 |
|
Wafflecopper posted:How has a considerable amount (half? most?) of the States got medicinal weed and we still seem to be years if not decades away? The loving States, how are we more conservative than the States about this? Also, weed is entirely legal in several states, not even just medicinal Ghostlight posted:The States has the advantage of being able to legalise things in Auckland without consulting Canterbury. Ehh NZ is the size of a small state anyway. Besides even super conservative redneck states have legal medicinal weed Wandle Cax fucked around with this message at 22:06 on Jan 31, 2018 |
# ? Jan 31, 2018 22:00 |
|
Xik posted:Why not both? Third option is that they have donors who want to keep selling Vicodin and codeine etc rather than you being able to buy locally made organic, gluten free medicinal weed.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 22:37 |
|
Wandle Cax posted:Ehh NZ is the size of a small state anyway. Besides even super conservative redneck states have legal medicinal weed It doesn't matter that we're the size of a small state because in that comparison we're one of the small states that hasn't legalised it.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 23:31 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/cjsbishop/status/958808901251510273
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 00:50 |
|
Ghostlight posted:Yes, but my point is that they don't have to have the demographics of the whole country vote on it. It's still illegal federally because certain areas simply don't want it and have the political capital to block it, despite conservatives in the US being ostensibly states-rights oriented and it not making any sense to remain federally illegal with certain states legalising it instead of being federally legal with certain states illegalising it. If they didn't have the ability to break up their decision making into smaller demographics then it wouldn't be legal anywhere in the US. So you're saying all states have a similar demographic among the millions of people living within it. Somewhat simplistic view isn't it? A state could be seen as essentially a country within itself full of different demographics. And they would still need the support of the population to pass the law. For example California which I know is one of the more liberal states, had a referendum for recreational use in 2010 which failed, then again in 2016 which passed. Anyway in your comparison NZ are like Idaho, Utah, all the southern states in terms of restricting medicinal cannabis, it's just surprising we aren't more progressive than that
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 01:45 |
The population is. It's just that National and NZF are always wrong about every single thing.
|
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 04:07 |
|
At a guess I would actually say that California would have more diverse demographics in it than most of the other US states. I would say the same about Auckland in comparison to other NZ cities.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 04:18 |
Dunno. That would imply Auckland (and Wellington I guess) have less olds than everywhere else which I find hard to believe. I'm pretty sure ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation etc have nothing on age when it comes to someone bring pro/anti weed.
|
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 04:42 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 23:29 |
|
Yeah, Auckland has Milford, the Elephant Graveyard of the north shore.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2018 05:04 |