if the first search result isn't snack overflow I rephrase the problem until it is, and if it's still not I close the browser and cry
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:48 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 04:10 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:no, i just use adblock competently you've never dealt with a real antiadblock script lol
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:49 |
carry on then posted:you've never dealt with a real antiadblock script lol you've never bothered dealing with anything above minimum effort lol
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:52 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:you've never bothered dealing with anything above minimum effort lol That reminds me, tell your sister "hi" from me.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:53 |
Schadenboner posted:That reminds me, tell your sister "hi" from me. anime is banned from yospos
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:54 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:you've never bothered dealing with anything above minimum effort lol explain, because i literally just detailed how i went into a websites loving source code to find the exact script that was running the adblock check out of a pile of minified polyfill scripts.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:54 |
carry on then posted:explain antiadblock scripts are not rare and antiantiadblock scripts have long since been invented
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:56 |
|
but what about antiantiantiadblock
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:56 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:antiadblock scripts are not rare and antiantiadblock scripts have long since been invented so you admit you didn't do anything interesting, you just installed another script and called it a day
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:57 |
carry on then posted:so you admit you didn't do anything interesting, you just installed another script and called it a day yes, that works and i dont have to go on old fart tantrums in programmer thread. once in a blue moon there's something to manually block, but i cant recall the last time that happened
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 15:58 |
galaxy brain: spend 30 minutes of your time hunting down a javascript bit a legion of angry grognards is aware of since the birth of the universe because you failed to google aak, aak-cont, nano defender, or ublock protector
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 16:02 |
|
how would one know to Google those if you don't even know they exist
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 16:25 |
necrotic posted:how would one know to Google those if you don't even know they exist you google "anti anti adblock". first hit is aak-cont. from there you deduce that aak is a thing, and as you follow the link to aak-cont you see 1) while still usable, it is eol 2) one successor is ublock protector 3) the other sucessor is adblock protector 2 - following the link to it will lead you to nano defender that supersedes it
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 16:29 |
anyways, c tp s: doing scala during a weird half-off day after week of meetings this is going to take a lot of time for me to get used to
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 16:30 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:anyways, c tp s: doing scala during a weird half-off day after week of meetings What's the underlying data structure there? Singely linked list? Seems like a p weird way to go about it. The real answer is 1) just use fold, and 2) never loving use SLL
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 16:51 |
gonadic io posted:What's the underlying data structure there? Singely linked list? Seems like a p weird way to go about it. The real answer is 1) just use fold, and 2) never loving use SLL that's just generic style guide for course assignments. "Make sure the lines are not too long, otherwise your code is very hard to read. Instead of writing very long lines, introduce some local value bindings. Using whitespace uniformly makes your code more readable." the initial example was code:
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 16:54 |
|
late to the party but: in the very rare occasions when a site has some content i can't easily find elsewhere and also has anti-adblocking tools that resist a simple right click->block element, i just press ctrl-u and scroll down to the actual page body. way less hassle. might not work with pure spas i guess but i haven't run into one of those yet though now that i think about it a smarter option could be to open the page in good old lynx, I'll remember to try it next time it happens
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 17:02 |
|
Schadenboner posted:That reminds me, tell your sister "hi" from me.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 17:08 |
i hope this isn't a recurring patter with idea + scala. that code works perfectly fine (and before you yell, i had to implement sum without knowing anything about the lang, and using only list methods foo.isEmpty, foo.head, and foo.tail)
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 18:31 |
|
recent firefox has a decrapifier button on the location bar which turns these sites' seo against them and the idea is loving genius
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 18:33 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 18:48 |
mystes posted:Are you sure they don't want you to use recursion? i am sure they want me to use recursion, but re: this is supposed to be done before i actually am taught anything more than tools setup and a bunch of links. im sure the course will get to it eventually, but im not terribly impressed so far most importantly, however, this is an optional assignment worth no points so im not going to bust my rear end against the flow
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 18:57 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:
What are those errors?
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 19:00 |
gonadic io posted:What are those errors? unreachable code is the greyed text with wavy underline. yellow highlighter is just a suggest to use .notEmpty or whats the inverse method
|
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 19:02 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:that's just generic style guide for course assignments. "Make sure the lines are not too long, otherwise your code is very hard to read. Instead of writing very long lines, introduce some local value bindings. Using whitespace uniformly makes your code more readable." ugh, this language should just use S-expressions already code:
code:
eschaton fucked around with this message at 19:23 on Feb 2, 2018 |
# ? Feb 2, 2018 19:06 |
|
eschaton posted:S-expressions
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 19:08 |
|
ugh i'm supposed to be evaluating some web frameworks and i just cant get motivated with this javascript one its not even the library itself, its just the pattens of the javascript/node development community: very clique-y, obsessed with build tools which they create new versions of every 6 months and abandon in a heartbeat, and no documentation because they just seem to expect you to be Entirely Online and balls deep in their community
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 19:36 |
|
don’t use JavaScript if you’re writing something server side, use a reasonable server side language if you’re writing something client side, write a native app there is no role for JavaScript in the modern world
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 19:44 |
|
What year are you posting from?
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 19:52 |
|
oh i can pretty much guarantee we won't end up with a javascript framework, this is much more of a due diligence/technology survey project; the type of task i would give to some more junior person if we had any which makes it even harder to get through because i have the additional aspect of just not caring that much
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 20:00 |
|
lancemantis posted:oh i can pretty much guarantee we won't end up with a javascript framework, this is much more of a due diligence/technology survey project; the type of task i would give to some more junior person if we had any i've been doing some js for a product demo and it seems like every single solution to any problem begins with "npm install" i can see how these people clock 80 hours a week, 40 of it seems to be reading tutorials for whatever is in fashion this week
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 20:02 |
|
eschaton posted:don’t use JavaScript mystes posted:What year are you posting from?
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 20:04 |
|
its javascript, it runs ANYWHERE! *runs npm install* *watches as a g++ is invoked by a python script to compile native bindings because the language isnt capable of doing anything useful by itself* oh hey this dependency doesnt know this ifdef macro is no longer in use and wont compile love to simultaneously debug python, makefiles and c++ just so some idiot web dev's asset packer plugin for webpack can strip some headers from a jpg file
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 20:06 |
|
is webpack the newest trend in build tools that will be abandoned in 6 months?
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 20:07 |
|
ls -lh ~/idiotwebprojectformorons karma.conf.js package.json tsconfig.json tsconfig.webpack.json tslint.json typedoc.json webpack.config.js yarn.lock gulpfile.js i have too many chromosomes and im a web dev
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 20:09 |
|
meh, i'd say react is ok. use react-scripts to make the build script bullshit somebody else's problem, and use some sort of type checker like typescript of flow. i like flow but for stupid reasons, so use typescript. semantic-ui lets non-graphic-designers throw together a web app that doesn't look like total dogshit and its react bindings seem pretty good yeah the webshit circus sucks but there's at least a few people in there who seem to know what they're doing
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 21:00 |
|
i am no js dev but from the outside it looks like js frameworks have so many custom build requirements and oddities that you better off use a different, better, language altogether use elm is what i'm saying
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 21:11 |
|
Yeah, if the JavaScript ecosystem seems to be a constantly changing mess, transpiling from the language of the week where each minor version change renders all existing tutorials on the internet useless constantly is definitely the solution.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 21:26 |
|
mystes posted:Yeah, if the JavaScript ecosystem seems to be a constantly changing mess, transpiling from the language of the week where each minor version change renders all existing tutorials on the internet useless constantly is definitely the solution. elm is actually a bad example of an ever-changing language since they actually care about compatibility
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 21:29 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 04:10 |
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:elm is actually a bad example of an ever-changing language since they actually care about compatibility
|
# ? Feb 2, 2018 21:33 |