(Thread IKs:
Platystemon)
|
Misc posted:https://twitter.com/Reuters_Health/status/1002587602841632769 It was never eradicated. It was covered up.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 18:28 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 11:32 |
|
Misc posted:https://twitter.com/Reuters_Health/status/1002587602841632769 dont people who work around electronics manufacturing get exposed to the pcb etching acids and stuff. Thats p cyberpunk.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 22:12 |
|
death to robo chuds
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 05:38 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:dont people who work around electronics manufacturing get exposed to the pcb etching acids and stuff. Thats p cyberpunk. not as much fun as the chinese kids that scrap out our old televisions in that horrible garbage dump Guiyu thats like hyper cyberpunk quote:Children are exposed to the dioxin-laden ash as the smoke billows around Guiyu, and finally settles on the area. The soil surrounding these factories has been saturated with lead, chromium, tin, and other heavy metals.[citation needed] Discarded electronics lie in pools of toxins that leach into the groundwater, making the water undrinkable to the extent that water must be trucked in from elsewhere
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 06:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 12:26 |
|
....to trigger the libs?
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 16:20 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 17:03 |
|
So how come Sheng's images are not displayed for me and I have to hit quote, copy and paste the link ? edit: VVVVThanks a bunch! Dawncloack has issued a correction as of 17:54 on Jun 2, 2018 |
# ? Jun 2, 2018 17:31 |
|
Dawncloack posted:So how come Sheng's images are not displayed for me and I have to hit quote, copy and paste the link ? They’re hot linked from twitter so your ad blocker might be blocking them
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 17:41 |
|
behold, the future of voting https://twitter.com/FordhamCLIP/status/1002910307130527744
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 23:31 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:behold, the future of voting lol lol just loving lol
|
# ? Jun 2, 2018 23:46 |
|
Blockchain is going to replace sensible standard encryption methods in the entire right wing, isn't it?
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 13:49 |
|
blockchain idiots are probably the only people peddling "secure" voting right now, and election boards are probably the only ones dumb enough to buy "secure" technology from a startup called "Voatz" this isn't just a right-wing thing, either. behold quote:Voatz, a Massachusetts-based startup that has struck up a partnership with one of the few companies in the country that actually builds voting systems, has used a blockchain paradigm to run elections for colleges, school boards, unions and other nonprofit and quasi-governmental groups. Perhaps its most high-profile endeavor was authenticating delegate badges at the 2016 Massachusetts Democratic Convention.
|
# ? Jun 3, 2018 15:26 |
|
HorrificExistence posted:people humiliating themselves and creating disturbances for pocket change https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqeGcEPlRFk
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 02:11 |
|
anime was right posted:lol lol just loving lol I like how techie weirdos worship the blockchain concept even though at the fundamental level it's a clunky inefficient concept.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 02:25 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:behold, the future of voting i mean, china has all the world's top super computers, they could easily use some of that computing power to corrupt blockchain elections. qkkl has issued a correction as of 04:22 on Jun 4, 2018 |
# ? Jun 4, 2018 02:31 |
|
One GPU, One Vote
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 03:03 |
|
Shear Modulus posted:One GPU, One Vote oh god but we’re already ruled by the dumbest people imaginable let’s not go lower
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 04:18 |
|
etalian posted:I like how techie weirdos worship the blockchain concept even though at the fundamental level it's a clunky inefficient concept. What really hit me in the lol was the Dilbert guy doing it after writing one point seven million "jokes" about out of touch people chasing buzzwords they don't understand
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 04:34 |
|
so the idea of blockchain is that its a publicly auditable ledger of transactions, right? it, uh. it seems like that could become a problem, with the ol' voting. yes, i'm aware that's like the dozenth-in-line problem with the concept, but even folk with headline awareness of what blockchain is should be aware that this idea might go over like a lead balloon.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 05:07 |
|
etalian posted:I like how techie weirdos worship the blockchain concept even though at the fundamental level it's a clunky inefficient concept. Isn't it the only way for something like Bitcoin to work though
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 05:19 |
|
https://twitter.com/thalestral/status/1002867653558480896 https://twitter.com/SarahTaber_bww/status/1003086394716192768
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 09:51 |
|
just buy your kids a gameboy and a tetris and that will replace youtube completely and will also fill your home with beautiful music
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 10:40 |
|
i grew up insanely internet poisoned and i didnt get steady access to it until i was 15. imagine growing up from a toddler with it lol
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 10:43 |
|
my childhood internet experience was poo poo like reading zelda fanpages about how to get the triforce in ocarina of time, while kids these days are just streaming neo-nazi propaganda 24/7 as promoted by the youtube algorithm. poo poo rules
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 12:35 |
|
BBJoey posted:poo poo rules Literally.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 12:53 |
|
Willie Tomg posted:so the idea of blockchain is that its a publicly auditable ledger of transactions, right? The term "blockchain" can mean a lot of different things depending on what people are trying to sell you. YOSPOS goon divabot wrote an anti-bitcoin/blockchain book (Attack of the 50-Foot Blockchain) which has an entire chapter for people in companies where their company might try to railroad them into buying "______ but with blockchain" and how to try and derail that/expose the vendor for the shysters they are. And e-voting by definition isn't properly democratic, blockchain or not.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 12:58 |
|
univbee posted:e-voting by definition isn't properly democratic Why?
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 13:09 |
|
no paper trail, it's too easy to manipulate results
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 13:11 |
|
hackbunny posted:Why? Democracy requires a few things: - Everyone eligible to vote gets one and only one vote. - This ability to vote is not transferable, they can't give/sell their vote or have someone else vote for them (exceptions for individuals in particular medical situations requiring assistance). - They cannot prove who they voted for to someone else (so their vote can't be bought or coerced). - The process by which votes are tallied has to be open and verifiable. e-voting screws up most of these, depending on their implementation, but there isn't currently a way to even theoretically implement e-voting that jives with the last rule, which is arguably the most important rule. It doesn't help that e-voting machines are closed source and trivially hackable, and that there have been allegations of backdoors implemented in them to force them to swing the vote a certain way. univbee has issued a correction as of 13:21 on Jun 4, 2018 |
# ? Jun 4, 2018 13:17 |
|
Sheng-Ji Yang posted:i grew up insanely internet poisoned and i didnt get steady access to it until i was 15. imagine growing up from a toddler with it lol this
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 13:40 |
|
univbee posted:Democracy requires a few things: - There are no artificial barriers to prevent any individual or group from voting freely, and any unintentional barriers (poverty+transportation, etc) are eliminated or mitigated. - Every vote has identical weight. America kinda has a problem with these two, but e-voting doesn't cause GOP laws/gerrymandering. Unless it's done securely it could allow them to cheat more directly. So this is more pointing out that the system is already undemocratic either way. One thing that might help with the possibility of digital corruption/manipulation (or single-event upsets like a cosmic muon scrambling a byte) would be that everything needs to be independently verifiable, so if every voter got their own ID string (which only they can know) so they can later go and anonymously view their database entry and say "hey someone/something changed my vote"
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 14:10 |
|
silentsnack posted:One thing that might help with the possibility of digital corruption/manipulation (or single-event upsets like a cosmic muon scrambling a byte) would be that everything needs to be independently verifiable, so if every voter got their own ID string (which only they can know) so they can later go and anonymously view their database entry and say "hey someone/something changed my vote" Nah, no one's gonna remember that poo poo, and they'll just use it to prove how they voted (so they can sell their vote or be coerced into voting a certain way). Just stop throwing computers at a non-computer problem when plenty of countries vote with paper and pencil effectively and laugh at how America gets it so wrong.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 14:16 |
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:Isn't it the only way for something like Bitcoin to work though sure, but the only reason Bitcoin has to exist is to be a tech demo for blockchain stuff there's not actually a lot of real-world use for a decentralized, trustless currency. most of its supposed advantages just take advantage of the fact that no government really takes it seriously enough to enforce regulations on it yet
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 14:19 |
|
univbee posted:Nah, no one's gonna remember that poo poo, and they'll just use it to prove how they voted (so they can sell their vote or be coerced into voting a certain way). Sometimes, "getting it wrong" can be entirely by design (or secondary to concerns like ensuring your cousin's firm gets the e-voting machine contract) so I'm not laughing much
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 14:22 |
|
hackbunny posted:Sometimes, "getting it wrong" can be entirely by design (or secondary to concerns like ensuring your cousin's firm gets the e-voting machine contract) so I'm not laughing much Yeah we're aware of that too, we know that America has a long tradition of limiting who gets to vote and how by design. Voting not being a federal paid holiday (or at least guaranteeing people can take paid time off to go vote) is a pretty massive red flag to this effect. Most other countries that dabbled in e-voting have gotten rid of it since then for the reasons I elaborated on.
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 14:23 |
|
i just post this whenever the topic comes up now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_0x6oaDmI it's a really really bad idea
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 14:28 |
|
https://twitter.com/laforgia_/status/1003619319736143872 https://twitter.com/laforgia_/status/1003619974831919104 https://twitter.com/laforgia_/status/1003620452282093568 https://twitter.com/laforgia_/status/1003620918181154816 https://twitter.com/laforgia_/status/1003621362831945728
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 16:08 |
|
Over Easy posted:just buy your kids a gameboy and a tetris and that will replace youtube completely and will also fill your home with beautiful music this my plan, she can have my old nes
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 17:15 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 11:32 |
|
Lol
|
# ? Jun 4, 2018 17:30 |