Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

Another reason for the insane ghetto strategy could be that results from the so-called welfare ceiling and 225-hour rule came in: 190 more people employed, or 600 after the ministry had juked the stats, and at least 10,000 more children below the poverty line in a single year. The first order of business for the government after the last election was abolishing the official poverty line, however.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Potrzebie
Apr 6, 2010

I may not know what I'm talking about, but I sure love cops! ^^ Boy, but that boot is just yummy!
Lipstick Apathy

SplitSoul posted:

The first order of business for the government after the last election was abolishing the official poverty line, however.

One weird trick to get rid of poverty! Socialists hate it!

Struensee
Nov 9, 2011

Buller posted:

Strikes are coming to Denmark, most notably the anestesians and ortophedians are striking. Should create some chaos at least.

Anaesthetists and radiologists, actually. This means delays in planned surgeries. I don't know of a speciality that doesn't depend on radiologists to review imaging.

https://www.laeger.dk/nyhed/strejkevarsel-paa-alle-anaestesiafdelinger-og-radiologiske-afdelinger posted:

Yngre Læger og Overlægeforeningen har i lighed med alle andre organisationer for offentligt ansatte udtaget ca. ti pct. af medlemmerne til konflikt. Men i stedet for at gå efter bestemte hospitaler eller regioner har overlægerne og de yngre læger valgt to specifikke områder: anæstesiafdelingerne og de radiologiske afdelinger.

”En konflikt på landets hospitaler må selvsagt ikke bringe patienter med livstruende sygdomme i fare eller sætte patienternes førlighed på spil. En konflikt på hospitalerne kan ikke undgå at berøre patienterne, men ved at vælge de radiologiske afdelinger og anæstesiafdelingerne kan vi sikre, at patienter med livstruende sygdomme og akutte patienter ikke bliver ramt. Der vil således primært komme længere ventetid på behandling, som er forsvarlig at udsætte, f.eks. planlagte operationer,” siger Lisbeth Lintz og Camilla Ratchke.

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

I'd love to see a general strike, but it's nice to see the unions showing a little teeth for once at least.

Reminder that the government has dropped all pretense of impartiality in the conflict. The Danish model is stone dead.

Potrzebie posted:

One weird trick to get rid of poverty! Socialists hate it!

It was a ridiculously low poverty line, too.

Buller
Nov 6, 2010
We don't need a general strike, that would just empty the strike coffers faster. Just make the people whose absens is very noticable strike.

Struensee
Nov 9, 2011
The whole idea of lockout is to empty the strike coffers by making everyone functionally unemployed rather than the 10% the unions have elected for strike.

Revelation 2-13
May 13, 2010

Pillbug
Last time there was a public sector strike in Denmark, the government intervened after a month, and literally gave the employer side everything they wanted, contrary to all tradition and completely in the face of the danish model (considered by most industrial relations researchers to be among the most effective in the world). Traditionally, and really the only reasonable thing to do when there is a longer, unsolvable, strike, is for the government to just prolong the current agreement, and say 'sorry guys, if you can't figure it out, you get four more years of the same', but no, the loving social democratic party literally gave the employers everything they wanted, going directly against labours interests. It was found out afterwards, that the government had planned the intervention with the employer side beforehand and therefore the employer side could just lockout without fear, and say NO to all labour demands, because they knew that their demands would be implemented by law. It's such a loving disgrace, and another reason that the social democrats are the loving worst.

I know several people who have sat in at the current negotiations (or rather been very close to the process, as aides or observers) and they all say that the employer side have been completely dismissive of everything. No giving an inch or even been willing to negotiate to any degree. The fear is obviously, that they know (like last time) that there will be an intervention and they will get their demands by the government anyway. They don't even have to plan it directly again, since they can now just expect it. I honestly think that if it happens again, it's time for unions to actually start resisting for real. If it happens again, the much loved danish model is dead.

Demiurge4
Aug 10, 2011

Revelation 2-13 posted:

Last time there was a public sector strike in Denmark, the government intervened after a month, and literally gave the employer side everything they wanted, contrary to all tradition and completely in the face of the danish model (considered by most industrial relations researchers to be among the most effective in the world). Traditionally, and really the only reasonable thing to do when there is a longer, unsolvable, strike, is for the government to just prolong the current agreement, and say 'sorry guys, if you can't figure it out, you get four more years of the same', but no, the loving social democratic party literally gave the employers everything they wanted, going directly against labours interests. It was found out afterwards, that the government had planned the intervention with the employer side beforehand and therefore the employer side could just lockout without fear, and say NO to all labour demands, because they knew that their demands would be implemented by law. It's such a loving disgrace, and another reason that the social democrats are the loving worst.

I know several people who have sat in at the current negotiations (or rather been very close to the process, as aides or observers) and they all say that the employer side have been completely dismissive of everything. No giving an inch or even been willing to negotiate to any degree. The fear is obviously, that they know (like last time) that there will be an intervention and they will get their demands by the government anyway. They don't even have to plan it directly again, since they can now just expect it. I honestly think that if it happens again, it's time for unions to actually start resisting for real. If it happens again, the much loved danish model is dead.

That was the teachers, right?

My mom had the theory after unions sold Alka that they did it to build a warchest for the coming strikes. It would show some forward thinking and that there's a general sense that solidarity is required between labor organizations because the government showed with the teachers that it won't act in good faith.

Revelation 2-13
May 13, 2010

Pillbug

Demiurge4 posted:

That was the teachers, right?

My mom had the theory after unions sold Alka that they did it to build a warchest for the coming strikes. It would show some forward thinking and that there's a general sense that solidarity is required between labor organizations because the government showed with the teachers that it won't act in good faith.

Yeah, that was the teachers strike. The problem is that if the employers planned an intervention with the government again, there is literally nothing the unions can do under the current system. Strike->lockout->government intervenes - and gives the employers all they want. Unions can do nothing about that because it would be illegal. The only solution is to go back to a less structured and more... Uhm, aggressive, time and say gently caress you to government interventions unless it's in favor of labour (or at least neutral). Unfortunately neither the unions (traditionalist as they are) nor the general populace (complacent as they are) probably have the stomach for that sorta thing. We can literally only hope the government and employers stick to the best labour market system in the world, rather than gently caress it over for short term gains.

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

Do keep us posted on this, if the state intervention can be assumed to favour one party that's genuinely big news

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

How did gov intervention turn out in practice? If they tried that in more hardcore syndicalised places the employees would just laugh and stay on strike.

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

evil_bunnY posted:

How did gov intervention turn out in practice? If they tried that in more hardcore syndicalised places the employees would just laugh and stay on strike.

it carries the force of law so that'd be interesting

Scandinavian unions are very powerful institutions, in exchange for strikes &c being highly ritualised affairs. the state is supposed to mediate between employers' confederation and union, and has the emergency power to halt a strike in the case of a legitimate emergency, like say a nurse's strike getting out of hand and leading to people potentially dying

crucially, this system relies on quite a lot of good faith, and we're living in an era where that's in short supply. if government intervention and mediation can no longer be trusted it's a huge deal because it means that labour can no longer effectively enforce its end of the system

to put it this way: scandinavian tripartism is the fundamental basis for social democracy in the form almost universally admired by anyone even slightly left-leaving in the western world. its erosion, more than any electoral result or government policy, marks the final death of our basic system of governance

like, this sounds very dramatic because it legitimately is. this being inevitable has been the union left's critique of this system since the beginning

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007
Probation
Can't post for 13 hours!
My GF works as part of Regions Apoteket, and she's been notified her workplace will be part of the conflict. From her email I also saw the teachers and doctors and nurses and a list of kommunes are also going out.

I work in the private sector, so not going out, but this is as close to a General Strike as I probably will see in my life...

thotsky
Jun 7, 2005

hot to trot

SplitSoul posted:

You didn't even read them, did you? Ethnic Danes score worse than immigrants and their children on a wide range of issues that immigrants are routinely lambasted for, including support for religious freedom, gender equality, acceptance of minorities, willingness to pursue higher education and friendships with people outside their own ethnicity, etc. "Parallel societies" is the current mantra of pretty much every party in parliament, but especially the governing ones. The discussion is literally turned on its head. It's also the reason why the average Dane thinks there are three times as many Muslims here than is the case.

Read the study yourself, it's linked in the tweet and outlines the methodology. It's considered representative and was conducted by Danmarks Statistik on behalf of the Ministry of Integration.

No point in arguing. If brown people do it it's uncivilized snik-islamifisering, but when white people do it it's common sense nationalism and/or conservatism. Look, he's ready to start an argument about whether basic liberal values should be considered "good" because this poll makes white people look bad. Why waste your time?

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

It's not like Danes are alone in this problem, the Gothenburg harbor dispute wouldn't be such a sore point if the government hadn't actively worsened the situation by promising the employer that they would intervene on their behalf. That this battle is being fought by a Social Democratic government on behalf of a strongly anti-union danish company, who is happily losing millions to come out on top, is just the race to the bottom coming full circle.

Kidney Stone
Dec 28, 2008

The worst pain ever!

Rust Martialis posted:

My GF works as part of Regions Apoteket, and she's been notified her workplace will be part of the conflict. From her email I also saw the teachers and doctors and nurses and a list of kommunes are also going out.

I work in the private sector, so not going out, but this is as close to a General Strike as I probably will see in my life...

Government employee here, not selected to strike. But as Sophie Løhde is expected to give a lockout warning today at press conference at 11:00, I'm sure we'll be directly involved as well - at least from the 7th of April.

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

V. Illych L. posted:

it carries the force of law so that'd be interesting

Scandinavian unions are very powerful institutions, in exchange for strikes &c being highly ritualised affairs. the state is supposed to mediate between employers' confederation and union, and has the emergency power to halt a strike in the case of a legitimate emergency, like say a nurse's strike getting out of hand and leading to people potentially dying
Oh that’s just loving peachy.

When the govt forced the anesthesiologist back to work, they did emergency stuff but refused to fill out any financial paperwork. They also did the by-the-book kind of striking, scrupulously following all the CYA regs to letter, and refusing to do the usual OT that had become the norm.

IMO yes the government is obviously to blame but you can still do better than throw your hands up and give up.

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

evil_bunnY posted:

Oh that’s just loving peachy.

When the govt forced the anesthesiologist back to work, they did emergency stuff but refused to fill out any financial paperwork. They also did the by-the-book kind of striking, scrupulously following all the CYA regs to letter, and refusing to do the usual OT that had become the norm.

IMO yes the government is obviously to blame but you can still do better than throw your hands up and give up.

yeah this would probably be the next step if it turns out the government genuinely can't be trusted

keep in mind that this has also gone in favour of workers defending existing rights in the past

Struensee
Nov 9, 2011
The only guys who didn't vote to gently caress the workers last time was EL and LA.

http://www.ft.dk/samling/20121/afstemning/316.htm

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

evil_bunnY posted:

How did gov intervention turn out in practice?

More than 10% of teachers quit their jobs. Success!

Revelation 2-13
May 13, 2010

Pillbug

SplitSoul posted:

More than 10% of teachers quit their jobs. Success!

It's probably way worse than that. I can't find it right now, but I think there was an article recently when showed that only about 40% of teachers from back then are left now (which is massive, even if there is some natural retiring and so on). About 25% more teachers left the school system than usually, in the following years and the number of newly educated teachers who quit after working for 1 year or less have exploded.

So, while we may think it's terrifying that we lose that much experience and knowledge, in a form of enforced school sector brain-drain, from one of the most important institutions in our society, the assholes are without a doubt high-fiving each other, because they've taken a huge leap in furthering the end goal of dismantling the public schools, in favor of private education, and on.

Here is solid research on why they're leaving - https://www.folkeskolen.dk/596569/forskning-stram-styring-faar-laerere-til-at-forlade-folkeskolen

Revelation 2-13 fucked around with this message at 18:21 on Mar 7, 2018

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

And we already know which political parties poorly educated people generally gravitate towards.

Edit: Social Democrats voted for lockout. Again.

SplitSoul fucked around with this message at 19:44 on Mar 7, 2018

Revelation 2-13
May 13, 2010

Pillbug
Yeah, there are now lockout warnings for 250.000 municipality employees, 70.000 region employees and 120.000 state employees, for the10th of April. It signals that the public sector employers feel they're in a very strong position, which one can only wonder why would be the case.

Lima
Jun 17, 2012

Yeah the gubmint got their negotiate-through-legislation plan lined up, just like with the teachers. The poor public sector employees are going to get suckerpunched :(

Demiurge4
Aug 10, 2011

What happens if people strike illegally?

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

You can’t strike on a lockout.

E: If the government is demonstrably acting in bad faith (setting up the legal basis for a later lockout) the logical course of action is to slowdown/strike unannounced. Like right now.

evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at 01:19 on Mar 8, 2018

PederP
Nov 20, 2009

A labor system based on labor unions and employer unions fighting with strikes and lockout when failing to reach an agreement, doesn't really work for the public sector. With the private sector, the state is an outside forcing a compromise on the parties. With the public sector, the state is one of the parties, so it just becomes politics as usual.

When the public sector was smaller, the state had to take care as the workforce could bugger off to the private sector if the conditions weren't good enough. On the other hand, the state could ignore any unreasonable demands, as they had to backing of majority private sector to not favor the public sector.

The public sector is now huge, it's impossible to figure out if public employees have poor, fair or good working conditions/wages as there isn't a private sector comparison for many groups. It becomes a bullshit populist theater of pretend old-school labor / employer conflict. But it's a completely different, and essentially the old tale of a planned economy being extremely hard to run without it turning into sections of the populace arguing about who deserves how many pie slices.

There is no way to have a non dysfunctional relationship between labor unions and the state when the public sector has this size. I consider it an inherent failing of a socialist system and a planned economy, that it's effectively not possible to have a meaningful negotiation of employment terms. There is no neutral 3rd party, and one party is much stronger than the other.

Edit: Oh and many public sector employees have absolutely lovely working conditions. I'm not taking sides in this conflict. Just saying there is no way to avoid it. It's going to be legislation-based from now on. It's too big to be otherwise.

Edit 2: Especially teachers have seen their profession reduced from well-respected civil servant status with a high degree of autonomy and decentralization to well the opposite - no respect, micro-management and centralization. I certainly understand why they are upset at seeing their power to influence these conditions disappear with the shift towards legislation instead of negotiation and labor conflicts. But it's been a political decision (from the majority of parties left to right) to dismantle their privileges, then their rights - most of them voted for the politicians implementing it.

The socialist Jørgen S Dich predicted most of this 30-40 years ago in his book "Den Herskende Klasse" (The Ruling Class), with the technocracy taking over control of everything and the fight for the swing-voters causing the working class to be sold out.

PederP fucked around with this message at 14:29 on Mar 8, 2018

vuk83
Oct 9, 2012
Public labour has to start to not loving cooperate. We are to loving nice.

TheRat
Aug 30, 2006

NSFW:

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011


Context?

TheRat
Aug 30, 2006


She posted this on facebook the day the film about Utøya was released

TheFluff
Dec 13, 2006

FRIENDS, LISTEN TO ME
I AM A SEAGULL
OF WEALTH AND TASTE
https://twitter.com/MariHuup/status/974363507167846400

lol

TheFluff
Dec 13, 2006

FRIENDS, LISTEN TO ME
I AM A SEAGULL
OF WEALTH AND TASTE
Hanif Bali: Russian influencer agent or just useful idiot? You decide!

Cardiac
Aug 28, 2012


In this case probably useful idiot.
https://twitter.com/hanifbali/status/974696110425083906?s=21
What is the thing about anyways, since the article is behind a paywall and I don’t read local newspapers like DN :v:?
Something about Oksanen?

Also what is the deal about New Karolinska, as far as I understood it is the normal political gently caress up in terms of cost overruns, nepotism and corruption that we see on a regular basis, irrespective of party ie see Gothenburg.
Or is it more ?

Retarded Goatee
Feb 6, 2010
I spent :10bux: so that means I can be a cheapskate and post about posting instead of having some wit or spending any more on comedy avs for people. Which I'm also incapable of. Comedy.
Oh boy, where do we begin with Nya Karolinska

- Paret Svenonius, på varsin sida av näringslivet / privata skötte delar av affärerna.
- Man tog sig an att gå med på en upphandling trots att det bara kom in ett bud från privat konsortium.
- Vårdmodellen man använder är Michael Porters tankeexperiment "Värdebaserad vård" - vilket, såklart, visat sig vara gift.
- Man gav riskkapitalisterna en ränta på 15%~ trots att man som motpart är staten, och således har skattekranen - vilket de facto är riskfritt.
- Man anställde en chef från BCG, som sedan anställde BCG för uppskattningsvis en miljard konsulttimmar. (En otrolig mängd av vilka saknar underlag)
- Denna enorma investering till trots lyckas man inte ens leverera fungerande vård. Sjukhuset fungerar inte ens.

AMA, I turned down an offer to do a phd in operations management on-site @ NKS

Potrzebie
Apr 6, 2010

I may not know what I'm talking about, but I sure love cops! ^^ Boy, but that boot is just yummy!
Lipstick Apathy

Retarded Goatee posted:

Oh boy, where do we begin with Nya Karolinska

- Paret Svenonius, på varsin sida av näringslivet / privata skötte delar av affärerna.
- Man tog sig an att gå med på en upphandling trots att det bara kom in ett bud från privat konsortium.
- Vårdmodellen man använder är Michael Porters tankeexperiment "Värdebaserad vård" - vilket, såklart, visat sig vara gift.
- Man gav riskkapitalisterna en ränta på 15%~ trots att man som motpart är staten, och således har skattekranen - vilket de facto är riskfritt.
- Man anställde en chef från BCG, som sedan anställde BCG för uppskattningsvis en miljard konsulttimmar. (En otrolig mängd av vilka saknar underlag)
- Denna enorma investering till trots lyckas man inte ens leverera fungerande vård. Sjukhuset fungerar inte ens.

AMA, I turned down an offer to do a phd in operations management on-site @ NKS

Was there anywhere in this miserable failure sought any input from actual hospital staff?

E: please do tell us more about that offer and what made you reject it.

E2:

Cardiac posted:

In this case probably useful idiot.
https://twitter.com/hanifbali/status/974696110425083906?s=21
What is the thing about anyways, since the article is behind a paywall and I don’t read local newspapers like DN :v:?
Something about Oksanen?

But wait, there's more! He feels compelled to lie about the source for some reason.

https://cached-images.bonnier.news/...put-format=webp

Potrzebie fucked around with this message at 21:16 on Mar 16, 2018

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011


Well during the day the story spun from 'Bali spread inappropriate documents' to 'Bali lied about how he got a hold of said documents' so things are certainly escalating.

quote:

Men en skärmdump från en konversation på sociala medier visar att han tidigare gett en helt annan version. Då svarade han: ”Fick det av en bekant”.

DN har avslöjat att det på UD finns misstankar om att främmande makt avlyssnat en mejlkonversation mellan UD och den profilerade säkerhetspolitiske journalisten Patrik Oksanen. Mindre än ett dygn efter mejlkonversationen ägde rum begärde en chef på den högerpopulistiska sajten Nyheter Idag ut alla mejl som UD skickat eller tagit emot från Patrik Oksanen.

Mejlen lämnades ut, men någon artikel i Nyheter Idag blev det aldrig.

Istället lade moderate riksdagsledamoten Hanif Bali ut mejlväxlingen på Twitter med kritiska formuleringar mot Oksanen.

Efter någon timme tog han bort meddelandena.

Mejlväxlingen mellan UD och Patrik Oksanen handlade om en intervju som Oksanen skulle göra med en ukrainsk människorättsaktivist, som UD bjudit in till en konferens.

Bali lade ut sina tweets om saken 18 minuter efter att Patrik Oksanens intervju med människorättsaktivisten publicerades i måndags.

Det råder flera frågetecken kring hur Hanif Bali fick mejlet. När DN under fredagen konfronterade honom uppgav han:

– Jag såg mejlen i flödet, sparade ner dem och lade upp dem nån timme senare.

Men det motsägs nu av ett meddelande Hanif Bali skickade tidigare i veckan till Henrik Sundbom, analytiker med fokus på påverkansfrågor. När han såg Hanif Balis tweet om mejlen frågade han om det var han som begärt ut mejlet. Svaret han fick var:

”Gud nej. Fick det av bekant”

Efter DN:s avslöjande konfronterade Henrik Sundbom Hanif Bali på Twitter.

Nyheter Idags grundare Chang Frick säger till DN att han inte har skickat mejlen till Hanif Bali.

Bali is currently busy being grilled by both his party and SÄPO so I wouldn't expect any clarity until tomorrow.

Cardiac posted:

Also what is the deal about New Karolinska, as far as I understood it is the normal political gently caress up in terms of cost overruns, nepotism and corruption that we see on a regular basis, irrespective of party ie see Gothenburg.
Or is it more ?

Way more.

MiddleOne fucked around with this message at 21:19 on Mar 16, 2018

Retarded Goatee
Feb 6, 2010
I spent :10bux: so that means I can be a cheapskate and post about posting instead of having some wit or spending any more on comedy avs for people. Which I'm also incapable of. Comedy.

Potrzebie posted:

Was there anywhere in this miserable failure sought any input from actual hospital staff?

E: please do tell us more about that offer and what made you reject it.


Well it was nothing super-exciting - I finished up my masters at the Stockholm University School of Business and had good recommendations from a group of senior professors and p. good grades - ultimately decided to go into private sector because Stockholm cost of living.

As operations management is a field both preoccupied with efficency and outcome they would probably test a lot of theoretical models regarding the OPS-model

Wild Horses
Oct 31, 2012

There's really no meaning in making beetles fight.

Retarded Goatee posted:

Oh boy, where do we begin with Nya Karolinska
- Vårdmodellen man använder är Michael Porters tankeexperiment "Värdebaserad vård" - vilket, såklart, visat sig vara gift.


förklara gärna
vill höra, för det jag hört om själva idén bakom verkar inte dålig, bara inte anpassad till svensk sjukvård.
mvh sjuksköterskestuderande

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BigglesSWE
Dec 2, 2014

How 'bout them hawks news huh!

MiddleOne posted:



Bali is currently busy being grilled by both his party and SÄPO so I wouldn't expect any clarity until tomorrow.




In my head I imagine Bali trying to own those lefist SÄPO-scrubs with his sick burns, and then get upset when he realises that the real world doesn't work like Twitter.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply