|
Rex-Goliath posted:he's been getting angrier but he's wrong like 50% of the time also 50% wrong is batting way over the average for tech predictions or whatever you call what hes doing
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 11:21 |
|
|
mrmcd posted:Meh. does this even loving matter to investor story time?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:07
|
|
|
fits my needs posted:does this even loving matter to investor story time? since when did any real world poo poo matter to investor story time
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:19
|
|
|
I wonder how softbank feels about a chunk of their huge cash injection going directly to google
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:20
|
|
|
what if tinder, but for real estate?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:27
|
|
|
qirex posted:I wonder how softbank feels about a chunk of their huge cash injection going directly to google it's funny, since google just sold 2.5% stake during the softbank deal and is getting a bunch of it right back.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:34
|
|
|
another few apps like this and you'll be able to build a fully automated slumlord
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:38
|
|
|
Logan Paul got all his videos de-monetized because he decided tasing a dead rat was a good comeback
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:41
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Logan Paul got all his videos de-monetized because he decided tasing a dead rat was a good comeback i want a google ai to tase him, can we make this happen?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:46
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/selenalarson/status/961994986542661632 Edit: Holy lol, so Kalanick and Levandowski getting thrown under the self driving bus hardcore: https://www.uber.com/newsroom/uber-waymo-settlement/ mrmcd fucked around with this message at 17:55 on Feb 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:50
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Logan Paul got all his videos de-monetized because he decided tasing a dead rat was a good comeback ~youtube stars~ are sociopaths? who knew
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:51
|
|
|
lol at believing uber's g1 valuation it's like 50-100 mil
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:52
|
|
|
Zikan posted:lmao google google can't take any project to completion also I kind of wonder if maybe google had a realization of how unlikely it is that Lidar-based fully autonomous car tech would see mass market adoption and decided getting $250M and letting another company continue to burn money on it was win-win.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 17:57
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:google can't take any project to completion probably the smarter play tbh
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:00
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Logan Paul an incredibly punchable youtuber.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:01
|
|
|
my hot take: they mutually decided to settle upon the realization that digging through the details of the tech in court would demonstrate that self-driving cars are still decades out, and neither company is anywhere near capable of doing what they claim
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:02
|
|
|
Krankenstyle posted:probably the smarter play tbh 100% the smarter move because they realized self driving cars are decades off let uber continue to burn money instead.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:02
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:my hot take: they mutually decided to settle upon the realization that digging through the details of the tech in court would demonstrate that both companies are nowhere near capable of doing what they claim, and that self-driving cars are still decades out  simulposting
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:03
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Logan Paul got all his videos de-monetized because he decided tasing a dead rat was a good comeback https://twitter.com/chariotdagawd/status/961335932350795781
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:09
|
|
|
the sarah jeong tweet of "hey guys is it bad to download the entire svn repo" and her article with "the core of the case seems to be in the 45 minutes the peanut gallery wasn't allowed to see the trade secrets" don't seem to line up
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:11
|
|
|
woah. that’s...appropriate.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:19
|
|
|
Greatbacon posted:Yup, the first generation of kids in the US in a century without lead poisoning and literally the sum of human knowledge in their hands is actually very dumb compared to their parents. if you use this phrase to refer to "the internet," you are a huge loving dipshit
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:23
|
|
|
hifi posted:the sarah jeong tweet of "hey guys is it bad to download the entire svn repo" and her article with "the core of the case seems to be in the 45 minutes the peanut gallery wasn't allowed to see the trade secrets" don't seem to line up the dude that downloaded the entire svn repo wasn't on trial, uber was
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:23
|
|
|
vine stars were always so desperate to be celebrities in movies and television 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:24
|
|
|
Chris Knight posted:if you use this phrase to refer to "the internet," you are a huge loving dipshit are you surprised by a post from "GreatBacon" ?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:25
|
|
|
hifi posted:the sarah jeong tweet of "hey guys is it bad to download the entire svn repo" and her article with "the core of the case seems to be in the 45 minutes the peanut gallery wasn't allowed to see the trade secrets" don't seem to line up uber and newco/ottomoto definitely thought they were doing something wrong/sneaky to give themselves a leg up on waymo and very incompetently failed to cover their tracks, it turns out this was also utterly irrelevant because the data they stole wasn't "valuable", or at least probably wouldn't have passed muster as "trade secrets"
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:29
|
|
|
they thought they were pulling some new rose hotel poo poo but all they managed was to very incompetently steal a phone book* *metaphorically, not a literal phone book
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:31
|
|
|
hifi posted:the sarah jeong tweet of "hey guys is it bad to download the entire svn repo" and her article with "the core of the case seems to be in the 45 minutes the peanut gallery wasn't allowed to see the trade secrets" don't seem to line up she’s saying that the public case was really weak because the closest thing google has to a smoking gun, the mis-sent email with the board layouts that were suspiciously like google’s, was apparently ruled to not relate to trade secrets, so all google has is this circumstantial evidence about repositories being copied. so maybe there was something stronger that was presented in secret. it’s totally unclear what trade secrets the case is actually still about except that if the repository copying is pertinent then it must be something that was checked in. also “copying the repository” seems to just mean “checking out the latest revision” and there’s a witness from google who’s on record saying that that’s pretty routine even for a manager who doesn’t directly contribute anymore
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 18:32
|
|
|
was goog claiming it was strange for a developer to checkout code?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:06
|
|
|
the softbank purchase valued uber down to 45 bil from 68, no way are they at 72 now
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:07
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:was goog claiming it was strange for a developer to checkout code? I mean whether or not downloading the entire repo history is normal behavior for svn, he also then copied everything to a SD card.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:09
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:was goog claiming it was strange for a developer to checkout code? part of their argument was that he downloaded the whole repository (and tons of other stuff), and that contained everything relating to the project at the time, and gosh, shouldn't that ring some alarm bells? and the google ops guy basically said, no, why?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:11
|
|
|
rjmccall posted:she’s saying that the public case was really weak because the closest thing google has to a smoking gun, the mis-sent email with the board layouts that were suspiciously like google’s, was apparently ruled to not relate to trade secrets, so all google has is this circumstantial evidence about repositories being copied. so maybe there was something stronger that was presented in secret. it’s totally unclear what trade secrets the case is actually still about except that if the repository copying is pertinent then it must be something that was checked in. also “copying the repository” seems to just mean “checking out the latest revision” and there’s a witness from google who’s on record saying that that’s pretty routine even for a manager who doesn’t directly contribute anymore that makes sense Shaggar posted:was goog claiming it was strange for a developer to checkout code? i thought it meant everything, like all the random branches and development artifacts, instead of the current useful code, although i guess not. the lawyers are getting me to think what they want me to think
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:16
|
|
|
qirex posted:the softbank purchase valued uber down to 45 bil from 68, no way are they at 72 now the people who cashed out to softbank, including kalanick and google ventures, did so at a 45 bil valuation. the additional 1.25b cash infusion was at 69/72 bil valuation. yes it's stupid. also the whole practice of saying valuation = new money * new shares / (new shares + old shares) is total bullshit as we know anyway. the new shares are almost always loaded with ratchets and covenants and such that makes them worth anywhere from 1-5x common stock that employees and whoever else get.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:17
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:was goog claiming it was strange for a developer to checkout code? he was a project lead or something at the time all developers know that that management mucking with code directly never ends well
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:18
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:are you surprised by a post from "GreatBacon" ? no, but it's common usage around the tech obsessed from what I've seen
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:27
|
|
|
quote:Musk wrote that as soon as the Model 3 reaches volume production this year, there will be "free frozen yogurt stands scattered around the factory" as well as a "Tesla electric pod car roller coaster." ok so never
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:47
|
|
|
mrmcd posted:I mean whether or not downloading the entire repo history is normal behavior for svn, he also then copied everything to a SD card. yeah, and also made an encrypted archive of it and deleted the checkout. the case against levandowski, that he was at least giving himself the ability to steal the checkout, is pretty solid. the problem for google is proving that uber actually accepted and used the checkout anyway, what happened post-checkout isn’t actually pertinent here. this came up at the trial because uber was trying to argue that google wasn’t taking the precautions with this information that you would expect if they actually thought of it as important trade secrets, because it’s a defense against the lawsuit to say “we didn’t take anything, but what you’re saying we took wasn’t secret anyway”. that’s why uber was pushing the whole “he copied the repository and you just let him????” angle
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:53
|
|
|
waymo hosed up when they didnt sue levandowski. they thought they could sue uber and then they just fired him which i dont think waymo was expecting. turns out he's a gigantic selfish jerk and yet he made out with millions of dollars oops
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 19:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 11:21 |
|
|
Chris Knight posted:no, but it's common usage around the tech obsessed from what I've seen a product of the sum of human knowledge
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2018 20:12
|
|