|
a national guardsman got high on unspecified drugs, stole an APC, and drove 60 miles to Richmond before police managed to stop him, livetweeting the entire goddamn thing which got weirder when people realized he was the same guy who tried to start a "sjw-free" version of Tor but managed to massively gently caress it up somehow
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2018 22:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 22:56 |
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:a national guardsman got high on unspecified drugs, stole an APC, and drove 60 miles to Richmond before police managed to stop him, livetweeting the entire goddamn thing Also one of his last Twitter posts. https://twitter.com/movrcx/status/1004068439328206850
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 01:58
|
|
|
Zil posted:Also one of his last Twitter posts.  https://twitter.com/Jake_Hanrahan/status/1004487856830730240 he also followed a whole bunch of infosec people and earlier tried and failed to fork tor because apparently he was upset about "SJWs" some time after one of the tor devs was outed as an actual loving rapist
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 03:12
|
|
|
Zil posted:Also one of his last Twitter posts. That guy rules.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 05:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/movrcx/status/1004045268856303617 https://twitter.com/movrcx/status/1004064310635696128
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 05:27
|
|
|
It's important to note that this dude isn't some shitshamming Specialist or a Private in the junior enlisted grades, but a company commander, officer, and 11 years in the Army under his belt with tours to Afghanistan. Officers basically never do poo poo like this.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 05:32
|
|
|
Vahakyla posted:It's important to note that this dude isn't some shitshamming Specialist or a Private in the junior enlisted grades, but a company commander, officer, and 11 years in the Army under his belt with tours to Afghanistan. Officers basically never do poo poo like this. It's pretty cool that we get to see reality itself breaking in front of our eyes, also that its super funny
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 05:55
|
|
|
Vahakyla posted:It's important to note that this dude isn't some shitshamming Specialist or a Private in the junior enlisted grades, but a company commander, officer, and 11 years in the Army under his belt with tours to Afghanistan. Officers basically never do poo poo like this. if he was in eleven years he probably went green-to-gold so this poo poo is in his blood
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 06:02
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:a national guardsman got high on unspecified drugs, stole an APC, and drove 60 miles to Richmond before police managed to stop him, livetweeting the entire goddamn thing he also follows felix on twitter
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 06:08
|
|
|
Aliquid posted:if he was in eleven years he probably went green-to-gold so this poo poo is in his blood He channeled his inner enlisted for a brief moment. Results are history.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 06:11
|
|
|
i work nights in a hotel. in a bizarre coincidence, my drill sergeant from ft benning 9 years ago is my security guard. he's a loving piece of poo poo and we get along great career enlisted are something else. dude had a half-dozen article 15s and was busted down three times
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 06:18
|
|
|
Vahakyla posted:It's important to note that this dude isn't some shitshamming Specialist or a Private in the junior enlisted grades, but a company commander, officer, and 11 years in the Army under his belt with tours to Afghanistan. Officers basically never do poo poo like this. Remember when that astronaut lady went nutso and put on an adult diaper to road trip to her booty call's house? Mental illness cares not for what your job was.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 09:15
|
|
|
Vahakyla posted:He channeled his inner enlisted for a brief moment. Results are history. Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 21:53
|
|
|
WampaLord posted:Remember when that astronaut lady went nutso and put on an adult diaper to road trip to her booty call's house? who said anything about this man being mentally ill 
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2018 22:10
|
|
|
  (for the locals) 
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2018 06:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jjmacnab/status/1005217403624620036
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 00:48
|
|
|
All these delusional Pizzagate and QAnon fuckwits should be on multiple watchlists, and their right to own firearms should be rescinded.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 22:33
|
|
|
e: False alarm
Platystemon has issued a correction as of 10:22 on Jun 12, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 09:44
|
|
|
someone got arrested for threatening violence against Nazi rallies https://mobile.twitter.com/jjmacnab/status/1006267352936112128 https://mobile.twitter.com/jjmacnab/status/1006279096693751808
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 15:02
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:someone got arrested for threatening violence against Nazi rallies I'm picturing the ACLU getting hard reading this and then re-reading and realizing it was a guy threatening nazis that's in trouble now and then going flaccid immediately
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 22:08
|
|
|
zegermans posted:I'm picturing the ACLU getting hard reading this and then re-reading and realizing it was a guy threatening nazis that's in trouble now and then going flaccid immediately The ACLU does not like the Nazis but will defend their right to free speech as a matter of principle.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 22:36
|
|
|
when I lived in richmond virginia everyone was just riding bikes and cultivating drinking problems
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 22:50
|
|
|
zegermans posted:I'm picturing the ACLU getting hard reading this and then re-reading and realizing it was a guy threatening nazis that's in trouble now and then going flaccid immediately The ACLU has offered to defend Rush Limbaugh before. They're not as partisan as you suggest.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2018 00:07
|
|
|
TotalLossBrain posted:The ACLU has offered to defend Rush Limbaugh before. They're not as partisan as you suggest. I mean yeah, you're right, but them defending Limbaugh doesn't change the poster's attempted point. He said they were getting hard over thinking they could be defending a nazi (growing flaccid when realizing it would have been someone opposed to nazis). There isn't a whole lot of space between defending Limbaugh and defending a nazi.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2018 12:12
|
|
|
don't forget that the ACLU literally defended Nazis in Charlottesville, preventing the city from canceling their march or even moving it to a safer location
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2018 13:15
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:don't forget that the ACLU literally defended Nazis in Charlottesville, preventing the city from canceling their march or even moving it to a safer location they seem to have realised they hosed up big doing that and have changed their official rules to stop it happening again
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2018 13:19
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpKxH2dDqEM
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2018 14:16
|
|
|
Wasabi the J posted:
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2018 21:30
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/willsommer/status/1016690000728133632
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 15:28
|
|
|
Well at least tarp man died for nothing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 15:33
|
|
|
I almost would agree with this if he commuted the sentences to what they'd already served. Mandatory minimums are dumb and 3-4 years seems fine? But nope, full pardon.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 16:29
|
|
|
just to be clear, this isn't the Bundys or anyone else involved in the actual occupation these are the ranchers who got sent to prison for a) deliberately setting fires on public land to destroy evidence of illegal hunting, endangering hunters who were camped nearby, which they knew about because they flew their private plane over the area to survey it before their hunt b) setting fires on public land while a burn ban was in effect, endangering firefighters and hunters that were camped nearby and although they were never prosecuted for it, they had a history of child abuse. for example, when 16-year-old Dusty Hammond got a tattoo on his chest, they removed it...with sandpaper (it was reported to the police, but the Hammonds got the charges dropped by agreeing to enter into a diversion program instead) very fine people
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 16:46
|
|
|
some of the good arsonists
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 18:16
|
|
|
 Very fine people.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 18:34
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:I almost would agree with this if he commuted the sentences to what they'd already served. Mandatory minimums are dumb and 3-4 years seems fine? Why would you support commutations for people who spent decades terrorizing the FWS? They didn't just recklessly risk the lives of firefighters. They repeatedly stalked and threatened to kill the people who work at Malheur. There is absolutely nothing redeemable about the Hammonds.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 18:49
|
|
|
Kazak_Hstan posted:Why would you support commutations for people who spent decades terrorizing the FWS? They didn't just recklessly risk the lives of firefighters. They repeatedly stalked and threatened to kill the people who work at Malheur. then convict them of that? it’s hosed up that the prosecution can appeal anything. if the judge hosed up go after the judge
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 18:57
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:then convict them of that? it’s hosed up that the prosecution can appeal anything. if the judge hosed up go after the judge after the hammonds were convicted on the first arson charges, they negotiated a settlement with the government in which they would agree to not fight those convictions, and in return the government would dismiss all still-outstanding charges, recommend only a five-year sentence for the convictions that had already been obtained, and allow the sentences to be served concurrently
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 19:03
|
|
|
Casimir Radon posted:
bad case of morgellons there
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 19:05
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:then convict them of that? it’s hosed up that the prosecution can appeal anything. if the judge hosed up go after the judge Absolutely no rights of the Hammonds, substantive or procedural, were prejudiced. They got all the process they were due and then some. You're making excuses for garbage people and there isn't even some broader principle underlying your argument. "The prosecution can't appeal" is a very dumb position to stake out. We're not talking about a do-over on a jury verdict, we are talking about a question of law. The people, represented by the government, have as much an interest as the defense in getting the law right.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 19:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 22:56 |
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:then convict them of that? it’s hosed up that the prosecution can appeal anything. if the judge hosed up go after the judge Mandatory minimum for drug offense against a minority: my hands are tied Mandatory minimum for arson during which life was endangered: this shocks the conscience, I won't do it! Appeals court: sorry, you have to. We have precedent from all those cases where we put away minority defendants for WAY too long I think on the balance our society would be well served if this was a precedent-setting SCOTUS ruling that would get applied to the hundreds of thousands otherwise serving mandatory minimums, but this is just more Trump garbage to embolden the nutjobs
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2018 19:43
|
|