|
Jimmy Hats posted:Most people in the dev talk are arguing for half pow instead of - 1 die, since the minus 1 die thing makes immunity really useless for the things that rely the most on it (low arm 1 box models) No, screw them. Getting auto-centered AoEs and e-leaps and stuff on direct hits onto your own models shouldn't be free, imo. Now the immunity at least makes it just very unlikely you'll die to blast damage and immune to auto point effects.
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 04:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 20:14 |
|
|
Are the rules for this new coc caster an Toro on their CiD site? I cannot locate them.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 05:03
|
|
|
For_Great_Justice posted:Are the rules for this new coc caster an Toro on their CiD site? I cannot locate them. They're all in the newest CiD rules pdf, yeah.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 05:09
|
|
|
I'm trying to even find that pdf, i hate the way the site is laid out. Also I'm a big dumb baby.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 06:32
|
|
|
Attached to this post: https://cid.privateerpress.com/forum/rules/model-rules-reference/68783-crucible-guard-cid-initial-rules
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 06:36
|
|
|
Thank you.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 09:47
|
|
|
S.J. posted:No, screw them. Getting auto-centered AoEs and e-leaps and stuff on direct hits onto your own models shouldn't be free, imo. Now the immunity at least makes it just very unlikely you'll die to blast damage and immune to auto point effects. It wouldn't be free, it just means your own model would die 50% of the time instead of 83% of the time. E-leaps aren't going to be affected either way, since e-leap targets are pretty much just fireflies, who have a bunch of boxes. Every high level Nemo3 player is (rightly) considering the immunity changes to be a buff. --- Anyways who gives a poo poo about cygnar or immunities when you can have your redlined Axiom run 14", engage the enemy wardude 2" away, Feat with Locke, cast Engine of Destruction, and then jackhammer away at Mat 9 Pow 23 that gets a free jackhammer every time they use focus/fury to reduce or transfer damage?!
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 14:44
|
|
|
I lied its 2 free jackhammers
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 15:36
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:I lied its 2 free jackhammers Isn't it one free boosted Jackhammer?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 16:00
|
|
|
!Klams posted:Isn't it one free boosted Jackhammer? Cant boost a jackhammer. Its free spell + 1 focus (which you then spend on jackhammer)
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:Cant boost a jackhammer. Its free spell + 1 focus (which you then spend on jackhammer) Ok, but, so, how is it two jackhammers? You can't cast a spell during their turn outside of the feat trigger?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 16:39
|
|
|
This is on your turn. You're casting a spell and getting a focus when they spend one to reduce damage or transfer, after you've ran your mat 9 (mat 11 really since you're gonna flare their rear end) collossal up from 16" away to engage them
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 16:46
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:It wouldn't be free, it just means your own model would die 50% of the time instead of 83% of the time. E-leaps aren't going to be affected either way, since e-leap targets are pretty much just fireflies, who have a bunch of boxes. Every high level Nemo3 player is (rightly) considering the immunity changes to be a buff. That depends on the model and the gun, really, but yeah. I was comparing it to now though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 18:08
|
|
|
Locke is broken as poo poo, so I'm arguing she's trash on Facebook to amuse myself.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 18:22
|
|
|
rydiafan posted:Locke is broken as poo poo, so I'm arguing she's trash on Facebook to amuse myself. Keep doing God's work
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 18:33
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:Anyways who gives a poo poo about cygnar or immunities when you can have your redlined Axiom run 14", engage the enemy wardude 2" away, Feat with Locke, cast Engine of Destruction, and then jackhammer away at Mat 9 Pow 23 that gets a free jackhammer every time they use focus/fury to reduce or transfer damage?! While this is pretty crazy, I feel like it'd be even easier to get an Inverter there with road to war and his smaller base. Same jackhammer insanity at enough pow with Redline that any caster would need to transfer/shield once, which means you win. I hadn't even thought about how Locke's Control range will be 16" with the corollary, so good luck keeping your caster back far enough out of Locke's Feat.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 18:42
|
|
|
rydiafan posted:Locke is broken as poo poo, so I'm arguing she's trash on Facebook to amuse myself. Naturally you're arguing for MAT10 right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 18:52
|
|
|
I think she'll be perfectly reasonable once she loses jackhammer. Jackhammer on a foc7 with free upkeeps, great defensive stats, and a focus generating feat is insane. CoC also has the game's cheapest arc nodes Nighttheii posted:While this is pretty crazy, I feel like it'd be even easier to get an Inverter there with road to war and his smaller base. Same jackhammer insanity at enough pow with Redline that any caster would need to transfer/shield once, which means you win. Yeah but in the axiom case if they decide to put things that could block the axiom getting in, it just means you get to either go in on those things or safely drag them in and set up for next turn. Inverter is also lower speed. Just take 2 axioms IMO E: i havent gone into detail why Sentry on a drag weapon is fukkin dumb but it is
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 19:01
|
|
|
she'll be subhuman garbage without jackhammer unplayable trash
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 19:55
|
|
|
Dont troll me bro.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 20:15
|
|
|
MonPoc is back, dudes. And in non-collectible, build and paint style models. Did not expect to read THAT today.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 20:17
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/WS_J5dv8Tag And https://t.co/BxsbVwSdMQ?amp=1 I am legit excited for this.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 20:23
|
|
|
OH MY GOD MON POC I WANT IT SO BAD I LOVED THAT GAMEFyrbrand posted:MonPoc is back, dudes. And in non-collectible, build and paint style models. Did not expect to read THAT today. Seriously, what the hell? This is out of nowhere but I'm happy. S.J. fucked around with this message at 20:30 on Mar 8, 2018 |
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 20:27
|
|
|
PP make a Pacific Rim licensed version of game, thx in advance #bless
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 20:39
|
|
|
Fyrbrand posted:PP make a Pacific Rim licensed version of game, thx in advance #bless There are going to be a lot of Gypsy Danger, etc, robots flying around in this game.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 20:40
|
|
|
I'm just bummed the old stuff won't work  I have some unopened boosters I won as a tournament prize. I guess I'll crack them at some point for fun?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 20:53
|
|
|
Pyrolocutus posted:I'm just bummed the old stuff won't work Might as well. I still think the original MonPoc had the best pre-painted figs, by far, of any pre painted miniature line I've ever seen.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 21:09
|
|
|
I'd be a lot more excited if they were pre painted!
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2018 21:52
|
|
|
I definitely understand that, but I enjoy painting robots. These look big enough to put some unique unit markings and stuff on without too much trouble. I'm hoping I'll be able to find some scale appropriate civilians/helicopters/etc to put on the tops of the buildings.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 06:17
|
|
|
S.J. posted:There are going to be a lot of Gypsy Danger, etc, robots flying around in this game. Pff. Cherno Alpha for Great Justice, Comrade!
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 13:38
|
|
|
Trading my menoth for convergence 8=======D Gonna have 2 prime axiom when its all over...just need to convert the 4 ciphers into monitors and i'm golden...
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 13:59
|
|
|
Crucible looks good as gently caress and I'm strongly compelled to go with a mini faction due to budget concerns.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 15:38
|
|
|
The railless are sooo stupid looking though. I was severely disappointed Best crucible guard is actually convergence > 
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 15:50
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:The railless are sooo stupid looking though. I was severely disappointed You just need to slap a Thomas the tank engine face on them and they become 10x better.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 18:11
|
|
|
The only bad thing about Crucible Guard so far is that Siege got a stupid jetpack instead of being the first tank mounted Warcaster.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 18:11
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:The railless are sooo stupid looking though. I was severely disappointed Oh no, are there pictures of the models? I'm kinda glad if they look dumb because the drawing made me achingly jealous, and I can't afford another faction at all.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 18:42
|
|
|
I'm talking about the concept drawings on the cid forum theres a whole thing for them. https://cid.privateerpress.com/forum/rules/model-rules-reference/68831-crucible-guard-solo-battle-engine-concepts
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2018 20:18
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:I'm talking about the concept drawings on the cid forum theres a whole thing for them. Right, where they look so loving rad I'm considering trading in for them!
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2018 01:15
|
|
|
Has anyone played any games with Crucible Guard yet?
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 04:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 20:14 |
|
|
S.J. posted:Has anyone played any games with Crucible Guard yet? Does the new CoC caster count? Because I got two games in against her last week with a six heavy Arkadius list. First game he was a bit too far forward and I feated bottom of one to get two war hogs into him. One killed the colossal (super hot dice) and the other killed an inverter, which led to an immediate concession. We re-racked, and second game had him play cagier, but again he didn't anticipate the right turn for me feating, which lead to him feating a turn too late for maximum value and a loss on scenario immediately afterwards-- dead monitor and colossal, plus an inverter left on one box that died to red line the next turn. I think with some more practice she's practically impossible for me to play into because of the jackhammer hits from the colossal on the feat turn. Though I sort of doubt she survives playtest as she currently is, considering she's just incredible even by A/S tier standards.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2018 17:00
|
|
