|
xzzy posted:Someone please send help to this man, everywhere he goes the earth starts glowing red hot. The sad part is that he's got some decent ideas with composition (a few a bit generic, but others I genuinely like). But that editing... yeesh.
|
# ? May 11, 2018 02:46 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 01:55 |
|
Color grading is my passion!
|
# ? May 11, 2018 05:15 |
|
The cpu5555 redditor saga reminds me of the scene from "Disaster Artist" where against the advice of the pros, Tommy Wiseau wants to buy film equipment rather than rent it. Pro: Alright, fine, whatever. Film or digital? Tommy Wiseau: Both. A gem of a movie about another gem of a movie if you haven't seen either. theHUNGERian fucked around with this message at 03:35 on May 22, 2018 |
# ? May 22, 2018 02:37 |
|
Watch both at the same time, it’s how Tommy would want it.
|
# ? May 22, 2018 03:28 |
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Watch both at the same time, it’s how Tommy would want it.
|
# ? May 22, 2018 03:42 |
|
theHUNGERian posted:The cpu5555 redditor saga reminds me of the scene from "Disaster Artist" where against the advice of the pros, Tommy Wiseau wants to buy film equipment rather than rent it. I think this is my favorite trivia from The Room, he wasn't sure if film would be obsolete by the time they finished production, so he had the crew shoot on film and digital simultaneously. Incredible.
|
# ? May 22, 2018 04:11 |
|
Let's ignore the politics and concentrate on the photograph. I feel that the photographer has just given up on his art and is deliberately halfassing it. When you can't you can't be bothered to even level an image, you've given up.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:06 |
|
why is the desk cut off, too? take a step back for christ's sake
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:27 |
|
Also there’s a big, orange blob in the middle.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:34 |
|
ansel autisms posted:why is the desk cut off, too? take a step back for christ's sake Trump demands his photographer use the bigliest lens possible. The photographer was fully zoomed out and standing against the wall outside the doorway when the picture was taken.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:36 |
|
The best part is there are literally a million pictures of this composition out there going back decades, so loving it up can only be attributed to willful ignorance. Someone got in good with the president, landed a job in the whitehouse, got the security clearance to be in the oval office, and made the conscious decision that publishing snapshots a beginner would take the first time they unboxed their DSLR is good enough.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 02:56 |
|
I'd like to remind you that this is the administration that does poo poo like hiring every member of it's own family as advisers. Nothing matters anymore.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 03:05 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 03:44 |
|
spog posted:
They haven’t given up, they’ve been complete poo poo from the start.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 04:17 |
|
Yeah, I want the gig purely just to put in the bare minimum effort and have fun with it. I think you can apply at the White House website too.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 05:43 |
|
xzzy posted:The best part is there are literally a million pictures of this composition out there going back decades, so loving it up can only be attributed to willful ignorance. You got me curious as to whether this were the case and it turns out that they Whitehouse : does have a legit photographer quote:The new administration does have an official photographer in Shealah Craighead, who was hired in late January. She was the personal photographer for first lady Laura Bush, as well as the photo editor for Vice President Dick Cheney. So far very few of her photos have been published. The majority exist in one 50-image gallery on the president’s official Facebook page or are scattered around Instagram. A few others seem to show up in the graphics created for the official @POTUS Twitter account. Wherever they can be found, the pictures we see appear to show Craighead has little in the way of special access to Trump. However: quote:Instead of leveraging the White House photographer, Trump’s team has published large numbers of photos taken by phone-wielding staffers. We often see the same pic collages, thumbs-up photo ops, and phone conversation photos. This is in keeping with Trump’s campaign. Trump kept the campaign press pool on a different plane, so the only behind-the-scenes looks we got of him were informal, often taken casually and at a distance. The photos were typically blurry, underexposed, and poorly composed. The campaign appeared to prioritize graphics, screenshots of tweets, and videos over high-quality photography.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 08:48 |
|
When’s he gonna get an official lomographer?
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 11:28 |
You 100% know that the first day she was on duty he tried to snatch the camera away as a power move and then made a comment about smartphone cameras when he couldn't take it
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 00:06 |
|
Who'd want to take the time to take good pictures of Trump
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 01:01 |
|
Probably that one political cartoonist who’s horny for him.
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 02:06 |
|
http://ekeler.com/game-boy-camera-canon-ef-mount/
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 16:38 |
|
This owns and is absolutely in the wrong thread
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 18:12 |
|
I thought this thread was for bad photographers?
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 18:20 |
|
Well it is now that you’re here. Boom!!
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 18:26 |
|
Guess it's the hot new retro tend because someone did a few shots with a game boy at an F1 race earlier this year. Off to eBay to get ahead of it.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 19:02 |
|
rio posted:I thought this thread was for bad photographers? best photographers. read the title.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 19:15 |
|
Pfft, Neil Young (and his kid) was doing it in 2000.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 23:18 |
|
Game boy cameras rule and always will
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 02:24 |
|
that thing is Internet grifter thread content but this one got archived. tr: must shoot pro quality photos daily, willing to put up with little sleep, lots of driving, be a nice guy, also move some poo poo around. You must get in touch and then fill an application. You don't get poo poo, or it isn't mentioned. It's a 3 week gig.
|
# ? Jun 24, 2018 20:55 |
|
$3 / image, what a bargain!
|
# ? Jun 25, 2018 18:28 |
|
InternetJunky posted:$3 / image, what a bargain! Please don't advertise your business ITT!
|
# ? Jun 25, 2018 20:46 |
|
Is changing the aspect with the transform tool part of the base package? Or do I have to pay extra.
|
# ? Jun 25, 2018 21:59 |
|
President Beep posted:Please don't advertise your business ITT!
|
# ? Jun 25, 2018 22:13 |
|
InternetJunky posted:It's actually one of my fears to open up this thread and see someone posting a link to my business. Lol. Same, only it’s to one of my flickr uploads.
|
# ? Jun 25, 2018 22:45 |
|
InternetJunky posted:$3 / image, what a bargain! I don't get photographers that charge so little. A guy near me charges a flat rate of $100 for up to 3 hours of shooting.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2018 01:23 |
|
xzzy posted:Is changing the aspect with the transform tool part of the base package? Or do I have to pay extra. It's called a non-invasive watermark and it's genius!
|
# ? Jun 26, 2018 02:10 |
|
The wildlife and landscape photos on his site are pretty good. Not 'I want a print of that on my wall' good, but they'd not get bagged on if he posted them here. His understanding of commas and sentence structure though is somewhere south of his understanding of aspect ratios.quote:Hello my name is Alan Bromley, I was born in Paisley, Scotland in 1965 my family immigrated to Calgary, Alberta. Canada when I was very young. I love spending time in the great outdoors pursuing my passion as a wildlife photographer.
|
# ? Jun 26, 2018 07:56 |
|
https://www.alberta.canada
|
# ? Jun 27, 2018 16:46 |
|
Thom12255 posted:I don't get photographers that charge so little. A guy near me charges a flat rate of $100 for up to 3 hours of shooting. People starting out at pro level often have no idea how to price their work but that's gonna be the case if you are an arts person that has never touched a business class before
|
# ? Jun 27, 2018 20:01 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 01:55 |
|
That, and the cultural taboo against talking about money with actual numbers. "So, about how much do you charge for a day-long product shot?" "Oh, I charge the going rate, pretty close to the average. I think it's fair and my clients do, too" "OK, but how much is that?" "It depends. Sometimes it's more, because, you know, I have to hire an assistant, or they have a really tight deadline" "OK, but how much? Like, dollars?" "It can seem like a lot, at first, yeah" "$10? $100? $1000... stop me when I get close" "$10? What? No. More than that."
|
# ? Jun 27, 2018 20:17 |