|
DoctorWhat posted:Jobby the Hong has a long list of alt-right videos in his "liked" list. Please tell me MMPRtoys is ok. Edit: amazing start to a page.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 03:29 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 07:31 |
|
ACES CURE PLANES posted:Regular Car Reviews is also amazing, they do very gonzo reviews of regular, everyday cars. With the occasional crazy video about car shows. How do you cite RCR and not link the Miata review
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 03:40 |
|
CrazyLittle posted:How do you cite RCR and not link the Miata review the Miata review, the PT Cruiser review and the AE86 Sprinter Trueno review are the go-to starter videos for RCR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp1kuo6xkbE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoxqtnI4I4c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNF5sic8WHo the Trueno video being my personal favorite
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 03:48 |
Zedd posted:This seriously surprises me tbh, he'd be poo poo-on for being "too brown" by that crowd. The alt right loving loves impressionable lonely brown kids because they're perfect for calling up whenever someone points out how incredibly racist the movement is and also easy to manipulate via social pressure.
|
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 03:48 |
|
CelticPredator posted:I want a toy reviewer who is chill as poo poo and doesn’t scream or act like a man child.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 04:01 |
|
Vangelus doesn't do reviews often and kind of has the same self-mockery schtick as jobby, but he actually watches and loves Kamen Rider and makes the references to their series when reviewing the figures. One of the things that got me into Kamen Rider.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 04:14 |
|
CelticPredator posted:I want a toy reviewer who is chill as poo poo and doesn’t scream or act like a man child. It's only a subset of toy, but here you go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW7uyD0hfqg
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 04:26 |
|
your dinosaurs are wrong is great in part because the toys are just a vehicle for dinosaur facts
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 04:29 |
|
The hits keep coming: https://twitter.com/MarzGurl/status/976299641162448896
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 04:34 |
|
AriadneThread posted:your dinosaurs are wrong is great in part because the toys are just a vehicle for dinosaur facts Yeah, that was a bit of a trick but YDAW is real good so I don't care
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 04:51 |
|
DoctorWhat posted:Carlgon of loving Akkad. Please refer to Marxus of Boobus by his proper name.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 05:07 |
|
Senerio posted:Please refer to Marxus of Boobus by his proper name. That-Guy-Who-Laughed-At-A-Graphic-Description-Of-Sexual-Assault
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 05:29 |
I will say that on the balance Jobby probably isn't a terrible person and he's probably realized at this point that alt-right talking points are, at the very least, a bad look and avoids bringing political poo poo up on his channel.
|
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 06:00 |
|
This isn't even a case where someone actively brings up political poo poo in his videos at times and turns people off because of it a la Gggmanlives - that's fair enough. It's a case of literally the first thing DoctorWhat thinking on the guy being brought up is "I'm gonna go to his liked videos to see if there's anything I can bring up here". Doesn't matter that from what can be seen he doesn't talk about anything like this either on his channel, or on any social media - a freaking like on a video is enough to be considered "buddy buddy" or whatever the poo poo. This is exactly the creepiness that people are talking about. It's not reasonable, it's becoming a witch hunt and if there's one thing the new thread needs, it's a rule against doing poo poo like it.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:07 |
|
Or, and hear me out here, we don't acknowledge, support, or encourage people who support regressive bullshit.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:14 |
|
I'm pretty sure "liking" something means you agree with it to some kind of extent.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:16 |
|
Neddy Seagoon posted:I'm pretty sure "liking" something means you agree with it to some kind of extent. So what? If it doesn't come up on his channel ever, if he doesn't talk about it in public, then so what? You have no context for anything at all except a like. No way of measuring what his level of support is or even if there is any because you don't have even any knowledge of the reason why there's a like. Just a thumbs up. Is that really enough evidence to accuse anyone of anything at all? EDIT: To stretch this out further, what's happening here isn't "punching Richard Spencer". It's punching someone who's looking at Richard Spencer. Kim Justice fucked around with this message at 09:28 on Mar 21, 2018 |
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:21 |
|
Can we ban the hand wringing about people not liking someone based of what they say or do. It gets really tedious reading pages of this is a witch hunt or this is creepy every time some one vaguely mentions something they think is bad. Or alternatively go the complete opposite way and just ban any negativity at all.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:22 |
|
Kim Justice posted:So what? If it doesn't come up on his channel ever, if he doesn't talk about it in public, then so what? Lol evidence see this is the exact bullshit I was talking about. Got to have an airtight legal case before saying some random internet jerk is bad.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:23 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Lol evidence see this is the exact bullshit I was talking about. Yeah lord forbid we actually have to justify our accusations Also lord forbid that if there's no evidence for something beyond freaking YouTube likes and they are not openly political in any way we let them have their beliefs (that we don't know) because they're not harming anyone and we live in a Democracy. Kim Justice fucked around with this message at 09:31 on Mar 21, 2018 |
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:29 |
|
Kim Justice posted:So what? If it doesn't come up on his channel ever, if he doesn't talk about it in public, then so what? So people can be as horrible shitlords as they like so long as it isn't something you directly see in the main content they produce right here right now? That's awfully convenient. It's like saying "well, sure, Mueller had a hand in plunging us into a foreverwar that killed thousands but he's against Trump right now so he's great!"
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:31 |
|
Kim Justice posted:Yeah lord forbid we actually have to justify our accusations Lol. Witch hunts free speech need tons of evidence, it’s the shithead trifecta. No you don’t need evidence especially when you have someone arbitrarily dismissing poo poo because they don’t personally find it convincing.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:33 |
|
ACES CURE PLANES posted:So people can be as horrible shitlords as they like so long as it isn't something you directly see in the main content they produce right here right now? That's awfully convenient. If you like YouTube videos, you might as well be killing people.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:34 |
|
ACES CURE PLANES posted:So people can be as horrible shitlords as they like so long as it isn't something you directly see in the main content they produce right here right now? That's awfully convenient. How is it even remotely like that lol. Mueller is a political figure. Random YouTube Toy Reviewer is not. And he is allowed to believe whatever the hell he wishes as long as he's not harming anyone. Not that you or I know anything about what he believes because trying to parlay whatever his level of belief in something is from a few likes (half of which were making memes out of these figures, I might add) is actually madness.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:35 |
|
Kim Justice posted:How is it even remotely like that lol. Mueller is a political figure. Random YouTube Toy Reviewer is not. And he is allowed to believe whatever the hell he wishes as long as he's not harming anyone. Not that you or I know anything about what he believes because trying to parlay whatever his level of belief in something is from a few likes (half of which were making memes out of these figures, I might add) is actually madness. Who is saying he isn’t allowed to believe in poo poo. Who said that. Because I don’t see anyone saying he should be arrested. You are literally making a free speech argument.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:36 |
|
Ah yes, the alt right, the people well known for their beliefs never harming anyone.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:39 |
|
ACES CURE PLANES posted:Ah yes, the alt right, the people well known for their beliefs never harming anyone. Even if they were harmless that doesn’t entitle them to your views like you owe them, that’s insane. You are entitled to watch whatever you want for whatever reason you see fit. Also a common Right wing argument.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:43 |
|
ACES CURE PLANES posted:Ah yes, the alt right, the people well known for their beliefs never harming anyone. ...Do you just not read my posts so you can continue on with this complete and utter projection of calling a Random YouTube Toy Reviewer an alt-righter for unfounded unjustifable reasons that wouldn't stand up anywhere? Charles: This is the problem. Right here. *prayers for the new thread* Kim Justice fucked around with this message at 09:47 on Mar 21, 2018 |
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:43 |
|
Kim Justice posted:
Yep, we agree here.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:45 |
|
I'm glad we've established the ideological fallibility of Jobby the Hutt, the guy who... reviews toys online?
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:45 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Even if they were harmless that doesn’t entitle them to your views like you owe them, that’s insane. You are entitled to watch whatever you want for whatever reason you see fit. You seem to think I'm not on your side on this one. As far as I'm concerned, someone being big into alt right content is enough of a red flag to stop watching their stuff.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:48 |
|
ACES CURE PLANES posted:You seem to think I'm not on your side on this one. I was more expanding on how dumb that point is, it’s just insane.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:50 |
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I was more expanding on how dumb that point is, it’s just insane. hmm, it's insane to dislike white supremacists, hmm yes
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:54 |
|
When BOTL is coming off like the most reasonable person in the whole room, that's when you know things have got ridiculous. In the end neither of you know a drat thing about this guy and are projecting to hell and back. Everything else is just bullshit. ED: And before either of you pipe up with "WELL YOU DON'T KNOW EITHER"...exactly. That was my point. Kim Justice fucked around with this message at 09:59 on Mar 21, 2018 |
# ? Mar 21, 2018 09:56 |
|
I always thought Jobby was a bit too praiseful of the SS Joe and the Volksformers lines. In retrospect his loyalties were obvious.
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 10:02 |
|
Goa Tse-tung posted:hmm, it's insane to dislike white supremacists, hmm yes No but you see if you dislike people who are okay with, or even worse, tacitly support a group of people who call for your destruction, death or deportation that's just you engaging in a circle-jerk hugbox and you should be less sensitive If you're friends with Sargon you're a garbage person, because he's a garbage person who has enabled a generation of regressive idiots who think being purposely offensive is the hill to die on for free speech, not even getting into the fact he's a good introduction to the alt-right. The only situation/circumstance in which it might be acceptable is if you're actively trying to get him away from those beliefs/spreading those beliefs and i see no evidence for that so far from any of his friends
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 10:06 |
|
Ffs Kim some people want to know if they are actively supporting a tool and they can take whatever information they get in here and figure it out for themselves. It's fine to say that we have to watch out with blowing things up and making false accusations but goddamn. In this thread you yourself have rightfully called people out for flinging around unsubstantiated accusations of people being pedophiles and a lot less. But then Dan gets rightfully angry that people were talking about watching someones videos without informing that this person is trash that makes unsubstantiated accusations of pedophilia all the time and you proceeded to get pissy and confused that you should maybe have informed people that, hey this person is personally hot garbage. This dude literally uses his platform to harass people. If that is not the time to inform people about the persons dumb opinions and actions when is? I get that it's personal and especially frustrating for you because you're a creator and get a lot of poo poo for every tiny perceived thought people read into what you put out there. Someone says that this person has liked a couple of alt right videos. I'm not interested in them or their videos because the subject is not my thing, but if I did I would appreciate a heads up so I could go and check for myself if I wanted to keep supporting that person. I would rather forego blissfully enjoying content by shitheads than be uncomfortable in hindsight. Sometimes what you perceive as tiny things or nothing at all are red flags to me so maybe it's just a difference en perception? I can't separate the art from the artist and that's just how it is for me. Sarcopenia fucked around with this message at 10:49 on Mar 21, 2018 |
# ? Mar 21, 2018 10:46 |
|
CelticPredator posted:I want a toy reviewer who is chill as poo poo and doesn’t scream or act like a man child. A grown man who collects toys acting like a man child, you say..
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 11:12 |
|
Why must thus thread crucify those with different opinions hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Keep driving the nails in hrmmmmmmmmmmmm
|
# ? Mar 21, 2018 11:16 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 07:31 |
|
somekindofguy posted:Why must thus thread crucify those with different opinions hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Why is criticism now considered "crucifixion"? If we point out someone has messed up views on <insert group/topic here> does that make us harrassers? People have pointed out chipmans messed up opinions on eugenics but I have yet to see a single poster cry about him being "crucified" If you are a public figure on the intenet you are going to be criticised Ash Crimson fucked around with this message at 11:23 on Mar 21, 2018 |
# ? Mar 21, 2018 11:21 |