Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/PaulSzoldra/status/979121232674263040
https://twitter.com/Ink0rSanguin/status/979132434959781889

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007



Who is this VanderWel idiot they interviewed? People see "chief engineer" and they think "tech savvy software geek" when in fact it's a 50-something hunt&peck typist who still forwards unfunny emails and gets his son to sync his Fitbit for him.
I agree with that Edwards guy. "Hysteria".

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007




I hate to laugh at this but it looks like I'm going to anyway.

shame on an IGA
Apr 8, 2005

Finger Prince posted:

Who is this VanderWel idiot they interviewed? People see "chief engineer" and they think "tech savvy software geek" when in fact it's a 50-something hunt&peck typist who still forwards unfunny emails and gets his son to sync his Fitbit for him.
I agree with that Edwards guy. "Hysteria".

stuxnet

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007



Or, the press release was too loving boring. "we had a security compromise, it was dealt with promptly, production and safety were not affected" vs "holy poo poo it was like y2k up in here! We called the VPs and everything! One of the machines stopped working until they fixed it! But seriously the whole place could have exploded! Who knows! Maybe even planes start falling out of the sky! I don't loving know but it's way more exciting sounding than speccing rivet hardness which is what I do 99.9% of the rest of the time!"

Hermsgervørden
Apr 23, 2004
Møøse Trainer

Finger Prince posted:

Or, the press release was too loving boring. "we had a security compromise, it was dealt with promptly, production and safety were not affected" vs "holy poo poo it was like y2k up in here! We called the VPs and everything! One of the machines stopped working until they fixed it! But seriously the whole place could have exploded! Who knows! Maybe even planes start falling out of the sky! I don't loving know but it's way more exciting sounding than speccing rivet hardness which is what I do 99.9% of the rest of the time!"

Moh riveting than what I do.

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


Hermsgervørden posted:

Moh riveting than what I do.

:golfclap:

shame on an IGA
Apr 8, 2005

Hermsgervørden posted:

Moh riveting than what I do.

:discourse:

Humphreys
Jan 26, 2013

We conceived a way to use my mother as a porn mule


Midjack posted:

I hate to laugh at this but it looks like I'm going to anyway.

Selfie Generation killing themselves off (and other innocent people)

Murgos
Oct 21, 2010

Finger Prince posted:

Who is this VanderWel idiot they interviewed? People see "chief engineer" and they think "tech savvy software geek" when in fact it's a 50-something hunt&peck typist who still forwards unfunny emails and gets his son to sync his Fitbit for him.

Yeah, exactly. The chief engineers primary job is to make sure that the engineering process is sound across all the engineering departments. That is defining the design cycle, approved analysis methods, required design artifacts and review requirements for the process of performing engineering tasks.

No one should expect the chief engineer to have a clue about IT issues.

HookedOnChthonics
Dec 5, 2015

Profoundly dull


Delivery McGee posted:


i.e. the original had every part hand-lapped to fit perfectly, the American version was cranked out en masse to a certain tolerance, and the the assembly workers rummaged around in the bin of pistons to find ones that fit well enough in the bores.

You've got this exactly backwards--Rolls-built examples were hand-fitted by workers picking the best-match parts out of bins; Packard had the equipment to machine to a higher tolerance and built them standard.




http://www.museumofflight.org/aircraft/Wonder-Womans-Invisible-Plane

Hermsgervørden
Apr 23, 2004
Møøse Trainer

HookedOnChthonics posted:

You've got this exactly backwards--Rolls-built examples were hand-fitted by workers picking the best-match parts out of bins; Packard had the equipment to machine to a higher tolerance and built them standard.



http://www.museumofflight.org/aircraft/Wonder-Womans-Invisible-Plane

Does wonder woman's plane have tricycle gear or is it a tail dragger? I can't tell which side I'm looking at here.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

HookedOnChthonics posted:

You've got this exactly backwards--Rolls-built examples were hand-fitted by workers picking the best-match parts out of bins; Packard had the equipment to machine to a higher tolerance and built them standard.

It's one guy's recollection, but I always liked this exchange:

quote:

In his book “Not Much of An Engineer”, Rolls-Royce engineer Sir Stanley Hooker recalls his introduction to the matter with Ford:

“One day their Chief Engineer appeared in Lovesey’s office, which I was then sharing, and said, ‘You know, we can’t make the Merlin to these drawings.’

I replied loftily, ‘I suppose that is because the drawing tolerances are too difficult for you, and you can’t achieve the accuracy.’

‘On the contrary’ he replied, ‘the tolerances are far too wide for us.’ We make motor cars far more accurately than this. Every part on our car engines has to be interchangeable with the same part on any other engine, and hence all parts have to be made with extreme accuracy, far closer than you use. That is the only way we can achieve mass-production.’”

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

You'd want to be facing the front of the plane while reading the information placard, so I think it's got conventional gear.

vessbot
Jun 17, 2005
I don't like you because you're dangerous
^-- to clarify before anyone gets confused, "conventional gear" to the FAA means what it meant in 1940, i.e., tailwheel

HookedOnChthonics
Dec 5, 2015

Profoundly dull


Hermsgervørden posted:

Does wonder woman's plane have tricycle gear or is it a tail dragger? I can't tell which side I'm looking at here.

Museum of Flight posted:

Wonder Woman’s Invisible Plane was designed by the enlightened Amazons of Paradise Island using highly advanced Amazon engineering.

Originally referred to as the Silent Invisible Plane, this propeller driven aircraft can fly faster than 2000 mph (3218.69 km/h) and can make trans-Atlantic flights without re-fueling. The plane features navigational devices such as a robot control pilot, a locascope and an electronic mist beam. Wonder Woman also commanded course and flight paths with telepathic signals and electronic devices in her tiara.

Barnstorming

Wonder Woman retired her invisible plane in the 1950’s—upgrading to a jet-powered version. the original plane has been stored in a barn outside of Washington D.C. ever since. The Museum of Flight acquired Wonder Woman’s Invisible Plane from Lt. Diana Prince on April 1st, 2013.

The Wonder of Flight

The invisible plane’s replacement, the invisible jet, is believed to be either an incarnation of Pegasus, the WINGED HORSE or a morphing robotic substance called "Dome ." Use of the invisible jet has become increasingly rare ever since Wonder Woman gained the ability to fly on her own.

Ahead of its Time

Amazon technology demonstrated advanced stealth and speed capabilities more than 20 years before comparable human-built aircraft such as the Lockheed YF-12A, which reached a speed of 2,070.1 miles per hour on May 1, 1965 and the YO-3A, the nearly silent observation aircraft created in 1970.


Manufacturer:
Unknown

Model:
Unknown

Year:
1940

Originally On Loan From:
Lt. Diana Prince

Currently On Loan To:
National Air & Space Museum, Washington, D.C.

Museum Location:
Not currently visible. (:v:)

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

vessbot posted:

^-- to clarify before anyone gets confused, "conventional gear" to the FAA means what it meant in 1940, i.e., tailwheel

My car has a standard transmission too

Craptacular
Jul 11, 2004

Unsurprisingly, the technology has been successfully militarized.


(old as gently caress, I know)

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

Craptacular posted:

Unsurprisingly, the technology has been successfully militarized.


(old as gently caress, I know)

Seems like the Mach 2.6 propeller technology didn't interest anyone, though.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


Craptacular posted:

Unsurprisingly, the technology has been successfully militarized.


(old as gently caress, I know)

Screw the stealth plane, I'm interested in the stealth missiles in the background.

Humphreys
Jan 26, 2013

We conceived a way to use my mother as a porn mule


Potato Salad posted:

Screw the stealth plane, I'm interested in the stealth missiles in the background.

You got me.

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS
I looked.

Humphreys
Jan 26, 2013

We conceived a way to use my mother as a porn mule


I've posted Aussie mustering, but this is cool seeing how the Robbies work with the ground crew
|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5nFtqGCZ88

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe
https://giant.gfycat.com/WhoppingPoliteAsianwaterbuffalo.webm

That'll buff out.

joat mon
Oct 15, 2009

I am the master of my lamp;
I am the captain of my tub.

If only they'd waited till evening.

shame on an IGA
Apr 8, 2005

:godwin:

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012


How does that even happen? Was it the fault of the guy driving the tug? Because if so, god drat I'm glad I am not that guy.

BIG HEADLINE
Jun 13, 2006

"Stand back, Ottawan ruffian, or face my lumens!"
For those around/near DC/Northern VA: https://m.facebook.com/events/150514185658935?acontext=%7B%22ref%22%3A%223%22%2C%22action_history%22%3A%22null%22%7D&aref=3

babyeatingpsychopath
Oct 28, 2000
Forum Veteran


Sagebrush posted:

How does that even happen? Was it the fault of the guy driving the tug? Because if so, god drat I'm glad I am not that guy.

Historically, the guy driving the tug just keeps driving all the way back to the line shack, gets out of the tug, and hands his badge and keys over to the supervisor.

Instead of taking a drug test.

azflyboy
Nov 9, 2005

Sagebrush posted:

How does that even happen? Was it the fault of the guy driving the tug? Because if so, god drat I'm glad I am not that guy.

When that happens, the wing walkers often get a chunk of the blame, since the person driving the tug generally has very limited visibility as to where the wingtips and tail are relative to obstacles, so they rely on the wing walkers to warn them if there's something getting too close to the airplane.

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


Sagebrush posted:

How does that even happen? Was it the fault of the guy driving the tug? Because if so, god drat I'm glad I am not that guy.

This one was in very heavy (like unusually heavy for the area) fog in Ben Gurion with no wing walkers.

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...

I was wing walking one of our DC-10s one night as we backed it up against a closed hangar door on the north side of MIA. We had a different tail parked there immediately beforehand, so we had just removed the forward chocks, and left the aft chocks as a parking guide for the tug driver. He put the wheels directly on the chocks, and the other wing walker and myself signaled to stop, and began to walk in to place the forward chocks, but the tug driver (a contractor) had other ideas. He apparently thought the airplane was stuck on something, so he gave it a stab of throttle, bounced both mains over the chocks, and drove the tailcone of #2 about two feet through the hangar door. The tip of the upper aft rudder and vertical stab got wedged in there too. Sadly, it was in the days before camera phones. The hangar door is STILL damaged, a decade later. The airplane was grounded for over a month, because (unrelated) problems were found in the cowling after they dropped #2.

:v:

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe

https://i.imgur.com/4v5lJSW.mp4

Party Plane Jones fucked around with this message at 01:13 on Apr 2, 2018

Ambihelical Hexnut
Aug 5, 2008
okay who has a link to more info on that one cause gently caress

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe

Ambihelical Hexnut posted:

okay who has a link to more info on that one cause gently caress

https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/88r8ao/footage_of_the_warbirds_over_wanaka_yak3_incident/

PainterofCrap
Oct 17, 2002

hey bebe



Guess he was using that 7700 cheat code.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008


quote:

The display organizers are alway under pressure to keep things moving and on time. The display that needed the cherry pickers had to run to time. The cherry pickers are slow-moving, so driving them out just for there display was time they didn’t want to waste so they pre-positioned them near to where they would be needed. The risk mitigation was a briefing to pilots not to use the part of the airfield on which they were parked.

Next, the highly experienced pilot had just finished a display alongside another similar aircraft. Display flying is stressful and tiring and sometimes mental checklist items outside what you are doing at that moment get lost. The pilot was a local and under stress may have reverted back to what he normally does at that airfield when there is not an airshow on and landed on the biggest flattest piece of grass runway instead of the narrower bit off to the right that was designated as “in use” in the morning briefing.

:wtc:

Is he saying that the "normal" grass runway was blocked so they were supposed to use an unmarked area instead and he landed on the real marked runway?

Heres the chart:

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS


New Dyson engine looking good.

BIG HEADLINE
Jun 13, 2006

"Stand back, Ottawan ruffian, or face my lumens!"

Platystemon posted:



New Dyson engine looking good.

:golfclap:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014



yakity yak

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply