Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

Count Roland posted:

Are those fire extinguishers lined up there?

Great for smuggling white powders

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

Squalid posted:

So uh some guys in Bahrain were planning something really big:



The white stuff is all explosives. Over one hundred people have been arrested in connection with an alleged Iran backed group. I guess anybody who wants social change in Bahrain doesn't have many other options.

That's one hell of a bust. :stare:

Collateral Damage
Jun 13, 2009

Sergg posted:

Great for smuggling white powders
And as bomb casings.

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!

Radio Prune posted:

You thought ~*PIPELINES*~ was high up on the galaxy brain scale?

I give you trans-dimensional brain

https://twitter.com/Partisangirl/status/971657346601517057

Someone's been reading too much Thomas Friedman

quote:

The French statesman Talleyrand famously observed about the Bourbons, “they had learned nothing and forgotten nothing.” Something similar might be said about New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman. Once upon a time he was the avatar of a new age of economic interdependence that would lead to global peace. No two countries that each had a McDonald’s, he wrote, would ever go to war with each other.

guidoanselmi
Feb 6, 2008

I thought my ideas were so clear. I wanted to make an honest post. No lies whatsoever.

nevar forget: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3076512

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos
Any idea what this is about?

https://twitter.com/Gebran_Bassil/status/971423676292911106

Bing Translate sez "Today, the Lebanese registered to vote abroad can obtain a new passport of only 1,000 Lebanese pounds, very quickly and without transportation costs, to be able to use it in the upcoming parliamentary elections... A new step from the foreign Ministry to facilitate the election of the scattered GB"

I've been seeing some negative reactions, for some reason.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Any idea what this is about?

https://twitter.com/Gebran_Bassil/status/971423676292911106

Bing Translate sez "Today, the Lebanese registered to vote abroad can obtain a new passport of only 1,000 Lebanese pounds, very quickly and without transportation costs, to be able to use it in the upcoming parliamentary elections... A new step from the foreign Ministry to facilitate the election of the scattered GB"

I've been seeing some negative reactions, for some reason.

Sounds like he's just pointing out that Lebanese citizens living abroad can pay 1k Lebanese pounds to purchase a new passport which can be used for voting. "Facilitate the election of the scattered GB" seems like a machine translation quirk and probably is more like "help the diaspora vote" and GB is his initials, i.e. he signed his post.

Cable Guy
Jul 18, 2005

I don't expect any trouble, but we'll be handing these out later...




Slippery Tilde
If it is talking about diaspora getting a vote then that could totally explain negative reactions. When you consider that historically influence from those that have left a nation has had some pretty unsavoury influence (sometimes), it seems totally reasonable for Lebanese nationals to be uneasy.

TROIKA CURES GREEK
Jun 30, 2015

by R. Guyovich

Absurd Alhazred posted:


Bing Translate

lol

Dodoman
Feb 26, 2009



A moment of laxity
A lifetime of regret
Lipstick Apathy
Twitter uses it.

Moatman
Mar 21, 2014

Because the goof is all mine.

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Any idea what this is about?

https://twitter.com/Gebran_Bassil/status/971423676292911106

Bing Translate sez "Today, the Lebanese registered to vote abroad can obtain a new passport of only 1,000 Lebanese pounds, very quickly and without transportation costs, to be able to use it in the upcoming parliamentary elections... A new step from the foreign Ministry to facilitate the election of the scattered GB"

I've been seeing some negative reactions, for some reason.

This is google translate's version:
Today, the Lebanese registered to vote abroad can obtain a new passport in the Lebanese pound only, very quickly and without the cost of transportation, in order to be able to use it in the upcoming parliamentary elections ... A new step from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to facilitate the election of publishers

And Bing translate without the initials at the end:
Today, the Lebanese registered to vote abroad can obtain a new passport of only 1,000 Lebanese pounds, very quickly and without transportation costs, to be able to use it in the upcoming parliamentary elections... A new step from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to facilitate the election of the spread

So if we roughly merge them it's something like
"The Lebanese diaspora can get a passport quickly and without having to travel to Lebanon for 1000 Lebanese pounds [or "can get a passport using Lebanese pounds," I can't actually read Arabic and no two machine translators have agreed on that part] and can use it in the upcoming parliamentary elections... A new step from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to facilitate the diaspora's participation in elections"
So yeah it looks like it's "letting the diaspora vote"

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Cable Guy posted:

If it is talking about diaspora getting a vote then that could totally explain negative reactions. When you consider that historically influence from those that have left a nation has had some pretty unsavoury influence (sometimes), it seems totally reasonable for Lebanese nationals to be uneasy.

Oh, yeah, that's really controversial in Israel, as well. People keep bringing it up, but it gets shot down. Meanwhile it's been the standard in the US for I don't know how long.

Is that a law that passed or is this some kind of unilateral decision by their interior/foreign ministry, does anyone know?

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Is that a law that passed or is this some kind of unilateral decision by their interior/foreign ministry, does anyone know?

According to Wikipedia, the debate has been ongoing for a while. The idea seems to be to create a constituency for expatriates, so that they can have representatives in Parliament.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Cat Mattress posted:

According to Wikipedia, the debate has been ongoing for a while. The idea seems to be to create a constituency for expatriates, so that they can have representatives in Parliament.

Interesting. France works that way, while in the US you're associated with the constituency you last lived in.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

Lebanese diaspora is disproportionately Christian so letting them vote would be kinda like letting Washington DC vote in that it would predictably benefit certain parties and disadvantage others.

Saladin Rising
Nov 12, 2016

When there is no real hope we must
mint our own. If the coin be
counterfeit it may still be passed.

Holy crap, East Ghouta barely exists anymore:



This reminds me of the collapse of East Aleppo, where formerly static lines that had held for years just vanished instantly. Douma/Duma is now almost completely surrounded.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
https://twitter.com/TheSyriaCmpgn/status/972526117562257419?s=19

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
Most of the government gains have been open terrain, the advance will slow down once they get into the populated built up areas and bimbing isn't as effective. Government losses have also been pretty heavy.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
Well at least Ahrar's Nusra prisoners are OK.

https://twitter.com/Tuairisceoir_/status/972531282478444545

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
https://twitter.com/WaelAlRussi/status/972580272683274240?s=20
https://twitter.com/AboZain6/status/972558744969252864

svenkatesh
Sep 5, 2016

by FactsAreUseless
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-taliban/afghan-taliban-urge-religious-scholars-to-boycott-peace-conference-idUSKCN1GM0CL

quote:

The conference, proposed by Indonesian President Joko Widodo in January and due to be held later this month, was an effort to present “the sacred Jihad in Afghanistan ... as unlawful bloodshed”, the Taliban said in a statement.

“Do not afford an opportunity to the invading infidels in Afghanistan to misuse your name and participation in this conference as means of attaining their malicious objective.”

Fighting to drive out international forces and re-establish their version of strict Islamic law, the Taliban control or contest large areas of Afghanistan and inflict heavy casualties on government security forces.

Shocking.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:


Is this the point where I post those warehouses full of dead children wrapped in white sheets from this bombing campaign and sarcastically note that they're terrorists and you're engaging in the same apologia that pro-Israel posters use by a factor of 10x, or are you already aware of that fact and totally accepting of it?

Coldwar timewarp
May 8, 2007



Sergg posted:

Is this the point where I post those warehouses full of dead children wrapped in white sheets from this bombing campaign and sarcastically note that they're terrorists and you're engaging in the same apologia that pro-Israel posters use by a factor of 10x, or are you already aware of that fact and totally accepting of it?

It’s city fighting, it’s inherently brutal, and US PGM’s didn’t change that reality in Raqqa or Mosul, or even Gaza. I must have been away when the international community was calling for ceasefires or holding security council meetings about the civilian casualties in IS strongholds.

This isn’t calling the rebels in the Ghouta pocket the same as IS, but I am calling the civilians in any of the areas the same, as they are under what amounts to martial law.

No country in the world would allow an armed rebel enclave in/next to their capital and to expect otherwise is fantasy. I don’t really get the tears over it other than war is hell.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
https://www.youtube.com/embed/0aaZmc2ONVM



https://twitter.com/CivilWarMap/status/972857035829235712

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Looks like the siege of Afrin is going to be starting soon. Does anyone know how many civilians are still in the town?

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
https://twitter.com/Brasco_Aad/status/972810642326540288

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

Coldwar timewarp posted:

It’s city fighting, it’s inherently brutal, and US PGM’s didn’t change that reality in Raqqa or Mosul, or even Gaza. I must have been away when the international community was calling for ceasefires or holding security council meetings about the civilian casualties in IS strongholds.

This isn’t calling the rebels in the Ghouta pocket the same as IS, but I am calling the civilians in any of the areas the same, as they are under what amounts to martial law.

No country in the world would allow an armed rebel enclave in/next to their capital and to expect otherwise is fantasy. I don’t really get the tears over it other than war is hell.

Ghouta appears to have been a shitload more deadly so far than Raqqa, Mosul, or Gaza incursions so I'm really not sure what your point here is. Killing thousands because you don't give a gently caress and shell/bomb indiscriminately is actually worse than killing hundreds accidentally while trying to minimize civilian casualties.

Warbadger fucked around with this message at 21:53 on Mar 11, 2018

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013

Warbadger posted:

Ghouta appears to have been a shitload more deadly so far than Raqqa, Mosul, or Gaza incursions so I'm really not sure what your point here is. Killing thousands because you don't give a gently caress and shell/bomb indiscriminately is actually worse than killing hundreds accidentally while trying to minimize civilian casualties.

Literally thousands died in those incursions. The civillian death toll for Mosul was at least ten thousand and possibly several times that, while Raqqa is a destroyed hellscape that was rendered largely uninhabitable. When you drop a PGB on every single building, it ultimately becomes little different from randomly dropping bombs.

While Raqqa and Mosul ended up in better hands than Assad, the fact is itfucking sucks to be a civilian in an urban warzone no matter who is fighting who.

Coldwar timewarp
May 8, 2007



Warbadger posted:

Ghouta appears to have been a shitload more deadly so far than Raqqa, Mosul, or Gaza incursions so I'm really not sure what your point here is. Killing thousands because you don't give a gently caress and shell/bomb indiscriminately is actually worse than killing hundreds accidentally while trying to minimize civilian casualties.

Ghouta if counted over the entire civil war, maybe. I don’t agree with their terror bombing, but I also don’t blame the regime for doing non-proportional responses to shelling, anyone would, as anyone with a monopoly of force would do. It’s lovely when Israel does it, it’s lovely when Assad does it.

Any time I hear this argument about PGMs being better, it’s basically an argument for the US and rich countries being the only ones who have a right to make war because they have the money to fight with the most sanitized toys.

Your guess of damage and casualties during Mosul are really way off base of even the low estimates.

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

you know that russia's been deliberately targeting hospitals right

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

It probably shouldn't really surprise me, but it's weird to see somebody in rebel held Idlib cheering a Russian air strike, and also recording it with obvious previous knowledge of where it's going to hit.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
MSF even stopped providing them with coordinates of their network field hospitals because they thought doing so made it more likely for them to be targeted, not less.

Ghost of Babyhead
Jun 28, 2008
Grimey Drawer

steinrokkan posted:

It probably shouldn't really surprise me, but it's weird to see somebody in rebel held Idlib cheering a Russian air strike, and also recording it with obvious previous knowledge of where it's going to hit.

I'd presume he's reposting a video from another source.

EDIT: Here's an earlier posting of the same video

https://twitter.com/QalaatAlMudiq/status/972803290202279936

Ghost of Babyhead fucked around with this message at 23:35 on Mar 11, 2018

Kawasaki Nun
Jul 16, 2001

by Reene

Coldwar timewarp posted:

Ghouta if counted over the entire civil war, maybe. I don’t agree with their terror bombing, but I also don’t blame the regime for doing non-proportional responses to shelling, anyone would, as anyone with a monopoly of force would do. It’s lovely when Israel does it, it’s lovely when Assad does it.

Any time I hear this argument about PGMs being better, it’s basically an argument for the US and rich countries being the only ones who have a right to make war because they have the money to fight with the most sanitized toys.

Your guess of damage and casualties during Mosul are really way off base of even the low estimates.

You don't really qualify that second sentence. Do you think that the capacity to enact foreign policy objectives should not necessarily be constrained by innocent deaths?

Coldwar timewarp
May 8, 2007



Kawasaki Nun posted:

You don't really qualify that second sentence. Do you think that the capacity to enact foreign policy objectives should not necessarily be constrained by innocent deaths?

It is flat out not constrained by innocent deaths. I don’t think less dead civilians by 50 or any percent is an acceptable justification to go forward with wars of choice. That said, there are still stacks of Iraqi dead due to US air strikes against IS.

If it was presented equally or even challenged that would make me take seriously the earnestness of those voting in the security council. The same with regards to Iran’s missile program when the GCC arms itself to the teeth with American supplied weaponry across the gulf.

OhFunny
Jun 26, 2013

EXTREMELY PISSED AT THE DNC
https://twitter.com/CivilWarMap/status/972845125218000896?s=19

East Ghouta has been cut into three smaller pockets.

https://twitter.com/CivilWarMap/status/972850151395033090?s=19

The Turks have almost linked up and cut off Afrin.

Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

You seem to be oscillating between regime apologia and "US killed lots of people in Mosul/Raqqa too so who are we to criticize?" as though nobody in here criticized the tens of thousands of dead civilians in Mosul and Raqqa. Maybe your blanket position should be that indiscriminate murder of civilian populations is bad and also that fascist dictatorships are bad? Seems like it'd be a lot easier to be logically consistent with that one.

I would also throw "People have a right to resist the tyranny of fascist dictatorships." but I dunno if you consider Bashar Assad to be the glorious torch-bearer of the Socialist Revolution instead of a murderous thug who turned his country to ash in order to avoid giving up an ounce of power.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Since it came up in this thread, I thought I'd share an article about the growing casualty numbers from Raqqa. It's no secret that Trump felt the military had been on too tight a leash, and that civilian fatalities increased significantly since he took office. Reaching a major urban center would have led to an increase in deaths under any other president too of course, and it genuinely is impossible to avoid some level of civilian deaths in urban combat, but you can read the latest reporting for yourself and decide what you think about the outcome:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/theyre-still-pulling-bodies-out-of-isis-capital

Ikasuhito
Sep 29, 2013

Haram as Fuck.

Speaking of city fighting, as would be expected, a lot of people are fleeing Afrin ahead of the fighting. Supposedly most are headed to Aleppo to wait it out.

https://twitter.com/BarzanSadiq/status/973202077391446016

Still haven't been able to get any sort of accurate number for how people were/still are in Afrin though.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

I can't blame them for leaving, and I'd do the same if I were them, but if ethnic cleansing really is what Turkey has in mind for the area, blocking people from returning and settling refugees in their homes will be a hell of a lot more camera friendly than actually expelling them. "Hey, they chose to leave!"

Edit: I still think the idea of sending fighters from Rojava to Afrin was stupid though, and if anything fighters from Afrin should have fled to Rojava to save themselves and reduce the need for civilians to flee the coming fighting. It's hard to see how losing this quickly did anything to help their cause, and even if the capture of the city Afrin ends up being long and bloody, it's going to be bloodier for the Kurds than for the invaders. I get the idea that trying to hold out there as long as possible takes pressure off the east for now, but realistically the US (or a deal with the regime) is the only thing saving Rojava from Turkey whether it's today or six months from now, so I don't think they accomplished anything.

Dr Kool-AIDS fucked around with this message at 19:44 on Mar 12, 2018

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply