|
One I accidentally at one of my own teeth thinking it was a chicken nugget so I have a pretty powerful mystic energy now. Took ages to grind it up
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 15:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 04:04 |
|
|
thinkin bout thos tooth nugs
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 15:17
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:One I accidentally at one of my own teeth thinking it was a chicken nugget so I have a pretty powerful mystic energy now. Took ages to grind it up Same but while eating an Oreo. I never saw the tooth leave...
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 15:31
|
|
|
I ground mine into dust. I went to bite a crunchy protruberance on a chicken nugget but I guess my tooth snapped immediatelly and what I thought was the crispy bit was my tooth and I had to grind it into dust. Didn't notice until I took a swig of coke and my mouth felt weird.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 15:36
|
|
|
Late to charity chat, but, depending on your definition, charity as a concept is good, but charities are a shitshow. First, there is an inverse relationship between income and percentage spent on charity, so it operates as a regressive tax, like the lottery. The majority of charities are barely concealed scams and any that are good are stuck in an advertising war with every other, wasting donations. The widely varying donations also cause greater inefficiency, as often people with necessary training cannot he kept around reliably. However, charity and generosity is good. Help people whenever you can, in whatever way you think you can, even while keeping an eye on the need for massive change, and work toward that too.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 15:38
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:I ground mine into dust. I went to bite a crunchy protruberance on a chicken nugget but I guess my tooth snapped immediatelly and what I thought was the crispy bit was my tooth and I had to grind it into dust. Didn't notice until I took a swig of coke and my mouth felt weird. holy poo poo this is nightmare fuel for me
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 16:03
|
|
|
Soviet Commubot posted:It's not word salad though. Gonna be straight with you: I've never heard of Umberto Eco before now and had to Google the legible text in that gif to find out where it comes from. Now I'm confused about what the emote means because I thought it was supposed to be mocking people who speak pseudo-intellectual gibberish 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 16:55
|
|
|
Mak0rz posted:Gonna be straight with you: I've never heard of Umberto Eco before now and had to Google the legible text in that gif to find out where it comes from. Did you read the essay? It's pretty short and self-explanatory. ETA: Eco was old enough to remember the Mussolini years, so he's not pulling this stuff completely out of his rear end.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 17:07
|
|
|
Mak0rz posted:Gonna be straight with you: I've never heard of Umberto Eco before now and had to Google the legible text in that gif to find out where it comes from. Yeah, no, it's about mocking the people who do exactly what Eco describes in that essay. Sees a lot of use in USPol threads these days.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 17:12
|
|
|
Mak0rz posted:Gonna be straight with you: I've never heard of Umberto Eco before now and had to Google the legible text in that gif to find out where it comes from. It's almost an inside joke. The phrase gets a lot of use in D&D and the reason it quickly becomes illegible is because the people using it see "Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus" already know what the rest of it is saying and so don't actually need to see it.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 17:21
|
|
|
Mak0rz posted:Gonna be straight with you: I've never heard of Umberto Eco before now and had to Google the legible text in that gif to find out where it comes from. It's an extremely common sentiment whenever someone is describing a terrible Other.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 17:25
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:One I accidentally at one of my own teeth thinking it was a chicken nugget so I have a pretty powerful mystic energy now. Took ages to grind it up 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 17:31
|
|
|
I feel like I haven’t seen LoB here in a while. Am I wrong?
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 17:38
|
|
|
BigglesSWE posted:I feel like I haven’t seen LoB here in a while. Am I wrong? didn't you hear? Tiresias cut out the middleman and goons are furious
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 17:44
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:Did you read the essay? It's pretty short and self-explanatory. I'm asking whatn context the emote is for, not what the essay is about. ToxicFrog posted:Yeah, no, it's about mocking the people who do exactly what Eco describes in that essay. Sees a lot of use in USPol threads these days. Ah that makes more sense, thanks.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 17:53
|
|
|
ToxicFrog posted:Yeah, no, it's about mocking the people who do exactly what Eco describes in that essay. Sees a lot of use in USPol threads these days. Yeah, the shorthand was desperately needed. Especially in the political cartoons thread.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 18:49
|
|
|
Piers Morgan explains Catholicism to the pope https://twitter.com/meakoopa/status/994117192454213632?s=19
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 18:54
|
|
|
How can the pope besmirch the good name of Catholicism by allowing it to be represented by ostentatious displays?
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 19:30
|
|
|
Why doesn't the Pope condemn these people like Muslim leaders do? Gosh, I wish the Pope was more like a Muslim. Then we'd get things done.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 19:33
|
|
|
I can hear that hideous noise of the dude chewing the teeth. 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 19:39
|
|
|
Tiresias2 posted:I know I'm just continuing a derail at this point and so I'll put up with any moderator backlash I might get. Hegel once said that the response of any honorable person to being accused of stealing is a box in the ear, but since that can't be done I'll settle for: firstly, my female friendships were quite close and not always entirely platonic; secondly, I did not try to make a reduction of reasons people would want to play a female character in a video game to anything in particular, not even bad faith, essentially what I was saying pointed out that any expression of these desires in public makes possible accusations of bad faith by making it possible to conceive of the desire being in bad faith, in particular a form of it that today is called by some "virtue-signalling"; thirdly, I never said that altruism is impossible, just questionable. Perhaps it is always self-interested in a way, that doesn't make it not-altruism. However, Schiller and Schopenhauer had ideas about absolutely disinterested and selfless acts, and provided reasons for believing in them. 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 20:36
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NuclearTakes/status/994275834725851136
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 21:25
|
|
|
Tiresias2 posted:I know I'm just continuing a derail at this point and so I'll put up with any moderator backlash I might get. Hegel once said that the response of any honorable person to being accused of stealing is a box in the ear, but since that can't be done I'll settle for: firstly, my female friendships were quite close and not always entirely platonic; secondly, I did not try to make a reduction of reasons people would want to play a female character in a video game to anything in particular, not even bad faith, essentially what I was saying pointed out that any expression of these desires in public makes possible accusations of bad faith by making it possible to conceive of the desire being in bad faith, in particular a form of it that today is called by some "virtue-signalling"; thirdly, I never said that altruism is impossible, just questionable. Perhaps it is always self-interested in a way, that doesn't make it not-altruism. However, Schiller and Schopenhauer had ideas about absolutely disinterested and selfless acts, and provided reasons for believing in them. I've been trying to read this five loving times, but I get to Hegel and then my eyes shut off as if some subconscious defense mechanism kicks in.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 21:28
|
|
|
Mak0rz posted:I'm asking whatn context the emote is for, not what the essay is about. In his essay about fascism, Eco describes the fact that the enemy of the regime needs to be presented as very powerful so as to instill fear in the people, but at the same time completely pathetic, so that the people can feel superior to it. Picture conspiracy theorists who say that the government is all powerful and malevolent, but at the same time all conspiracies have huuuuge obvious flaws in them. The government is at the same time omnipotent and impotent, therefore :eco:
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 21:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/DudeSlater/status/994310379198189569?s=19
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 21:36
|
|
|
Good god, this is a thing someone not only thought, but also believed other people needed to hear. The world is a magical place.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 21:51
|
|
|
This guys has an alarming amount of opinions on the size of womens' vaginas. Here's a fake study he posted in another thread. 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:00
|
|
|
belt posted:This guys has an alarming amount of opinions on the size of womens' vaginas. How would you even measure the circumference of a vagina considering it will stretch and flex depending on what's going on inside it? 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:07
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:14
|
|
|
I guess once the probe reaches a set psi
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:15
|
|
|
Panfilo posted:How would you even measure the circumference of a vagina considering it will stretch and flex depending on what's going on inside it? Gonna need a speculum and a protractor.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:16
|
|
|
Teledildonics, people.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:23
|
|
|
"tallchad" is not entirely off the mark. It's called a husband's stitch, and it has been used in the past, and probably still gets performed. There don't appear to be any studies on the prevalence of the procedure, and I imagine that there probably won't be too many doctors willing to admit that they performed an unnecessary procedure without consent.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:25
|
|
|
belt posted:This guys has an alarming amount of opinions on the size of womens' vaginas. I like how a woman has to have 20 opposite-sex partners before we start seeing a significant difference in vaginal circumference. According to the most recent data, the median number of opposite-sex partners for sexually-experienced American women aged 25-44 is 4.2, while only 10.1 percent of sexually-experienced women aged 15-44 have had 15 or more opposite-sex partners: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:35
|
|
|
Rick_Hunter posted:Teledildonics Mods, name change pls.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:42
|
|
|
Rick_Hunter posted:Teledildonics, people. This is funny irrespective of what it's being said in response to. So I'd imagine that these boys believe that a woman who has had sex exactly once with each of 30 partners would have a bigger "circumference" than a woman who's had sex thousands of times with one man.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:44
|
|
|
belt posted:This guys has an alarming amount of opinions on the size of womens' vaginas. For anyone curious, everything in the source is fake (author, date, title). The link is to a study about vaginal dimensions with no mention of sexual partners having an effect. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/21/6/1618/724374
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:54
|
|
|
captainOrbital posted:This is funny irrespective of what it's being said in response to. Those boys know that some of those partners probably had bigger dicks than they do. Probably a lot of those partners. So many guys have bigger dicks and that's bad because it
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 22:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 04:04 |
|
|
"You know, my dick's not big enough to ruin your vagina for future lovers. Here, look at this graph..." - me on my first Bumble chat
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2018 23:01
|
|